Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study of UV-aging of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Material
Study of UV-aging of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Material
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In the present work, the characteristics of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) material exposed to artifi-
Received 15 June 2009 cial weathering environment for different durations were studied. The influence on (i) appearance and
Received in revised form 20 October 2009 morphology, (ii) thermal properties and (iii) mechanical properties evolution of the material were inves-
Accepted 6 January 2010
tigated during aging. For this purpose, ultraviolet (UV) chamber was used as accelerated aging technique.
Optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations revealed changes in appearance and mor-
phology of TPU material after UV-exposure. From differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis, it was
Keywords:
mainly found that thermal properties, in terms of glass transition temperature (Tg ), were affected. Changes
UV-aging
Thermoplastic polyurethane
in mechanical behaviour were equally discerned using both computer-controlled tensile testing and abra-
Mechanical properties sive wear tester. The mechanical properties in bulk of the studied material displayed tow steps. The elastic
Thermal properties modulus and the stress at 200% of strain initially decreased and then increased progressively revealing an
increase in crosslink density. The tribological properties, in terms of wear resistance, were affected and
this degradation became more important with UV-exposure. Furthermore, our experimental results dis-
played prominently that there was a competition between chain scission and crosslinking mechanisms.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction the other hand, the mechanisms of such degradation are quite
complex and are usually dependent on the testing configuration
Since their appearance, polymers have been extensively used [12]. This generally requires extensive experimental characteri-
in many fields. Some of their applications have required a deep zation [13]. In fact, natural weathering tests are commonly used
knowledge of the durability and predictability of the properties to evaluate the weather resisting property of materials, but they
under different environmental conditions and over long periods are time-consuming and they have bad reproducibility. However,
to cover the whole lifetime of the material [1]. Thus, it is critical, artificial aging procedures are generally adopted to simulate natu-
for certain applications, to find relationships between some envi- ral weathering conditions. In this context, accelerated aging tests
ronmental parameters with the mechanical, physical and chemical are examples of useful instruments to investigate the material
properties of the polymer. Natural conditions, external factors such behaviour after environmental aging [7,14–16]. As reported in the
as sunlight rays and weather variations (temperature, humidity) literature [17,18], xenon lamp, carbon-arc lamp, mercury vapour
are important and difficult to control and/or to record. lamps and ultraviolet fluorescent lamp are commonly used, in arti-
It is well known that exposure of polymer materials to an ficial weathering devices, as light sources to simulate ultraviolet
aggressive environments (i.e. UV radiation, thermal exposure, radiation from sunshine.
oxidative atmosphere) causes changes in their physical, chemi- From the results reported in the literature of the UV-aging of
cal, and mechanical characteristics [2–7]. In these works, changes polymers, many important matters were discussed. The influence
in calorimetric behaviour, infrared absorption bands and mechan- of the aging process on the polymer lifetime has got a great interest
ical properties were addressed. Recently, many authors [8–10] in the last few decades [19–21]. Similarly, many recent studies have
have shown that most polymers absorb solar UV radiation, which reported that UV-aging can generally provoke changes in physi-
causes degradation due to photo and thermo-oxidative reactions. cal properties [22,23] like cracking (microcracks) [24,25] or voids
In particular, the thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) material is sus- [17] and mechanical properties [7,23,26,27]. All these modifica-
ceptible to this degradation [5,6,11]. The later is most used in a tions are a consequence of a chemical evolution of the material
variety of conditions such as weather exposure and aggressive ele- when exposed to aging. In this context, two phenomena can take
ments (sunlight, UV-exposure) which can affect its durability. On place: chain scission or branching and crosslinking which are con-
currently influenced by oxygen and temperature. Claude et al. [22]
have correlated the formation of a crosslinked structure to the
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +216 99 614 199; fax: +216 74 275 595. increase of the glass transition temperature (Tg ) and the Young’s
E-mail address: noamen.guermazi@gmail.com (N. Guermazi). modulus. Zhao et al. [17] have shown that the UV-aging induces
0921-5093/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.014
1650 A. Boubakri et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 1649–1654
Table 1
Principal properties of the studied TPU.
Table 2
TPU molding conditions.
Tube machine temperature Mold temperature Injection time Injection pressure Cooling time
◦ ◦
210 C 35 C 3s 8.625 MPa 30 s
A. Boubakri et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 1649–1654 1651
Fig. 3. Colour modifications of UV-aged TPU versus exposure time: (a) unaged, (b) 6 h and (c) 72 h.
1652 A. Boubakri et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 1649–1654
Table 4
Variation of glass transition temperature of TPU
exposed to UV-aging.
Sample Tg (◦ C)
4. Conclusion
Fig. 7. Surface morphologies of unaged (a) and UV-aged TPU after sliding for 6 h (b) and 72 h (c).
1654 A. Boubakri et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 527 (2010) 1649–1654
ing, abrasive wear tester, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) [11] D. Rosu, L. Rosu, C.N. Cascaval, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 94 (2009) 591–596.
and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). TPU material, which ini- [12] B.G. Kumar, R.P. Singh, T. Nakamura, J. Comp. Mater. 36 (2002) 2713–2733.
[13] S. Pillay, U.K. Vaidya, G.M. Janowski, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69 (2009)
tially has a colourless appearance, yellower in the first stage of 839–846.
aging (after 6 h), and then turn to brown (after 72 h) and there- [14] M.S. Lin, M.W. Wang, C.T. Lee, S.Y. Shao, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 60 (1998)
fore remained almost unchanged. SEM photographs have shown 505–510.
[15] L.E. Nielsen, R.F. Landel, Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites,
the formation of microcracks on UV-exposed surfaces, especially at Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 1994.
long exposure duration. From DSC analysis, the thermal properties [16] K.S. Toohey, T.A. Blanchet, D.D. Heckelman, Wear 255 (2003) 1076–1084.
of the studied TPU were affected. The glass transition temper- [17] Q. Zhao, X. Li, J. Gao, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 92 (2007) 1841–1846.
[18] A. Heikkilä, P. Kärhä, A. Tanskanen, M. Kaunismaa, T. Koskela, J. Kaurola, T. Ture,
ature (Tg ) decreased in the beginning and then increased with S. Syrjälä, Polym. Test. 28 (2009) 57–65.
UV-exposure time. Similarly, the mechanical properties, elastic [19] F. Delor, N. Barrois-Oudin, X. Duteurtre, C. Cardinet, J. Lemaire, J. Lacoste, Polym.
modulus and stress at 200% of strain, initially decreased and then Degrad. Stabil. 62 (1998) 395–401.
[20] R. Giesse, M.A. De Paoli, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 21 (1988) 181–187.
increased progressively revealing an increase in crosslink density.
[21] F.R. Flandrin, J.M. Widmaier, J.J. Flat, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 57 (1997) 59–67.
On the other hand, the wear resistance of the material surface [22] B. Claude, L. Gonon, J. Duchet, V. Verney, J.L. Gardette, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 83
decreased and this degradation became more important with UV- (2004) 237–240.
exposure time. Finally, a competition between chain scission and [23] S. Oprea, V. Oprea, Eur. Polym. J. 38 (2002) 1205–1210.
[24] L. Rosu, C.N. Cascaval, C. Ciobanu, D. Rosu, E.D. Ion, C. Morosanu, M. Enachescu,
crosslinking mechanisms was discerned in this study. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 169 (2005) 177–185.
In any further research on the UV-aging of TPU, following the [25] R.S.C. Woo, Y. Chen, H. Zhu, J. Li, J.K. Kim, C.K.Y. Leung, Compos. Sci. Technol. 67
crosslink density and more thermal characterizations (melting (2007) 3448–3456.
[26] B.U. Ahn, S.K. Lee, S.K. Lee, J.H. Park, B.K. Kim, Prog. Org. Coat. 62 (2008)
temperature, degree of crystallinity) appear to be of prime impor- 258–264.
tance to provide more additional data. [27] Z.F. Wang, B. Wang, X.M. Ding, M. Zhang, L.M. Liu, N. Qi, J.L. Hub, J. Membr. Sci.
241 (2004) 355–361.
[28] C. Andersson, J. Johnson, L. Järnström, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112 (2009) 1636–1646.
References [29] B. Menzel, T.A. Blanchet, Wear 258 (2005) 935–941.
[30] F.J. Buchanan, P.H. Shipway, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 93–100.
[1] P.W. Sibal, R.E. Camargo, C.W. Macosko, Proceedings of the Second Interna- [31] A. Tidjani, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 64 (1997) 2497–2503.
tional Conference on Reactive Processing of Polymers, Pittsburgh, PA, 1982, pp. [32] S.H. Ding, D.Z. Liu, Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (2006) 878–881.
97–125. [33] E.R. Klinshpont, V.K. Milinchuk, V.V. Vasilenko, Polym. Photochem. 4 (1984)
[2] E.I. Valko, C.K. Chiklis, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 9 (1965) 2855–2877. 329–346.
[3] E.M. Murty, T.W. Yehl, Polym. Eng. Sci. 30 (1990) 1595–1598. [34] J. Subocz, J. Michalski, W. Zajac, L. Subocz, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 24 (1989)
[4] R. Scaffaro, D.N. Tzankova, F.P. La Mantia, Polym. Test. 27 (2008) 49–54. 335–339.
[5] V. Rek, M. Bravar, J. Elastom. Plast. 15 (1983) 33–42. [35] J.N. Tey, A.M. Soutar, S.G. Mhaisalkar, H. Yu, K.M. Hew, Thin Solid Films 504
[6] A. Ludwick, H. Aglan, M.O. Abdalla, M. Calhoun, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 110 (2008) (2006) 384–390.
712–718. [36] P.V. Zamotaev, Z.O. Streltsova, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 36 (1992) 267–274.
[7] H. Aglan, M. Calhoun, L. Allie, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 108 (2008) 558–564. [37] M. Baba, J.M. Nedelec, J. Lacoste, J.L. Gardette, M. Morel, Polym. Degrad. Stabil.
[8] P.K. Das, P.J. DesLauriers, D.R. Fahey, F.K. Wood, F.J. Comforth, Polym. Degrad. 80 (2003) 305–313.
Stabil. 48 (1995) 11–23. [38] N.S. Tomer, F. Delor-Jestin, R.P. Singh, J. Lacoste, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 92 (2007)
[9] H. Kaczmarek, A. Kaminska, M. Swiatek, J.F. Rabek, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 457–463.
261–262 (1999) 109–121. [39] J.V. Gulmine, L. Akcelrud, Eur. Polym. J. 42 (2006) 553–562.
[10] M. Diepens, P. Gijsman, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 93 (2008) 1383–1388. [40] C.N. Cascaval, C. Ciobanu, D. Rosu, L. Rosu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 83 (2002) 138–144.