Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology

College of Business Administration and Accountancy

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING

Term Paper
Guidelines

1. 14 groups will be created by the faculty. Each group is given a specific topic to focus
their term paper on.
2. A hard-copy of the term paper should be submitted to the faculty on November 23,
2019 for initial reading.
3. Text font to be used should be Arial/Times New Roman, not smaller than size 10
characters per inch including those in graphs, tables, charts and labels.
4. Paper used should be A4 bond
5. Paper should include abstract of not more than 300 words and total pages should not
exceed 20.
6. A scheduled oral presentation will be done.
7. A peer evaluation will be done after you have presented your term paper.
8. Final Term paper should be submitted on or before December 14, 2019.
9. Attached below are the groupings and assessment rubrics for the term paper.
10. For Inquiries, contact me thru my email at joanamarie.edera@g.msuiit.edu.ph or thru
messenger Joana Canoy Edera.
 Term Paper
Groupings

Group 1 – Topic 7 Group 8 – Topic 14

Groups and Teams Organizations and Systems Thinking
ANADEO, CELESTE MARIE Q. CARDIÑO, LEA S.
DUROG, MARK RONIE O. LOPERA, DEXTER KEN P.
MULOK, MOKHALIDAH O. ROSADA, MARK JHUNREL D.

Group 2 –Topic 8 Group 9 – Topic 7

Communication Groups and Teams
ANDRADE, JOHN CARL MARLO F. CAYTONA, SHEILA MAE C.
GABUNILAS, ELAINE CLAIRE M. LOPERA, Evangeline Y.
NAVIDAD, MARIE JEAN S. TABUADA, WYNONA C.

Group 3 – Topic 9 Group 10 – Topic 8

Leadership Communication
ARPON, ELAINE MARIEL L. CELESTE, MARY JOY F.
JIMENEZ, CLAIRE ANNE D. MANABAT, NILO JR. A.
ONG, MONN ALEXANDER VILLAMOR, MARICEL P.

Group 4 – Topic 10 Group 11 – Topic 9

Power and Politics Leadership
BADONG, KIER JOHN M. CELLAN, Jenuine M.
JUMAMIL, JONIE JR. A. MASILANG, ACERON S.
PANANGLITAN, LOVELIE MAE R. VILLANCA, BEA NIÑA E.

Group 5 – Topic 11 Group 12 – Topic 10

Conflict Management and Negotiation Power and Politics
BAGUIO, JOSHUA EMMANUEL E. DECIERDO, JOHN ELDRICK Y.
JUNTILLA, VERONIKKA AYNNE C. MERCADO, GIANNA NORMA
RACMAT, NAIMAH G. STEFANI D.

Group 6 – Topic 12 Group 13 – Topic 11

Organizational Culture Conflict Management and Negotiation
BARGA, SARAH DALE S. FUENTES, KARLO VIC A.
LAWANSA, SITTIE ANISHA G.
RAPUN, YASSER M. Group 14 – Topic 12
Organizational Culture
Group 7 – Topic 13 TEANCO, Jovelyn Joy L.
Organization Change and Stress
Management
BROYLES, MARIA TERESA R.
LIM, WELLA DAWN B.
REMOLADO, Celestine April D.
 Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology
College of Business Administration and Accountancy
DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration major intg Entrepreneurial Marketing

MBA 202 – ORGANIZATION THEORY

Rubric for Term Paper

The outputs of the students will be assessed using specific rubrics. Assessment rubrics to be used are attached.

Rubric A: For Case Analysis

Rubric B: Oral Presentation
Rubric C: For Teamwork and Collaboration

Grading System:

The student will be graded according to the following: The grade will be determined based on this scale:

 Case Analysis – 40 % 98%- 100% : 1.00 75% – 79% : 2.25

 Oral Presentation – 30 % 95%– 97% : 1.25 70% – 74% : 2.50
 Teamwork and Engagement – 30 % 90%– 94% : 1.50 65% – 69% : 2.75
Total – 100% 85%– 89% : 1.75 60% – 64% : 3.00
80%– 84% : 2.00 Below 60% : 5.00

3
 Rubric A
For Term Paper

EXEMPLARY SATISFACTORY DEVELOPING BEGINNING RATING

CRITERIA
(91% - 100%) (81% - 90%) (71% - 80%) (70% and below)
Correct The submitted work manifests The submitted work manifests The submitted work partially The submitted work does not
application of impeccable use of concepts and appropriate but not the best application manifests appropriate but not the manifest appropriate use of
concepts and theories. of concepts and theories. best application of concepts and concepts and theories.
theories theories.
(50%)

Completeness The submitted work manifests The submitted work manifests the The submitted work partially The submitted work does not
of case qualities which go beyond the required qualities. manifests the required qualities. manifest the required qualities.
components requirements. Certain aspects are either A material amount or a
(15%) incomplete or incorrect. substantial number of parts are
either incomplete or incorrect.
Adherence to The submitted work manifests The submitted work manifests the The submitted work partially The submitted work does not
principles and qualities which go beyond the required qualities. manifests the required qualities. manifest any of the requirements.
values requirements. Certain aspects are either
professional, incomplete or incorrect.
social, and
ethical
responsibility
(20%)
Writing quality The manual contains very minimal The manual contains some The manual contains several The manual contains substantial
and format or no grammatical and technical grammatical and technical errors grammatical and technical errors. grammatical and technical errors.
(15%) errors.
TOTAL:
Note: Group grade becomes the grade of all members for this grade component.

Beginning
(70% and below)
(The presentation is at a beginning
stage.)
Content 20% The presentation does not include
information on the major points.
Thinking and The presentation does not express
Communica- main points clearly, thoroughly, or
tion 20% persuasively.
Organization, No introduction is used to capture
Mechanics, audience attention.
and The body of the presentation needs
Vocabulary organization and supporting details.
A suitable closing is missing.
20%
The speaker has not mastered key
words and phrases relevant to the
topic.
Presentation Control of speaking tone, clarity,
20% and volume is not evident.
No evidence of creativity.
Speaker is visibly nervous and does
not convey interest in the topic.
Speaker does not make eye contact
with audience.
Physical gesture and awareness of
facial expression are absent.
Note: Students are graded individually on this particular final grade component.
Rubric B
For Oral Presentation
Novice
(71%-80%)
(The presentation may show flashes of
quality, but could be improved in several
important ways.)
Important information is missing, or
there are few supporting details.
The presentation seems to convey
only limited understanding of the
topic.
The main points are not clearly stated
or persuasive.
The introduction is unclear or fails to
capture audience attention.
The body of the presentation is
confusing with limited supporting
details.
The closing is unclear or does not
include many of the major points.
The speaker's topic related vocabulary
is limited.
Clarity of speech is uneven; delivery
is halting.
Limited evidence of creativity.
Speaker is not completely sure of
topic but appears nervous or
disengaged.
Limited or sporadic eye contact with
audience.
Limited or inappropriate use of
physical gesture and facial expression.
Proficient
(81%-90%)
(The presentation is acceptable, but could be
improved in a few important ways.)
Information is complete with basic supporting
details, increasing audience knowledge at
least to some degree.
The presentation conveys good understanding
of the topic, with some lapses.
The speaker's main points are clear but are
not persuasive.
The introduction states the purpose but does
not capture the attention of the audience.
The main part of the presentation is organized
and sequential with some supporting details.
The closing provides a basic summary of the
most major points.
Vocabulary is appropriate to the topic, with
some lapses.
Good speaking voice; recovers easily from
speaking errors.
Creativity apparent, but is not well integrated
into presentation.
Speaker is in command of the topic but
appears slightly nervous in delivery.
Good eye contact with audience throughout
most of the presentation.
Use of physical gesture and facial expression
is good, but appears forced or artificial at
times.
Exemplary
(91% - 100%)
(The presentation is exemplary) Rating
Information is complete and well supported
by detail, significantly increasing the
audience's knowledge of the topic.
The presentation conveys deep and thorough
understanding of the topic.
The speaker's main points are logical and
persuasive.
The introduction captures audience attention
and gives a clear statement of purpose.
The main part of the presentation is well
organized, sequential, and well supported by
detail.
The closing provides a thorough summary of
all of the major points.
The speaker demonstrates a rich vocabulary
appropriate to the topic.
Strong, clear speaking voice easily
understood by audience.
Use of creativity keeps audience engaged.
Speaker conveys confidence in talking about
the topic.
Excellent eye contact with audience
throughout presentation.
Use of physical gesture and facial
expression conveys energy and enthusiasm.
Total
 Rubric C

For Teamwork and Collaboration

UNSATISFACTORY PROFICIENT ADVANCED

Criteria Rating
(70% and below) (71% - 85%) (86% - 100%)
Contributions Group member was often off-task, did not Group member was prepared to work each day, In addition to Proficient criteria: The group
and Work complete assignments or duties, or had met due dates by completing member made up for work left undone by other
Ethic attendance problems that significantly impeded assignments/duties, and worked hard on the group members and demonstrates willingness
(50%) progress on project. May have worked hard, but project most of the time. If absent, other group to spend significant time outside of class/school
on relatively unimportant parts of the project. members knew the reason and progress was not to complete the project.
significantly impeded.
Leadership Group member played a passive role, Group member played an active role in In addition to Proficient criteria: The group
and generating few new ideas; tended to do only generating new ideas, took initiative in getting member provided leadership to the group by
Initiative what they were told to do by others or did not tasks organized and completed, and sought help thoughtfully organizing and dividing the work,
(25%) seek help when needed. when needed. checking on progress, or providing focus and
direction for the project.
Facilitation Group member seemed unable or unwilling to Group member demonstrated willingness to In addition to Proficient criteria: The group
and Support help others, made non-constructive criticisms help other group members when asked, actively member actively checked with others to
(25%) toward the project or other group members, or listened to the ideas of others, and helped create understand how each member was progressing
distracted other members. a positive work environment. and how he or she may be of help.

Note: A student is graded individually by all group members. The average peer ratings shall be the grade of the student this particular final grade component.

Prepared by:

PROF. JOANA MARIE C. EDERA

Faculty, MBA202