Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Τοπογραφία αρχαίων ελληνικών μαχών στο Βόρειο Ιράκ
Τοπογραφία αρχαίων ελληνικών μαχών στο Βόρειο Ιράκ
Ideologies, Identities,
Representations
Edited by
Antonios Ampoutis,
Marios Dimitriadis,
Sakis Dimitriadis,
Theodora Konstantellou,
Maria Mamali
and Vangelis Sarafis
Violence and Politics: Ideologies, Identities, Representations
All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without
the prior permission of the copyright owner.
Introduction ................................................................................................. 1
Antonios Ampoutis and Marios Dimitriadis
Figures
4.1 Silver tetradrachm of King Areus I
4.2 Silver obol of King Areus I
5.1 Map of Triphylia and adjacent areas
5.2 Plan of the Samikon citadel
5.3 Plan of the Platiana citadel
5.4 Plan of the Lepreon citadel
5.5 Hypothetical reconstruction of the Triphylian road system
5.6 Rough plan of the visual-territorial control in Samikon, Platiana
and Lepreon
5.7 Map of the attested visual links between the citadels and the other
settlements within Triphylian territory
5.8 Distances between the Peloponnesian cities
6.1 Map depicting the area between ancient Nineveh, the south side
of the Maqlub elevation and beyond the western side of the Great
Zab river (Zab el Ala) (after: Sushko, Gavgamela, 39)
6.2 Map depicting the general area between Arbela (present-day
Erbil) and Nineveh (after: Sushko, Gavgamela, 51)
23.1 Plan of the Olympieion in Polichne near Syracuse (after Mertens,
2006)
23.2 Plan of the Athenaeum [temple C] in Gela (after Heiden, 1998)
23.3 Plan of the Athenaeum in Ortygia, Syracuse (after Van
Compernolle, 1989)
23.4 Plan of the Athenaeum in Himera (after Van Compernolle, 1989)
23.5 Plan of the Olympieion in Akragas (after Van Compernolle,
1989)
23.6 Hypothetical reconstruction of Atlantes
Tables
21.1 Membership National Federation of Land Labourers (FNOA)
21.2 CNT Membership in Andalusia, 1918–19
21.3 Strikes in Andalusia, 1917–21
21.4 CNT membership in Andalusia, 1931–36
xii List of Figures and Tables
Vasiliki Βoura was born in 1986. She graduated from the Department of
History and Archaeology in the National and Kapodistrian University of
Athens and holds a master’s degree in modern and contemporary Greek
history from the same university on the subject of “The international status
of the Greek exiled governments, 1941–44)”. She is currently a PhD
candidate in the same department, working on the subject of “The Greek
political bourgeois forces during the occupation, 1941–44”.
a PhD candidate of the same department, in the field of literary theory. Her
research focuses on narratology and cultural criticism, especially on issues
of representation, ideology and identity and their poetics, in modern and
postmodern Greek literature. She has presented papers in conferences and
workshops and teaches literature, Greek language and history in high
school.
This volume was a collective effort. We are deeply indebted to all those
who made this publication, the Proceedings of the Third Colloquium of the
Postgraduate Association of the Faculty of History and Archaeology,
possible. Special thanks are due to the heads of the Faculty of History and
Archaeology of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
Professor Anastasia Papadia-Lala and Professor Panos Valavanis, who
offered invaluable support and encouragement during the whole process of
the publication. We would also like to thank the academic staff of our
faculty. In particular, we would like to express our gratitude to the
members of the advisory board – Professor Evanthis Hatzivassiliou,
Associate Professor Costas Gaganakis, Assistant Professor Sophia Aneziri,
Assistant Professor Girgios Pallis and Assistant Professor Katerina
Konstantinidou – for their contribution at all the critical stages of the
publication. The editing of the articles is due to the systematic and detailed
work of Dr Damian Mac Con Uladh, whom we warmly thank.
Personally, I must underline how much I miss his presence and how much
I cherish his responsible behaviour in matters of academic life, in which he
acted valiantly and bravely, giving his very best. In this volume, I
undertook to present a review of his academic work. In order to do that, I
shall highlight the milestones in his career, the outcome of his successful
research, which was cut short by his premature end.
His first systematic contribution and critical approach to the world (and
the myth) of ancient Sparta was followed by a plethora of scholarly
articles. Birgalias was also the organiser of an international conference
entitled “The Contribution of Ancient Sparta in Political Thought and
Practice” (September 2002), in which many prominent international
scholars participated. It is important to note that this successful
Violence and Politics: Ideologies, Identities, Representations xxv
conference, which took place in Sparta, not only returned the scholarly
debate on ancient Sparta to its historical birthplace but revealed the
perspectives of modern Greece as a centre for such remarkable efforts. As
its academic organiser, Birgalias was a true pillar of Sosipolis, the
International Institute of Ancient Hellenic History. Birgalias established
and organised the institute with great zeal, with the assistance of the
Prefecture of Ιleia and especially his partner and coorganiser of all his
projects, his wife, Natassa Florou.
Another project of his, which we had discussed with enthusiasm was the
analysis of forms of popular assemblies in ancient Greek cities. Birgalias
started methodically to examine the presence, function and importance of
popular assemblies from the phase of Homeric society. The outcome was
the publication of his last book entitled Πόλη και πολιτικοί θεσμοί στον
Όμηρο (Polis and political institutions in Homer) (Athens, 2014).
I reiterate that the legacy of Nikos Birgalias is alive among us, and it is our
duty, especially of the younger generation, to preserve and continue it. His
enthusiasm, his passion for academia and people, and his memorable smile
(a diffusion valve for him and us) will remain a source of both inspiration
xxvi Foreword
*
I would like to thank Dr Maria Anagnostou, who continues the debates on
Ancient Sparta based on Nikos Birgalias’ work, for her help in completing titles,
details and photographic material. I would also like to thank Marios Dimitriadis
and Antonios Ampoutis for their translation of the above text.
CHAPTER SIX
KLEANTHIS ZOUBOULAKIS
This article deals with the topography of two major political and military
events of Greek interest that occurred in the wider area. The March of the
Ten Thousand, as it is conventionally known, in 401–400 BC and the
Battle of Arbela or Gaugamela in 331 BC, after which Alexander the Great
essentially abolished the Achaemenid empire. The aim is to elucidate the
main topographical problems by reexamining the groundwork of the
current scholarly communis opinio using preliminary onsite research and
denoting common topographic denominators. This research has led to a
rereading of some crucial details from the secondary sources. The
1
See Kopanias, Beuger and Fox, “Tell Nader”; Kopanias et al., “Tel Baqtra
Project.”
In Search of the Landscapes of Violence 99
2
Luckenbill, Records, s.v. “Arbela.”
3
Kent, Old Persian, 30.
4
Taylor, Arshama Letters, vol. 2, Texts, Translations, and Glossary, 40.
5
Greek sources: Diod., 17.1., 53.4., 61.3., 62.1., 64.1; Ael., V.H., 3.23; Alex.
Rhet., Fig., 35.24; Anonymi Chronicon Oxyrynchi, FGrH, 255 F1.7; FGrH, 124
F.14a (Calisthenes); D.H., Amm.12.23; Lib., Or,.18.260; Lucianus, D.Mort., 25.3,
Rh.Pr., 5.5; Polyaen., 4.3.6, 3.17, 3.27; Zos., 1.4.3; Marmor Parium FGrH F.106;
IG XVI.1296. Latin sources: Amp., 16.2; Curt., 4.9.9, 16.9, 5.1.2, 6.1.21, 9.2.23;
Fron., Str., 2.3.19; Plin., Nat., 6.16.41(Arbelitis); Tac., Ann., 12.13.
6
The latest overview of Adiabene, part of which was Arbela and its territory, and
its formation during the Hellenistic and Parthian periods, is Marciak, “Adiabene,”
who has collected all the relevant testimonies. At that time, the relatively small
area of Arbela, defined by the two modern Zabs (the ancient Lycus and Kaprus
rivers), belonging administratively to the Achaemenid satrapy of Babylonia, as
Strabo reports, expanded beyond the Lycus and Tigris rivers.
7
Herzfeld, Empire, 304–8, where the satrapies of Babylonia and Athura (Assyria),
where the territory beyond the Great Zab belongs, are discussed together during
the reign of Darius I. It is marked as an indication of their close connection.
Jacobs, Satrapienverwaltung, 151–52, who accepts that Strabo’s information could
apply to the Achaemenid period and Arbeletis belongs to Babylonia. Briant, From
Cyrus to Alexander, 719, who stresses the fact of how little detail we have about
the subdistricts of Babylonia during the time of the Achaemenids.