BUMBLE DEFENSE COMMENTS

Ms. Therese asked about the number of questions, there were too many?
Specific Objectives:
For Chapter 5!
Shouldn’t the focus more on the experiences of the Bumble users.

READ ABOUT THE PARTICIPANT’S PROCESS OF CURATING THEIR PROFILES for Specific
Objective #1

SO#3: Reviewed chapter 6 (rephrase chapter 6, it was too show and illustrate the common
dating profiles on Filipina Bumble) The SO WHAT QUESTION?

Why do we need to know this? How is this helpful? More analytical—in the analysis explore.
Make sure you connect the two objectives (add a few more analytical, in depth study) one
thing to identify what’s common, but it’s another thing to dig deeper.

Definition of Terms
Operationalization of certain technical terms. Self-Promotion how do you use it in you
contect in it. IN BUMBLE (what is method on Bumble)

 How is it operationalized on Bumble? The STRATEGIES MAKE USE OF IT.

Adjust the words for Definition of Terms, put the conceptual framework. Specific
definitions!

Online dating is not needed anymore.

BACKGROUND OF STUDY:
 Should the reader why your research is important
 Focus more on online dating applications RIGHT AWAY

Have a general matrix DOMINANT. SUMMARY MATRIX to get a bigger picture.

COLLATE INFORMATION. EASIER FOR THE USER TO LOOK AT DATA.

Summary of findings
Collated by themes na lang rather than per person.
HELPFUL FOR THE DISCUSSION

More rigor and more discipline in looking for the result and interpretation.

*BE CAREFUL WITH WORDS AND DON’T SAY PROVE. Explain more the SIMPLE WAY.
MORE DIRECT. ACTIVE VOICE.

CHAPTER 5:
Common Dating Profile
Page 83: Own findings FIRST before other RRL. Page 85.
GO through BG of STUDY and traditional to modern dating (start with traditional to modern
dating) EXPLAIN SOME MORE TALAGA.

PARAGAPH ON CITATION OF TINDER AND BUMBLE (pg. 15)

Synthesis (pg. 22) remove the part
Pg. 23 – relatively new lay down all the Tinder studies (argue in the synthesis an kulang sa
Bumble and more on Tinder)

WORK IN DETAIL FOR CONCEPTUAL. JUSTIFY THE RESEARCHERS. It can just be lines rather
than arrows. So contextualize. REPHRASE. PWEDE TRIANGULATION
BEGIN WITH BUMBLE USER-> Impression management theory and the strategies.

FROM THE PROCESS OF BUMBLE USER to CIM AND SIM VISUALIZE THE PROCESS.

SO WE HAVE TO JUSTIFY THE CONCEPTS OPERATE

Define the concepts. FIRST DISCUSS THE MODEL.

For some categories: BE CAREFUL. They give false compliments, DEFLECTION rather than
FALSE COMPLIMENTS (Soundcloud).

FIX THE BUMBLE USERS PER BUMBLE PROFILE. How do we deepen this? What do these
profiles mean? Why would anybody do the opposite, what’s the point?
1. How do they portray themselves in a positive way like what ways? And SO WHAT?
a. How do we portray themselves

Add how some of them DON’T EVEN LIKE THE APP.

Age range, how are women? How do filipina males like the women that they date? THAT’S A
FACTOR AND HOW THEY.

How do women make the first move? USP. What appeals to my audience, specifically?
What kind of woman/man am I trying to attract? To attract a certain guy.

UPDATE CHAPTER 4 (TENSES NEED TO BE FIXED)

EMPHASIZED UNDER CONFIDENT CHLOE THAT SHE WANTS TO PORTRAY HERSELF AS A

CONFIDENT MANNER. Explain angas and why emphasize the picture, what sets each other
apart?

Friendly Faye SET APART FROM Confident Chloe. (Nuances) IN DEPTH ANALYSIS.
And how it impacts their communication strategy.

Explain why you’re looking at the most common dating profile SO WHAT?! PUT THAT IN.
WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT THE NUANCES. MAKE SURE.
Doon ba sa nagdedevelop. For who are these findings?

If effective, does it really?

Nuances to include. CHAPTER 5: BE MORE IN DEPTH. Make sure you JUICE IT UP.
THEMATIC ANALYSIS. INTERJECT THE NUANCES THAT WOULD BRING OUT WHAT WE WANT
FOR THIS STUDY. MAKE SURE TO BRING OUT THE CHAPTER 5 MORE WITH THE
TRANSCRIPTIONS.

Dagdagan ang RRL in reference to cultural practices for DATING IN THE PHILIPPINES.
PUSH in the BG and how has it changed in the RRL. How does it affect the way women
communicate their needs and wants to their potential partner. MORE WOMEN
EMPOWERMENT. HOW THEY WANT TO FIND PARTNERS. Make sure sa findings. ANALYZE
MORE. Make sure to DEEPEN CHAPTER 5. Include stories na rin from TRANSCRIPTIONS.

The TABOO at least for this particular demographic.

Not looking for causality, pero may tendency. What persists? TENSES and CONCLUSION. The
dating profiles VS the ones who don’t enjoy the app as much. PH dating app.

TRADITIONAL EXPECTATIONS VS CURRENT.

What does that tell us? Religious. Social Penetration Theory SANA. What does that mean
LEVEL OF TRUST or GENUINE.

NUANCES. CHAPTER 5 NEEDS TO BE MORE (INFLUENCE).

INTERFACE (BG OF STUDY NA LANG AND MAS SMALLER)

BE MORE IN DEPTH.

ORGANIZATION OF CHAPTER 5 FOLLOW OF OBJECTIVES

CREATE SUBHEADINGS BASED ON CHAPTER 5 OBJECTIVES.

BASED on INSIGHT.

WORK ON TITLE. “THROUGH BUMBLE IN A WOMEN’S HIGHER EDUCATION

INSTITUTION” WORK ON IT.

USE THE DATA.

MENTION THE PRETEST ANALYSIS SA INSTRUMENTS AND NO LONGER CO

PRETEST IN INSTRUMENTS AND WHY DID WE EDIT IT.

CHAPTER 2: WHAT ARE THE OTHER STUDIES IN RELATION TO OTHER ONLINE

DATING APPS. PARALLELISMS ON TINDER AND BUMBLE. COMPARE IT WITH
TINDER.

DATING IS TINDER AND BUMBLE. DIRECT COMPETITION. AND MATCH.COM

No more description sa BIO.
So wala na yung profiles for Chapter 5.

The study focuses on how undergraduate students from a women’s higher educational
institution located in Quezon City present themselves on Bumble and how they converse
with their matches by identifying the different communication strategies they use under the
Impression Management Theory. The participants are selected undergraduate students who
are between the ages of 18 to 24 years old and are from first to fourth-year levels that are
current and active users of Bumble.

A strategy used in conversation wherein the Bumble user agrees to their matches’ thoughts
and opinions to not feel judged or avoid conflict with their matches.