You are on page 1of 3

Front page

Group # 1 Date August 20th, 2019.


Topic:
Feedback:
They did a good job explaining their topic, the method they used was the adequate
to teach grammar in an explicit way.

- The group had good visual material.


- The activities were good, but they didn’t include the whole class to participate
- Their tone was good and we could hear them without problems
- Their pronunciation was good (just one teacher had problems for some words
and it was a little hard to understand her)
- They used correctly the methods and the approaches.
- The students were paying attention during the activities, but the rest of them
that were sitting in their desk were distracted)
- Good control of the group
Photos
Strength:
weakness:
Creativity in the organization:
Personal touch:

Group # 2 Date: August 20th, 2019


Topic: Ed pronunciation. Past simple
Feedback: Great job. the used a good website to do the activity.
Photos
Strength:
weakness:
Creativity in the organization:
Personal touch:

Group # 3 Date: August 21st, 2019


Topic: Present Progressive
Feedback:
- They did a Funny warm up , but the member of the group made a lot of
mistakes
- Good visual material. The slides were easy to understand and the letter and
pictures had a good size.
- The explanation of the rules were clear and the teacher had a good tone.
- The activity to practice was good.
- The indications were clear
Photos
Strength:
weakness:
Creativity in the organization:
Personal touch:

Group 4 Date: August 21st, 2019


Topic: Simple Past vs Present perfect.
- The Warm Up was good but the group were not motivated. The teacher look
so serious, for this reason the activity was a little bored.
- They used good visual material during the class, the video they used had
good information and the physical material was excellent.
- For the next time, it would be ok if they had a good attitude during the class.
Present Perfect:
- The Teacher had a good tone and as a students we could feel that she was
motivated.
Photos
Strength:
weakness:
Creativity in the organization:
Personal touch:

Group #5 Date: August 27th, 2019.


Topic: Will vs Going to.
- The warm up was funny but the member who explained the dynamic did not
explain well.
- During the class, the teacher was confident when he was giving the class and
the students could see that he prepared himself and read about the topic.
- They used good material during the class. I think that the song they used was
according to the topic and it was a funny example of the topic, but the only
thing to highlight would be that next time they could do it more interactive with
the students.
- The worksheet they gave was good and according with the information they
gave during the explanation.
- The teachers had a good control of the group and the students were paying
attention.
- During the last activity, the member of the group did not give well the
indications and at the beginning they did not know what to do, but at the end,
they could understand what the game was about.

Group #6 Date: August 27th, 2019.


Topic: Conditionals.
- The activity they did as a warm up was a good idea, but I think that next time
the member should show a better attitude during the activity. In that way, the
students are going to be happier and motivated during the class.
- The member who developed the class had an excellent motivation and the
way he explained the class was easier and clear to understand. Also, they
used good visual material. The slides had good information and were easy to
read and comprehend.
- They did a good development of the class. They gave basic and important
information about the conditionals. Furthermore, the class was interactive and
the students were participating during the explanation.
- Next time, the team should be more careful with the orthography and check
twice the slides.

Group #7 Date:
Group #8 Date:

You might also like