Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0923-1811/ ã 2018 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
66 Letter to the Editor / Journal of Dermatological Science 93 (2019) 65–70
[(Fig._1)TD$IG]
Fig. 1. Clinical Findings. (A) Physical examination revealed multiple fine pitted scars across the face. Diffuse erythema was noted, and was most prominent on the upper
eyelids. (B) Variously sized erythematous patches with crusting and pigmentation were seen on the dorsal hands.
[(Fig._2)TD$IG]
Fig. 2. Molecular analyses. (A) Direct sequencing demonstrated a heterozygous single nucleotide change at the intron 6 / exon 7 border of UROD, designated as c.673-2 A > C.
(B) RT-PCR analysis of UROD mRNA from the proband. Gel electrophoresis showed that RT-PCR products of the proband demonstrated a shorter band (arrow) as well as a band
with the expected size (arrowhead). M, molecular marker; C, control; P, proband. The primer sequences to amplify the specific UROD cDNA are as follows;
50 CCCAGAGCCATTAAGAGAAG-30 (forward) and 50 -AGCCCAACCACCTCATAGCC-30 (reverse). (C) Direct sequencing of the shorter band revealed the whole deletion of exon 7,
confirming the skipping of exon 7. (D) Immunoblotting using antibodies against UROD (Bioworld Technology, BS7604) (upper panel) and b-actin (lower panel). C, control; P,
proband. These blots are representative of three independent experiments.
Letter to the Editor / Journal of Dermatological Science 93 (2019) 65–70 67
[4] B.P. Khoo, Y.K. Tay, Porphyria cutanea tarda, Singapore Med. J. 41 (2000) 292–294.
Conflict of interest [5] N.G. Egger, D.E. Goeger, D.A. Payne, E.P. Miskovsky, S.A. Weinman, K.E. Anderson,
Porphyria cutanea tarda: multiplicity of risk factors including HFE mutations,
hepatitis C, and inherited uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase deficiency, Dig. Dis.
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Sci. 47 (2002) 419–426.
b
coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot based on UniFrac distances, a Low score group (range) 6 (0.4–4.9) NA
b
clearly different distribution between pts and HCs (Fig. 1A) was High score group (range) 6 (5.4–19.2) NA