Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genetic Algorithm Optimized Perfectly Matched Layers For Finite
Genetic Algorithm Optimized Perfectly Matched Layers For Finite
1. Introduction
-iR,E,E, = V, x H,,!
2
where
1 1
K~ = T ~ : ~ :+ - 1- i - ~7 ;
+ T (4)
s, s, ' s,: .
where K 2 = R$E and Ks = ks sinc(kbAs / 2 ) . Given two PML half spaces with
stretching variables SILand S,; and all other stretching variables being unity, the
reflection coefficient of an incident TE plane wave is
e - r 6 ~ : - ,162: - e-&: + SO:
(5)
where 6,; follows from the interface stretching variable So, = 0.5(S1, + S2J.
Reflection coefficients from multilayered PML media can be computed recursively,
or by the finite difference method.
2107
3. Numerical Results
In this paper we will restrict ourselves to the design of PML absorbers for
finite difference frequency domain applications, for which R, = o. First, consider
an 8-layer PML, the thickness of each layer equals the spatial discretization
A, = h / 100. The reflection of this PML was minimized over incident angles in the
range 0 I k, / k 5 0.9 by optimizing the 16 parameters ajz a.nd R,, . No attempt
was made to simultaneously minimize the reflection coefficient in the evanescent
part of the spectrum, Figure 1 compares the reflection coefficients of the GA
optimized P M L to those of a polynomial P M L with profile
ajz = 1 +(a;,,, - 1)[j/NIm"and R,, = R,,,,,[j/N]mR with judiciously selected
parameters a;,mnx,M,, RL:.,,,, and R,.,,=. It is observed that the GA optinlized
PML exhibits a lower reflection coefficient than the polynomial PML. A similar
optimization was performed for a 20 layer PML-a problem with 40 degrees of
freedom-the results are shown in Figure 2. Similar conclusions hold true.
Ongoing research focuses on the design of broadband GA-optimized PMLs. Initial
results indicate that polynomial PMLs appear to be near-optimal for broadband
applications.
4. Conclusions
210s
j 4:
-20
-30
;
1 ....................
....................................
............................
... . . . . . .6
...............................
Ai..!
,;
- .....
,
’
yli;.:v
................................
:lr:.,
3
n?
-40 ................................ :............................
..............................
I
I
f
.
.......... I.......
........ ,..,..
I ’
<...
-50 ......................................................
.................................. ...,.....; .............,!.. ...................
-60 :._.,
..~. - ~- .~-:. ~. ,l ~...~.
...........................
-80
0 0.5 1 1.5
kxk
0 0.5 I 1.5
kxk
2109