Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Monopulse Sidelobe Suppression 13-fp-114 PDF
Monopulse Sidelobe Suppression 13-fp-114 PDF
I. INTRODUCTION
Monopulse antenna plays an important role in
obtaining the maximum detection range. Array antennas
offer desired sidelobes with controlled aperture excitation.
Aperture distributions such as Taylor distribution &
Chebyshev distribution are often used to get maximum beam
efficiency which are important to achieve high gain leading
to higher range detection. A common approach has been to
optimise the sum pattern and accept the resulting difference Figure 1 : a) Schematic of 5-quadrant monopulse array
fed; ω=2 for center fed. Similarly, the series slot resistance in
each branch line is determined by the following equation
M n 2
r n = K ∑ A ( n , m ) ---------- eqn(2)
m = 1
N
∑r n
= W where W =1 for end feed
and n =1 -
W =2 for center feed
Figure 1b : Schematic of 5-quadrant monopulse array
comparator structure --------------- eqn (3)
The method by which the match condition is obtained
II. DESIGN METHODOLOGY depends how the aperture is divided. In the conventional
technique the quadrant is determined along Ø= 0° and Ø=
A very common observation in the design of array 90° plane ie straight cardinal plane cuts (figure2b).
difference pattern in the E-plane, along the principal plane W = K ∑∑ A 2 (n, m) --------------------- eqn(4)
n =1 m =1
(H-plane) cuts ie Ø= 0° plane and Ø= 90° plane . A typical Ø= 90°
⎛ u2 ⎞ Ø= 0°
⎜1 − ⎟
(π u ) n −1 ⎜ 2 ⎟
F (u ) = 2J 1
∏ ⎝ un ⎠
πu ⎛ u2 ⎞
n =1
⎜1 − ⎟ Where un 0
⎜ μn 2 ⎟
⎝ ⎠ -5
-10
1/ 2
⎡ A 2 + ( n − 1 / 2) 2 ⎤
-15
= n⎢
2 ⎥
-20
----------- (1)
Power (dB)
⎣ A + ( n − 1 / 2) ⎦
2 -25
-30
-35
-45
-5
folded magic tee comparator at the back.
-10 Hence, a difference sidelobe suppression of atleast
-15
25dB is achieved with no additional circuitry. Using a single
-20
Power (dB)
-25
feed design, optimum sum and difference radiation patterns,
-30 low side lobe levels, compactness and simplicity were
-35
satisfied simultaneously. The only penalty is the reduction of
-40
monopulse slope which is acceptable for most on-board
-45
-50 applications.
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Angle (deg)
Figure 3: Sum & Difference pattern at Ø= 45° plane III. HARDWARE EXPERIMENTATION
An array antenna was fabricated using this
Ø= 45° techniques and its pattern shows the reduced difference
sidelobe level. The design at Ku-band was implemented in a
reduced height waveguide dimension to keep the overall
height and weight of the antenna low.
Ø= 135°
-10
Power (dB)
-20
-30
-40
-50
-20 -10 0 10 20
Angle (deg)
Figure 6: Radiation pattern with inter-cardinal feeding
showing reduced difference sidelobe level.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This form of antenna feed can be easily
implemented and used in tracking radar systems without the
problem of achieving high sum gain while preserving low
sidelobes in difference pattern.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
References