Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Free Klein Gordon Field Theory PDF
The Free Klein Gordon Field Theory PDF
Jeremy Atkins
April 20, 2018
Abstract
A single-particle relativistic theory turns out to be inadequate for
many situations. Thus, we begin to develop a multi-particle relativistic
description of quantum mechanics starting from classical analogies. We
start with a Lagrangian description, and use it to build a Hamiltonian
description we can then quantize. We then illustrate the decomposition
of the field into its positive and negative energy components, and define
the creation and annihilation operators.
1 Introduction
Relativistic quantum mechanics turns out to be inadequately described by a
single-particle theory. One of the primary reasons for this is that a relativistic
particle may have enough energy to create other particles, and thus any theory
describing it must account for this.
A theory which describes an infinite-degree-of-freedom system could be built
out of a function defined over all space and time, similarly to the way such
things are modeled in electromagnetic theory. From such a theory, we would
need to find two major descriptions/properties: dynamical equations of motion
and quantization. For the first, we can develop a Lagrangian description, and
for the second, a Hamiltonian description lends itself quite well to quantization.
We will assume we have a field variable φ(x) = φ(x, t) which is real and
behaves as a scalar under Lorentz transformation, and drops off to 0 at spatial
infinity (as well as its derivatives).
1
We will assume there exists an action S defined as normal, which we can write
in terms of L: Z tf Z tf Z tf
S= dt L = dt d3 x L = d4 x L (2)
ti ti ti
We will further assume that L depends only on the field variable and its first
derivative, i.e.
L = L(φ(x), ∂µ φ(x)) (3)
Now we will change the field arbitrarily and infinitesimally to find what condi-
tions will result in a stationary action
If we commute δ and ∂µ (it can be shown fairly easily that we can do this):
Z tf
∂L ∂L
= d4 x δφ(x) + ∂µ (δφ(x)) (8)
ti ∂φ(x) ∂∂µ φ(x)
Then, we integrate the second term by parts splitting up into ∂∂µ∂L φ(x) and ∂ µ (δφ(x))
to obtain
Z tf
∂L ∂L ∂L
= d4 x δφ(x) + ∂µ − ∂µ δφ(x) (9a)
ti ∂φ(x) ∂∂µ φ(x) ∂∂∂µ φ(x)
Z tf Z tf
∂L ∂L ∂L
d4 x d3 x
= − ∂µ δφ(x) + δφ(x) (9b)
ti ∂φ(x) ∂∂µ φ(x) ∂φ(x) ti
The second integral vanishes from the boundary conditions, so we’re just left
with the first term. To make the action stationary in the case of an arbitrary
infinitesimal change in φ(x), it must be true that
∂L ∂L
= ∂µ (10)
∂φ(x) ∂∂µ φ(x)
2
We will pick the Lagrangian density
1 1
L= ∂µ φ∂ µ φ − m2 φ2 (11)
2 2
This choice can be motivated by looking at the Lagrangian for a classical har-
monic oscillator,
1 1
L = mv 2 − mω 2 x2 (12)
2 2
We see that if we treat φ(x) as x, ∂µ φ is analogous to v, and doing so gives us
(11).
Evaluating both sides to be
∂L
= −m2 φ(x) (13a)
∂φ(x)
∂L ∂ 1 νµ
= ∂µ φη ∂ν φ (13b)
∂∂µ φ(x) ∂∂µ φ 2
1 νµ ∂ ∂
= η ∂µ φ ∂ν φ + ∂µ φ ∂ν φ (13c)
2 ∂∂µ φ ∂∂µ φ
1
= η νµ (∂ν φ + ∂µ φδνµ ) (13d)
2
1
= η νµ (2∂ν φ) (13e)
2
= ∂µφ (13f)
Thus, the Klein-Gordon equation can be derived solely from the Lagrangian
mechanics of our field operator φ.
3
with the Hamiltonian itself defined as
Z
H = d3 x H (17)
{x, x} = 0 = {p, p}
{x, p} = 1
We can use these relations to write (after a semi-involved process) the Klein-
Gordon equation in Hamiltonian form.
First, the Lagrangian density can give us the Hamiltonian density:
1 1
L= ∂µ φ∂ µ φ − m2 φ2 (11 again)
2 2
1 2 1 1
= φ̇ − (∇φ) · (∇φ) − m2 φ2 (20)
2 2 2
∂L
→ Π(x) = = φ̇(x) (21)
∂ φ̇
→ H = Π(x)φ̇(x) − L (16 again)
1 2 1 1
= Π2 (x) − Π (x) − (∇φ) · (∇φ) − m2 φ2 (22)
2 2 2
1 1 1
= Π2 (x) + (∇φ) · (∇φ) + m2 φ2 (23)
2 2 2
This in turn gives us the Hamiltonian
Z
H = d3 x H (17 again)
Z
3 1 2 1 1 2 2
= d x Π (x) + (∇φ) · (∇φ) + m φ (24)
2 2 2
4
equations with φ:
φ̇(x) = {φ(x), H}
Z
1 2 1 1
= φ(x), d3 y Π (y) + (∇φ(y)) · (∇φ(y)) + m2 φ2
2 2 2
Z
1
= d3 x {φ(x), Π2 (y)}x0 =y0
2
Z
= d3 y Π(y){φ(x), Π2 (y)}x0 =y0
Z
= d3 y Π(y, x0 ){φ(x), Π(y)}x0 =y0
Z
= d3 y Π(y, x0 )δ 3 (x − y)
= Π(x) (25)
Here we have used that the Hamiltonian is time-independent, so we can assert
that x0 = y 0 , allowing us to use the equal-time relation (19). We can go through
a similar process to find Π̇:
Π̇(x) = {Π(x), H}
Z
3 1 2 1 1 2 2
= Π(x), d y Π (y) + (∇φ(y)) · (∇φ(y)) + m φ
2 2 2
Z
= d3 y (∇φ(y) · {Π(x), ∇φ(y)}x0 =y0
5
4 Field Decomposition
The following plane wave equation set forms a complete basis for solutions to
the Klein-Gordon equation [1]:
k 2 = m2 (33)
φ̃(k) = 0 (34)
6
Now we can plug this new form into (35b):
Z
1
φ(x) = C dk 0 d3 k (δ(k 0 − Ek ) + δ(k 0 + Ek ))
2Ek
0 0
× e−i(k x −k·x) a(k 0 , k)
Z
1 i(−Ek x0 +k·x) 0
= C d3 k e a(Ek , k) + ei(Ek x +k·x) a(−Ek , k) (39)
2Ek
We will replace Ek with k 0 and switch k to −k in the second term to obtain
Z
1
φ(x) = C d3 k e−ik·x a(k) + eik·x a(−k)
(40)
2Ek
Since φ is Hermitian,
φ(x) = φ† (x)
Z
1
= C d3 k eik·x a† (k) + e−ik·x adagger (−k)
(41)
2Ek
Combining (40) with (41), we get that
a(k) = a† (−k) and a(−k) = a† (k) (42)
Now we can rewrite (40) as
Z
1
φ(x) = C d3 k e−ik·x a(k) + eik·x a† (k)
(43)
2Ek
From (36c), we know that k 0 = k 0 (k), so we can redefine a(k) to reflect this:
a(k) a† (k)
a(k) = √ and a† (k) = √ (44)
2k 0 2k 0
Using these new definitions, we will rewrite phi(x) once more as
Z
1
φ(x) = D d3 k e−ik·x a(k) + eik·x a† (k)
; D= p (45)
(2π)3 2k 0
We can denote φ(x) in terms of its positive and negative energy parts:
Z
φ (x) = D d3 k e−ik·x a(k)
(+)
(46a)
Z
φ(−) (x) = D d3 k eik·x a† (k)
(46b)
7
References
[1] Ashok Das. Lectures on Quantum Field Theory. World Scientific, 2008.
[2] Ben Saltzman. Second quantization of the klein-gordon equation. 2018.