You are on page 1of 9

Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS

Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant


MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 1 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

UNIVERSITY VISION

In 2030, the Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation is a globally competitive university with high concentrations of talent, excellent teaching environment, rigorous program quality,
sufficient resources, and a culture of collaboration.

UNIVERSITY MISSION

The Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation is a private, non-stock, non-profit, non-sectarian educational foundation with a three-fold function – instruction, research and community
service – offering responsive and alternative programs supportive of national development goals and standards of global excellence.

GOAL

The Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation shall produce graduates who have research-based knowledge, leadership and managerial skills, and professionalism.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VISION

The MSEUF College of Engineering shall be a globally competitive engineering institution.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MISSION

The MSEUF College of Engineering shall produce competent engineers adequately prepared in the practice of their profession supportive of national development goals and standards
of global excellence.
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 2 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES MISSION


The graduates of an Engineering program shall: Instruction Research Community
Service
1. Be effective in engineering design and the practical application of engineering theory in accordance with high standards of ethics   
2. Be effective in communication skills and exhibit teamwork.   
3. Be successfully employed or accepted into graduate programs and serve their communities, whether locally, nationally or globally.   
4. Be successful designer, manager, planner and or entrepreneur in the practice of engineering profession serving local international or   
global communities

COURSE SPECIFICATION

Course Code: EAPD 5522


Course Title: Power Plant Engineering
This course deals with the study of types of power plants, power plant operation and protection, load graphics, , interconnections, economics
Course Description:
of electric service and arrangement of equipment for modern plants.
Prerequisite: Power System Analysis and Design Co-requisite:
Lecture Contact/Hours per Laboratory Contact/Hours per
Course Credits: 2 3 hours N/A
Week: Week:
Total Contact Hours (for 18 weeks): 36Hours
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 3 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

Student Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives:

Program Educational
Student Outcomes Objectives
1 2 3 4
a. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, physical, life and information sciences; and engineering sciences appropriate to the field of practice.    

b. An Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice    
c. Ability to recognize, formulate, and solve electrical engineering problems    

Course Outcomes and Relationship to Student Outcomes:

Course Outcomes
a b c
After completing the course, the student must have the ability to:
1. Identify different types of power plants and resources for power generation I I I
2. Identify different sources of energy from conventional and non-conventional sources I I I
3. Calculate power plant economics and identify different generating equipment I I I
4. Identify different layout and components of power plant building I I I
Level: I – Introduced R – Reinforced D – Demonstrated
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 4 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

COURSE LEARNING PLAN

DATE OF
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT/
LEARNING OUTCOMES TOPICS CONTACT
AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES EVALUATION
SESSION
LO: Enhanced awareness about Discussion of VMG and PEO Multimedia equipment Interactive discussion Q and A
the VMG and PEO as well as
course requirements Presentation of the Syllabus and Course Paper and pen Open forum
Requirements
1st Contact Session Multimedia projector, white Lecture-Discussion Recitation/ Feb. 01-02,
LO 1.1 Enhanced knowledge on Power plant concepts screen and speakers, Oral Presentation 2020
power plant concepts 1. Introduction to power plants Rubric PowerPoint presentation
2. Types of Power Plants Chauhan, D.S. (2006) Non- of reports Quizzes
LO 1.2 Enhanced knowledge on 3. Fossil Fuels Conventional Energy Resources. Library Research/
different fossil fuels New Jersey: Pearson Prentice- Library Research: Assignment
Hall
Keljik, Jeff (2008) Electricity 3: Assignment/Research To be submitted
Power Generation and Delivery. 1. Types of power plants on
Australia: Thomson Delmar Feb. 22-23, 2020
Learning 2. Different fossil fuels

CO1: Identify different types of power plants and resources for power generation
DATE OF
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT/
LEARNING OUTCOMES TOPICS CONTACT
AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES EVALUATION
SESSION
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 5 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

LO 2.1 Enhanced ability to 2nd Contact Session Multimedia projector Lecture-Discussion Written outputs Feb 22-23,
identify resources for power Energy Sources Chauhan, D.S. (2006) Non- 2020
generation 1. Resources for Power Generation Conventional Energy Resources. Library research Library Research/
2. Conventional sources of energy New Jersey: Pearson Prentice- Assignment
LO 2.2 Enhanced knowledge on 3. Non-conventional sources of energy Hall
alternative sources of energy Keljik, Jeff (2008) Electricity 3: Assignment/Research: To be submitted
Power Generation and Delivery. 1. Conventional Energy on
Australia: Thomson Delmar Sources March 7-8, 2020
Learning

DATE OF
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT/
LEARNING OUTCOMES TOPICS CONTACT
AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES EVALUATION
SESSION
LO 3.1 Enhanced knowledge on 3rd Contact Session Multimedia projector Lecture-Discussion Written outputs March 7-8,
power generation for hydro, 1. Hydroelectric Power systems Chauhan, D.S. (2006) Non- 2020
nuclear , and solar energy 2. Nuclear Fission systems Conventional Energy Resources. Library research Library Research/
3. Solar energy systems New Jersey: Pearson Prentice- Assignment
Hall
Keljik, Jeff (2008) Electricity 3:
Power Generation and Delivery.
Australia: Thomson Delmar
Learning
Course Assessment: Midterm Examination (March 14-15, 2020)
CO2: Identify different sources of energy from conventional and non-conventional sources
Assessment Tools: Rubric, Written Examination
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 6 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

DATE OF
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT/
LEARNING OUTCOMES TOPICS CONTACT
AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES EVALUATION
SESSION
LO 4.1 Enhanced knowledge on 4th Contact Session Multimedia projector Lecture-Discussion Research/ April 4-5,
power generation for geothermal, Assignment 2020
wind, and fuel-cell energy Chauhan, D.S. (2006) Non- Library research Written
generation systems 1. Geothermal power systems Conventional Energy Resources. Technical Specs
2. Wind Energy systems New Jersey: Pearson Prentice- Assignment/Research
3. Fuel-cell power systems Hall 1. Non-conventional To be submitted
Keljik, Jeff (2008) Electricity 3: energy resources on
Power Generation and Delivery. April 25-26, 2020
Australia: Thomson Delmar

CO3: Calculate power plant economics and identify different generating equipment
DATE OF
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT/
LEARNING OUTCOMES TOPICS CONTACT
AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES EVALUATION
SESSION
LO 5.1 Enhanced knowledge on 5th Contact Session Multimedia projector Lecture-Discussion Research/ April 25-26,
power generation for tidal wave, Single Phase Electrical System Assignment 2020
biomass, and diesel power Chauhan, D.S. (2006) Non- Library research Written
generation systems 1. Tidal Wave Power systems Conventional Energy Resources. Engineering
2. Biomass Power systems New Jersey: Pearson Prentice- Contract
3. Diesel Power Plants Hall Assignment/Research: To be submitted
Keljik, Jeff (2008) Electricity 3: on
Power Generation and Delivery. May 9-10, 2020
Australia: Thomson Delmar
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 7 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

DATE OF
EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT/
LEARNING OUTCOMES TOPICS CONTACT
AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES EVALUATION
SESSION
LO 6.1 Enhanced ability to 6th Contact Session Multimedia projector Lecture-Discussion Research/ May 9-10,
calculate power plant economics Power Plant Economics and calculations Assignment 2020
and electrical calculations Chauhan, D.S. (2006) Non- Library research
1. Steam Power Plant Conventional Energy Resources.
2. Plant Economics New Jersey: Pearson Prentice- Assignment/Research:
3. Power Plant Engineering Hall Power Plant Engineering
Calculations Keljik, Jeff (2008) Electricity 3: calculations
Power Generation and Delivery.
Australia: Thomson Delmar

CO4: Identify different layout and components of power plant building Course Assessment: Final Examination May 23-24, 2020
Assessment Tools: Rubric, Oral Examination Sheet
Resit / Re-exam and submission of portfolio
COURSE EVALUATION
Student performance will be rated based on the following:
Assessment Tasks Weight Minimum Average for
Satisfactory
Performance
CO1/CO2 Class Requirements (Output Papers, Quizzes, Participation, Problem Solving, etc.) 40%
Mid-term Examination 60%
100% 75%
Previous (Midterm) Grade = 100% x 40%
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 8 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

CO3/CO4 Class Requirements (Output Papers, Quizzes, Participation, Problem Solving, etc.) 40%
Final Examination 60%
100% 75%
Present (Final) Grade = 100% x 60%
40% Midterm Grade + 60% Final Grade = Overall Final Grade

The following table will be used in giving the final grades:


Percentage Equivalent 74 and below 75-77 78 - 80 81-83 84-86 87-88 89-91 92-94 95-97 98-100
Final Grade 5.00 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00

ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF PROGRAM/STUDENT OUTCOMES


PERFORMANCE INDICATOR: ASSESSMENT TOOL TARGETS AND STANDARDS
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC 80% of the students shall have a
1. Identify different types of power plants and resources for power generation (75% & above – Passed)(Below 75% - Failed) rating of at least 75%
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC 80% of the students shall have a
2. Identify different sources of energy from conventional and non-conventional sources (75% & above – Passed)(Below 75% - Failed) rating of at least 75%
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC 80% of the students shall have a
3. Calculate power plant economics and identify different generating equipment (75% & above – Passed)(Below 75% - Failed) rating of at least 75%
4. Identify different layout and components of power plant building ASSESSMENT RUBRIC 80% of the students shall have a
(75% & above – Passed)(Below 75% - Failed) rating of at least 75%

Rubrics will be used for assessment & evaluation of program/student outcomes and other types of assessment such as return demonstration, simulation, case analysis, experiments, oral
presentation, etc.
1 2 3 4 5
BEGINNING DEVELOPING APPRAISING PROFICIENCY PROFICIENT ADVANCE
Document Code: CEng-ETEEAP- F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in Power Plant
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Engineering EAPD 5522
Page No. : Page 9 of 9
An Autonomous University
Revision No.: 5
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 24 January 2020
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency Prepared by:
and Accreditation program (ETEEAP) Roder V. Sedeño, REE
Professor
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Reviewed by:
Guillermo M. Rago Jr. Ed.D. CE
QUALITY FORM Dean
Approved by:
Benilda N. Villenas, Ph. D.
Chair, ETEEAP

(Minimal and Limited Evidence of (Some evidence of Achievement) (Adequate Evidence of (Commendable Achievement) (Exceptional Achievement)
Achievement) Achievement)
75 - 77 78 - 80 81 - 83 84 - 86 87 - 88 89 - 91 92 - 94 95 - 97 98 – 100
Aside from academic deficiency, other grounds for a failing grade are:
1. Failing academic standing and failure to take the final examination
2. Grave misconduct other than cheating
3. Excessive absences (in excess of 20% of the total class hours)
REVISION HISTORY
NO. DATE REVISIONS
0 Initial Release
1 June 02, 2014 Revised to OBE format
2 June 08, 2015 Added curriculum mapping in the content
4 December 12, 2016 Added program outcomes, course outcomes, and assessment plan in the format
5 August 1, 2018 Updated the references
6 January 11, 2019 Revised the format and included course learning outcomes for each period

You might also like