Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Second edition
Editors
Dr Carmencita A. Banatin
Dr Marilyn V. Go
Arch Ma. Rebecca M. Peňafiel
Dr Romeo A. Bituin
DRAFT
Foreword 5
Francisco T. Duque III
Secretary of Health, Republic of the Philippines
Preface 6
Acknowledgements 7
Section I. Introduction
Introduction 10
Safe Hospital 11
Every year, many hospitals and health facilities in the country are damaged and destroyed by
disasters to which the Philippines has a very high vulnerability. However, the government
through the Department of Health has been non-stop in its efforts to ensure that our
countrymen are not left without the vital care that they need in the midst of these
catastrophes.
“The price to pay for the failure of health care facilities when disasters happen is too high in
comparison to the cost of making these safe and resilient." Recent disaster experiences in the
Bicol and Visayas regions and in earlier years in the Quezon Province highlight the
tremendous impact that disasters can have on health facilities and local health systems.
The health sector is filled with highly trained, committed, and dedicated personnel who are
ready to deliver healthcare especially in times of great suffering and need. To achieve and
maintain quality of health care during health emergencies, these personnel will have to be
supported by enabling them to work in safe health facilities where they can do what they do
best --- save lives and limit injuries among disaster victims.
Among the objectives of the global campaign for "Hospitals Safe from Disasters" is to
reinforce both the structural and non-structural resilience of health care facilities and to
ensure that they continue to function after a disaster strikes. The first points to structures in
safe geographical locations; while the latter refers to health personnel and emergency
preparedness plans which will keep hospitals operational in the wake of disasters.
Therefore, I commend the Steering Committee and Technical Working Groups who
painstakingly labored in consolidating indicators into this manual that will guide all Hospital
Administrators in the pursuit of one vision - to make every hospital safe from disaster and
accessible at all times for all disaster victims. Likewise, this Manual signifies the continuing
partnership between the Department of Health, World Health Organization, and other
members of the health sector in making our health system strong, reliable and resilient for the
Filipino people.
Meanwhile, the Department Personnel Order 0254 series of 2008 mandated the Steering
Committee to provide assistance and technical guidance to the different Technical Working
Groups which determined, defined, and finalized the structural, non-structural, and functional
indicators through a series of write-shops and critiquing sessions. This body came up with a
Manual on Safe Hospitals' Indicators which was supported by the National Center for Health
Facility Development (DOH-NCHFD), the Association of Hospital Administrators and the
World Health Organization - Western Pacific Regional Office (WHO-WPRO).
After the research implementation, the sets of indicators found on the Manual were revisited
and revised through several write-shops with the Technical Working Groups. The output of
which is this second edition. In this new version, the structural, non-structural and functional
indicators which were deemed important and most applicable to the country setting were
retained, while the others were either revised or removed. National codes, policies and
guidelines are also included in this new version as additional resource materials for the
readers and users.
This Manual neither provides nor claims to be the definite and only guide to follow in ensuring
safety in health facilities. Readers are encouraged to other complementary references and
documents. The contributors recognize that this Manual is an evolving reference and may
need to be adapted to different contexts considering that some indicators may not be
necessary, appropriate nor tailored to some hospitals or health facilities.
The revision for this second edition of the Philippine Indicators for Safe Hospitals in
Emergencies and Disasters was done through the efforts of the “Assessment Team”
composed of the following individuals: Dr Joseph Bacareza; Dr Jose Edgar Balita; Engr Aida
Barcelona; Dr Romeo Bituin; Ms Josefina Blanco, RN; Arch Allen Buenaventura; Dr
Emmanuel Bueno; Engr Israel Camposano; Mr Elmer Benedict Collong, RMT; Arch Leonard
Cordero; Dr Ma. Paz Corrales; Arch Corazon Cruz; Ms Aida Cuadra, RN; Arch Ferdinand
dela Paz; Dr Alex Dimapilis; Mr Philip Du; Engr Marilyn Ebuen; Arch Christopher Espina; Dr
Jasminda Espiritu; Ms Ma. Belinda Evangelista, RN; Ms Jacinta Garcia; Mr Manny Guevarra,
RN; Engr Eric Gutierrez; Dr Rodrigo Hao; Dr Joseph Juico; Dr Cesar Brence Labastida; Mr
Gerardo Lirag, RN; Engr Jesus Lorenzo; Arch Prosperidad Luis; Engr Nilo Marayag; Dr
Rommel Menguito; Dr Joseph Nocom; Dr Antoinette Pacapac; Ms Celia Pangan, RN; Engr
Jennifer Quintero; Dr Mary Grace Reyes; Dr Myrna Rivera; Dr Epifania Simbul; Dr Alexis Uy;
Mr Willy Veloria, RN;and Engr Vivian Young.
Grateful appreciation also goes to Dr Noel Juban and Prof Nina Carandang for their technical
expertise in conducting the research project; Dr Asuncion Anden and Dr Irma Asuncion for
overseeing the management of the project in the National Capital Region; and Arch Ma.
Rebecca Peñafiel and Dr Nathaniel Carl Tan for their technical inputs to the project.
The completion of this Manual is also due to the support of the Emergency and Humanitarian
Action of the World Health Organization - Western Pacific Region through the technical
supervision of Dr Arturo Pesigan, technical assistance of Dr Lester Sam Geroy and
administrative support of Ms Glessie Salajogg. This project was supported by the European
Commission through its Humanitarian Aid department.
Advisers
Steering Committee
Dr Mario Villaverde DOH Policy and Standard Development Team for Service
Delivery (PSDTSD)
Dr Ma. Alicia Lim DOH – Bureau of Health Facilities and Services (DOH-BHFS)
Dr Marilyn Go DOH-HEMS
Dr Edmundo B. Lopez Las Piñas General Hospital and Satellite Trauma Center
Engr Bayani San Juan DOH – Bureau of Health Devices and Technology
Introduction
Hospitals and other health facilities should be a source of strength during emergencies and
disasters. They should be ready to save lives and to continue providing essential health
services such as laboratories, medicines, treatment and rehabilitation. They should also be
the symbol of hope during these critical times and contribute to the community’s sense of
security and well-being. However, there are circumstances where hospitals and health
facilities are made vulnerable, especially during an emergency or disaster. The hospitals or
health facilities may be damaged or destroyed; or their capacities stretched to the limit by the
surge in number of patients seeking health services and support.
The Hyogo Framework for Action in 2005 emphasizes the importance of "making hospitals
safe from disasters by ensuring that all new hospitals are built with a level of resilience that
strengthens their capacity to remain functional in disaster situations and implement mitigation
measures to reinforce existing health facilities, particularly those providing primary health
care.” The roles of hospitals and health facilities in emergencies and disasters cannot be
underestimated.
The World Health Organization, in support of the World Disaster Reduction Campaign on
Hospitals Safe from Disasters (2008-2009) aims to raise awareness in making hospitals safe
in emergencies and from disasters:
Protect the lives of patients and health workers by ensuring the structural
resilience of health facilities
Ensure that health facilities and health services are able to function in the
aftermath of emergencies and disasters, when they are most needed
This Manual defines what a safe hospital is during an emergency or disaster. It also
describes the essentials in supporting safe hospitals. It also lists the structural and non-
structural indicators as well as functional indicators which every hospital and health facilities
should consider as standards to be achieved.
This manual, “Safe Hospitals in Emergencies and Disasters: Philippine Indicators” is a guide
to help assess the vulnerability and resilience of hospitals and health facilities to ensure
patient safety and staff security, and guarantee continuous operations in times of
emergencies and disasters. This manual is intended for people who recognizes the important
role of hospitals and health care facilities during emergencies and disasters. These people
include: hospital administrators, health emergency management staff, and health
professionals.
The sets of indicators listed in this manual were arrived at, after a comprehensive review of
existing codes and guidelines which are related to structures, non-structural elements and
functions of hospitals and health facilities. This manual neither provides nor claims to be the
definite and only guide to follow in ensuring safety in health facilities. This is a work in
progress and subsequent revisions will be made accordingly to ensure that hospitals and
health facilities are safe in emergencies.
Safe hospitals are health facilities whose services remain accessible and functioning, at
maximum capacity and within the same infrastructure, during and immediately following
disasters, emergencies or crises.
A safe hospital . . .
…will not collapse in disasters, killing patients and staff
…will be able to continue to function and provide critical services in emergencies
…will be organized, with contingency plans in place and health personnel trained to keep
the network operational
Supporting safe hospitals involves knowledge of the many factors that contribute to their
vulnerability, which includes:
Buildings: The location and design specifications and the resiliency of the materials
used contribute to the ability of hospitals to withstand adverse natural events.
Medical and support staff: The loss or unavailability of personnel disrupts the care of
the injured; hiring outside personnel to sustain the response capacity adds to the
overall economic burden.
Basic lifelines and services: A hospital’s ability to function relies on lifelines and other
basic services such as electrical power, water and sanitation, and waste treatment
and disposal. When some services are affected, the performance of the entire
hospital suffers.
Supporting safe hospitals entails vision and commitment to ensure that they are fully
functional especially in times of emergencies and disasters. There should be involvement of
various sectors such as: planning, finance, public services, architecture and engineering.
The structural elements of health facilities, such as foundations, columns, beams, slabs, load-
bearing walls, braces, and trusses, are essential elements that determine the overall safety of
the building. The following is a list of structural indicators for safe hospitals in the Philippines
based on the (1) National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) Revised 2001
Guidelines, (2) National Building Code Revised 2006 Guidelines and (3) Association of
Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP) Recommended Guidelines on Structural
Design Peer Review of Structures. This can be used as a checklist to identify strengths and
vulnerabilities when planning for new construction or reviewing existing hospital or health
facility.
Instruction:
Encircle the thumbs-up sign (means Yes or complies completely with what is asked for) and thumbs-
down sign (means No or may not comply completely with what is asked for) when assessing the
hospital or health facility according to the following indicators. Use the Remarks column to write
essential observations when doing the assessment, especially when the result is No..
The following are the indicators for the architectural elements, equipment and contents and
services or lifelines. As with the structural indicators, this list can be used to identify strengths
and vulnerabilities when planning for new construction or reviewing existing hospital or health
facility.
Instruction:
Encircle the thumbs-up sign (means Yes or complies completely with what is asked for) and thumbs-
down sign (means No or may not comply completely with what is asked for) when assessing the
hospital or health facility according to the following indicators. Use the Remarks column to write
essential observations when doing the assessment, especially when the result is No..
9.10.14 Security
Provided with Close Circuit TV
(CCTV) cameras with recorder
Roving guard available
Secured entrance and exit points
Provided with equipment for
inspection such as metal
detectors
Instruction:
Encircle the thumbs-up sign (means Yes or complies completely with what is asked for) and thumbs-
down sign (means No or may not comply completely with what is asked for) when assessing the
hospital or health facility according to the following indicators. Use the Remarks column to write
essential observations when doing the assessment, especially when the result is No.
rollers or roller trolleys must be
anchored or fastened near the
operating table during operations
and can be removed afterwards
• Lamps, equipment for anesthesia
and surgical tables are secured and
table or cart wheels are locked
• Equipment on roller trolleys must
have proper anchoring system
using hooks and chains, and can be
attached to beds or walls (ECG,
monitors, suction units, ventilators,
incubators, BP monitors,
resuscitation equipment, etc.)
2.1.2 Safety of Radiology Equipment
• Dedicated portable mobile X ray
machine that is battery operated
3. Laboratory Room (P3 Laboratory and Bio-
safety and Bio-security)
- Gloves
• Safety devices on laboratory
• Safety Laboratory Equipment –
Biosafety Cabinet Class II
3.2.3 Emergency Equipment
• Fire extinguishers
• Emergency showers
• Eye wash station
3.2.4 Appropriate Procedures
• Good housekeeping
• Personal hygiene (handwashing)
• Laboratory safety protocol
Instruction:
Encircle the thumbs-up sign (means Yes or complies completely with what is asked for) and thumbs-
down sign (means No or may not comply completely with what is asked for) when assessing the
hospital or health facility according to the following indicators. Use the Remarks column to write
essential observations when doing the assessment, especially when the result is No.
Guidelines, Procedures, and Protocols
5.1 SOP for internal referral of patients
5.2 Treatment Guidelines/Protocols for
Emerging/Re-emerging Infections
5.3 Procedures for hospital epidemiologic
Surveillance
5.4 Procedures for preparing sites for temporary
placement of dead bodies for highly
infectious disease
5.5 SOP/Guidelines for food and supplies of
dedicated hospital staff during emergency
6. Hospital Systems
6.1 Logistics Management System
6.1.1 System for prioritizing hospital
personnel to be given prophylactic/
therapeutic drugs for highly infectious
diseases in times of drug scarcity
6.1.2 Surveillance System
• Established hospital disease
surveillance system for the patients
and personnel
6.1.3 Water Supply System
• Presence of adequately safe water
at all times even during emergency
for hygienic purpose, for flushing
toilets and other utilities
• Presence of alternate source of
water in case the main supply is cut
off
• Identified agencies responsible for
timely restoration of water service
• Supplementary pumping system in
case system fails or services
disrupted
6.1.4 Electrical System
• Presence of emergency power
generator or alternative power for
emergency lighting and operation of
essential equipment
6.1.5 Security System
• Dedicated security personnel
• Tightened security of the Isolation
Room/Biological Unit, being a
restricted area
• Only authorized personnel are
allowed to enter
• Separate entrance or access route
• With proper signages
Safe Hospitals in Emergencies and Disasters: Philippine Indicators 35
6.1.6 Transportation and Communication
System
• Available back-up communication
facilities (cellular phone, handheld
radios satellite communication
facilities,etc)
• Dedicated ambulance for highly
infectious patients with glass
separator between the driver and
the patient compartment equipped
with proper
decontamination/disinfection
supplies and materials
6.1.7 Public Information System
• Presence of established Public
Information Center where public
can go to request information
concerning family members
• Public Information Center is
coordinated by a social worker and
staffed by personnel or volunteers
• Available public awareness and
public education campaign with
advisories, IECs, warning
messages
• Designated spokesperson for risk
communication
• Procedures for communicating
with the public and media
6.1.8 Hospital Emergency Incident
Command System (HEICS)
• The Chief of Hospital as the
Incident commander and other staff
to fill up the position of the Incident
Command Structure
• System of activating and
deactivating the Incident Command
System
• System of activating the Hospital
Response Plan
• Hospital Early Warning and Code
Alert System in order for hospital to
prepare and mobilize resources in
response to early warning signs or
signals
• System of recalling staff and
positioning them for possible
response to emergencies
• System of activating and
deactivating the Code Alert System
6.1.9 Information Management System
• Preparation of a census of
admitted patients and those
referred to other hospitals
• Proper recording and reporting
using standard forms
• Ways of sharing information with
proper authorities
These are the Codes, Policies and Guidelines from which the indicators in this manual are
based on. Hospitals and health facilities are advised to have a copy of these materials for
reference.
The provision of this code shall apply to the construction, alteration, moving, demolition,
repair, maintenance and use of any building or structure within its jurisdiction, except work
located primarily in a public way, public utility towers and poles, hydraulic flood control
structures, and indigenous family dwellings.
In Chapter 2. Minimum Design Loads, revisions of load combinations were made to adopt
the new strength-based seismic forces, and special load combinations to reflect the provision
of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Near-source factors are specified in seismic zone
4 to recognize the amplified ground motions that occur close to known acyive faults. The
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) issued the maps showing the
active faults throughout the country as reference for determining near-source factors. Also
basic wind speed are revised based on statistical studies of PAGASA data over 30 years and
recommendations of the sub-committee on Design Loads and Lateral forces and on the
ASCE 7 – 95 provisions.
In Chapter 5. Steel, recommendations to adopt AISC's 1997 Edition of the Seismic Provision
for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC Seismic '97) incorporates on-going development of
seismic design and much of the current knowledge on design and quality assurance following
intensive research and testing in the U.S. Significant issues associated with moment frames
and AISC's Seismic Provisions are also addressed. Likewise, important issues and
considerations on braced frames, eco-centric braced frames, and truss moment frames
following much research and development in recent years are also discussed.
Scope: Public and Private Buildings, Electric Generating Plants, Industrial Plants,
Transformer Stations, Permanent and Temporary Substations, Airfields, Railways
Switchyards, yards, Carnivals and other Lots, Quarries and Mines, Watercraft,
Dockyards, Trailers, Mobile Homes and Recreational Vehicles, Offshore Facilities
The Act in a nutshell is about- Segregation, Storage and Collection systems; Selection of
Vehicle for Solid Waste Collection; Designing and Planning a Collection System; Operation of
a Transfer Station; Intelligent Service Contracting; Public Education and Awareness; and the
critical part is the Policy Formulation of the Act as well as its enforcement. Under the latter is
the Solid Waste Management Financing, Incentives and Cost Recovery, wherein the money
aspect and proceedings of the Act is discussed.
The Department of Health (DOH) provides the following policies and guidelines for the
gradual phase-out of mercury in all Philippine health care facilities. Recognizing the
unnecessary risks posed by the continued use of mercury-containing products in the health
care system, the DOH hereby orders that:
1. All Hospitals shall immediately discontinue the distribution of mercury thermometers
to patients through the distribution of hospital admission/ discharge kits.
2. All Hospitals shall follow the guidelines for the gradual phase-out of mercury in
health care facilities described in this document in the timeline specified.
3. All new Health Care Facilities applying for a License to Operate shall submit an
inventory of all mercury-containing devices that will be used in their facilities and a
corresponding mercury elimination program.
4. All other Health Care Facilities other than hospital shall make a Mercury
Minimization Program based on the guidelines set by the Administrative Order.