Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISBN: 978-606-554-938-8
All chapters contain a general description of the machine and phenomena treated,
the equations used as well as the code for respective FORTRAN calculation
programs.
Tel/Fax: +040-256-403-823
Email: editura@upt.ro
T. DORDEA:
Tel. +1-925-980-2435
Email: tdordea@gmail.com
Chapter 1. INDUCTION MACHINE.
PROGRAM INDARUPT
The program is based on the induction machine theory and design, as in [5, 7,
10, 12, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 32]. For squirrel cage rotor machines, the current
displacement phenomenon and his influence on the rotor impedance, one uses a
10 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
method very similarly to the FEM-method. It was developed the analytical method,
named the “strips method” [1.17] used in the subroutine REXI. The strips method
avoid the calculus of magnetic potential vector for finding magnetic field flux
density . The used assumptions are: the magnetic permeability of the ferromagnetic
core is tending to infinite (one neglects the m.m.f. of the ferromagnetic core): the
magnetic field lines inside the slot are perpendicular to the slot axis. The current
displacement phenomenon is assumed stronger (with a few percent) because of these
assumptions, but that is an advantage for the machine calculus. The subroutine can be
used for a generally-shaped slot as in Fig. 1.1.a. Consider the slot, divided along its
entire height, H, by parallel planes, parallel to the axis of the machine, spaced at h
between them, so that between two parallel plans the current density can be considered
as constant.
The strips are indexed starting from the base of the slot toward the air gap.
For a bar whatsoever, λ, the first strip has the index nλi, while the last one nλf . The
axial length of a band is equal to the length of the magnetic core, that can be
considered as the same as the ideal length of the machine. Consider two stacked bands,
with sequential numbers ν-1 andν, as per figure 1.1.b run a curve Γ through the upper
parts of the two bands, through the conductive part, that closes through the two lateral
surfaces of the conductor material. After setting the positive direction for the current
Iλof the bar as well as for the currents Iν-1andIνof the selected bands, bands so thin that,
in each of them the current is considered, with an acceptable error, to be uniformly
distributed and thus having a constant current density (an acceptable assumption for a
thickness of the order of microns or fractions of a micron), it results, as in [1.16] a
relation between the currents Iν-1and Iνas follows
I ν = C ν I nλi − E ν I uλ (1.1)
where the coefficients Cνand Eνare complex quantities, that can be determined
through iterations as functions of the geometrical dimensions and material constants,
all these being known. Inλiis the current in band nλi, and Iuλis the sum of the currents for
all conductors located between the base of the slot and the bar λ. This way, through the
summation of Iν for all bands of the conductor λ current,Inλiof the first band of the
1.3 – Program Structure 11
conductor λ can be determined and further all bar currents are known as functions of
the currents flown through the conductors of the slot. These allow the determination of
the current and internal fluxes for all bands, which, in turn, allow the determination of
the electrical parameters (electrical resistances and corresponding reactances).
This method allows the calculation of the impedance of the cage winding,
irrespective of its type (single or double cage), as well the equivalent impedance of the
machine and so, all the characteristics of interest.
The program has been developed considering all the sequences of the
calculations required.For this purpose INDARUPT contains the following 7 groups:
IND1, IND2, …, IND7.
- IND1 – PRINC (the main program);
- IND2 – AUXI;
- IND3 – CSIE, FKR, FKX;
- IND4 – REXI;
- IND5 – CAR;
- IND6 – HB, OPTIM, FCX, FKAR, FKAX, FCS;
- IND7 – DATELE.
The structure of the INDARUPT with all the subroutine is given in fig. 1.2.
PRINC
The main program contains, in COMMON blocks, both input data received
via the subroutine DATELE, as well the partial results via different subprograms. It
also contains all COMMON blocks that make the connection to all subprograms. Main
operations performed in the main program are:
- setting the computation values for a version, both the fixed values and the ones
that change during optimization;
12 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
- calling subroutine AUXI where, for a set of values pertinent to a version,
calculates all slip independent values necessary, that are either final values for a
version, or as coefficients intervening in the expressions of slip dependent
quantities. For squirrel cage rotor machines, the subprogram REXI is called
from AUXI, that determines the electrical parameters of the squirrel cage rotor
machine via the band method;
- all necessary values being known, the subroutine CAR is called. This program
calculates energetic parameters. Also this program selects, in case of
optimization, the optimal version, that constitutes the final result;
- the integer variable TIP1 has been introduced for calculation monitoring. It
appears in all subprograms and, if no error appears, has a value of 0 (zero); if an
error is encountered and the calculation process cannot be continued, it gets
assigned a value different from zero. In such case the calculation process ends
for this version, but the calculation can be continued for another version. The
cause is identified through analysis of the assessed value and subsequently error
avoiding measures are taken, via input data;
- calculation stop occurs always in the main program, that also gives information
on the error cause with regard to the assessed value for the variable TIP1;
- one investigates all the domain of the modifiable data for finding the optimum
solution; one defines a smaller domain, much closer around the optimum
solution and one prints the data defining them.
39. DIZ2 - similar to DIZ1 but for slip rings rotors, with the same
recommendations;
40. DJDEX - variation step used, in optimization (IIDEX=1), for DEX. It can be
considered DJDEX= 0.0005 ÷ 0.002; if DJDEX<0, then the step will
be DJDEX=DEX0*(-DJDEX0)/ZIT*KZZR, where
KZZR=ZZR/CC, and CC=100;
41. DJDIN - similar to DJDEX but referring to DIN0, with the same
recommendations; if DJDIN<0, then the step will be
DJDIN=DIN0*(-DJDIN0)/ZIT*KZZR, where KZZR=ZZR/CC,
and CC=100;
42. DJIJL - variation step used, in optimization (IIJI=1), for the current density
JI in the end ring of the working cage in case of squirrel cage rotors.
Considered values 1÷2.5*105 A/m2; if DJIJL<0, then the step will be
DJIJL=JI0*(-DJIJL0)/ZIT*KZZR, where KZZR=ZZR/CC, and
CC=100;
43. DQB1 - variation step used, in opt1imization(IIQB1>0), for QB1 –cross
section area of the stator winding conductor; if DQB1<0, then the
step will be DQB1=QB10*(-DQB10)/ZIT*KZZR, where
KZZR=ZZR/CC, and CC=100;
44. DQBL - similar to DQB1, but referring to the rotor winding; in case of
squirrel cage rotors it refers to the working cage bars; ; if DQBL<0,
then the step will be DQBL=QBL0*(-DQBL0)/ZIT*KZZR, where
KZZR=ZZR/CC, and CC=100;
45. DQI - variation step used, in optimization, for QIL, (cross-sectional area of
the cage end ring), for squirrel cage rotors;
18 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
46. DRIL - difference between the radius of the rotor circumscribed circle and
cage end ring circumscribed circle, for squirrel cage rotors (figure
1.8). For low power machines DRIL= 0.001÷0.004 m, while for large
power machines DRIL= 0.01÷0.02 m;
47. DRNAB0 - variation step used, in optimization (IINEL≥1), for RINAB. Its
initial value is RINAB0; ; if DRNAB0<0, then the step will be
DRNAB=RNAB0*(-DRNAB0)/ZIT*KZZR, where
KZZR=ZZR/CC, and CC=100;
48. DS1 - initial value for the slip s (cannot be zero (0)); but can be chosen as
±0.0001, where (+) is for operation as motor and (-) for operation as
generator (figure 1.5);
49. DS2 - variation value for the slip s from 0 up to a value around the critical
(break-down) slip. Can be chosen as DS2=±0.001;
50. DS3 - the value used to vary the slip s in the domain above the critical
(break-down) slip. Can be chosen as DS3= ± 0.1;
51. DURATA - life time of the machine, given in hours.
52. EPS1 - stator coil pitch shortening, expressed in number of stator slots for
double layer windings. For single layer EPS1 = 0;
53. EPS2 - similar with EPS1 but for rotor windings with slip rings. For single
layer windings and squirrel cage windings consider EPS2 = 0;
54. F - frequency of stator input voltage;
55. FUR - is the ratio between the cross-section area of the conducting material
in a rotor slot and the cross-sectional area enclosed by the slot
insulation;
56. FUS - similar to FUR but for stator slot;
57. GACUBL - specific mass of the work cage bar material for squirrel cage rotors
and rotor winding for slip ring rotors;
58. GACUIL - specific mass of the work cage end ring material for squirrel cage
rotors (IR=1; IR=3; IR=4).
For slip ring machines GACUIL= 0;
59. GAMCU1 - specific mass of the stator winding conductor material;
60. GAMFE - specific mass of the ferromagnetic core of the machine;
61. HR2 - distance between the wedge and the metal conductor in the rotor slot
(figure 1.3);
62. HR3 - height of the skewed part of the rotor slot that limits the wedge
(figure 1.3);
63. HR4 - height of the rotor slot opening (figure 1.3);
64. HS2 - similar to HR2 but for stator slot (figure 1.7);
65. HS3 - similar to HR3 but for stator slot (figure 1.7);
66. HS4 - similar to HR4 but for stator slot (figure 1.7);
67. H10 - height of the stator slot (figure 1.7);
68. H20 - height of the rotor slot (figure 1.3);
69. IC - relative skew of the rotor slots (figure 1.9):
IC = C / TAUC1 (1.5)
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 19
70. JI0 - initial value for optimization (IIJI≥1) of the current density in the
end ring of the work cage, for squirrel cage rotors (JI≈2÷2.5 A/mm2);
71. J10 - initial value, for optimization (IIJ1≥1), of the current density in the
primary (stator) winding;
72. J20 - initial value, for optimization (IIJ2≥1), of the current density in the
rotor winding;
73. KCBR - the ratio between the coil end width and the width in the rotor slot
(usually KCBR=1.1÷1.2). For squirrel cage rotors KCBR=1;
74. KCBS - similar to KCBR, but for stator;
75. KE - fill factor of the ferromagnetic core (usually 0.95...0.97 for 0.5 mm
thick laminations), corresponding to the clamping force, equal to the
ratio between axial length of the non-insulation coated iron of a
lamination stack and the axial length of the insulation coated
lamination stack;
76. KIP0 - ratio of the starting current and the rated/nominal current;
77. KMK0 - ratio between the break-down torque and the nominal/rated torque;
78. KMP0 -ratio between the starting torque and rated/nominal torque;
79. KO - coefficient that, at the calculation of the surface losses, accounts for
the quality and thickness of the lamination of the ferromagnetic core
of the machine. This coefficient, KO has following values for some
materials:
- Dynamo laminations 0.5 mm KO =1156,5
- Dynamo laminations 1 mm KO =2127,9
- Steel laminations 1 mm KO =925,2
- Cast steel KO =8095,2
- Forged steel KO =10780
80. KPJ - machining coefficient for calculation of the losses in the stator yoke.
If punching occurs without structural change of the material
KPJ=1.25; usually KPJ=1.4 ÷ 1.7;
81. KPZ - machining coefficient for the calculation of losses in teeth. For
correct stamping KPZ=1.25. Practically KPZ=1.5 ÷ 1.8;
82. KQ1 - zone factor for the primary winding. In case of diametrical pitch
coil, if KQ1=0 is selected, then KQ1 is calculated in the program.
For fractional windings the actual value is entered in the data file;
83. KQ2 - zone factor for the rotor winding;
- for slip-ring machines, the procedure is similar to KQ1;
- for squirrel cage rotor machines KQ2=1;
84. KS - initial value of the saturation factor for the stator and rotor teeth for
the start of the calculation (usually KS=0.34), where KSis:
ks = (Vz1+Vz2)/Vδ (1.6)
Vz1, Vz2 and Vδ are the magneto motive forces (MMF) of the teeth and
of the air gap. The final value is found in the program through
iterative calculations;
85. KW - factor greater that 1, serving for the selection of the optimal case; for
20 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
KW=1 only currently found optimal cases are printed successively;
86. K1 - is a coefficient to account for the influence of the diameter D on the
length ls of the stator coil end:
ls= K1 * D + K2 (1.7)
For K1 and K2 it can be considered:
for single layer windings:
- small and medium machines (< 1000 kW):
K1=0.6π/p; K2=0.06;
- large machines ( > 1000 kW):
K1=0.8π/p; K2=0.1; (1.8)
- machines with preformed coils for 6000 V
K1=0.85π/p; K2=0.37
for double layer windings:
p≤7: K1=1.5 (Nc1-2 pε1)/(pNc1 1 − AI 2 )
K2=2⋅DIZ1+0.06
p>7: K1=[0.247+1.57( Nc1-2pε1)/(Nc1 1 − AI 2 )]/p (1.9)
K2=2⋅DIZ1+0.069
where p is the number of pole pairs of the machine, ε1 -winding pitch
in slot pitches, AI is:
AI = (bk + a)/ τc (1.10)
where bk , τc and a are given in figure 1.6.
K1 and K2 depend on the process used in manufacturing of the
coils;
87. K1R -coefficient used in the calculation of the leakage reactance of the
rotor windings:
- slip ring machines
single layer windings:K1R=1;
double layer windings:
- normal three phase windings extended over 60° :
for 0 ≤y/τ≤ 0.34 :
K1R = 0.25 + 0.559 ·y/τ ; K2R = 0.735 y/τ
for 0.34 ≤y/τ≤ 0.66 :
K1R = 0.44 + 9 ( y/τ - 0.34 ) / 8 ; (1.11)
K2R = 0.25 + 25 ( y/τ - 0.34 ) / 16
for 0.66 ≤ y/τ≤1:
K1R = 0.8 + 10 (y/τ - 0.66 ) / 17 ;
K2R = 0.75 + 25 (y/τ - 0.66 ) / 34;
- normal two-phase windings (extended on 90°):
K1R = 0.25 + 0.75 y/τ ; K2R = y/τ (1.12)
Above, y represents the coil pitch, and τ- the pole pitch;
- squirrel cage machines: K1R= 0;
88. K1RR - coefficient similar to K1, but for the rotor. If it is not known, it can
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 21
be determined using the expressions given for K1 with the values
corresponding to the rotor. For squirrel cage motors: K1RR=0;
89. K1S - coefficient used in the calculation of the stator leakage reactance.
Similarly as for K1R but with corresponding values for the stator.
90. K2 - coefficient given at the same time as K1;
91. K2R - coefficient given at the same time as K1R. For single layer rotor
windings K2R=1. For squirrel cage rotors K2R=0;
92. K2RR - coefficient similarly to K2 but for the rotor. For squirrel cage
windings K2=0;
93. K2S - coefficient similarly to K2R, but for the stator. For single layer
windings K2S=1;
94. L0 - axial length of the ferromagnetic core without the air ducts;
95. LAMDA0 - initial value of the coefficient λ=li/τ, (li - ideal length and τ - polar
pitch);
96. MN - nominal (rated) torque Mn of the machine:
MN = Pnp/((1-sn) 2πƒ1 ) (1.13)
where p is the number of pole pairs, Pn - rated/nominal power, sn -
nominal slip (sn = 0.01 ~ 0.04) and f1 – stator frequency;
97. M1 - number of phases of the stator winding.
98. M2 - number of phases of the rotor winding. For squirrel cage rotors
M2=NC2 (Nc2 - number of rotor slots);
99. NCUBL - for slip-ring machines it is the price per mass unit of the rotor
winding;
- for squirrel cage rotors it is the price per mass unit of the working
cage bars material;
100. NCUIL - is the price per mass unit of the working cage end rings material;
101. NCU1 - is the price per mass unit of the stator winding material;
102. NFE1 - is the price per mass unit of the stator ferromagnetic core material;
103. NFE2 - is the price per mass unit of the rotor ferromagnetic core material;
104. NKWH - is the price per Wh;
105. N1 - number of turns per phase of the stator winding;
106. P - number of pairs of poles of the machine;
107. PMEC - mechanical losses of the machine at rated power;
108. PN0 - rated/nominal power of the machine;
109. POP - surface and pulsation losses of the machine, approximated initially
as (0.4÷0.5%) of the nominal power; final values are calculated by
the program;
110. PSUP - additional losses due to skin effect in stator winding and losses due
to the magnetic fields in parts next to end windings. Normally
considered as 0.5% of the rated power of the machine;
111. P0DR - specific losses in the teeth region of the rotor laminations, at the
magnetic flux density B0 (pct.12) and frequency F (pct.54);
112. P0DS - specific losses in the teeth region of the stator laminations, at a
magnetic flux density B0 and frequency F;
22 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
113. P0JR - specific losses in the yoke region of the rotor laminations, at a
magnetic flux density B0 and frequency F;
114. P0JS - specific losses in the yoke region of the stator laminations, at a
magnetic flux density B0 and frequency.
115. QBL0 - for slip-ring rotors it is the cross-section area of the conductor of the
rotor winding. If the conductor consists of several wires in parallel,
the total component cross-section area is considered;
- for squirrel-cage rotors it is the cross-section area of the work bar;
116. QB10 - cross-section area of the conductor (or group of parallel conductors)
of the stator winding, considered on one winding path;
117. QIL0 - cross-section area of the work cage end ring;
118. Q1 - number of stator slots per pole and phase.
119. Q2. - for slip-ring rotors it is the number of rotor slots per pole and phase;
for squirrel cage rotors Q2 is:
Q2= NC2/(2*P*M1) (1.14)
120. RAN0 - initial value of the machine efficiency;
121. RINAB0 - initial value of RINAB-ratio between the radial and axial dimension
for the optimized end ring (IINEL=1). If IINEL=0 the program uses
RINAB0;
122. RO2 - electrical resistivity of the rotor winding material (of cage rotor bars,
if IR=1);
123. ROIL - for squirrel cage rotors (IR=1) it is the working cage end rings
material resistivity;
124. RO1 - electric resistivity for the stator winding material;
125. SB2 - for slip-ring rotors (IR=0) it is the number of turns of a rotor coil;
- for squirrel-cage rotor…SB2=1;
126. SIGMW1 - is the coefficient σw in the expression of the specific losses due to
eddy currents in the stator ferromagnetic core
- pFe= (σhf + σw f2Δ2 )B2, where f - frequency, Δ - lamination thickness
and B – magnetic flux density;
127. SIGMW2 - coefficient similarly to SIGMW1, but for the rotor core.
128. SIGM01 - is the air gap leakage coefficient for the stator winding:
Three-phase windings
for 0 ≤ε1 ≤ q
σ0 = π2·[5q2+1-3· ε12/2-ε1/(4q)+ε13/(4·q)]/(54 kb12·q2 )-1 (1.15)
Wire or multiple wires
Bar winding
for q≤ε1 ≤ 2q
σ0=π2 ·[5q2+1-(ε1-q)2-(2/3)·(ε1 –q)/q+2(ε1-q)3/(3q)-
-3q(ε1-q)]/(72kb12·q2 )-1 (1.16)
For single layer winding use ε1 =0.
Two-phase windings:
σ0=π2(4q2+2-3ε12-ε1/q+ε13/q)/(48kb12q2)-1 (1.17)
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 23
where kb1 is the winding factor (kb1 = kq1⋅ky1 for the fundamental; ε1-
winding pitch in slot number; q - number of slots per pole and phase).
Values for σ0 are indicated in the table below:
Figu
ure 1.8. Ring diimensions of sq
quirrel cage winnding
Integer Variables
NRM - number of iterations in the solution domain, if ZIS=1;
ZIRR - number of calculated variants;
COD - specified in 1.4.3.2point 1;
IR - specified in 1.4.3.2 point 47;
JJ - internal variable in subroutine CAR;
NSV - specified in 1.4.3.2 point 53;
STR - specified in 1.4.3.2 point 54;
STR2 - specified in 1.4.3.2. point 55;
Real Variables
ALFAI - pole pitch factor;
ALFAR - inverse of ALFAI;
A1 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 5;.
A2 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 6;
BB2 - ratio between the width of the trapezoidal rotor slot at the air gap and its
width at the bottom level of the conductor (used in permeance
calculation);
BDE - calculation air gap magnetic flux density;
BDEM - average value of BDE along pole pitch;
BEZ1H - magnetic flux density at stator tooth base;
BEZ10 - magnetic flux density in point P10 (figure 1.7) of the stator tooth;
BEZ2H - magnetic flux density at rotor tooth base;
BEZ20 - magnetic flux density in point P10 (figure 1.3) of the rotor tooth;
BJ1 - magnetic flux density in the neutral axis of the stator yoke;
BJ2 - magnetic flux density in the neutral axis of the rotor yoke;
BP1 - pulsation magnetic flux density in the stator slots;
BP2 - pulsation magnetic flux density in the rotor slots;
BR4 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 7;
BSV - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 10;
BS4 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 11;
BZ1H - width of the stator tooth at its base;
BZ1I - width of the stator tooth in point P10 (figure 1.7);
BZ2H - width of the rotor tooth at its base;
BZ2I - width of the rotor tooth in point P10 (figure 1.3);
B01 - length of the determined segment, through extension of the trapezoidal
slot walls, to the circle that passes through the ends of the teeth and has its
center on the axis of the machine (figure 1.7);
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 33
B02 - similar to B01, but for rotor slot (figure 1.3);
B1 - width of the stator slot at its base (figure 1.7);
B2 - width of the rotor slot at its base (figure 1.3);
CC2 - ratio of the losses in the rotor winding and the losses of both stator and
rotor windings Pcu2/(Pcu1 + Pcu2);
CF - ratio of the iron core losses and the sum of the losses in the iron core
losses and the losses in the windings PFe/(PFe + Pcu);
CFI - power factor at rated power;
COST - cost of active materials (core and windings);
CSI2 - calculation of height of the bar for the determination of the coefficients
for the modification of the resistance and leakage reactance due to the skin
effect in the case IR=1;
CT - ratio of the sum of the main losses in the ferromagnetic core and
windings and the total losses in the machine;
D - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 23;
DE - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 26;
DEX - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 36;
DIL - average diameter of the working cage end ring for the case of squirrel
cage rotors;
DIN - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 37;
F - stator frequency;
F1 - magnetic flux density pulsation frequency in the stator teeth;
F2 - magnetic flux density pulsation frequency in the rotor teeth;
G - mass of the active parts (core and windings);
GCU - mass of the machine windings;
GCUBL - mass of the rotor winding for the slip ring machine (IR=0); mass of the
working cage end ring for a squirrel cage rotor machine (IR=1);
GCUIL - mass of the working cage end rings (IR=1);
GCU1 - mass of the stator winding;
GFE - mass of the ferromagnetic core (stator and rotor);
GFE1 - mass of the stator ferromagnetic core;
GFE2 - mass of the rotor ferromagnetic core;
GJ1 - mass of the stator yoke;
GJ2 - mass of the rotor yoke;
GZ1 - mass of the stator teeth;
GZ2 - mass of the rotor teeth;
HHZ1 - average value of the magnetic voltage in the stator teeth;
HHZ2 - similar to HHZ1 but for the rotor;
HJ1 - height ( radial) of the stator yoke;
HJ2 - similar to HJ1 but for the rotor;
HR2 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 61;
HR3 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 62;
HR4 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 63;
HS2 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 64;
34 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
HS3 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 65;
HS4 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 66;
H1 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 67;
H2 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 68;
IBL - phase current in the rotor working cage;
IL - current in the rotor working cage end ring for IR=1;
IPD - primary current for locked rotor (s=1);
I0 - total machine current considered in the primary phase, at rated
conditions;
I0R - active component of current I0;
IOX - reactive component of current I0;
I1 - nominal/rated current in the primary phase;
I2 - nominal rotor phase current reduced to the primary;
JBL - density of rotor current for IR=0 and of the work cage bar for IR=1;
JIL - working end ring current density for IR=1;
J1 - current density in the primary winding;
KAPAF - form factor;
KDE - air gap factor (Carter);
KDE1 - stator air gap factor;
KDE2 - rotor air gap factor;
KEI - total transforming factor of the machine (kui = kiku);
KEN - factor accounting for the slot transversal magnetic field in the air duct;
KES - ratio between axial length of the laminations and the axial length of the
ferromagnetic core including air ducts;
KE1 - ratio between the axial length of the laminations (without air ducts) and
the ideal length of the machine;
K12 - current transformation ratio;
KR - coefficient for the modification of the rotor phase resistance at nominal
slip;
KRY - coefficient for the modification of the rotor resistance at the slip s=1;
KS - specified in 1.4.3.1. position 84;
KUEMTR - ratio between the cross-sectional area of the conducting material and the
area enclosed by the rotor slot insulation (=FUR);
KUEMTS - similar to KUEMTR, but for the stator slot;
KU2 - phase voltages transformation ratio of the machine;
KX - modification factor of the rotor leakage reactance at nominal slip;
KXY - modification factor of the rotor leakage reactance at s=1;
K1 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 86;
K1RR - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 88;
K2 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 90;
K2RR - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 92;
L - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 94;
MKDG - critical torque for operating as generator;
MKDM - maximum/critical/breakdown torque for operation as motor;
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 35
MN - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 96;
MP - start torque (s=1);
NC1 - number of stator slots;
NC2 - number of rotor slots;
N1 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 105;
N2 - number of turns per phase in the rotor;
PCU - machine winding losses;
PCU1 - stator winding losses;
PCU2 - rotor winding losses;
PFE - main iron losses;
PFEJ1 - main stator yoke losses;
PFEZ1 - main stator teeth losses;
PMEC - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 107;
PN - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 108;
PO1 - superficial losses in the stator teeth;
PO2 - superficial losses in the rotor teeth;
PP1 - pulsation losses in the stator teeth;
PP2 - pulsation losses in the rotor teeth;
PSUP - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 110;
QB=QBL - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 115;
QB1 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 116;
QIL - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 117;
R - electric resistance of the secondary phase reduced to the stator at
nominal slip;
RAN - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 120;
RM -real part of the magnetizingreactance ZM;
RP - secondary (rotor) electrical resistance reduced to the stator, for locked
rotor (s=1);
R1 - electrical resistance of the primary (stator) phase;
R1BN - primary (stator) phase electrical resistance corresponding only to the part
of the winding placed in the slot;
R1IN - primary (stator) phase electrical resistance corresponding to the end
windings;
R2BNL - secondary (rotor) phase electrical resistance, reduced to the stator,
corresponding to the part of the work cage located in the slot;
R2INL - secondary (rotor) phase electrical resistance, reduced to the stator,
corresponding to the part of the working cage located outside of the slot,
for the working cage;
SK - critical (break-down) slip;
SN - nominal slip (for torque MN);
TAU - polar pitch;
TAU1 - Heyland leakage factor;
TC1 - stator slot pitch;
TC2 - rotor slot pitch;
36 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
TETA - machine ampere-turns for nominal/rated power;
UE1 - EMF of the primary phase, at nominal power;
U1 - specified in 1.4.3.1. point 131;
VDE - air gap magneto motive force mmf at nominal power;
VJ1 - stator yoke magneto motive force mmf at nominal power;
VJ2 - rotor yoke magneto motive force mmf at nominal power;
VZ1 - stator teeth magneto motive force mmf at nominal power;
VZ2 - rotor teeth magneto motive force mmf at nominal power;
W - objective function specified in 1.4.3.2. position 1;
XM - magnetization circuit reactance considered in the stator;
XP - secondary leakage reactance, at start, reduced to the stator;
X1 - leakage reactance of the primary phase;
X2 - secondary leakage reactance, reduced to the stator, at nominal state of
operation;
ZALIN - electrical loading [ampere-turns/m] for rated steady-state operation;
0.,2915.,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500., For the stator - transversal
155800.,189700.,225200.,477500.,696000.,965000.,1.26D6,1.56D6, direction
1.84D6,2.096D6,2.312D6,2.496D6,2.65D6,2.79D6,2.91D6,3.02D6,
3.122D6,3.217D6,3.308D6,3.396D6,3.482D6,3.566D8,3.649D6,3.731D6
0.,2915.,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500., For the rotor - longitudinal
155800.,189700.,225200.,477500.,696000.,965000.,1.26D6,1.56D6, direction
1.84D6,2.096D6,2.312D6,2.496D6,2.65D6,2.79D6,2.91D6,3.02D6,
3.122D6,3.217D6,3.308D6,3.396D6,3.482D6,3.566D8,3.649D6,3.731D6
0.,2915.,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500., For the rotor - transversal
155800.,189700.,225200.,477500.,696000.,965000.,1.26D6,1.56D6, direction
1.84D6,2.096D6,2.312D6,2.496D6,2.65D6,2.79D6,2.91D6,3.02D6,
3.122D6,3.217D6,3.308D6,3.396D6,3.482D6,3.566D8,3.649D6,3.731D6
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 45
Magnetic flux density B in [T]
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
2.4,2.5,2.6,2.7,2.8,2.9,3.0,3.1,
3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5,3.6,3.7,3.8,3.9,
4.0,4.1,4.2,4.3,4.4,4.5,4.6,4.7,
1.4.9. Calculation of the coefficient SIGMW from the expression of the specific
losses in laminations due to eddy currents
The expression of the specific losses in laminations (per mass unit) is due to
the magnetic hysteresis and eddy currents that appear in the laminations; this
expression is:
pFe = σ h f ⋅ B α h + σ w (Δ Fe ⋅ f ) 2 B 2 (1.18)
where:σh is the hysteresis coefficient; f – frequency of the time variation of the
magnetic flux densityB; αh is an exponent depending on B; σw is the loss coefficient for
eddy currents losses; ΔFeis the thickness of the lamination. Usually, consider for αh the
value αh≅2; for a higher precision, αh can be determined through practical tests.
Usually, the laminations manufacturer gives the specific losses for 2 values of
the magnetic flux density (B1=1 T and B2=1.5 T) and for 2 frequencies (usually f1=50
Hzand f2=60 Hz) as well as the lamination thickness ΔFe. For the general case consider
2 thicknesses for the laminations Δ1 and Δ2, the material being the same. It is assumed
that, for a given material, following values are known p1, Δ1, f1, B1 and p2, Δ2, f2, B2.
Thus, the coefficients σh and σw can be determined. Following relationships exist:
α
p1 = σ h f1 B1 h + σ w (Δ1 f1 ) 2 B1
2 (1.19)
α 2
p2 = σ h f 2 B2 h + σ w (Δ 2 f 2 ) 2 B2
of which σh and σw can be determined as:
α α
p1 f 2 B2 h − p2 f1 B1 h
σw = 2 2 α 2 2 2 α 2
f1 f 2 (Δ1 f1 B2 h B1 − Δ 2 f 2 B1 h B2 )
(1.20)
p1 − σ w (Δ1B1 ) 2
σh = α
f1B1 h
where αh has been assumed as known. If it is unknown, it can be determined, providing
that 3 groups of values are known. The most convenient case is (p1, f1,Δ1, B1), (p2, f2,
Δ1, B1) and (p3, f1 , Δ1 , B2), that allow the determination of αh, σh and σw.
Using this relation, the program PHPW was writing with following structure:
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION(A-Z)
INTEGER I,IBF,IBI
DIMENSION B(25),P0(25)
READ(1,5)ALH,B0,B1,B2,DEL,DEL1,DEL2,F,F1,F2,P01,P02
5 FORMAT(D20.14)
READ(1,10)IBF,IBI
10 FORMAT(I10)
46 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
WRITE(2,15)ALH,B0,B1,B2,DEL,DEL1,DEL2,F,F1,F2,P01,P02
15 FORMAT(2X,'ALH =',D15.8/2X,'B0 =',D15.8/2X,'B1 =',D15.8/
12X,'B2 =',D15.8/2X,'DEL =',D15.8/2X,'DEL1=',D15.8/
12X,'DEL2=',D15.8/2X,'F =',D15.8/2X,'F1 =',D15.8/
12X,'F2 =',D15.8/2X,'P01 =',D15.8/2X,'P02 =',D15.8)
WRITE(2,20)IBF,IBI
20 FORMAT(2X,'IBF =',I3/2X,'IBI =',I3//)
SGW=(P01*F2*B2**ALH-P02*F1*B1**ALH)/(F1*DEL1**2*B1**(2-ALH)-
1F2*DEL2**2*B2**(2-ALH))/F1/F2/(B1*B2)**ALH
SGH=P01/F1/B1**ALH-SGW*F1*DEL1**2*B1**(2-ALH)
WRITE(2,25)F,SGH,SGW
25 FORMAT(4X,'F=',F4.1,2X,'SGH=',D14.8,2X,'SGW=',D14.8/)
DO35I=IBI,IBF
B(I)=.1D00*I
PH=SGH*F*B(I)**ALH
PW=SGW*(DEL*B(I))**2*F**2
P0(I)=PH+PW
WRITE(2,30)B(I),P0(I)
30 FORMAT(2X,'BI=',F4.1,3X,'P0(I)=',D15.8)
35 CONTINUE
STOP
END
Real data
2.332, 1. ALH
1., 2. B0 Integerdata; limits for the flux density
1., 3. B1 counterfor which, at frequency f1 , losses are
1., 4. B2 calculated
0.0005, 5. DEL 25, 13. IBF
0.0005, 6. DEL1 1, 14. IBI
0.0005, 7. DEL2
50., 8. F
50., 9. F1
60., 10. F2
1.25, 11. P01
1.5873, 12. P02
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 47
Output data
SGH= .17725000D-01 SGW= .58200000D+03 - coefficients σh and σw
BI= .1 P0(I)= .77637568D-02 |
BI= .2 P0(I)= .35325821D-01 | Loss graph for flux
BI= .3 P0(I)= .86218930D-01 | density from 0.1 T in 0.1
BI= .4 P0(I)= .16280686D+00 | T for a frequency of
BI= .5 P0(I)= .26695437D+00 | f=50 Hz corresponding to
BI= .6 P0(I)= .40023054D+00 | the flux density domain
BI= .7 P0(I)= .56400433D+00 | (0∼2.5 T).
BI= .8 P0(I)= .75949852D+00 |
BI= .9 P0(I)= .98782350D+00 |
BI= 1.0 P0(I)= .12500000D+01 |
BI= 1.1 P0(I)= .15469753D+01 |
BI= 1.2 P0(I)= .18796352D+01 |
BI= 1.3 P0(I)= .22488131D+01 |
BI= 1.4 P0(I)= .26552970D+01 |
BI= 1.5 P0(I)= .30998355D+01 |
BI= 1.6 P0(I)= .35831422D+01 |
BI= 1.7 P0(I)= .41058993D+01 |
BI= 1.8 P0(I)= .46687614D+01 |
BI= 1.9 P0(I)= .52723576D+01 |
BI= 2.0 P0(I)= .59172942D+01 |
BI= 2.1 P0(I)= .66041564D+01 |
BI= 2.2 P0(I)= .73335102D+01 |
BI= 2.3 P0(I)= .81059039D+01 |
BI= 2.4 P0(I)= .89218693D+01 |
BI= 2.5 P0(I)= .97819230D+01 |
For other frequencies, F is assigned the value of interest and the flux density
domain is set by the limits IBI and IBF, considering that the realflux density is
B=IB*0.1. The coefficient σhdepends on the flux densityB; in this case, for a more
precise calculation, the losses for the 2 frequencies have to be known also for
intermediary values of the magnetic flux densityB1 and B2.
I B MUR H I B MUR H
The input data file for computing the limits values of N1 are:
A1 - the number of current path in the phase;
DD - the initially value of the machine diameter;
EPS1 - shorting of the stator coil pitch (regarding to the pole pitch – in slots
number);
F - line voltage frequency;
LL - the initially reference values of the machine stator axially length;
M1 - the phase number of the stator winding;
P - the pole pair number of the stator winding;
PN0 - the rated power of the machine;
Q1 - the slots number per pole per phase in the stator;
U1 - the rated feed voltage;
IID - integer data, specified in 1.4.3.2, point 22;
IIL - similarly to IID, point 31;
STR - the winding layer number (integer data).
Using these data one obtains N1MI, N1MA. These values can be increasing,
or decreasing with 1 unit the number of turns per coil (to avoid the loose of good
solution).
Numerical example: The presented data are given in the input data file a (in
SI units)
b. The results
N1MI= 60. N1MA=140.
1.4 – User Guide/Operation Instruction of the Program INDARUPT 51
The data A1, M1, P, Q1 and STR are essentially for the values of N1 between
60 and 140. Outside that area are 50 and 150 that can be also tested.
1.4.12. The initially value of the squirrel cage ring cross section Qin
One assumes as known the values of following data:
Pn - the rated power;
U1 - the rated stator phase voltage;
F - the voltage frequency;
m1 - thestator phase number;
p - the pole pair number;
N1 - the turns number per statorphase;
Nc2 - the rotor slot number.
The counter IO defining the computing process obtains values depending upon
the slip S and the ratio DS according to relation IO=S/DS+1. So, the suitable values of
S corresponding to some standard regimes one can identifying. The file b1includes the
main data for rated power, maximum torque for generator and no-load, break-down
torque and starting for motor behavior
The output data fileb1(din \00CARTE\CARIND\CGM\CGMFF.)
Induction generator behavior
---------------------------
S=-.100000000D-03 I1= .112019586D+02 I01= .112036732D+02 COSFI=-.239074523D-01 RAN=.312533650D+00
M=-.139090842D+01 I2= .677742950D+00 UE1= .214912289D+03 PG =-.176754792D+03 IO = 0
.. .......................................
S=-.520000000D-02 I1= .368844604D+02 I01= .112818155D+02 COSFI=-.926148412D+00 RAN=.968245556D+00
M=-.724299814D+02 I2= .354884405D+02 UE1= .216411240D+03 PG =-.225459197D+05 IO =-51
... .......................................
S=-.386000000D-01 I1= .243386840D+03 I01= .104283753D+02 COSFI=-.839508329D+00 RAN=.887589897D+00
M=-.289677391D+03 I2= .243505366D+03 UE1= .200040289D+03 PG =-.134854684D+06 IO =-385
FUNCTION FKR(CS)
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-Z)
INTEGER I
COMMON/P10T/I
X=2.*CS
FKR=.5*X
IF(X.LE.10.) FKR=FKR*(DSINH(X)+DSIN(X))/(DCOSH(X)-DCOS(X))
RETURN
END
FUNCTION FKX(CS)
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-Z)
INTEGER I
COMMON/P10T/I
X=2.*CS
FKX=3./X
IF(X.LE.10.) FKX=FKX*(DSINH(X)-DSIN(X))/(DCOSH(X)-DCOS(X))
RETURN
END
FUNCTION FKAR(X)
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-Z)
FKAR=1.
1.5 – The Program INDARUPT 117
IF(DABS(X).GT.0.001)FKAR=.5*X*(DSINH(X)+DSIN(X))/(DCOSH(X)-
1DCOS(X))
RETURN
END
FUNCTION FKAX(X)
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-Z)
FKAX=1.
IF(DABS(X).GT.0.001)FKAX=3./X*(DSINH(X)-DSIN(X))/(DCOSH(X)-
1DCOS(X))
RETURN
END
SUBROUTINE HB(B,BP,H,KZ,K,T1,T2)
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-Z)
INTEGER I,J,K,N,T1,T2
DIMENSION BE(48),C1BH(48,6),C2BH(48,6),HH(48,6)
COMMON/P8CDH/BE,C1BH,C2BH,HH
COMMON/P10T/I
J=0
MU0=1.25663706143592D-6
DO 1 N=2,T1
1 IF(BP.GE.BE(N-1).AND.BP.LE.BE(N))J=N
IF(BP.GT.2.3)GOTO20
V2=C2BH(J,T2)
V1=C1BH(J,T2)
IF(K.NE.0)GOTO3
B=BP
GOTO15
3 BI=0.
FI=-BP
BF=BP
B=BF
FF=KZ*MU0*V1*B**V2
5 BM=(BF+BI)/2.
B=BM
FM=B-BP+MU0*KZ*V1*B**V2
IF(DABS(FM).LT.1.D-6.OR.BF-BI.LT.1.D-7)GOTO15
IF(FF*FM)10,10,13
10 BI=BM
FI=FM
GOTO5
13 BF=BM
FF=FM
GOTO5
15 H=V1*B**V2
GOTO45
20 CONTINUE
MUK=MU0*KZ
25 RAP=(BE(J)-BE(J-1))/(HH(J,T2)-HH(J-1,T2))
IF(K.EQ.0)H=HH(J-1,T2)+(BP-BE(J-1))/RAP
IF(K.EQ.0)GOTO45
B=BP-MUK*(BP-BE(J-1)+HH(J-1,T2)*RAP)/(MUK+RAP)
IF(BE(J-1).LE.B.AND.B.LE.BE(J))H=(BP-B)/MUK
118 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
IF(B-BE(J-1))30,35,40
30 J=J-1
GOTO25
35 B=BE(J-1)
H=HH(J-1,T2)
GOTO45
40 H=(BP-B)/MUK
45 CONTINUE
RETURN
END
SUBROUTINE OPTIM
IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (A-Z)
INTEGER I,IBZ1,IBZ1O,IBZ2,IBZ2O,ID,IDEX,IDEXO,IDIN,IDINO,IDO,
1IJI,IJIO,IQB1,IQB1O,IQB2,IQB2O,ILA,ILAO,INEL,INELO,ISB1,ISB1O
COMMON/P10T/I
COMMON/P11CO/IBZ1,IBZ2,ID,IDEX,IDIN,IJI,IQB1,IQB2,ILA,INEL,ISB1,
1I1O,CFI,CFII,CFIIO,CFINN,CFIO,KS,KST,RAN,SN,WA,WO,WOO,WY
COMMON/P14COMS/B01O,B02O,B1O,B2O,BZ1O,BZ2O,CFIYYO,DDO,DEXO,DINO,
1H1O,H2O,J1O,J2O,JIO,KSO,LO,N1O,QB1O,QBLO,QILO,RANO,RINABO,SNO,
1IBZ1O,IBZ2O,IDEXO,IDINO,IDO,IQB1O,IQB2O,IJIO,ILAO,INELO,ISB1O
WO=WO
CFIIO=CFII
CFIO=CFINN
IBZ1O=IBZ1
IBZ2O=IBZ2
IDEXO=IDEX
IDINO=IDIN
IDO=ID
IJIO=IJI
IJQBO=IQB1
IJQBO=IQB2
ILAO=ILA
INELO=INEL
ISB1O=ISB1
WA=WO
WO=WY
RETURN
END
1IR,KDR,KDS,L1,L2,MR,NSV,STR,STR2,TH,T1,ZIPR0,ZIS,ZIT,ZIV,ZIY,ZIZ,
1ZJ,ZJC,ZZB,ZZC,ZZDF,ZZDI,ZZK,ZZL,ZZM,ZZO,ZZR,ZZT
10 FORMAT(I10)
READ(1,15)(HH(J,1),J=1,24),(HH(J,2),J=1,24),(HH(J,4),J=1,24),
1(HH(J,5),J=1,24)
READ(1,15)(BE(J),J=1,24)
15 FORMAT(8F15.2/8F15.2/8F15.2)
DATA CBH/1.66,1.66,1.66,1.66,1.66,1.663,1.667,
11.672,1.678,1.685,1.693,1.73,1.78,1.84,1.91,2.00,2.1,2.2,2.33,
12.476,2.646,2.84,3.06,3.308,3.587,3.898,4.244,4.628,5.051,
15.517,6.027,6.584,7.191,7.851,8.567,9.34,10.175,11.073,12.04,
113.074,14.183,15.367,16.631,17.978,19.411,20.932,22.547,24.257/
BE1=BE(20)
BE2=BE(21)
DBE=BE1-BE2
HH11=HH(20,1)
HH12=HH(21,1)
HH21=HH(20,2)
HH22=HH(21,2)
HH41=HH(20,4)
HH42=HH(21,4)
HH51=HH(20,5)
HH52=HH(21,5)
MU11=BE1/MU0/HH11
MU12=BE2/MU0/HH12
AL1=(DLOG(MU11-1)-DLOG(MU12-1))/DBE
BL1=DLOG(MU11-1)-AL1*BE1
MU21=BE1/MU0/HH21
MU22=BE2/MU0/HH22
AL2=(DLOG(MU21-1)-DLOG(MU22-1))/DBE
BL2=DLOG(MU21-1)-AL2*BE1
MU41=BE1/MU0/HH41
MU42=BE2/MU0/HH42
AL4=(DLOG(MU41-1)-DLOG(MU42-1))/DBE
BL4=DLOG(MU41-1)-AL4*BE1
MU51=BE1/MU0/HH51
MU52=BE2/MU0/HH52
AL5=(DLOG(MU51-1)-DLOG(MU52-1))/DBE
BL5=DLOG(MU51-1)-AL5*BE1
DO70J=22,48
BE(J)=.1*(J-1)
MURR(J,1)=1.+E**(BE(J)*AL1+BL1)
1.5 – The Program INDARUPT 121
HH(J,1)=BE(J)/MU0/MURR(J,1)
MURR(J,2)=1.+E**(BE(J)*AL2+BL2)
HH(J,2)=BE(J)/MU0/MURR(J,2)
MURR(J,4)=1.+E**(BE(J)*AL4+BL4)
HH(J,4)=BE(J)/MU0/MURR(J,4)
MURR(J,5)=1.+E**(BE(J)*AL1+BL1)
HH(J,5)=BE(J)/MU0/MURR(J,5)
70 CONTINUE
DO20J=1,T1
HH(J,3)=HH(J,2)/CBH(J)/(1.+.025D00*DFLOAT(J)*ZCBH1)
20 HH(J,6)=HH(J,5)/CBH(J)/(1.+.025D00*DFLOAT(J)*ZCBH2)
DH=0.
IF(IMD.EQ.0)GOTO35
WRITE(12,25)(BE(J),J=1,12),(HH(J,1),J=1,12),(HH(J,2),J=1,12),
1(HH(J,4),J=1,12),(HH(J,5),J=1,12),(CBH(J),J=1,12)
WRITE(12,25)(BE(J),J=13,24),(HH(J,1),J=13,24),(HH(J,2),J=13,24),
1(HH(J,4),J=13,24),(HH(J,5),J=13,24),(CBH(J),J=13,24)
25 FORMAT(2X,'BE=',6X,12F10.2,/2X,'HH(J,1)=',1X,12F10.2/2X,
1'HH(J,2)=',1X,12F10.2/2X,'HH(J,4)=',1X,12F10.2/2X,'HH(J,5)=',1X,
112F10.2/2X,'CBH=',6X,12F10.3/)
30 FORMAT(2X,'BE=',6X,12F10.2,/2X,'HH(J,1)=',1X,12F10.1/2X,
1'HH(J,2)=',1X,12F10.1/2X,'HH(J,4)=',1X,12F10.1/2X,'HH(J,5)=',1X,
112F10.1/2X,'CBH=',7X,12F10.3/)
35 CONTINUE
BDEMA=0.900
BDEMI=0.2D00
J1MA=10.D6
J1MI=2.D6
J2MA=10.D6
J2MI=2.D6
KBJ1MA=7.
KBJ2MA=7.
WRITE(12,40)
1AA,AIZCB,AS,ASR,A1,A2,BR4,BS,BSR,BSV,BS4,B0,BZ10,BZ20,CFI0,CX2I,
1C01N,C02N,C1NN,C1SN,C2NN,C2SN
WRITE(12,45)
1D0,DBZ10,DBZ20,DE,DEIZC1,DEIZC2,DELBL,DELD0,DELFE,DELH,DELL0,
1DELTR,DELTS,DEX0,DIN0,DIZ1,DIZ2,DJIJL0,DQB10,DQBL0,DJDEX0,DJDIN0,
1DQI,DRIL,DRNAB0,DS10,DS20,DS30,DURATA,EPS1,EPS2,F,FUR,FUS,
1GACUBL,GACUIL,GAMCU1,GAMFE,HR2,HR3,HR4,HS2
WRITE(12,50)
1HS3,HS4,H10,H20,IC,JI0,J10,J20,KCBR,KCBS,KE,KIP0,
1KMK0,KMP0,KO,KPJ,KPZ,KQ1,KQ2,KS0,KW,K1,K1R,K1RR
WRITE(12,55)
1K1S,K2,K2R,K2RR,K2S,L0,
1LAMDA0,MN,M1,M2,NCUBL,NCUIL,NCU1,NFE1,NFE2,NKWH,N1,P,PMEC,PN0,POP,
1PSUP,P0DR,P0DS,P0JR,P0JS,QBL0,QB10,QIL0,Q1,Q2,RAN0,RINAB0,RO2,
1ROIL,RO1
WRITE(12,60)
1SB2,SIGMW1,SIGMW2,SIGM01,SIGM02,SN0,U1,V01,
1V02,ZALIMA,ZB,ZCBH1,ZCBH2,ZCOL,ZH
40 FORMAT(//,
12X,'AA =',D12.6,3X,'AIZCB =',D12.6,3X,'AS =',D12.6,
13X,'ASR =',D12.6,3X,'A1 =',D12.6,3X,'A2 =',D12.6/
122 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
12X,'BR4 =',D12.6,3X,'BS =',D12.6,3X,'BSR =',D12.6,
13X,'BSV =',D12.6,3X,'BS4 =',D12.6,3X,'B0 =',D12.6/
12X,'BZ10 =',D12.6,3X,'BZ20 =',D12.6,3X,'CBH1 =',D12.6,
13X,'CBH2 =',D12.6,3X,'CFI0 =',D12.6,3X,'CX2I =',D12.6/
12X,'C01N =',D12.6,3X,'C02N =',D12.6,3X,'C1NN =',D12.6,
13X,'C1SN =',D12.6,3X,'C2NN =',D12.6,3X,'C2SN =',D12.6)
45 FORMAT(
12X,'D0 =',D12.6,3X,'DBZ10 =',D12.6,3X,'DBZ20 =',D12.6,
13X,'DE =',D12.6,3X,'DEIZC1=',D12.6,3X,'DEIZC2=',D12.6/
12X,'DELBL =',D12.6,3X,'DELD0 =',D12.6,3X,'DELFE =',D12.6,
13X,'DELH =',D12.6,3X,'DELL0 =',D12.6,3X,'DELTR =',D12.6/
12X,'DELTS =',D12.6,3X,'DEX =',D12.6,3X,'DIN =',D12.6,
13X,'DIZ1 =',D12.6,3X,'DIZ2 =',D12.6,3X,'DJIJL0=',D12.6/
12X,'DQB10 =',D12.6,3X,'DQBL0 =',D12.6,3X,'DJDEX =',D12.6,
13X,'DJDIN =',D12.6,3X,'DQI =',D12.6,3X,'DRIL =',D12.6/
12X,'DRNAB0=',D12.6,3X,'DS1 =',D12.6,3X,'DS2 =',D12.6,
13X,'DS3 =',D12.6,3X,'DURATA=',D12.6,3X,'EPS1 =',D12.6/
12X,'EPS2 =',D12.6,3X,'F =',D12.6,3X,'FUR =',D12.6,
13X,'FUS =',D12.6,3X,'GACUBL=',D12.6,3X,'GACUIL=',D12.6/
12X,'GAMCU1=',D12.6,3X,'GAMFE =',D12.6,3X,'HR2 =',D12.6,
13X,'HR3 =',D12.6,3X,'HR4 =',D12.6,3X,'HS2 =',D12.6)
50 FORMAT(
12X,'HS3 =',D12.6,3X,'HS4 =',D12.6,3X,'H1 =',D12.6,
13X,'H2 =',D12.6,3X,'IC =',D12.6,3X,'JI0 =',D12.6/
12X,'J10 =',D12.6,3X,'J20 =',D12.6,3X,'KCBR =',D12.6,
13X,'KCBS =',D12.6,3X,'KE =',D12.6,3X,'KIP0 =',D12.6/
12X,'KMK0 =',D12.6,3X,'KMP0 =',D12.6,3X,'KO =',D12.6,
13X,'KPJ =',D12.6,3X,'KPZ =',D12.6,3X,'KQ1 =',D12.6/
12X,'KQ2 =',D12.6,3X,'KS0 =',D12.6,3X,'KW =',D12.6,
13X,'K1 =',D12.6,3X,'K1R =',D12.6,3X,'K1RR =',D12.6)
55 FORMAT(
12X,'K1S =',D12.6,3X,'K2 =',D12.6,3X,'K2R =',D12.6,
13X,'K2RR =',D12.6,3X,'K2S =',D12.6,3X,'L =',D12.6/
12X,'LAMDA0=',D12.6,3X,'MN =',D12.6,3X,'M1 =',D12.6,
13X,'M2 =',D12.6,3X,'NCUBL =',D12.6,3X,'NCUIL =',D12.6/
12X,'NCU1 =',D12.6,3X,'NFE1 =',D12.6,3X,'NFE2 =',D12.6,
13X,'NKWH =',D12.6,3X,'N1 =',D12.6,3X,'P =',D12.6/
12X,'PMEC =',D12.6,3X,'PN0 =',D12.6,3X,'POP =',D12.6,
13X,'BSUP =',D12.6,3X,'P0DR =',D12.6,3X,'P0DS =',D12.6/
12X,'P0JR =',D12.6,3X,'P0JS =',D12.6,3X,'QBL =',D12.6,
13X,'QB10 =',D12.6,3X,'QIL0 =',D12.6,3X,'Q1 =',D12.6/
12X,'Q2 =',D12.6,3X,'RAN0 =',D12.6,3X,'RINAB0=',D12.6,
13X,'RO2 =',D12.6,3X,'ROIL =',D12.6,3X,'RO1 =',D12.6)
60 FORMAT(
12X,'SB2 =',D12.6,3X,'SIGMW1=',D12.6,3X,'SIGMW2=',D12.6,
13X,'SIGM01=',D12.6,3X,'SIGM02=',D12.6,3X,'SN =',D12.6/
12X,'U1 =',D12.6,3X,'V01 =',D12.6,3X,'V02 =',D12.6,
13X,'ZALIMA=',D12.6,3X,'ZB =',D12.6,3X,'ZCBH1 =',D12.6/
12X,'ZCBH2 =',D12.6,3X,'ZCOL =',D12.6,3X,'ZH =',D12.6)
WRITE(12,65)
1COD,I,I01,I02,I03,I04,I05,IBZ1F,IBZ1I,IBZ2F,IBZ2I,IC1,IC2,IDEXF,
1IDEXI,IDF,IDI,IDINF,IDINI,IIBZ1,IIBZ2,IID,IIDEX,IIDIN,IIH1,
1IIH2,IIIP,IIJI,IIQB1,IIQB2,IIL,IIMK,IIMP,IINEL,IJIF,IJII,
1IQB1F,IQB1I,IQB2F,IQB2I,ILAF,ILAI,IMD,INELF,INELI,IORA,IR,
1.5 – The Program INDARUPT 123
1KDR,KDS,L1,L2,MR,NSV,STR,STR2,TH,T1,ZIPR0,ZIS,ZIT,ZIV,
1ZIY,ZIZ,ZJ,ZJC,ZZB,ZZC,ZZDF,ZZDI,ZZK,ZZL,ZZM,ZZO,
1ZZR,ZZT
65 FORMAT(
1 2X,'COD =',I5,10X,'I =',I5,10X,'I01 =',I5,
110X,'I02 =',I5,10X,'I03 =',I5,10X,'I04 =',I5/
1 2X,'I05 =',I5,10X,'IBZ1F =',I5,10X,'IBZ1I =',I5,
110X,'IBZ2F =',I5,10X,'IBZ2I =',I5,10X,'IC1 =',I5/
1 2X,'IC2 =',I5,10X,'IDEXF =',I5,10X,'IDEXI =',I5,
110X,'IDF =',I5,10X,'IDI =',I5,10X,'IDINF =',I5/
1 2X,'IDNI =',I5,10X,'IIBZ1 =',I5,10X,'IIBZ2 =',I5,
110X,'IID =',I5,10X,'IIDEX =',I5,10X,'IIDIN =',I5/
1 2X,'IIH1 =',I5,10X,'IIH2 =',I5,10X,'IIIP =',I5,
110X,'IIJI =',I5,10X,'IIQB1 =',I5,10X,'IIQB2 =',I5/
1 2X,'IIL =',I5,10X,'IIMK =',I5,10X,'IIMP =',I5,
110X,'IINEL =',I5,10X,'IJIF =',I5,10X,'IJII =',I5/
1 2X,'IQB1F =',I5,10X,'IQB1I =',I5,10X,'IQB2F =',I5,
110X,'IQB2I =',I5,10X,'ILAF =',I5,10X,'ILAI =',I5/
1 2X,'IMD =',I5,10X,'INELF =',I5,10X,'INELI =',I5,
110X,'IORA =',I5,10X,'IR =',I5,10X,'KDR =',I5/
1 2X,'KDS =',I5,10X,'L1 =',I5,10X,'L2 =',I5,
110X,'MR =',I5,10X,'NSV =',I5,10X,'STR =',I5/
1 2X,'STR2 =',I5,10X,'TH =',I5,10X,'T1 =',I5,
110X,'ZIPR0 =',I5,10X,'ZIS =',I5,10X,'ZIT =',I5/
1 2X,'ZIV =',I5,10X,'ZIY =',I5,10X,'ZIZ =',I5,
110X,'ZJ =',I5,10X,'ZJC =',I5,10X,'ZZB =',I5/
1 2X,'ZZC =',I5,10X,'ZZDF =',I5,10X,'ZZDI =',I5,
110X,'ZZK =',I5,10X,'ZZL =',I5,10X,'ZZM =',I5/
1 2X,'ZZO =',I5,10X,'ZZR =',I5,10X,'ZZT =',I5)
ROB01=10.
ROB02=ROB01
ROB03=ROB01
ROB04=ROB01
ROB05=ROB01
ROB06=ROB01
ROB07=ROB01
ROB08=ROB01
ROB09=RO2
ROB10=ROB02
ROB11=ROB01
IF(IR.EQ.-1)ROB11=ROB09
ROB12=ROB01
IF(IR.EQ.-1)ROB12=ROB09
IR=IR**2
DS1=DABS(DS10)
DS2=DABS(DS20)
DS3=DABS(DS30)
RETURN
END
From the source program “ .FOR” one obtains the “ .EXE” file. The program
running demand the files as follows (see point 1.4.8.5): a - the input data file; b - for
124 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
verifying the input data file; c- the data for defining the area of the optimum solution; d
-the final results (this file is open and closed during the running process).
On the computer display are presented a few significant data from the files a
and d. The program uses also 3 files: o - for the optimum solution find after
investigation of a searching path; f - contains the results after using a linear method
optimization (ZIS=2); e contains the results defining the whole optimization process.
The machine core is made from steel lamination V30.50A with 1.25 W/kg at
50 Hz and 1 T.
The optimization process is considered with ZIS=3:
– one begins with linear optimization (ZIS=2) for the whole area of existing
solutions;
– one chooses 100 searching path (the step between two path is 0.01), with the
parameter (efficiency*power factor). Because one reduces the parameter, the ratio
is negative (-0.01). In the practical cases, it not necessary to decreases this
parameter below 0.15.After every searching path, one type the solution in the file
c;
– after the linear optimization, the obtained solution is considered as starting point
for the grid method optimization (ZIS=1), until the final optimum solution is
gained.
One chooses: a two layer winding for both stator and rotor part; Q1=5 slots per
pole and phase for stator and Q2=4 slots per pole and phase for the rotor; SB2=4 turns
per rotor coil; semi-closed trapezoidal slots.
According to point 1.4.3 the input file data is:
The input data – file a (on CD\22kW\A0221100)
0.0025, 1. AA 0., 3. AS
0.001, 2. AIZCB 0., 4. ASR
1.6 – Numerical examples 125
1., 5. A1 8890., 59. GAMCU1
1., 6. A2 7800., 60. GAMFE
0.0035, 7. BR4 0.001, 61. HR2
0., 8 .BS 0.0025, 62. HR3
0., 9. BSR 0.0005, 63. HR4
0., 10. BSV 0.0008, 64. HS2
0.004, 11. BS4 0.0025, 65. HS3
1., 12. B0 0.0008, 66. HS4
0., 13. BZ10 0., 67. H10
0., 14. BZ20 0., 68. H20
1.0, 15. CFI 0., 69. IC
0.9, 16. CX2I 0., 70. JI
0.1, 17. C01N 4.D6, 71. J1
0.1, 18. C02N 4.D6, 72. J2
0.1, 19. C1NN 1.1, 73. KCBR
0.1, 20. C1SN 1.1, 74. KCBS
0.1, 21. C2NN 0.92, 75. KE
0.1, 22. C2SN 0., 76. KIP0
0., 23. D0 0., 77. KMK0
0.0001, 24. DBZ1 0., 78. KMP0
0.0001, 25. DBZ2 1156.5, 79. KO
0.00065, 26. DE 1.7, 80. KPJ
0.0005, 27. DEIZC1 1.8, 81. KPZ
0.0005, 28. DEIZC2 0., 82. KQ1
0., 29. DELBL 0., 83. KQ2
-0.15, 30. DELD0 0.34, 84. KS
0.0005, 31. DELFE 1., 85. KW
100., 32. DELH 1.8333, 86. K1
-0.15, 33. DELL0 0.82, 87. K1R
1.d-3, 34. DELTR 1.8, 88. K1RR
1.D-3, 35. DELTS 0.643, 89. K1S
0., 36. DEX0 0.1, 90. K2
0.042,, 37. DIN0 1., 91. K2R
0.01, 38. DIZ1 0.08, 92. K2RR
0.01, 39. DIZ2 0.843, 93. K2S
-0.15, 40. DJDEX0 0., 94. L
0., 41. DJDIN 2., 95. LAMDA0
0., 42. DJIJL0 72.37, 96. MN
-0.15, 43. DQB10 3., 97. M1
-0.15, 44. DQBL0 3., 98. M2
0., 45. DQI 10., 99. NCUBL
0., 46. DRIL 10., 100. NCUIL
0., 47. DRNAB0 10., 101. NCU1
0.0001, 48. DS1 5., 102. NFE1
0.001, 49. DS2 5., 103. NFE2
0.1, 50. DS3 1.D-4, 104. NKWH
15000., 51. DURATA 60., 105. N1
4., 52. EPS1 1., 106. P
0., 53. EPS2 260., 107. PMEC
50., 54. F 22000., 108. PN
0.65, 55. FUR 60., 109. POP
0.65 , 56. FUS 60., 110. PSUP
8890., 57. GACUBL 1.25, 111. P0DR
8890., 58. GACUIL 1.25, 112. P0DS
126 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
1.25, 113. P0JR 1, 25. IIH1
1.25, 114. P0JS 1, 26. IIH2
0., 115. QBL 0, 27. IIIP
0., 116. QB1 0, 28. IIJI
0., 117. QIL0 2, 29. IIQB1
5., 118. Q1 2, 30. IIQB2
4., 119. Q2 2, 31. IIL
0., 120. RAN 0, 32. IIMK
0., 121. RINAB0 0, 33. IIMP
2.16D-8, 122. RO2 0, 34. IINEL
0., 123. ROIL 0, 35. IJIF
2.16D-8, 124. RO1 0, 36. IJII
4., 125. SB2 0, 37. IQB1F
582., 126. SIGMW1 0, 38. IQB1I
582., 127. SIGMW2 0, 39. IQB2F
0.0089, 128. SIGM01 0, 40. IQB2I
0.004873, 129. SIGM02 0, 41. ILAF
0., 130. SN 0, 42. ILAI
220., 131. U1 0, 43. IMD
0.0008, 132. V01 0, 44. INELF
0.0008, 133. V02 0, 45. INELI
50000., 134. ZALIMA 1, 46. IORA
0.00445, 135. ZB 0, 47. IR
1., 136. ZCBH1 0, 48. KDR
1., 137. ZCBH2 0, 49. KDS
0., 138. ZCOL 815, 50. L1
15.D-3, 139. ZH 825, 51. L2
3, 1. COD 500, 52. MR
1, 2. I 0, 53. NSV
10000, 3. I01 2, 54. STR
1040, 4. I02 2, 55. STR2
1, 5. I03 0, 56. TH
985, 6. I04 48, 57. T1
0, 7. I05 13, 58. ZIP
0, 8. IBZ1F 3,2, 59. ZIS
0, 9. IBZ1I 20, 60. ZIT
0, 10. IBZ2F 0, 61. ZIV
0, 11. IBZ2I 0, 62. ZIY
1, 12. IC1 1, 63. ZIZ
1, 13. IC2 250000, 64. ZJ
0, 14. IDEXF 0, 65. ZJC
0, 15. IDEXI 1, 66. ZZB
0, 16. IDF 1, 67. ZZC
0, 17. IDI 20, 68. ZZDF
0, 18. IDINF 100, 69. ZZDI
0, 19. IDINI 1, 70. ZZK
2, 20. IIBZ1 100, 71. ZZL
2, 21. IIBZ2 1, 72. ZZM
2, 22. IID 100, 73. ZZQ
2, 23. IIDEX 2, 74. ZZR
0, 24. IIDIN 1, 75. ZZT
1.6 – Numerical examples 127
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
C Magnetizing curve for the laminations V310-50A with 1.25W/kg at 1T and 50Hz.
C For Aluminum one consider:RO=4.3d-8.
The results after the linear optimization procedure are presented in the file c as
follows:
The minimum value of W is obtained for ZZD=48, when W=3222.62 (file c).
If ZIS=3, one optimizes the machine using the linear method, with the starting
reference values for the variable data ⊗ 00. The process continues with ZIS=1, and the
results are typewritten in the file d.
In this file are given all machine data demanded for machine manufacturing.
Selected data from file d and a are presented in the file e.
The files d and e are presented below:
The file d (on CD\22kW\D0221100)
F I N A L VALUES
=============================
BJ2 BP1 BP2 BR4 BSV BS4 BZ1H BZ1I BZ2H BZ2I
.16329D+01 .70873D-01 .81606D-01 .35000D-02 .00000D+00 .40000D-02 .60517D-02 .60517D-02 .64186D-02 .62940D-02
GCUBP GCUIL GCUIP GCU1 GFE GFE1 GFE2 GJ1 GJ2 GZ1
.00000D+00 .00000D+00 .00000D+00 .38970D+02 .78188D+02 .59547D+02 .18640D+02 .51150D+02 .10594D+02 .83975D+01
GZ2 HHZ1 HHZ2 HJ1 HJ2 HR2 HR3 HR4 HS2 HS3
.80465D+01 .15644D+04 .74435D+04 .41287D-01 .31611D-01 .10000D-02 .25000D-02 .50000D-03 .80000D-03 .25000D-02
1.6 – Numerical examples 129
HS4 H1 H2 IBL IBP IL IIP IPD I0 IOR
.80000D-03 .28993D-01 .33160D-01 .00000D+00 .00000D+00 .00000D+00 .00000D+00 .34114D+03 .10566D+02 .34404D+00
TIP1= 0 N1= 60. NNM= 40 ZJ= 250000 ZIRR= 105425 ZIRRA= 104276
TIMI= 9;11;27,39
TIMF= 9;15; 5,17
Using the grid method one finds a cheaper machine (with 172.01) and having
WF=3045.0138. That means that the machine obtained by linear optimization is more
expensive with 5.65 %. The obtained optimum solution was find after ZIRR=105425
analyzed solutions. Realistic manufacturing solution are ZIRRA=104276. The range of
the optimum solution is ZIRRF=102173. For a computer with 3 GHz the running time
130 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
is 3 minutesand 38 seconds. For the grid optimization procedure, the area of the
existing solutions was investigated NNM=40 times corresponding to an error
ERAB=10-4. The variation of the criterion data WF depending upon ZZD is shown in
Fig. 1.10.
For the linear optimization, beginning with ZZD=100, W decreases with ZZD
decreasing; the minimum value is for ZZD=48,corresponding to M2 (see Fig. 1.10)
The optimization continues using the grid method; the results are presented in
the file d, corresponding to a value of CFIE·RANE=0.924607·0.942431=0.87137, very
closed of ZZD=87, but bigger(with 0.137).
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
1.6 – Numerical examples 133
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
C Magnetizing curve V310-50A with 1.25W/kg at 1T and 50Hz.
C For Aluminum: RO=4.3d-8
The results are presented in the files ac, cc, dc. An abstract of results are
presented in the file ec:
The file ec (on CD\22kW\EC211100)
TIP1= 0 N1= 60. NNM= 53 ZJ= 250000 ZIRR= 134952 ZIRRA= 134219
TIMI= 8;17;43,93
TIMF= 8;28;25,40
As expected, for the squirrel cage machine it was obtained a lower value of W
and a better efficiency (0.84 %), in comparison with the slip ring machine obtained in
the previous example.
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
136 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
C Magnetizing curve V310-50A with 1.25W/kg at 1T and 50Hz.
C For Aluminum:RO=4.3d-8.
The calculus is made as in the previous example. The file cl211100 contains
the results defining the area of the existing solution. The file dl211100 contains the
final results and the file el211100 contains significates information from the output
files al and dl. The file el is:
The file el (on CD\22kW\EL211100)
TIP1= 0 N1= 60. NNM= 48 ZJ= 250000 ZIRR= 123957 ZIRRA= 123055
TIMI= 8;46;28,12
TIMF= 8;57;30,25
From the files ac, al, dc, dl, ec and el one obtains the main data presented in table 1.2.
Tabelul 1.2
⊗ D L QB1 BZ1 DEX QBL BZ2
Cu .151213 .181932 19.0788D-6 6.36780D-3 .304855 135.918D-6 6.54490D-6
Al .164960 .190078 19.3286D-6 6.09683D-3 .319101 233.198D-6 6.33822D-6
1.6 – Numerical examples 137
⊗ COST WF
Cu 791.59 2507.7842
Al 793.33 2674.6482
As expected, the motor with squirrel cage from aluminum has W bigger with
166,864 units, the outer stator diameter bigger with 1.426 cm and the length bigger
with 8.146 mm, than the motor with squirrel cage made from copper.
The high voltage demands to manufacture the coils with special insulation. The
both stator and rotor slots are rectangular shaped, but open for the stator and semi-
closed for the rotor.
The assumed machine data are: BR4=0.005 m; Q1=3; EPS1=1; Q2=2; SB2=1.
One obtains Nc2=2pq2m2=2·16·2·3=192 slots (64 per rotor phase); with 1 conductor per
coil (SB2=1) results N2=64. For technological reason, one choose BR4=0.005 m. The
input data file a is:
The input data – file a (on CD\1000kW\A0220010)
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
140 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
C Magnetizing curve V310-50A with 1.25W/kg at 1T and 50Hz.
C For Aluminum: RO=4.3d-8.
The table defining the area of existing solution (filec) and that corresponding
to the final results are given in the attached CD. A few significant results are presented
in the file e.
File e (on CD\1000kW\E0220010)
TIMI=11;58;12,93
TIMF=11;58;39,10
For the active part of the machine COST=84631.94, and with the losses for
100000 hours, results WF=388628.21.
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
1.6 – Numerical examples 143
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
C Magnetizing curve V310-50A with 1.25W/kg at 1T and 50Hz.
C For Aluminum: RO=4.3d-8.
The results are presented in the files on CD. The file e is:
File e (on CD\1000kW\E1210110)
TIMI=10;55;59,67
TIMF=11;25;39,39
It was considered an error of 10-4. The area of the existing solutions was
investigated using the grid method 59 times(NNM=59), providing ZIRR=411277
solutions. The optimum solution is that labeled ZIRRF=399380, having
COST=68861.44 and WF=339004.59.
2. The influence of the machine lifetime on the optimum solution. An assumed error of
10-2is a realistic one.One reduces the rotor slot opening from 5 mm to 2.5 mm. One
investigates the values of the machine lifetimeof 104, 2·104, 4·104, 6·104, 8·104, 105
hours. All the input data files are given on the attached CD (file a, c, d, e).The
significant data from the final results (from the file e) are presented in table 1.3 (for
instance e8 in table 1.3 means that lifetime is 8•104). The parameters CFI, RAN, COST
and W, depending upon the machine lifetime are presented in Fig. 11 a, b, c. The
machine COST, CFIand RAN increases with the machine lifetime increase.
144 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
a)
b)
c)
Fig.1.11 The influence of the lifetime TR (hours) on the: a) CFI, b) RAN, c) COST and WFTR
1.6 – Numerical examples 145
Because the core and the windings are recyclable materials it is reasonable to
consider as long as possible the machine lifetime
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.,29.15,58.3,87.45,116.6,145.7,174.9,206.2,
242.9,292.8,363.8,504.6,701.7,996.9,1548.,2700.,
5000.,10000.,17960.,30330.,46390.,67910.,94380.,123500.,
0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,
0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,
1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3,
C Magnetizing curve V310-50A with 1.25W/kg at 1T and 50Hz.
C For Aluminum: RO=4.3d-8.
One uses the general optimization method when the limits of ZZD are
ZZDI=100 and ZZDF=20. The results are presented in files c1 and d1 on the attached
CD. The file e1 is:
File e1 (on CD\120kW\E1)
DDE= .295192D+00 LLE= .450000D+00 QB1E= .355864D-04 BZ1E= .603185D-02
TIP1= 30 N1= 80. NNM= 28 ZJ= 250000 ZIRR= 17049 ZIRRA= 10541
TIMI=12;54;53,67
TIMF=12;56;16,12
1.7. Conclusions
Induction machines are the simplest, most robust, operation safe and least
costly machines, their combination with variable frequency converters may satisfy,
practically, any dynamic requirement. Therefore, they are the most widely used
machines. Their operational life is comparable to the life of their components,
estimated to extend over 20 ~ 40 years. Even if these machines are highly efficient,
their efficiency can be further increased such that the difference between total costs of
a normal present machine and that of an optimized machine, taking into account the
life-span, could cover several times the cost of its component materials. This is one of
the main reasons to consider the transformation of electromechanical in heat via losses,
when a portion of it could be saved from dissipation into the environment, as
inadmissible.
The promotion of energy optimized machines is somehow hindered by the
fact that the manufacturer and the final user of the machines, the consumers, have
distinct interests, linked to society structure. The manufacturers are interested to keep
manufacturing costs as low as possible to allow them to sell, taking into account
competition, as many products as possible. While consumers are interested to buy at
the lowest cost possible.
The costs of the machine also include operating costs, so the consumer is
interested in lower maintenance costs. As long as the manufacturer and the consumer
are totally independent, with their divergent interests, the optimization problem cannot
be practically solved.
The only way that leads to higher efficiencies is to have a higher authority
that considers manufacturers and consumers, the government. The government can act
1.8 – References 149
appropriately, based on recommendations from specialists' panels. This problem has a
general character and applies to any product.
Optimization of induction machines represents a research task. The problem
has been tackled with theoretically, to find a mathematical optimization method. Huge
difficulties appear due to the non-linear character of the magnetization process,
influenced by many factors, leading to questioning the rightness of material constants.
Using the finite element method implies knowing as precise as possible the
magnetization curves for different machine parts. These curves are influenced by
temperature, mechanical stress, besides frequency, time variation of magnetic stress,
accuracy of material constants as well as the 2D and especially 3D calculation of the
electromagnetic field.
The proposed method considers the magnetic saturations improvable on-the-
run and correction via coefficients found through testing. Because the biggest share in
the overall losses is borne by winding heat losses, an accurate determination of those
losses represents the main task of this undertaking.
Therefore, based on the results achieved, it has been considered as beneficial
to make available to induction machine designers both the EXE and the source code, to
allow an important possible contribution to the improvement in the design and
manufacturing of electrical machines by minimizing losses as much as possible.
1.8. References
1. Adkins B.: Obsciaia teoria electriceskih masin, Moscva-Leningrad,
Gosenergoizdat, 1960;
2. Alexeev A.: Construcţia maşinilor electrice, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 1951;
3. Andronescu P.: Bazele electrotehnicii, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti,
1972;
4. Andronescu P.: Aplicarea calculului operaţional în studiul circuitelor electrice,
Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 1957;
5. Arnold E., La Cour L., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1923
Vol I, Theorie der Wechselströme,
Vol III, Die Wichlungen der Wechseltstrommaschinen,
Vol V, Die Induktionsmaschinen;
6. Babescu M., Păunescu D.: Maşini electrice, Timişoara, Editura Politehnica, 2001;
7. Bălă C.: Proiectarea maşinilor electrice, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică,
Bucureşti, 1967;
8. Boldea I.: Parametrii maşinilor electrice, Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti,
1991;
9. Boldea I.: Variable speed generators, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 2006;
10. Boldea I., Tutelea L.: Electric machines. Steady State, Transients, and Design with
MATLAB, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton London New York
2010;
11. Câmpeanu A., Vlad I.: Maşini Electrice. Teorie, construcţie şi aplicaţii, Editura
Universitaria, Craiova, 2006;
150 Induction Machine. Program INDARUPT - 1
12. Cioc I., Nica C.: Proiectarea maşinilor electrice, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică,
Bucureşti, 1994;
13. Dancea I.: Metode de optimizare, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1976;
14. Danilevici I., Dombrovski V., Kazovski E.: Parametrii maşinilor de curent
alternativ, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 1968 (traducere din limba rusă);
15. Dordea T.: Maşini electrice. Proiectare., Vol. II, Editura ASAB, Bucureşti, 2003;
16. Dordea T., Dordea T.P.: Erzatzläuferimpedanz einer Inductionmaschine mit
Vielfachen Käfig und in denselben Nuten untergebrachten Stäben, Rev. Roumaine
Sci.Techn. – Electrotechn. Et Energ., T.29, Nr.2, p.151-159, Bucureşti, 1984;
17. Dordea T., Dordea T.P., Madescu Ghe., Torac I., Ocolişan L.C., Moţ M.: Maşini
Electrice, Programe de calcul, Editura POLITEHNICA Timişoara, 2010;
18. Gheorghiu I., Fransua Al.: Tratat de maşini electrice. Maşini asincrone, Vol. III,
Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti, 1971;
19. Heiles F.: Wicklungen electrischer Maschinen und ihre Herstellung, 2 Auflage,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1953;
20. Lager I.: Modele numerice directe pentru calculul câmpului electromagnetic
staţionar şi static, Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti, 2002;
21. Liwschitz M.: Die elektrischen Maschinen, Vol. II, Vol. III, Verlag Teubner,
Leipzig und Berlin, 1934;
22. Nicolaide A: Maşini electrice, Vol I, Vol. II, Editura Scrisul Românesc, Craiova,
1975;
23. Nürnberg W.: Die Asynchronmaschine, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963;
24. Opaschi M., Răduleţ R.: Proiectarea hidrogeneratoarelor şi a motoarelor
sincrone, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 1980;
25. Postnicov I.: Proiectarea masinilor electrice, Editura Energetică de stat, Bucureşti,
1954;
26. Reiche H., Glöckner G.: Maschinelles Berechnung elektrischer Maschinen, VEB-
Verlag Technik, 1973;
27. Richter R.: Maşini electrice. Maşini asincrone, Vol. IV, Editura Tehnică,
Bucureşti, 1960;
28. Schuisky W.: Berechnung electrischer Maschinen, Springer-Verlag, Wien, 1960;
29. Schuisky W.: Induktionmaschinen, Springer-Verlag, Wien, 1957;
30. Sequenz H.: Die Wicklungen electrischer Maschinen, Vol. I, II, III, IV, Springer-
Verlag, Wien, 1950-1973;
31. Vlad I., Enache S., Alexandru D.: Utilizarea metodelor numerice în proiectarea
maşinilor electrice de tracţiune, Editura Sitech, Craiova, 2000;
32. Wiedemann E., Kellenberger W.: Konstruction elektrischer Maschinen, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1967.