Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Physical Therapist, Sohag General Hospital.
2
The Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders and its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo
University
3
The Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University
ABSTRACT
Background: The colle's fracture is the most common fracture site in the upper extremity; it causes functional
problems and disabling complications. Treatment of these common fractures and their dysfunctional sequalae
continues to challenge surgeons and therapists. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of
Maitland's mobilization versus closed kinetic chain exercises after stable colle's fracture. Method: Thirty patients had
participated in this study. They were assigned randomly into two groups (Group A and Group B) with age ranged from
eighteen to fourty five years old. Group A consisted of 15 patients (15 females) received mitland's mobilization with
therapeutic ultrasound, group B consisted of 15 patients (15 females) received closed kinetic chain exercises with
therapeutic ultrasound for 3 times per week (12) sessions for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated pre and post
treatment for their pain severity, function of the wrist joint, grip strength, wrist joint's ROM and proprioception at 20 ̊
wrist flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation. Result: The result revealed that there were significant differences
between both groups regarding the improvement in function, grip strength, range of motion of flexion, extension, radial
and ulnar deviation and there were no significant difference between both groups regarding the improvement in
function, grip strength, and joint position sense. Conclusion: Maitland's mobilization versus closed kinetic chain
exercises after stable colle's fractures no significant difference in improvement in function, grip strength, and joint
position sense, and Maitland's mobilization significantly improve wrist range of motion.
KEY WORDS: Colle's fracture, Maitland's mobilization, closed kinetic chain exercises,
Proprioception.
*Corresponding author
IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36
Table (2): Comparison between the mean values of the variable in the two studied groups after treatment.
Items Group A Group B t-value P value
Function 10.2±1.923 12.2±3.492 -0.868 0.502 NS
Grip strength 13.8±2.049 14.2±3.114 -0.185 0.861 NS
Range of motion
Flexion (degree) 5±1.224 2.8±1.303 2.130 0.003 Significant
Extension (degree) 4.8±1.643 2.9±1.083 1.672 0.016 Significant
Radial deviation 2.05±0.570 1.15±0.335 2.356 0.014 significant
(degree)
Ulnar deviation 2.2±0.758 0.95±0.325 2.623 0.009
(degree) Significant
Proprioception
Flexion 0.264±0.276 0.53±0.379 -0.981 0.043 NS
Extension 0.33±0.33 0.39±0.276 -0.265 0.625 NS
Radial deviation 0.132±0.180 0.198±0.295 -0.33 0.272 NS
Ulnar deviation 0.266±0.434 0.332±0.408 -0.191 0.426 NS
improving wrist ROM, there was no significance exercises as those used in the CKC exercises in the
difference between patients in group A who received rehabilitation after colle's fracture which is a common
Maitland's mobilization with therapeutic ultrasound, and fracture seen in orthopedic wards. The results of this
group B who received closed kinetic chain exercises on study revealed that there was a proprioceptive defect in
function, grip strength, and wrist proprioception. A patients with colle's fracture after removal of the cast
similar study by (30) and (31) they statement that thermal and before starting the physical therapy program. In this
ultrasound used in concert with joint mobilizations was study, the resesrcher investigated the effect of
an effective regimen aimed at restoring ROM in maitland's mobilization with therapeutic ultrasound
hypomobile wrists postinjury or when immobilized after versus closed kinetic chain exercises with therapeutic
surgery. Ultrasound also increased patient comfort ultrasound in the rehabilitation after colle's fracture,
during the treatment and minimized posttreatment maitland's mobilization used in group A, no significance
soreness. Another study by (32) study who statement difference on function, grip strength, and wrist
that early mobilization of the wrist joint lead to increase proprioception at the four tested angles (at 20 ̊ wrist
in both strength and movement without any flexion, at 20 ̊ wrist extension, at 20 ̊ wrist radial and
observational progression of residual deformity. (33) ulnar deviation) after four weeks of training in
report that applying mobilization early confirmed the comparison to group B which received closed kinetic
improvement in strength and pain. chain exercises and significant improvement of wrist
Abd El-Latief (34)who statement that closed ROM (flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation) in
kinetic chain exercise need more time and greater group A who received Maitland's mobilization.
range of motion in upper limb joints especially wrist joint
during quadruped and push up activities and active CONCLUSION
range of motion has a little effect on recruitment of all It can be concluded that, Maitland's
muscle fibers. Another study by (35) who statement that mobilization versus closed kinetic chain exercises after
closed kinetic chain with traditional physical therapy stable colle's fractures no significant difference in
program in the rehabilitation after fractures distal end of improvement in function, grip strength, and joint
radius, closed kinetic chain exercises didn't significantly position sense. And Maitland's mobilization significantly
improve the proprioception of the wrist joint at the two improved wrist joint range of motion.
tested target angles (at 30 ̊ wrist flexion and at 30 ̊ wrist
extension) after four weeks of training in comparison to RECOMMENDATIONS
traditional physical therapy program without CKC The results of the present study offered the need
exercises, but CKC exercises shown significant for considering the following recommendations:
improvement in grip strength, functional activities, and Further studies are required to investigate the
increase in ROM of wrist flexion and extension, thought effect of the weight bearing exercises like
radial and ulnar deviation didn't increase significantly. closed kinetic chain exercises on different
Saad et al., (25), added the closed kinetic chain upper extremity fractures.
exercises to the open kinetic chain exercises despite (36) Further similar comparisons including a larger
has found that the wrist proprioception was improved number of patients and possibly longer
only by open kinetic chain exercises but not by the treatment period.
closed kinetic chain exercises because training with Replication of the current study may be
closed kinetic chain exercises will add additional required to the test proprioception of the wrist
benefits to the exercise program such as allowing the joint at more target angles.
mechanoceptors within the joints to be more aware and Correlational study is required between
responsive to static and dynamic stability at the joint functional disability after colle's fractures and
(37)
; the CKC activities facilitate the integration of proprioceptive errors of the wrist joint.
proprioceptive feedback coming from joint
mechanoceptors; and that the proprioceptive exercises, Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is
especially in the closed kinetic chain, train the body to no conflict of interest in this study. The manuscript has
use cocontraction of the muscles to produce stability, been read and approved by authors.
thus protecting the healed soft tissue structures that
might be damaged by open chain exercises.
Studies are unfortunately lacking the effect of
proprioceptive training on different conditions of the
wrist joint, and up to the investigator knowledge, there's
are no study to show the effect of eight bearing
(Eds.). Hand and upper extremity rehabilitation. threshold and self- reported pain in
3rd edition. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 489- experimentally induced shoulder pain. Man Ther;
503. 28: 38.
5. Masood K, Jamil M, Pasha FI, Quresshi KZ, Malik 19. Singh S, Rao K, Iyer C and Khatri S (2014):
NI (2013): Is casting an acceptable treatment Effect of progressive controlled weight bearing of
approach for a distal radius fracture that has upper extremity following proximal humeral
undergone a satisfactory closed reduction? fracture: Randomised control study. Inter J of
JUMDC; 4(1). Scien and Res Publications; 4 (4).
6. Balsky S and Goldford RJ (2000): Rehabilitation 20. Ritting A and Wolf J (2012): How to Measure
protocol for undisplaced Colles’ fractures Outcomes of Distal Radius Fracture Treatment,
following cast removal. J Cand Chiropr Assoc; Hand Clinics; 2(28): 165-175.
44(1):29–33). 21. Alencar MA, Dias JM, Figueiredo LC and Dias
7. Altizer L (2003): Hand and Wrist fractures. Orthop RC (2012): Handgrip strength in elderly with
Nurs; 22(3): 232-239. dementia: study of reliability. Rev Bras Fisioter;
8. Schneppendahl J, Windolf J and Kaufmann RA 16(6):510-514.
(2012): Distal radius fractures: current concepts.
22. Dzaja I, Macdermid JC, Roth J and Grewal R
J Hand Surg Am; 37:1718-1725.
(2013): Functional outcomes and cost estimation
9. Karagiannopoulos C, Sitler M, Michlovitz S and
for extra-articular and simple intra-articular distal
Tierney R (2013): A descriptive study on wrist
radius fractures treated with open reduction and
and hand sensori-motor impairment and function
internal fixation versus closed reduction and
following distal radius fracture intervention. J of
percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. Canadian J
Hand Ther; 26(3): 204-215.
of Surgery; 56(6): 378-384.
10. O'Brien WD Jr (2007): Ultrasound-biophysics
23. MacDernid JC (1996): Development of a scale for
mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol ; 93(1-
patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand
3):212-55.
Ther; 9: 178-183.
11. Stansinopoulos D, Stansinopoulu K and Johnson
24. Lonn J, Crenshaw AG and Djupsjobacka
MI (2005): An Exercise programme for the lateral
M(2000): position sense testing: influence of
elbow tendinopathy. British J of Sport Med; 39:
starting position and type of displacement. Arch
944-947.
Phys Med Rehabil; 81:592-597.
12. Dickey TC, Tych R, Kliot M, Loeser JD and
25. Saad M, El Nahass B and El Safouri Y (2008):
Pederson K (2012): Intense Focused Ultrasound
Assessment of proprioception in pre-operative
Can Reliably Induce Sensations in Human Test
and postoperative carpal tunnel syndrome
Subjects in a Manner Correlated with the Density
patients following different physical therapy
of Their Mechanoreceptors. Ultrasound in
programs. Doctoral Thesis Cairo University
Medicine and Biology; 38: 85–90.
Library.
13. Tyler WJ, Tufail Y, Finsterwald M, Tauchmann 26. MACDERMID JC, TURGEON T and RICHARDS
ML and Olson EJ (2008): Remote excitation of RS (1998): Patient rating of wrist pain and
neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low- disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J
frequency ultrasound. PLoS One; 3: P3511. Orthop Trauma; 12: 577-586.
27. Maciel JS, Taylor NF, and McIlveen C (2005): A
14. Varsha N (2007): Maitland’s mobilization
randomized clinical trial of activity- focused
technique was found to be an effective in active
physiotherapy on patients with distal radius
and passive wrist flexion. According to the
fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 125: 515-
Maitland’s concept the different grades of
520.
mobilization will produce activation of different
28. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy
mechanoreceptors. Indian J of Physio and
N, and Roth JH (2000): Responsivness of the
Occupational Ther - An Inter J; 1(4).
short form- 36, Disability of the Arm, shoulder,
15. Cuomo F, Birdzell MG and Zuckerman JD (2005):
and Hand questionnaire, Patient- Rated Wrist
The effect of degenerative arthritis and prosthetic
Evaluation, and physical impairement
arthroplarty on shoulder proprioception. J
measurements in evaluating recovery after a
Shoulder Elbow Surg; 14: 345-348.
distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg [Am]; 25:330-
16. Clark NC, Roijezon U and TreleavenJ (2015):
340.
Prorioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
29. MacDermid JC and Tottenham V (2004):
Part 2: Clinical assessment and intervention. Man
Responsivness of the disability of the arm,
Ther; 20(3): 378-387.
shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient- ratede
17. Haavik H and Murphy B (2012): The role of spinal wrist/ hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating
manipulation in addressin disordered change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther; 17: 18-
sensorimotor integration and altered motor 23.
control. J Electromyogr. Kinesiol; 22: 768-776. 30. Draper DO (2011): Ultrasound and Joint
Mobilizations for Achieving Normal Wrist Range
of Motion After Injury or Surgery: A Case
18. Wassinger CA Rich D, Cameron N, Clark S,
Series. J Athl Train; 46(1): 112
Davenport S, Lingelbach M, Smith A, Baxter GD
31. Kaltenborn FM (2003): Manual Mobilization of the
and Davidson J (2015): Cervical and thoracic Joints: The Kaltenborn Method of Joint
manipulations: Acute effects upon pain pressure
IJTRR 2016; 5 (5):29-36
Examination and Treatment. Vol 2. 4th ed. Oslo, exercise on the range of motion in patients with
Norway: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel. colles’ fracture.Med J Cairo Univ, 83(1): 933-939.
32. Kuo LC, Yang TH, Hsu YY, Wu PT, Lin CL and 35. Abdel fatah MA (2009): combined effect of closed
Hsu HY (2013): Is progressive early digit kinetic chain exercises and convensional physical
mobilization intervention beneficial for patients therapy after fractures of lower end of radius.
with external fixation of distal radius fracture? A Master Thesis Cairo University Library.
pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil; 27: 36. Hatches LH (2005): The effect of wrist
983-999. proprioception on joint stability for forward falls.
33. Burke SL, James PH, Michael AM, Rebecca JS Published master thesis, school of physical
and Lauren V (2006): Hand and upper extremity education, Morgantown, West Virginia.
rehabilitation: A practical guide, Third Ed. 37. Ubinger ME, Prentice WE, and Guskiewiccz KM
Elsevie. (1999): Effect of closed kinetic chain training on
34. Abd El-Latief EM, El-Kabalawy MA, Saleh AM neuromuscular control in the upper extremity. J
and Mohamed AL (2015): The effect of russian Sport Rehab; 8: 184-194.
current stimulation versus closed kinetic chain