PPST - Individual Performance Commitment and Review

Form
Name of Employee: ________________________________________ Name of Rater : ____________________________________
Position : ________________________________________ Position : ____________________________________
School : RODOLFO A. MEDEL SR. ELEM.SCHOOL____ Date of Review: ____________________________________
Rating Period : ________________________________________

Weight
PPST KRAs PPST Objectives per Mode of Verifications QET Performance Indicator Actual Results Rating Score
KRA Outstanding 5 Very Satisfactory 4 Satisfactory 3 Unsatisfactory 2 Poor 1 Q E T Ave
1. Modeled 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled No Modeled
effective (7.5) tool (COT) rating sheet effective effective effective effective acceptable effective
Content applications of and/or inter-observer applications of applications of applications of applications of evidence applications of
Knowledge content agreement form about content content content content was shown content
effective applications of
and knowledge within content knowledge within
knowledge knowledge knowledge within knowledge knowledge
Pedagogy and across and across curriculum within and within and and across within and within and
curriculum teaching areas across across curriculum across across
teaching areas. 2. Lesson plans/modified curriculum curriculum teaching areas curriculum curriculum
DLLs used in teaching areas teaching areas as shown in teaching areas teaching areas
demonstration teaching as shown in as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in as shown in
highlighting integration of MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
content knowledge within rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 8
and across subject areas
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted at
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable least 4 lessons
effective application of as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence as evidenced by
content knowledge within MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from was shown MOV 1 and
and across subject areas supported by colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and supported by
4. Performance tasks/test any 1 of the supported by supported by any supported by any 1 of the
material(s) used in other MOV any 1 of the 1 of the other any 1 of the other MOV given
demonstration teaching given other MOV given MOV given other MOV given
highlighting integration of
content knowledge within
and across subject areas
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No Submitted MOV
5. Results of assessment were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable were distributed
used in demonstration across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence across 4
teaching highlighting quarters quarters quarters was shown quarters
mastery of lessons
learned
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
2. Collaborated (7.5) 1. Copy of the research Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted Proposed action No Conducted and
with colleagues in proposal focused on completed and completed action action research research with acceptable completed action
the conduct and enriching knowledge of disseminated research with with colleagues colleagues evidence research with
application of content and pedagogy action research colleagues was shown colleagues
2. Proof of participation
research to enrich and/or contribution to a
with colleagues
knowledge of collaborative research Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted any 2
content and (e.g. e-mail, actual output least 4 of the of the MOV MOV acceptable MOV
pedagogy. submitted, terms of given MOV acceptable MOV evidence
reference, etc.) was shown
3. Certified completed Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No Conducted the
collaborative research research report research report research report research report acceptable research report
focused on enriching within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating evidence within the rating
knowledge of content and
pedagogy
period period period period was shown period
4. Proof of dissemination of
research findings with
colleagues
5. Proof of utilization of
research findings
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
3. Developed and 1. Classroom observation Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No Demonstrated
applied effective (7.5) tool (COT) rating sheet effective effective effective effective acceptable effective
teaching and/or inter-observer teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence teaching
strategies to agreement form about strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown strategies to
using effective teaching
promote critical strategies to promote
promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
and creative critical and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking, as well teaching, as well as other thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well
as other higher- higher order thinking skills as other higher as other higher- as other higher- as other higher as other higher-
order thinking 2. Lesson plans/modified order thinking order thinking order thinking order thinking order thinking
skills. DLLs used in skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown
demonstration teaching n MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
highlighting different rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 7
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3
teaching strategies that more lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable lessons as
develop critical and as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidence evidently shown
creative thinking and/or shown in MOV in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and was shown in MOV 1 and
other HOTS 1 and supported supported by supported by any supported by supported by
4. Performance tasks/test
by any 1 of the any 1 of the 1 of the other any of the other any 1 of the
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching other MOV other MOV given MOV given MOV given other MOV given
given
 5. Results of assessment Timeliness
used in the demonstration
teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
4. Worked with 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No Modeled and
Learning colleagues to (7.5) tool (COT) rating sheet shared effective shared effective shared effective shared effective acceptable shared effective
Environment model and share and/or inter-observer classroom classroom classroom classroom evidence classroom
and effective agreement form about management management management management was shown management
sharing effective
Diversity of techniques in the techniques in the
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners management of management of classroom engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
classroom structure in activities/ in activities/ in activities/ in activities/ in activities/
structure to 2. Lesson plans/modified tasks done in tasks done in tasks done in tasks done in tasks done in
engage learners, DLLs used in different different physical different physical different physical different physical
individually or in demonstration teaching physical learning learning learning learning
groups, in highlighting effective learning environments as environments as environments as environments as
meaningful classroom management environments shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, strategies that engage as shown in with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 8
learners in activities/tasks
discovery and in different physical
MOV 1 with a
hands-on activities learning environments rating of 8
within a range of 3. Minutes of LAC Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted at
physical learning highlighting the sharing on least 4 lessons lessons lessons of the acceptable least 4 lessons
environments. effective classroom supported by supported by supported by acceptable MOV evidence supported by
management techniques MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any was shown MOV 1 and any
4. Instructional materials 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
used in demonstration acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
teaching
MOV
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations) Timeliness
5. Exhibited Classroom observation tool Quality Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited No Exhibited
effective and (7.5) (COT) rating sheet and/or effective and effective and effective and effective and acceptable effective and
constructive inter-observer agreement constructive constructive constructive constructive evidence constructive
behavior form about effective teacher behavior behavior behavior behavior was shown behavior
management of learner
management skills behavior using the following
management management management management management
by applying strategies: skills by skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying
positive and non- 1. Providing motivation applying positive and positive and non- positive and positive and
violent discipline 2. Praising the positive and non-violent violent discipline non-violent non-violent
to ensure learners/Giving positive non-violent discipline to to ensure discipline to discipline to
learning-focused feedback 3. discipline to ensure learning learning focused ensure learning ensure learning
environments. Setting house ensure learning focused environments focused focused
rules/guidelines focused environments shown in MOV 1 environments environments
4. Ensuring learners’ active environments shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
participation
5. Allowing learners to
shown in MOV with a rating of 7 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 7
express their ideas/opinions 1 with a rating
of 8
 6. Giving equal opportunities Efficiency Applied at least Applied at least Applied at least 7 Applied any of No Applied at least
to learners 7 of the given 7 of the given of the given the given acceptable 7 of the given
7. Encouraging learners to strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence strategies as
ask questions observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only shown observed in 3
8. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson lessons
Timeliness
6. Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No Worked with
colleagues to highlighting one’s sharing of colleagues at colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues but acceptable colleagues in the
share strategies on differentiated least in the school level to department or no evidence of evidence school level to
differentiated, and developmentally- district/cluster share lesson grade level to sharing with shown share lesson
appropriate opportunities to
developmentally address learners’
level to share share lesson others
appropriate differences lesson
opportunities to 2. Lesson plans/modified
address learners’ DLLs highlighting strategies Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No Submitted at
differences in on differentiated and least 1 lesson least 1 lesson as least 1 lesson as least 1 lesson, acceptable least 1 lesson as
gender, needs, developmentally appropriate as evidently evidently shown evidently shown as evidenced by evidence evidently shown
strengths, opportunities to address shown in MOV in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and either MOV 2 or shown in MOV 1 and
interests and learners’ differences 1 and supported supported by supported by any 3 but no supported by
experiences. 3. Corresponding
by any any acceptable acceptable MOV evidence of any acceptable
instructional materials
showing differentiated and acceptable MOV sharing with MOV
developmentally appropriate MOV others
opportunities to address
learners’ differences
4. Others (e.g. testimonial, Timeliness
write-up from colleagues of
the lessons/insights gained
from the Master Teacher's
sharing)
7. Developed and 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No Developed and
Curriculum applied effective (7.5) tool (COT) rating sheet applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective acceptable applied effective
and strategies in the and/or inter-observer strategies strategies strategies strategies evidence strategies
Planning planning and agreement form about showing showing showing showing shown showing
using effective strategies
management of in implementing
developmentally developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
developmentally developmentally - sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning learning process learning process learning process learning process
learning 2. Results of learners’ process as as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
processes to meet assessment during the shown in MOV MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
curriculum actual teaching 1 with a rating rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 7
requirements and 3. Lesson plans/modified of 8
varied teaching DLLs used in
demonstration teaching
contexts.
 highlighting Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No Submitted 2-3
developmentally least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as acceptable lessons as
sequenced teaching- as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence evidenced by
learning process MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown MOV 1 and 2
4. Instructional materials
showing effective
and supported and supported and/or 2 and acceptable MOV and supported
strategies in by any 1 of the by any 1 of the supported by any by any 1 of the
developmentally other other acceptable 1 of the other other acceptable
sequenced teaching and acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
learning process MOV
5. Performance tasks/test Timeliness
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
8. Reviewed with 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No Frequently led
colleagues, (7.5) Plan collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative acceptable collaborative
teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of evidence reviews of
learner feedback sessions on use of teacher teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and shown teacher and
and learner feedback to
to plan, facilitate enrich teaching practice
learner learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback
and enrich with proof of attendance feedback as as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
teaching practice. 3. Others (Please specify evidenced by the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
and provide annotations) the MOV submitted submitted submitted submitted
submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative acceptable collaborative
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of evidence reviews of
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and shown teacher and
learner learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback
feedback as as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently
evidently shown shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of shown in MOV 1
in MOV 1 and and supported and supported the acceptable and supported
supported by by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV by any 1 of the
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
 9. Advised and 1. Teaching and learning Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No Frequently
guided (7.5) resources developed by advised advised advised colleagues in acceptable advised
colleagues in the colleagues and colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, evidence colleagues in
selection, critiqued on their the selection, the selection, the selection, organization, shown the selection,
alignment to learning
organization, organization, organization, organization, development organization,
goals
development 2. Lesson plans by development development development and development
and use of colleagues critiqued in and and and appropriate appropriate and
appropriate terms of the alignment appropriate appropriate use of teaching use of teaching appropriate
teaching and of the teaching and use of use of teaching and learning and learning use of teaching
learning learning resources to teaching and and learning resources as resources as and learning
resources, the indicated learning learning resources as shown in the shown in the resources as
including ICT, to goals and resources as shown in the MOV submitted MOV shown in the
address specific appropriateness to the shown in the MOV submitted MOV
learning goals. target learners MOV submitted submitted
3. Others (Please specify
submitted
and provide
annotations) Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 2
least 4 teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning evidence learning
learning resources as resources as resource as shown resources as
resources as evidenced by evidenced by at evidenced by evidenced by
evidenced by at least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the at least 1 of the
at least 1 of acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
the acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Assessment 10. Worked 22.5% 1. Any proof of Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No Frequently
and collaboratively (7.5) collaborative review if reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively acceptable reviewed
Reporting with colleagues to the test is designed collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment evidence collaboratively
review the design, based on its purpose assessment assessment assessment tools with shown assessment
selection, (e.g. diagnostic, tools with tools with tools with colleagues as tools with
organization and formative and colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the colleagues as
use of a range of summative) shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted shown in the
effective 2. Any proof of MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
diagnostic, collaborative review of
formative and
summative the alignment of the test Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3
assessment with the curriculum least 4 assessment assessment assessment tool acceptable assessment
strategies 2.1. formative test assessment tools as tools as evidently as evidently evidence tools as
consistent with attached to a lesson tools as evidently shown shown in any of shown in any of shown evidently shown
curriculum plan evidently shown in any of the the acceptable the acceptable in any of the
requirements. 2.2. summative in any of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV
assessment with TOS acceptable
2.3. diagnostic test with MOV
its TOS Timeliness
3. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
11. Interpreted 1. Collaborative Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No Frequently
collaboratively (7.5) interpretation of the index collaborated collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with acceptable collaborated with
monitoring and of mastery obtained from 1 with colleagues colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the evidence colleagues in the
evaluation class in the interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of was shown interpretation of
2. Collaborative
strategies of interpretation of item
interpretation of assessment data assessment data assessment data assessment data
attainment data to analysis of quarterly assessment as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
support learner examinations data as shown MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
progress and 3. Collaborative in the MOV
achievement. interpretation of results of submitted
performance assessment Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No Submitted at
4. Others (Please specify least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the of the MOV acceptable least 3 of the
and provide annotations) types of MOV same kind of same kind of evidence same kind of
MOV MOV was shown MOV
Timeliness
12. Applied skills 1. Sample agreement for Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied No Frequently
in the effective (7.5) learners at risk signed by applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in skills in the acceptable applied skills in
communication of parents and corresponding the effective the effective the effective effective evidence the effective
learner needs, evidence of improvement communication communication communication communication was shown communication
2. Record of dialogue and/or
progress and parent teacher
of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs
achievement to conferences and and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to
key stakeholders, corresponding evidence of parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
including improvement guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
parents/guardians. 3. Anecdotal record shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
communicated to and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
signed by the learners
and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted any 3
improvement least 3 of the MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV
4. Sample of learners’ test
acceptable evidence
results signed by parents
and MOV was shown
Timeliness
 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No Frequently
Plus Factor various related or Participation performed performed performed performed acceptable performed
works/activities 2. Certificate of Training special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks evidence special tasks
that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership and/or and/or and/or and/or was shown and/or
4. Committee involvement
the teaching- 5. Advisorship of Co-
assignments as assignments as assignments as assignments as assignments as
learning process. curricular activities shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
6. Book or Journal MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Authorship/ Coauthorship/
Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/ Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted only 3
Chairpersonship least 4 different different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable different kinds of
8. Coaching and mentoring kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence acceptable MOV
learners in competitions
acceptable was shown
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers MOV
Timeliness
10. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 PPST - Individual Performance Commitment Review Form (IPCRF) Summary
Sheet
(For Teacher I-III)
Name of Employee: ________________________________________ Name of Rater : ____________________________________
Position : ________________________________________ Position : ____________________________________
School : RODOLFO A. MEDEL SR. ELEM.SCHOOL____ Date of Review: ____________________________________
Rating Period : ________________________________________

Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Weight per KRA Objectives
objective Q E T Average Score
Objective 1 7.5%
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5%
Objective 3 7.5%
Objective 4 7.5%
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5%
Objective 6 7.5%
Objective 7 7.5%
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5%
Objective 9 7.5%
Objective 10 7.5%
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5%
Objective 12 7.5%
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10%
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as a Teacher and We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected herein is product of a careful appraisal of the evidences to support each
willingly commit to implement what have been stipulated and agreed upon in rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
this document to the best of my ability. Ratee : Rater:

_________________________ LANI T. BOSCAS, Ph.D.


_________________________________
Master Teacher
Teacher Principal III
Approving Authority:
LANI T. BOSCAS, Ph.D. Concurred:
Principal III
Date: _______________ MICHELL L. ACOYONG, CESE
Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Date: ___________________