Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

sikap * kepatuhan
46 100.0% 0 .0% 46 100.0%
pengelolaan limbah

sikap * kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah Crosstabulation

kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah

patuh tidak patuh Total

sikap positif Count 17 10 27

Expected Count 12.9 14.1 27.0

% within sikap 63.0% 37.0% 100.0%

% of Total 37.0% 21.7% 58.7%

negatif Count 5 14 19

Expected Count 9.1 9.9 19.0

% within sikap 26.3% 73.7% 100.0%

% of Total 10.9% 30.4% 41.3%

Total Count 22 24 46

Expected Count 22.0 24.0 46.0

% within sikap 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.002a 1 .014

Continuity Correctionb 4.624 1 .032

Likelihood Ratio 6.188 1 .013

Fisher's Exact Test .019 .015

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.872 1 .015

N of Valid Casesb 46

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,09.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .340 .014

N of Valid Cases 46
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pengetahuan * kepatuhan
46 100.0% 0 .0% 46 100.0%
pengelolaan limbah

pengetahuan * kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah Crosstabulation

kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah

patuh tidak patuh Total

pengetahuan baik Count 10 2 12

Expected Count 5.7 6.3 12.0

% within pengetahuan 83.3% 16.7% 100.0%

% of Total 21.7% 4.3% 26.1%

cukup Count 8 10 18

Expected Count 8.6 9.4 18.0

% within pengetahuan 44.4% 55.6% 100.0%

% of Total 17.4% 21.7% 39.1%

kurang Count 4 12 16

Expected Count 7.7 8.3 16.0

% within pengetahuan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.7% 26.1% 34.8%

Total Count 22 24 46

Expected Count 22.0 24.0 46.0

% within pengetahuan 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.487a 2 .009

Likelihood Ratio 10.144 2 .006

Linear-by-Linear Association 8.878 1 .003

N of Valid Cases 46

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 5,74.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .413 .009

N of Valid Cases 46
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

masa kerja * kepatuhan

46 100.0% 0 .0% 46 100.0%
pengelolaan limbah

masa kerja * kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah Crosstabulation

kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah

patuh tidak patuh Total

masa kerja baru Count 4 9 13

Expected Count 6.2 6.8 13.0

% within masa kerja 30.8% 69.2% 100.0%

% of Total 8.7% 19.6% 28.3%

lama Count 18 15 33

Expected Count 15.8 17.2 33.0

% within masa kerja 54.5% 45.5% 100.0%

% of Total 39.1% 32.6% 71.7%

Total Count 22 24 46

Expected Count 22.0 24.0 46.0

% within masa kerja 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.113a 1 .146

Continuity Correctionb 1.267 1 .260

Likelihood Ratio 2.160 1 .142

Fisher's Exact Test .197 .130

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.067 1 .151

N of Valid Casesb 46

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,22.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .210 .146

N of Valid Cases 46
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pendidikan * kepatuhan
46 100.0% 0 .0% 46 100.0%
pengelolaan limbah

pendidikan * kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah Crosstabulation

kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah

patuh tidak patuh Total

pendidikan SPK Count 1 1 2

Expected Count 1.0 1.0 2.0

% within pendidikan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% of Total 2.2% 2.2% 4.3%

D3 Kep Count 9 19 28

Expected Count 13.4 14.6 28.0

% within pendidikan 32.1% 67.9% 100.0%

% of Total 19.6% 41.3% 60.9%

S1 Kep Count 3 1 4

Expected Count 1.9 2.1 4.0

% within pendidikan 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% of Total 6.5% 2.2% 8.7%

S1 Kep+ners Count 9 3 12

Expected Count 5.7 6.3 12.0

% within pendidikan 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% of Total 19.6% 6.5% 26.1%

Total Count 22 24 46

Expected Count 22.0 24.0 46.0

% within pendidikan 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.499a 3 .058

Likelihood Ratio 7.751 3 .051

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.709 1 .017

N of Valid Cases 46

a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is ,96.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .374 .058

N of Valid Cases 46
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

jenis kelamin * kepatuhan

46 100.0% 0 .0% 46 100.0%
pengelolaan limbah

jenis kelamin * kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah Crosstabulation

kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah

patuh tidak patuh Total

jenis kelamin perempuan Count 19 21 40

Expected Count 19.1 20.9 40.0

% within jenis kelamin 47.5% 52.5% 100.0%

% of Total 41.3% 45.7% 87.0%

laki-laki Count 3 3 6

Expected Count 2.9 3.1 6.0

% within jenis kelamin 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% of Total 6.5% 6.5% 13.0%

Total Count 22 24 46

Expected Count 22.0 24.0 46.0

% within jenis kelamin 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .013a 1 .909

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .013 1 .909

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .624

Linear-by-Linear Association .013 1 .910

N of Valid Casesb 46

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,87.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .017 .909

N of Valid Cases 46
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

umur * kepatuhan
46 100.0% 0 .0% 46 100.0%
pengelolaan limbah

umur * kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah Crosstabulation

kepatuhan pengelolaan limbah

patuh tidak patuh Total

umur dewasa awal Count 10 16 26

Expected Count 12.4 13.6 26.0

% within umur 38.5% 61.5% 100.0%

% of Total 21.7% 34.8% 56.5%

dewasa akhir Count 9 7 16

Expected Count 7.7 8.3 16.0

% within umur 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%

% of Total 19.6% 15.2% 34.8%

lansia awal Count 3 1 4

Expected Count 1.9 2.1 4.0

% within umur 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% of Total 6.5% 2.2% 8.7%

Total Count 22 24 46

Expected Count 22.0 24.0 46.0

% within umur 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.8% 52.2% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.552a 2 .279

Likelihood Ratio 2.607 2 .272

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.496 1 .114

N of Valid Cases 46

a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 1,91.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .229 .279

N of Valid Cases 46