You are on page 1of 8

1/30/20

DRIVING FORCES OF GOVERNANCE CODE DEV’T


CORPORATE 1. GLOBALIZATION
GOVERNANCE 2. INVESTOR CONCERNS
3. CORPORATE SCANDALS
CODE

PRINCIPLES BASED APPROACH CHARACTERISTICS OF PRINCIPLE BASED APPROACH


Voluntary code coupled with disclosure. • Focus on aims
• Flexibility
• Breadth of Application
• Comply or explain
• Role of capital markets

1
1/30/20

RULES BASED APPROACH CHARACTERISTICS OF RULES BASED APPROACH


Based on detailed laws or regulations. • Emphasis on achievements
• Compulsory compliance
• Visibility of compliance
• Limitations of rules
• Criminal Sanctions

ADVANTAGES OF PRINCIPLE BASED APPROACH CRITICISMS OF PRINCIPLE BASED APPROACH


• Avoids legislation • Broadness of principles
• Less costly • Consistency between companies
• Appropriate for company • Confusion over rules
• Emphasis on explanations • Inadequate explanation
• Emphasis on investor decisions

2
1/30/20

INSIDER OR OUTSIDER SYSTEMS OECD


Insider or relationship-based systems are where most The Organization for Economic Co-operation and
companies listed on the local stock exchange are owned Development (OECD) has carried out an extensive
and controlled by a small number of major consultation with member countries, and developed a
shareholders. set of principles of corporate governance that countries
and companies should work towards achieving.
Outsider systems are ones where shareholding is more
widely dispersed, and there is the manager ownership
separation.

OECD PRINCIPLES ICGN REPORT


1. The right of shareholders The International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN)
2. The equitable treatment of shareholders issued a report (published in 2005, revised in 2009)
3. The role of stakeholders aiming to enhance the guidance produced by the OECD.
4. Disclosure and Transparency The purpose is to provide practical guidance for boards
5. The responsibilities of the Board to meet expectations so that they can operate efficiently
and compete for scarce capital effectively.

3
1/30/20

ICGN REPORT EMPHASIS SARBANES OXLEY ACT


1. Sustainable value Also known as “Public Company Accounting Reform and
2. Structure of the Board Investor Protection Act” in the Senate. “Corporate and
3. Corporate Culture Auditing Accountability and Responsibility Act” in the
4. Risk Management House
5. Remuneration Commonly called as Sarbanes-Oxley, Sarbox or SOX.
6. Audit Enacted on July 30, 2002 and named after sponsors,
7. Disclosure and Transparency U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative
8. Shareholders Michael G. Oxley.

REASONS FOR SARBANES OXLEY ACT SARBANES OXLEY ACT APPLIES TO…
Includes reforms in corporate governance and the accounting All public companies in the U.S. and international
profession intended to: companies that have registered equity or debt securities
q Improve corporate financial reporting and internal control with the SEC and the accounting firms that provide
q Strengthen audit committees
auditing services to them
q Change the relationship between the auditor and client
q Improve auditor independence
q Provide additional auditor assurance over internal control
q Provide oversight and regulation for auditors of publicly
traded companies.

4
1/30/20

SARBANES OXLEY ACT SOX AFFECTS


Contains 11 Titles ü External Auditors
1. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) ü Internal Auditors
2. Auditor Independence
3. Corporate Responsibility
ü Board of directors and Committees
4. Enhanced Financial Disclosures ü Top Executives
5. Analyst Conflicts of Interest ü Senior Managers
6. Commission Resources and Authority
ü Attorneys, both internal and external
7. Studies and Reports
8. Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability ü Regulators
9. White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancements
10. Corporate Tax Returns
11. Corporate Fraud and Accountability

MAJOR PROVISIONS OF SOX MAJOR PROVISIONS OF SOX


ü Chief executives and financial officers are held ü Internal audits and review and certification of audits
responsible for their companies’ financial reports. by outside auditors are mandatory.
ü Executive officers and directors may not solicit or ü There will be criminal and civil penalties for securities
accept loans from their companies. violations.
ü Insider trades are reported more quickly. ü There will be longer jail sentences and larger fines for
ü Insider trades are prohibited during pension-fund executives who intentionally misstate financial
blackout periods. statements.
ü Disclosure of executive compensation and profits is ü Audit firms may no longer provide actuarial, legal, or
mandatory. consulting services to firms they audit.

5
1/30/20

I. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board II. Auditor Independence


v establishes the Public Company Accounting Oversight v establishes standards for external auditor
Board, to provide independent oversight of public independence, to limit conflicts of interest.
accounting firms providing audit services. v It also addresses new auditor approval requirements,
v creates a central oversight board tasked with audit partner rotation, and auditor reporting
registering auditors, defining the specific processes requirements.
and procedures for compliance audits, inspecting v It restricts auditing companies from providing non-
and policing conduct and quality control, and audit services (e.g., consulting) for the same clients.
enforcing compliance with the specific mandates of
SOX.

III. Corporate Responsibility IV. Enhanced Financial Disclosures


v mandates that senior executives take individual v and describes enhanced reporting requirements for
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of financial transactions, including off- balance sheet
corporate financial reports. transactions, pro-forma figures and stock transactions
v It defines the interaction of external auditors and of corporate officers.
corporate audit committees, and specifies the v requires internal controls for assuring the accuracy of
responsibility of corporate officers for the accuracy and financial reports and disclosures, and mandates both
validity of corporate financial reports. audits and reports on those controls.
v It enumerates specific limits on the behaviors of v requires timely reporting of material changes in
corporate officers and describes specific forfeitures of financial condition and specific enhanced reviews by the
benefits and civil penalties for non-compliance. SEC or its agents of corporate reports.

6
1/30/20

V. Analyst Conflict of Interest VI. Commission Resources and Authority


v includes measures designed to help restore investor v defines practices to restore investor confidence in
confidence in the reporting of securities analysts. securities analysts.
v defines the codes of conduct for securities analysts and v defines the SEC’s authority to censure or bar securities
requires disclosure of knowable conflicts of interest. professionals from practice and defines conditions
under which a person can be barred from practicing as
a broker, advisor, or dealer.

VII. Studies and Reports VIII. Corporate & Criminal Fraud Accountability
v requires the Comptroller General and the SEC to v also referred to as the “Corporate and Criminal Fraud
perform various studies and report their findings. Accountability Act of 2002”.
v Studies and reports include the effects of consolidation v It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation,
of public accounting firms, the role of credit rating destruction or alteration of financial records or other
agencies in the operation of securities markets, interference with investigations, while providing certain
securities violations and enforcement actions, and protections for whistle-blowers.
whether investment banks assisted Enron and Global
Crossing and others to manipulate earnings and
obfuscate true financial conditions.

7
1/30/20

IX. White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancements X. Corporate Tax Returns


v also called the “White Collar Crime Penalty v states that the Chief Executive Officer should sign the
Enhancement Act of 2002.” company tax return.
v increases the criminal penalties associated with white-
collar crimes and conspiracies.
v recommends stronger sentencing guidelines and
specifically adds failure to certify corporate financial
reports as a criminal offense.

XI. Corporate Fraud and Accountability ACTIVITY


v called as “Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002”. If you were writing a corporate governance code, would you
v It identifies corporate fraud and records tampering as employ a principles-based or rules-based approach? Will
criminal offenses and joins those offenses to specific your answer be the same if you operate your company in
penalties. It also revises sentencing guidelines and the Philippines?
strengthens their penalties.
v enables the SEC to resort to temporarily freezing
transactions or payments that have been deemed
"large" or "unusual".

You might also like