Professional Documents
Culture Documents
25:73 82 (1991)
Wood Science
and Technology
9 Springer-Verlag 1991
Summary. This paper reports the relationship between thickness swelling and density in lab-
made aspen flakeboards. The boards were manufactured with several levels of initial mat
moisture content and urea resin content. Weight increase and thickness swelling at 12 locations
on each board were recorded under specified environmentalconditions over a period of 71 days.
Each board was then cut into 12 specimens, each containing one of the 12 locations at its center,
and density was calculated. No definite relationship was found between thickness swelling and
density among the 12 specimens of each board. Our results suggest that high initial moisture
content and high resin content can decrease thickness swelling. Variations in mat pressure and
core temperature during the press cycle and weight increase at 80 percent relative humidity are
discussed.
Introduction
For structural reconstituted wood products such as flakeboards, thickness swelling and
panel density vary from point to point in the plane of the board. Knowledge a b o u t
this intrinsic variation is essential to improving the m a n u f a c t u r i n g process as well as
the engineering application of such products.
A flake mat is formed by r a n d o m l y depositing adhesive-coated flakes on a flat
surface; the flakes are n o t uniformly distributed. The mat is densified by compression
in a hot press, a process that results in a considerable a m o u n t of plastic deformation.
Densification of the mat is strongly dependent on, a m o n g other things, the interaction
of heat and moisture transfer from the surfaces to the core and to the edges of the
mat during the press cycle. Therefore, a single localized density value or vertical
density profile does not characterize the density variation in the whole board.
W h e n pressure is released in the hot press, the thickness of the flakeboard increas-
es because of the elasticity of the flakes. Thickness swelling also subsequently occurs
as a consequence of moisture adsorption from the environment. The total increase in
thickness is believed to be related to the rheological properties of the flakes (deforma-
tion and flow) and resin, environmental conditions, and density variation. Therefore,
thickness increase is not uniform throughout the board.
The purpose of this study was to relate resin content and initial mat moisture
content to thickness swelling of the finished flakeboards, and in turn, to relate
thickness swelling to horizontal density distribution within a board. Aspen flakeboards
were manufactured with several values of initial moisture content and resin solids
content. The variations o f mat pressure and core temperature with time during the
press cycle were recorded. We then measured the thickness swelling at 12 evenly
distributed locations in each b o a r d at 80 percent relative humidity (RH) over a period
of 71 days. Each b o a r d was cut into twelve 51- by 64-mm specimens, each containing
one of the 12 locations at its center, and mean density values were calculated.
Literature Review
Experimental procedures
The experimental design o f the study included four target levels o f resin solids content
(RSC) 0, 1, 6, and 12 percent - and three target levels o f initial moisture content
( I M C ) 6, 12, and 18 percent. The RSC was based on the ovendry weight o f wood,
and I M C was based on the ovendry weight o f w o o d plus resin. Actual values were
somewhat different from the design values, as described in the flakeboard manufac-
ture section.
Material preparation
Aspen disk-cut flakes, 0.38 by 12.7 by 38.1 mm, were used to m a k e the boards. The
blocks for the flakes were cut from logs without regard to annual ring orientation. The
flakes were dried in a r o t a r y - d r u m dryer to a b o u t 2 percent moisture content and were
then screened on a 6.35-mm screen. Flakes retained on the screen were stored in
plastic bags. Before mixing a urea-formaldehyde resin solution with the flakes in a
r o t a r y - d r u m blender, the measured moisture content o f the flakes in the bags varied
from 2.4 to 3.7 percent.
Flakeboard manufacture
Dimensions o f the mat-forming box were 30.48 by 35.56 cm. Design thickness of the
b o a r d was 12.7 ram. W i t h a specified target density o f 0.65, the total ovendry weight
o f the flakes and resin solids was 895 g. Thus, when water and resin solution were
mixed with the flakes in the blender to reach a specified I M C value for the mat, the
weight of flakes was adjusted to retain a total weight o f dry w o o d and resin solids of
895 g. Because the a m o u n t o f water a d d e d was based on the estimated moisture
content o f the flakes and the water loss in the blender, the exact design value of the
120
8
6
80
I3.
~4 E
E
40 ~.
G.
25./-.crn
~-5.1cm-~
1 9 T
I M C was difficult to obtain. Actual average values and value ranges for the three I M C
levels were 7.0 (6.1 to 7.8) percent, 11.0 (9.6 to 11.6) percent, and 15.0 (14.0 to 15.2)
percent 9 The press temperature was 149 ~
M o v e m e n t o f the lower press platen t o w a r d the stationary upper platen in a press
cycle was b r o k e n into two segments, which were controlled by a computer. Sixteen
seconds were required to close the gap between the platens from 76.2 to 17.78 m m and
10 s from 17.78 to 12.7 ram, the design thickness o f the board. The lower platen
remained at that level for a specified period before opening up. The total press time
for the b o a r d s varied from 320 to 570 s. The longer time was used when the I M C was
relatively high to allow the steam to emit from the edges to reduce the risk o f blisters
(blows).
F o u r flakeboards were made for each combination of I M C and RSC values. F o r
each board, d a t a for pressure and core temperature over time were recorded in both
analog and digital forms starting when the gap between the platens was 50 mm. A
sample plot o f these relationships is shown in Fig. 1.
W h e n the flakeboards were removed from the press, they were m a r k e d with a
prefabricated template at 12 evenly distributed locations (Fig. 2). The boards with
resin adhesive were trimmed to 25.4 by 29.2 cm. Those without resin adhesive were
not trimmed to avoid possible disintegration 9
Altogether, 40 boards with resin and 36 b o a r d s without resin were manufactured over
a period o f 2 weeks. After the boards were removed from the press, they were weighed
and the thickness measured at the 12 locations shown in Fig. 2. Boards were then
transferred to an environmental r o o m at 27 ~ and 80 percent R H , where they were
weighed and their 12 thickness values measured a b o u t once a week for 71 days. By
then, both thickness swelling and weight increase had largely stabilized.
Thickness swelling and density variation in aspen flakeboards 77
7 RSC
9,'_. (%}
6 ",~ o 9 0 x 6
e+ 8~x o 1 + 12
9+ _,_, "I~ ~
5 §
o + 9 Pmox
~4
,, + T f O:.,gs
,oJ
++
2
"~'l'- [ (t =240s)
, , , , ,
)'6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Moisture content (%)
Fig. 3. M a x i m u m pressure Pm,x at t = 19 s and residual pressure P,e, at t = 2 4 0 s as a function of
initial moisture content for several resin solids content (RSC) values
78 J.Y. Liu and J.D. McNatt
Fig. 4. Cross section of a blister close to surface of flakeboard with 11 percent initial moisture
content and 12 percent resin solids content
the press was 2.0 percent for the 7-percent I M C boards, 3.5 percent for the l l - p e r c e n t
I M C boards, and 4.4 percent for the 15-percent I M C boards.
Stability of boards with no RSC depended very much on IMC. A t 27 ~ and 80
percent R H , those boards with 7 percent I M C became loose in 2 weeks and started
to fall a p a r t in a b o u t 1 month; the boards with 11 percent I M C also became loose in
2 weeks but remained intact during the rest of the test period. Boards with 15 percent
I M C remained intact with glossy surfaces during the entire 71-day conditioning
period. This could have been the results o f better contact between flakes as a result
o f plasticization (Kelley et al. 1987) and the adhesive effect of the lignin, which
became activated at higher moisture contents (Tomimura, M a t s u d a 1986).
Equilibrium moisture contents of all the boards at 80 percent R H were very
consistent, ranging from 11.6 to 13.4 percent and averaging 12.5 percent, based on
ovendry weight o f w o o d plus resin.
A l t h o u g h the vertical moisture movement in the boards could not be monitored
in the manufacturing process, it seemed to be restricted; blisters occasionally ap-
peared close to the surfaces of a number of boards in which 1MC was > 7 percent and
RSC > 6 percent. A cross section through a blister in a board with 11 percent I M C
and 12 percent RSC is shown in Fig. 4; a gap created by trapped steam is visible below
the upper surface o f the board. The blisters could not be totally eliminated by
increasing the pressing time from 320 to 530 s. This observation agrees with that
reported by M a k u et al. (1959), who stated that vertical movement of moisture was
restricted within flake-type particles. Blisters in boards with 0 or 1 percent RSC were
not evident, possibly because moisture movement was not greatly or only slightly
h a m p e r e d by resin adhesive.
Figure 5 presents the thickness changes with time o f a b o a r d with 7 percent I M C
and 6 percent RSC at the 12 locations shown in Fig. 2. After the b o a r d had been
reconditioned at 22 ~ and 65 percent R H until equilibrium, it was cut into twelve 6.4-
by 5.1-cm specimens (Fig. 2). The thickness and density of each piece were measured
Thickness swelling and density variation in aspen flakeboards 79
- - end 8 0 percent RH
Thickness, 27~
------ Thickness,22~ and 6 5 percent RH
qP-.---o Density (basedon ovendry weight)
.•. t 0.86
j\I".
24 / \ /10.82
20
2
~12
,I ! .t " ~
8
2 ,J
i.--
4
0 f
~
1 2
'
3
~
4
L
5
,
6
~
Location number
7
~
8
,
9
, ,
10
,
11
~n0.70
12
Fig. 5. Thickness swelling with time for flakeboard with 7 percent initial moisture content and
6 percent resin solids content at 27 ~ and 80 percent relative humidity (RH) and after condition-
ing at 22 ~ and 65 percent RH. Density values based on initial thickness and ovendry weight
of small specimens (Fig. 2)
and the percentage of residual thickness swelling (springback) recorded (Fig. 5). The
residual thickness swelling curve thus obtained follows essentially the same pattern as
the curves obtained during conditioning o f the b o a r d at 80 percent R H , indicating the
reconditioning and cutting of the b o a r d did not significantly affect the relative thick-
ness changes at the 12 locations. As used here, the term residual thickness swelling
does not refer entirely to springback because initial thickness measurements were
made at a b o u t 2 to 4 percent moisture content and final thickness measurements were
made at a b o u t 8 to 10 percent moisture content. (Moisture contents o f the specimens
after conditioning at 65 percent R H were a b o u t 8 to 10 percent.)
The corresponding density curve shows that density did not bear a definite rela-
tionship to thickness (Fig. 5). The r a n d o m variation of thickness swelling with density
serves to verify the inconsistent findings in the literature that thickness swelling might
or might not increase with increasing density (e.g., Gatchell et al. 1966; Halligan,
Schniewind 1972; Lehmann, Hefty 1973; Stewart, L e h m a n n 1973). It also implies that
the relationship between thickness swelling and density in a b o a r d is much more
complex than that described by Suchsland (1967).
Total thickness swelling at 80 percent R H and residual thickness swelling follow-
ing conditioning at 65 percent R H are presented in Fig. 6 for flakeboards made at 6
and 12 percent R S C and 7, 11, and 15 percent I M C . Boards m a d e with 0 and 1 percent
RSC were excluded because their spongy nature precluded accurate thickness mea-
80 J.Y. Liu and J.D. McNatt
24 Location number
20
~_4
Fig. 6. Thickness swelling over time for
0 i i ! I I I I I several locations (from Fig. 5)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (day)
16 Location 5 7
s
10 11
~8
Conclusions
References
Beech, J. C. 1975: The thickness swelling and wood particleboard. Holzforschung 29:11-18
Gatchell, C. J.; Heebink, B. G. ; Hefty, F. V. 1966: Influence of component variables on proper-
ties of particleboard for exterior use. Forest Prod. J. 16(4): 46-59
Halligan, A. E; Schniewind, A. P. 1972: Effect of moisture on physical and creep properties of
particleboard. Forest Prod. J. 22(4): 41-48
Humphrey, P. E. 1982: Physical aspects of wood particleboard manufacture. Ph.D. thesis,
Department of Forestry and Wood Science, University College of North Wales, Bangor
Kass, A. J. 1969: Inelastic mechanical behavior in wood stressed perpendicular to the grain
radially, Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Kavvouras, P. K. 1977: Fundamental process variables in particleboard manufacture. Ph.D.
thesis, Department of Forestry and Wood Science, University College of North Wales,
Bangor
Kelley, S. S.; Rials, T, G. ; Glasser, W. G. 1987: Relaxation behavior of the amorphous compo-
nents of wood. J. Mater. Sci. 22:617-624
Kelly, M. W. 1977: Critical literature review of relationships between processing parameters and
physical properties of particleboard. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-10. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Products Laboratory
Kunesh, R. H. 1961: The inelastic behavior of wood: A new concept for improved panel
forming processes. Forest Prod. J. 11 : 395-406
Lehmann, W F. ; Hefty, F. V. 1973 : Resin efficiency and dimensional stability of flakeboard. Res.
Pap. FPL 207. Madison, W 1: U.S, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Prod-
ucts Laboratory
82 J.Y. Liu and J.D. McNatt
Maku, T.; Hamada, R. ; Sasaki, H. 1959: Studies on the particleboard (chipboard). IV. Temper-
ature and moisture distribution in particleboard during hot pressing. Kyoto University,
Wood Research 21 : 34 46
Stewart, H. A. ; Lehmann, W. F. 1973 : High-quality particleboard from cross-grain, knife-planed
hardwood flakes. Forest Prod. J. 23(8): 52-60
Strickler, M. D. 1959: Effect of press cycles and moisture content on properties of Douglas-fir
flakeboard. Forest Prod. J. 9 : 2 0 3 - 2 1 5
Suchsland, O. 1959: An analysis of the particleboard process. Quarterly Bull. of the Michigan
Agric. Exp. Stn., Michigan State University 42:350 372
Suchsland, O. ! 967 : Behavior of a particleboard mat during the pressing cycle. Forest Prod. J.
17(2): 51-57
Suchsland, O. 1973: Hygroscopic thickness swelling and related properties of selected commer-
cial particleboards. Forest Prod. J. 23 (7): 26-30
Tomimura, Y.; Matsuda, T. J 986: Particleboard made of steamed flakes. Mokuzai Gakkaishi
32:170-175
Jen Y. Liu
J. D. McNatt
USDA Forest Service
Forest Products Laboratory
One Gifford Pinchot Drive
Madison WI 53705-2398
USA