You are on page 1of 2

UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

RUBRIC FOR LABORATORY REPORT +

REPORT TITLE GROUP


COURSE CODE
COURSE NAME
STUDENT NAME DUE DATE
STUDENT ID
☐ CLO3 : Demonstrate the capability of programmable logic devices in
controlling a system. (P2)

CLO ☐ CLO4 : Construct the combinational and sequential logic circuits by using
logic gates, flip flops and MSI devices. (P3)

 Tick which applicable.


This CLO is to evaluate the phsycomotor elements in the learning domain
whereby students were evaluated based on their skills (hands-on) to solve
laboratory experiments.

The write-up for laboratory report should identify, formulate and solve
broadly defined engineering problems of instrumentation and control
DESCRIPTION OF CLO
engineering technology practice in digital system.

Group based laboratory task will assess abilty and skill on the professional
skills such as excellent leadership, and teamwork in diverse and cross-
functional technical teams and must be translated in term of laboratory
report.

VERY VERY EXCEL-


PERFORMANCE CRITERIA POOR
POOR GOOD
GOOD LENT
MARKS
1 2 3 4 5

AREA 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope of introduction provide comprehensive descriptions of task.
1.2 Provide brief explanation about engineering technology problems and
contribute to the designs of systems, components or processes to
meet specified needs in introduction.
1.3 Provide brief explanation about demonstration on professional skills
such as excellent leadership, and teamwork in diverse and cross-
functional technical teams in introduction.
AREA 2. IMPLEMENTATION
2.1 Concepts and findings are clearly stated and defined (e.g., block
diagram,derivation, code (or script), flowchart, etc), with clear descriptions
and explanations of relevant concepts
2.2 Sufficient and precise synthesis of task and added own thoughts,
interpretations and arguments (i.e., systematic and graphical explanation
of concept or methods, diagram, table, etc)
AREA 3. TESTING AND VERIFICATION
3.1 Clear explanation of result validation (i.e., logic gate designs, outputs)
3.2 Sufficient explanation of the implication of testing done which leading to
results.
AREA 4. CONCLUSION
4.1 Answers are made based specific objectives of specific topic related to
engineering technology problems and contribute to the designs of
systems, components or to meet specified needs in introduction.

4.2 Advantage/Limitation is highlighted in term of appropriate techniques


and resources.
4.4 Full paragraph is well-written, with good use of grammar, punctuation, and
spelling.

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
FULL
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA UNABLE CONSTANT PERIODIC INDEPENDENT
INDEPENDENT

0 1 2 3 4

PRACTICAL SKILLS

1 Answers are made based specific objectives of specific topic related to


appropriate techniques and resources.

NOT EXTEND EXTEND EXTEND


PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SUBMIT 3 2 1
ON TIME

-55 -15 -10 -5 0

SUBMISSION
1 Comply with submission dateline

OVERALL MARKS (%) :


ASSESSOR REMARKS:

ASSESSED BY: DATE OF ASSESSMENT:

You might also like