PROJECT DESIGN RUBRICS
CRITERIA EXCELLENT (4) VERY GOOD (3)
The design explains the key
purposes of th etechnology
and points in a clear
manner.
PURPOSE
The design shows the
strengthss and weaknesses
of technology, and sugesst
ways in which it can be
CRITIQUE innovated.
The design details both key
and hiddes innovation and
works how to work hand in
hand with the purpose.
INNOVATION
The design has made
excellent significance
between purposes and
innovation.
SIGNIFICANCE
Evaluated by: LARENZE P. DIMAANDAL
GOOD (2) POOR (1)
The design The design explains The design explains
explains all of the most of the key less of the key
key purposes of purposes of the purposes of the
the design. design. design.
The design shows The design shows The design shows
the strengths and either the strengths either the strengths
weaknesses of and weaknesses of and weaknesses of
the technology. the technology but the technology
not both. The (both). The design
design does not. does not.
The design details The design neglects The design neglects
the key features details the key most of the details
of the invention features of the and the key features
and shows the invention and of the invention and
purposes work shows the purposes shows the purposes
onto. work onto. work onto.
The design has The design has The design has
made significance made some made less
between significance significance
purposes and between purposes between purposes
innovation. and innovation. and innovation.
 PROJECT PERFORM
NOT ACCEPTABLE (0) Score CRITERIA EXCELLENT (4)
The design does not The member conrtributes
refer to the purposes to the design processes
of the design. giving his/her best to
attend meettings and do
CONTRIBUTION specific works.

Mention that strength The member has a great

or the weakness of the mastery to the design
technology. process and the
technology behind it.
MASTERY

The design does not The member's idea places

detailed the features key and hiddes innovation
of the invention or the and works how to work
purposes the show. hand in hand with the
working ethics.
IDEA

The design has made The member has made

no significance excellent significance
between the between purposes and
innovation and other innovation with knowing
things. the right thing to work
WORKING ETHICS out.

Total :
Precentage:
Evaluated by:
 PROJECT PERFORMANCE RUBRICS
VERY GOOD (3) GOOD (2) POOR (1) NOT ACCEPTABLE (0) Score
The member The member The member The member does not
conrtributes to the conrtributes to the conrtributes to the contribute to
design processes design processes design processes anything.
his/her attend his/her attend few his/her attend few
meettings and do meettings and do meettings and do
specific works. specific works. few specific works.

The member has a The member has a The member has a The member does not
good mastery to the masters in either minimal knowledge contribute to
design process and the the design process in either the design anything.
technology behind it. and the technology process and the
behind it. technology behind
it.

The member's idea the The member The member The member does not
key features of the neglects ideas and neglects most of the contribute idea in the
invention and shows the key features of idea and the key features of the
ethical working the invention but features of the invention without any
pattern. shows working invention and ethical work..
ethics. shows no working
ethics.

The member has made The member has The member has The member has
significance between made some made less made no significance
purposes and significance significance between the
innovation, complying between purposes between purposes innovation and other
with the right work. and innovation, and innovation, not things.
complying with the complying in
right work. assigned works.

Total :

Precentage: