Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clat 2016 Question Paper and Answer Key PDF
Clat 2016 Question Paper and Answer Key PDF
2. the best
4. more than
Ans 1. whoever
2. whom
3. whichever
4. whomever
2. not to get
3. not get
4. not getting
Ans 1. off
2. away
3. out
4. from
Ans 1. pedagogy
2. philately
3. paediatrics
4. training
Ans 1. with
2. by
3. of
4. from
2. little
3. lot of
4. any
Ans 1. on, a
2. in, a
3. in, the
4. upon, the
Ans 1. knock at
2. knock on
3. knock to
4. knock
Ans 1. at
2. across
3. to
4. around
Ans 1. in
2. on
3. from
4. with
Ans 1. goes
2. are going
3. were going
4. go
Ans 1. to
2. be
3. been
4. being
Ans 1. at
2. in
3. to
4. on
Ans 1. integerety
2. integerity
3. integrity
4. intigerity
Ans 1. deceive
2. deceeve
3. diecieve
4. decieve
Ans 1. berrister
2. barisster
3. barrister
4. berister
Ans 1. sacribegous
2. sacrilegious
3. sacrilegiuos
4. saereligious
Ans 1. collaborat
2. colaborate
3. collaborrate
4. collaborate
2. The Film Star come out of the car and smiled at the people.
3. The Film Star got out of the car and smiled at the people.
4. The Film Star climbed off the car and smiled at the people.
Ans 1. Your grammar is very good, but you need to work on correcting y
our pronunciation.
2. Your grammar is very good, but you need to work on modifying y
our pronunciation.
3. Your grammar is very good but you need to work on managing y
our pronunciation.
4. Your grammar is very good, but you need to work on repairing yo
ur pronunciation.
2. in defence of a comment
Ans 1. false
2. expected to happen
3. fake identity
4. social blunder
2. bachelorhood, single
3. ignorance, folly
4. romance, boring
Linked Answer Question:
Direction for Questions 29-30: Complete the proverb, in the following questions:
SubQuestion No : 30
Q.3 ______________ waters run ____________.
0 Question ID : 2185952438
Chosen Option : 1
Marks : -0.25
2. Stagnant, leisurely
3. Still, deep
4. Hot, fast
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 31
Q.3 In the fifth paragraph, the word 'endorsement' means
1 Question ID : 2185952450
Chosen Option : 1
Marks : 1.00
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 32
Q.3 The paradox, 'it's certain that nothing is certain in life', indicates the
2 writer's Question ID : 2185952448
Chosen Option : 3
Marks : 1.00
2. scientific mind
3. analytical mind
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 33
Q.3 Immanuel's interest in dynamites influenced Alfred's inclination for
3 working ___________. Question ID : 2185952442
Chosen Option : 2
Marks : 1.00
2. with explosives
3. with contradiction
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 34
Q.3 The Manhattan Project was initiated _____________.
4 Question ID : 2185952446
Chosen Option : 1
Marks : 1.00
3. in honour of Einstein.
4. to bomb Hiroshima.
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 35
Q.3 In paragraph 4, the word 'accomplished' means ___________.
5 Question ID : 2185952449
Chosen Option : 1
Marks : 1.00
2. won awards.
3. worked hard.
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 36
Q.3 The passage is _____________.
6 Question ID : 2185952441
Chosen Option : --
Marks : 0.00
2. a descriptive essay.
3. an argumentative essay
4. an expository essay.
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 37
Q.3 Alfred established the Nobel Prizes to ____________.
7 Question ID : 2185952445
Chosen Option : 4
Marks : -0.25
Ans 1. ease his guilt and promote work for the betterment of mankind.
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 38
Q.3 Working with arms and ammunition helped Alfred to amass _______
8 __. Question ID : 2185952443
Chosen Option : 3
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. enemies
2. intelligence
3. wealth
4. popularity
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 39
Q.3 One of the paradoxes in Alfred's life was that he was ___________.
9 Question ID : 2185952444
Chosen Option : 1
Marks : 1.00
1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed
by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research
and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was e
ngaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingen
uity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
3. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the d
ynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring
men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who work
ed for the promotion of peace.
4. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a lar
ge part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f
or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
5. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world'
s first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was
considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the w
orld's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in
1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nu
clear research.
6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never r
ecommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked
with the bomb.
Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain t
hat nothing is certain in life.
SubQuestion No : 40
Q.4 Einstein had the impression that the Germans would __________.
0 Question ID : 2185952447
Chosen Option : 2
Marks : 1.00
3. bomb Hiroshima.
2. Rajesh Atra
4. Mahendra Singh
2. Green Planet
3. Blue planet
4. Brown Planet
3. Prime Minister
4. Attorney General of India
2. December, 2015
3. January, 2016
4. November, 2015
2. Katerina Lehou
3. Ronaldo
Ans 1. Mysuru
2. Tirupathi
3. Varanasi
4. New Delhi
2. 15th July
3. 5th June
4. 15th March
Ans 1. Punjab
2. Kerala
3. Haryana
4. Sikkim
Ans 1. USA
2. Japan
3. UK
4. Greece
Ans 1. Telangana
2. Punjab
3. Karnataka
4. Rajasthan
Ans 1. China
2. South Africa
3. Mexico
4. India
4. Justice Balakrishnan
Ans 1. Geneva
2. New York
3. Paris
4. New Delhi
Ans 1. Punjab
2. Kerala
3. Telangana
4. Andhra Pradesh
2. Fyodor Dostoevsky
3. Karl Marx
2. Boys' Scout
2. Sushruthi Krishna
3. Sushobita Kapoor
4. Priyadarshini Chatterjee
Ans 1. 20
2. 15
3. 25
4. 30
2. Jayavardane
3. Maithripala Sirisena
4. K. Sripavan
Ans 1. 6
2. 16
3. 26
4. 20
3. Justice Bhandhari
Ans 1. U. S. A.
2. Sweden
3. India
4. Denmark
Ans 1. 2 lakhs
2. 1 lakhs
3. 3 lakhs
4. 4 lakhs
Ans 1. Vice-President
2. Prime Minister
3. Chief Election Commissioner
2. Dipa Karmakar
3. Anjubala
4. Rupinder Kaur
2. 153 laws
3. 315 laws
4. 1053 laws
Ans 1. Mars
2. Venus
3. Mercury
4. Jupiter
Ans 1. Rupee
2. Ringgit
3. Baht
4. Peseta
Ans 1. Nicaragua
2. Nigeria
3. Nepal
4. Maldives
Ans 1. fourth
2. fifth
3. second
4. third
2. Virat Kohli
3. Dhoni
4. Sania Mirza
Ans 1. UK
2. Japan
3. Pakistan
4. India
2. Maharashtra
3. Karnataka
4. Uttar Pradesh
Ans 1. 603
2. 503
3. 453
4. 403
Ans 1. Vice-President
2. Prime Minister
4. President
3. Hindi
4. English
3. Prajusha of India
Ans 1.
2.
3.
4.
2. on 24th day
3. on 27th day
4. on 17th day
Ans 1. 30 kms
2. 80 kms
3. 70 kms
4. 40 kms
Ans 1. 16 and 18
2. 22 and 24
3. 20 and 22
4. 12 and 14
2. 7:28:00 hours
3. 7:27:30 hours
4. 7:27:50 hours
Ans 1. 36 kgs.
2. 44 kgs.
3. 53 kgs.
4. 80 kgs.
4. Equal
2. Rs. 1672
3. Rs. 1652
4. Rs. 2002
Ans 1. 285
2. 250
3. 276
4. 280
Ans 1. 64.25
2. 65.75
3. 64.75
4. 63.25
2.
3.
4.
2. 300, 30
3. 400, 30
4. 200, 20
Ans 1. 5052
2. 5000
3. 6000
4. 5050
2. lesser than
3. greater than
4. equal to
Ans 1. 101
2. 100
3. 99
4. 98
2. Rs. 750.87
3. Rs. 1,000
4. Rs. 800
2. 14½ degrees
3. 17½ degrees
4. 13½ degrees
2. Rs. 11,475
3. Rs. 10,950
4. Rs. 12,750
Ans 1. 40 litres
2. 38.5 litres
3. 38 litres
4. 39.5 litres
Ans 1. Rs. 18
2. Rs. 15
3. Rs. 12
4. Rs. 21
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 1
Q.1 Principle: Whoever by words or writing conveys to others any imput
ation concerning any person's reputation is said to defame that pers Question ID : 2185952538
on. Chosen Option : 3
Facts: During a marriage ceremony, 'A' circulated a pamphlet saying Marks : 1.00
that 'S', sister of the bride, is a thief, she has stolen the shoes of the
bridegroom.
Ans 1. 'A' defamed the bride.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 2
Q.2 Principle: Causing of an effect partly by an act and partly by an omis
sion is an offence. Question ID : 2185952536
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: 'A' confined her daughter 'D' in a room. 'A' also did not provid
e any food to her daughter 'D'. Consequently, 'D' died of starvation. Marks : -0.25
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 3
Q.3 Principles:
• A person is said to abet the doing of a thing when he instigates any Question ID : 2185952542
other person to do that thing. Chosen Option : 2
• Mere acquiescence, however, does not amount to instigation.
Marks : -0.25
Facts: 'A' says to 'B': I am going to kill 'C'." And, 'B' replies: "Do as y
ou wish and take the consequences"; whereafter 'A' kills 'C'.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 4
Q.4 Principle: Killing is not murder if the offender, whilst deprived of the
power of self-control by intense and sudden provocation, causes the Question ID : 2185952543
death of the person who gave the provocation. Chosen Option : 1
Facts: 'A', a man found his girl friend sleeping, in her own bed room, Marks : 1.00
with another man named 'B'. 'A' did not do anything but went to his
home, picked a gun and cartridges, returned to the girl friend's bed r
oom with loaded gun but found the place empty. After fifteen days h
e saw his girl friend dining in a restaurant. Without waiting for even
a second, 'A' fired five bullets at his girl friend who died on the spot.
Ans 1. 'A' did not kill his girl friend under intense and sudden provocatio
n.
2. 'A' killed his girl friend under intense and sudden provocation.
3. 'A' could have killed both 'B' and his girl friend.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 5
Q.5 Principle:
1. Wagering agreements are void. Question ID : 2185952533
2. Collateral agreements to wagering contracts are valid. Chosen Option : 3
Facts: XYZ Bank lends Rs. 40, 000 to Sabu in order to enable him to Marks : 1.00
award as prize to Randeep who is the winner of horse race. Later Sa
bu refuses to pay the prize stating that horse racing is wagering agr
eement. Can XYZ Bank recover money from Sabu?
Ans 1. No, as it is a wagering contract.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 6
Q.6 Principle: Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the decision of a pe
rson to enter into a contract is not fraud. Question ID : 2185952526
Chosen Option : 1
Facts: 'A' sells to 'B' (A's daughter who is minor) a horse which 'A' k
nows to be unsound. 'A' says nothing to 'B' about the unsoundness Marks : 1.00
of the horse.
Ans 1. 'A' has not committed fraud.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 7
Q.7 Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the
act should be the same for which consent was given. Question ID : 2185952551
Fact: 'B' was formally invited by 'A' to his house. 'B' after sitting for s Chosen Option : 2
ome time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. 'A' Marks : -0.25
sued 'B' for trespass.
Ans 1. 'B' has offended 'A' by moving to bed room.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 8
Q.8 Principle: Consent is a good defence for civil action in tort. But cons
ent must include both knowledge of risk and assumption of risk, i.e , Question ID : 2185952550
readiness to bear harm. Chosen Option : 3
Facts: A lady passenger was aware that the driver of the cab, in whic Marks : -0.25
h she opted to travel was little intoxicated. The cab met with an acci
dent and lady got injured.
Ans 1. Lady can refuse to pay the fare as she had suffered injuries.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 9
Q.9 Principle: A condition to a contract can also be complied with after t
he happening of the event to which such a condition is attached. Question ID : 2185952556
Chosen Option : 4
Facts: 'A' promises to pay Rs. 5000 to 'B' on the condition that he sh
all marry with the consent of 'C', 'D' and 'E'. 'B' marries without the c Marks : 1.00
onsent of 'C', 'D' and 'E', but obtains their consent after the marriage.
Ans 1. 'B' has not fulfilled the condition.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 10
Q.1 Principle: Existence of all the alleged facts is relevant, whether they
0 occurred at the same time and place or at different times and places. Question ID : 2185952557
Chosen Option : 4
Facts: 'A', a citizen of England, is accused of committing murder of '
B' in India by taking part in a conspiracy hatched in England. Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. Only the fact that 'A' is accused of conspiracy hatched in Englan
d is relevant.
2. Only the fact that 'A' citizen of England is accused of committing
murder of 'B' in India is relevant.
3. 'A' citizen of England cannot be tried in India.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 11
Q.1 Principle: Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under twelv
1 e years of age, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understan Question ID : 2185952541
ding to judge the nature and consequences of his conduct on that o Chosen Option : 1
ccasion.
Marks : 1.00
Facts: Himesh, 11 years old boy, picks up a gold ring worth Rs 5000/
- lying on a table in his friend's house and immediately sells it for Rs
2000/-, and misappropriates the money.
Ans 1. Himesh would not be protected under the principle stated above
because his acts show that he was sufficiently mature to understand the n
ature and consequences of his conduct.
2. Himesh would be protected under the principle stated above bec
ause his acts show that he was not sufficiently mature to understand the n
ature and consequences of his conduct.
3. Himesh would be protected under the principle stated above bec
ause he is below 12 years of age.
4. Himesh would not be protected under the principle stated above
because, irrespective of the age, stealing is an offence.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 12
Q.1 Principle: Defamation is the publication of a statement which tends t
2 o lower reputation of a person in the estimation of other members of Question ID : 2185952548
the society generally. Chosen Option : 2
Marks : 1.00
Facts: 'A' writes a highly offensive and derogatory letter about 'B', a
nd sends it directly to 'B' in a sealed cover.
Ans 1. 'A' is liable to 'B' for defamation, as it has hurt his (B's) self-estee
m.
2. A' is not liable to 'B' for defamation, since there is no publication t
o any other person in whose estimation the reputation of 'B' could be brou
ght down.
3. 'A' is liable to 'B' for defamation, as the letter is highly offensive a
nd derogatory and is directly sent to 'B'.
4. 'A' is liable to 'B' for defamation, as the letter is highly offensive a
nd derogatory.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 13
Q.1 Principle: Letters or words not describing quality of things can be re
3 gistered as a trade mark. Question ID : 2185952554
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: Ram made an application for registration of alphabet 'B' writte
n in a fancy style as trade mark to be applied on packets and cartons Marks : 1.00
of shoes manufactured by him.
Ans 1. The alphabet 'B' cannot be registered as trade mark because it i
s an English letter.
2. The alphabet 'B' can be registered as trade mark.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 14
Q.1 Principle: Acceptance of proposal must be the exact mirror image of
4 the proposal. Question ID : 2185952524
Chosen Option : 4
Facts: 'A' made a proposal to 'B' to sell a chair for Rs. 500. 'B' expres
sed his desire to buy the said chair for Rs. 400. Marks : 1.00
3. It is not clear whether 'B' has accepted the proposal of 'A' or not.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 15
Q.1 Principles:
5 · An independent contractor is one who is employed to do some wo Question ID : 2185952547
rk of his employer. He is engaged under a contract for services. He u Chosen Option : 1
ndertakes to produce a given result, and in the actual execution of th
e work, he is not under the direct control or following directions of hi Marks : -0.25
s employer. He may use his own discretion in execution of the work
assigned.
· In general, an employer is not liable for the torts (wrongful acts) of
his independent contractor. But, the employer may be held liable if h
e directs him to do some careless acts.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 16
Q.1 Principle: A person, who is usually of unsound mind, but occasionall
6 y normal, may make a contract when he is not of unsound mind. Question ID : 2185952530
Chosen Option : 4
Facts: 'A' generally remains in the state of unsound mind and rarely
becomes capable of understanding the things. Marks : 1.00
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 17
Q.1 Principles:
7 · A servant is one who is employed to do some work for his employ Question ID : 2185952546
er (master). He is engaged under a contract of service. He works dire Chosen Option : 4
ctly under the control and directions of his master.
· In general, the master is vicariously liable for those torts (wrongfu Marks : 1.00
l acts) of his servant which are done by the servant in the course of
his employment.
Facts: 'M' appointed 'D' exclusively for the purpose of driving his tou
rist vehicle. 'M' also appointed 'C' exclusively for the purpose of perf
orming the work of a conductor for the tourist vehicle. During one tri
p, at the end of the journey, 'C', while 'D' was not on the driver's seat,
and apparently for the purpose of turning the vehicle in the right dire
ction for the next journey, drove it through the street at high speed,
and negligently injured 'P'.
Ans 1. 'M' could be made liable for the act of 'C', as 'C' was employed u
nder a contract of service.
2. 'M' is not liable as he was not present at the time of accident.
3. 'M' could be made liable for the act of 'C', as his (C's) act of drivi
ng the vehicle was within his scope of employment.
4. 'M' could not be made liable for the act of 'C', as his (C's) act of d
riving the vehicle was not in the course of his employment.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 18
Q.1 Principle: Where a person lawfully does anything for another person
8 , or delivers anything to him, not intending to do so or to provide gra Question ID : 2185952527
tuitously, and such other person takes the benefit of that; the latter i Chosen Option : 4
s bound to compensate the former for something done or thing prov
ided, or to restore, the thing so delivered. Marks : 1.00
Facts: Trader 'A' delivers certain eatables at B's house by mistake. '
B' consumed the eatables without asking anything. Which of the foll
owing derivations is correct?
Ans 1. It is the discretion of 'B' to make payment to 'A'
2. 'B' can be made liable to pay for the eatables, only if 'A' establish
es an express contract between 'A' and 'B'.
3. 'B' is not bound to pay 'A' for the eatables.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 19
Q.1 Principle: Law does not penalise for wrongs which are of trivial natu
9 re. Question ID : 2185952540
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: In the course of a discussion, 'A' threw a file of papers at the t
able which touched the hands of 'B'. Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. 'A' is liable for insulting 'B'.
3. 'A' is liable for his act, as the file touched 'B's hand.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 20
Q.2 Principle: One who dishonestly mis-appropriates or converts to his
0 own use or sells any movable property belonging to another, is guilt Question ID : 2185952539
y of the offence of misappropriation. Chosen Option : 1
Facts: 'A' takes property belonging to 'Z' out of Z's possession, in go Marks : 1.00
od faith, believing when he takes it, that the property belongs to him
self. Subsequently, 'A', on discovering his mistake, without disclosin
g the actual facts, dishonestly sells the property to a stranger.
Ans 1. 'A' is guilty of an offence of misappropriation.
4. 'A' is not guilty as the property can be recovered from the strang
er.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 21
Q.2 Principle: There are certain acts which, though harmful, are not wron
1 gful in law; therefore, do not give legal right to bring action in law, to Question ID : 2185952545
the person who suffers from such acts. Chosen Option : 4
Facts: 'Prakash' has a rice mill. His neighbour, Shanti, sets up anoth Marks : 1.00
er rice mill and offers a tough competition to Prakash. As a consequ
ence, Prakash's profits fall down. He brings a suit against Shanti for
damages.
Ans 1. Prakash may succeed in his claim for damages, as it is a case of
loss to his business.
2. Prakash can succeed in his claim for damages, as it is a case of
damage as a result of infringement of his legal right.
3. Prakash can succeed in his claim as it is a case of actual damag
es.
4. Prakash cannot succeed in his claim for damages, as it is a case
of damage without infringement of any legal right.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 22
Q.2 Principle: Whoever takes away any moveable thing from the land of
2 any person without that person's consent, he is said to have commit Question ID : 2185952534
ted theft. Chosen Option : 3
Facts: During his visit to the house of 'C', 'A' asked 'B', the son of 'C' Marks : 1.00
, to accompany 'A' to the forest. Neither 'A' nor 'B' informed 'C' in thi
s regard. 'B' accompanied 'A' to the forest.
Ans 1. 'A' has not committed theft till 'B' did not accompany him.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 23
Q.2 Principle: Whoever does not arrest the killer and report the matter to
3 the concerned authorities commits an offence. Question ID : 2185952535
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: 'A', a woman, sees 'B' , another woman, killing a third woman
'C'. 'A' neither attempted to arrest 'B' nor informed the concerned aut Marks : 1.00
horities.
Ans 1. 'A' has not committed an offence.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 24
Q.2 Principle: Intentional application of force to another person is action
4 able in law. Question ID : 2185952544
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: 'P' and 'D' are unknown to each other. When 'P' is about to sit
on a chair, 'D' intentionally pulls it away as a result of which 'P' falls Marks : 1.00
on to the floor and is injured.
Ans 1. 'D' is not liable as the injury is not directly caused.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 25
Q.2 Principle: An agreement may be entered into orally or in writing, or b
5 y conduct. Question ID : 2185952532
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: 'A' went to the shop of 'B' and picked a toothbrush and gave a
cheque of Rupees twenty to 'B' and left the shop. Marks : -0.25
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 26
Q.2 Principle: Law never enforces an impossible promise.
6 Question ID : 2185952531
Facts: 'A' made a promise to 'B' to discover treasure by magic. Chosen Option : 1
Marks : 1.00
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 27
Q.2 Principle: A person is said to have committed assault when an appre
7 hension is caused in the mind of a person that he is about to use ph Question ID : 2185952552
ysical force against his body. Chosen Option : 1
Marks : -0.25
Facts: 'A' abuses 'B' while he was sitting in a moving train, by aggre
ssively shaking his fists when 'B' was standing on the railway platfor
m at a distance.
Ans 1. 'A' has committed assault against 'B'.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 28
Q.2 Principle: Nothing is an offence, which is done by accident or misfor
8 tune, and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing o Question ID : 2185952537
f a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper car Chosen Option : 2
e and caution.
Marks : -0.25
Facts: 'A' takes up a gun, not knowing whether it is loaded or not, po
ints it playfully at 'B' and pulls the trigger. Consequently, 'B' falls dea
d.
Ans 1. B's death is not accidental, as there was want of proper care and
caution on the part of 'A'.
2. B's death is accidental, as 'A' had no intention to kill 'B'.
3. B's death is accidental, as 'A' was just pointing the gun playfully
at 'B'.
4. B's death is accidental, as 'A' did not have the knowledge that th
e gun is loaded.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 29
Q.2 Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforced only a
9 t the option of the party whose consent was not free. Question ID : 2185952529
Chosen Option : 3
Facts: A obtains the consent of 'B' to enter into an agreement by put
ting a gun on the head of B's girl friend. Marks : 1.00
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 30
Q.3 Principle: Sale of liquor is illegal. All agreements relating to prohibit
0 ed items do not exist in the eyes of law. Question ID : 2185952525
Chosen Option : 3
Facts: 'A' entered into an agreement with 'B' for the sale of liquor. 'A'
failed to supply the agreed quantity of liquor to 'B'. Marks : 1.00
4. 'A' and 'B' can initiate appropriate legal proceeding against each
other.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 31
Q.3 Principle: In cases where there is an infringement of legal right even
1 without any actual loss or damage, the person whose right is infring Question ID : 2185952558
ed has a cause of action. Chosen Option : 4
Facts: 'P' was wrongfully prevented by the Returning Officer from ex Marks : 1.00
ercising his vote in an assembly election. However, the candidate for
whom he wanted to caste his vote won the election. Still, he ('P') bro
ught an action claiming damages. Which of the following derivations
is correct?
Ans 1. 'P' would not succeed in his action, as he did not suffer any loss i
n that election.
2. 'P' would not succeed in his action, as the candidate for whom h
e wanted to give his vote won the election.
3. 'P' would succeed in his action, as it is mandatory to cast vote.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 32
Q.3 Principle: False imprisonment is a tort (wrong) which means the tota
2 l restraint of a person's liberty without lawful justification. Question ID : 2185952549
Chosen Option : 3
Facts: A part of a public road had been closed for spectators of a bo
at race. 'P' wanted to enter but he was prevented by 'D' and other pol Marks : 1.00
icemen because he had not paid the admission fee. 'P' was able to e
nter the enclosure by other means but was unable to go where he w
anted to go. The policemen refused access to where he wanted to go
but allowed him to remain where he was or to go back. 'P' remained
within the enclosure and refused to leave. Subsequently, 'P' sued 'D'
for false imprisonment.
Ans 1. 'D' could be made liable for false imprisonment, as he did restrict
P's movements.
2. 'D' could not be made liable for false imprisonment as he has not
touched him.
3. 'D' could not be made liable for false imprisonment, as he did not
totally restrict P's movements.
4. It was a case of false imprisonment, but 'D' could not be made li
able for it.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 33
Q.3 Principle: Import means bringing some consignment into India from
3 a foreign country. Question ID : 2185952555
Chosen Option : 2
Facts: A consignment from Sri Lanka entered the territorial waters of
India. However, this consignment never crossed the Indian custom b Marks : -0.25
arrier nor did it enter into the stream of commerce in India.
Ans 1. The consignment was imported into India.
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 34
Q.3 Principle: The communication of a proposal is complete when it com
4 es to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made. Question ID : 2185952528
Chosen Option : 3
Facts: 'A' sent a letter making a proposal to 'B' to purchase the hous
e of 'B'. Marks : 1.00
The question numbers 1-35 in this section consist of legal proposition(s)/ principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and fa
cts. Such principles may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for t
he purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the
principles those are given herein below for every question. Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the
question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability,
even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.
To answer a question, the given principle is to be applied to the given facts so as to arrive at most reasonable conclusion. Only o
ne of the options, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion.
SubQuestion No : 35
Q.3 Principle: Copyright law protects only work. 'Work' means cinemato
5 graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine Question ID : 2185952553
matographic film. Chosen Option : 4
Ans 1. The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law onl
y as an artistic work.
2. The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as
professional work.
3. The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producer's work
.
4. The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright law.
2. Non-person
3. Non-performance of promise.
4. An unacceptable person
2. Decision awaited.
3. Awaited information.
4. A pending suit.
2. Mandamus
3. Certiorari
4. Prohibition
Ans 1. Contract
2. Trust
3. Law
4. Authority
Ans 1. Gujarat
2. Punjab
3. Haryana
4. Kerala
2. Freedom of Religion
2. Religious Rights
2. Morality
3. Public order
4. Health
A and B are good in driving bus and car. C and A are good in driving car and scooter. C, D and E are good in driving scooter and t
ractor. E and C are good in driving scooter and auto- rickshaw. D and B are good in driving bus and tractor.
SubQuestion No : 1
Q.1 Who is good in driving scooter, tractor and auto- rickshaw but not g
ood in driving car? Question ID : 2185952576
Chosen Option : 1
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. E
2. C
3. A
4. D
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
A and B are good in driving bus and car. C and A are good in driving car and scooter. C, D and E are good in driving scooter and t
ractor. E and C are good in driving scooter and auto- rickshaw. D and B are good in driving bus and tractor.
SubQuestion No : 2
Q.2 Who is good in driving tractor, scooter, car and auto-rickshaw but no
t bus? Question ID : 2185952578
Chosen Option : 3
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. A
2. D
3. C
4. B
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
A and B are good in driving bus and car. C and A are good in driving car and scooter. C, D and E are good in driving scooter and t
ractor. E and C are good in driving scooter and auto- rickshaw. D and B are good in driving bus and tractor.
SubQuestion No : 3
Q.3 Who is good in driving scooter, tractor and bus?
Question ID : 2185952577
Chosen Option : 4
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. A
2. C
3. B
4. D
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In each question, there is a statement and two assumptions numbered as I and II. Read the statement and find which of the given
assumptions is implicit:
(A) If assumption I is implicit.
(B) If assumption II is implicit.
(C) If neither assumption I nor Assumption II is implicit.
(D) If both Assumption I and Assumption II are implicit.
SubQuestion No : 4
Q.4 Statement: The next meeting of the executive board of a company wi Question ID : 2185952582
ll be held after six months.
Chosen Option : 2
Assumptions: Marks : 1.00
2. Assumption II is implicit.
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In each question, there is a statement and two assumptions numbered as I and II. Read the statement and find which of the given
assumptions is implicit:
(A) If assumption I is implicit.
(B) If assumption II is implicit.
(C) If neither assumption I nor Assumption II is implicit.
(D) If both Assumption I and Assumption II are implicit.
SubQuestion No : 5
Q.5 Statement: In the State of Zuminisia, people prefer to travel by X airli
ne instead of Y airline, as X airline has advanced German security sy Question ID : 2185952580
stem and 99% on time operations. Chosen Option : 4
4. Assumption I is implicit.
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In each question, there is a statement and two assumptions numbered as I and II. Read the statement and find which of the given
assumptions is implicit:
(A) If assumption I is implicit.
(B) If assumption II is implicit.
(C) If neither assumption I nor Assumption II is implicit.
(D) If both Assumption I and Assumption II are implicit.
SubQuestion No : 6
Q.6 Statement: To attend a convocation ceremony scheduled to be held
on Thursday at GM University, Chennai, Mr X left for Chennai on Tue Question ID : 2185952581
sday by train. Chosen Option : 4
4. Assumption II is implicit.
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In a joint family, A, B, C, D, E, and F are the members. B is the son of C. A and C are husband and wife. C is not the mother of B. E
is the brother of C. D is the daughter of A and F is the brother of B.
SubQuestion No : 7
Q.7 Who is the mother of B?
Question ID : 2185952584
Chosen Option : 2
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. D
2. A
3. E
4. F
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In a joint family, A, B, C, D, E, and F are the members. B is the son of C. A and C are husband and wife. C is not the mother of B. E
is the brother of C. D is the daughter of A and F is the brother of B.
SubQuestion No : 8
Q.8 Which of the following is a pair of females in the family?
Question ID : 2185952585
Chosen Option : 3
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. BD
2. AE
3. AD
4. DF
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In each of the questions, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two
statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent c
auses without having any relationship. Read both the statements and mark your answer as:
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In each of the questions, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two
statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent c
auses without having any relationship. Read both the statements and mark your answer as:
2. 192 grams
3. 186 grams
4. 172 grams
Ans 1. 95
2. 105
3. 100
4. 110
Ans 1. 40, 27
2. 29, 32
3. 27, 40
4. 32, 29
Linked Answer Question:
Direction for Questions 11-40: Choose the most appropriate option:
SubQuestion No : 14
Q.1 Find the odd one out from the following group.
4 Question ID : 2185952599
WINDSHIELD, SPARK PLUG, CLUTCH PEDAL, CAR, ENGINE Chosen Option : 4
Marks : 1.00
Ans 1. Windshield
2. Spark Plug
3. Engine
4. Car
Ans 1. 26
2. 30
3. 28
4. 32
Ans 1. 1 minute
3. 30 seconds
4. 59 seconds
2. Advocate General.
3. Solicitor General.
Ans 1. All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.
Ans 1.
2.
3.
4.
2. Frog : Toad
3. Water : Fish
4. Cat : Mare
Ans 1. 18
2. 29
3. 17
4. 23
2. Ripples
3. Water
4. Powerful
4. Snow is white.
Ans 1. 88
2. 96
3. 98
4. 91
2. [a, d]
3. [a, c]
4. [c, d]
2. 1240 hrs
3. 1220 hrs
4. 1210 hrs
Ans 1. 10
2. 16
3. 8
4. 12
Ans 1. Thrive
2. Prosper
3. Flourish
4. Excite
Ans 1. NORY
2. SVYZ
3. MLIF
4. XLMP
2. Author : Book
3. Actor : Acting
4. Driver : Car
Ans 1. 9
2. 12
3. 10
4. 8