1Public Notice Affidavit

4SHUTTING OFF WATER OR ELECTRIC SUPPLY WITH WILLFUL INTENT DOES

5DEPRIVE A Lawful Bloodline Native American  FAMILY OR Single Man or
6Woman OF THEIR RIGHT TO LIFE , Liberty , and the Pursuit of
7Happiness  AND IS IN VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW THE DECLARATION OF
8INDEPENDENCE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW''

10

11whereas ,,,,,,  Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any

12and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C, 1-
13207.1-308. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. NOTICE TO
14PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

15

16Please Share This Far And Wide

17

18Check the Original Charter Constitution for the united states of

19America, 1787-1789; the Bill of Rights; your State Constitution and
20Bill Of Rights to find more violations and hold their feet to the
21fire!

22

23“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable

24rights,-'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;' and to
25'secure,' not grant or create, these rights, governments are
26instituted. That property [or income] which a man has honestly
27acquired he retains full control of. . .''

28''Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892).

29

30No legislature can bargain away the public health or the public
31morals. The people themselves cannot do it. much less their servants.
32See: New Orleans Gas Co1 v. Louisiana Light Co ,115 U.S. 650 (1885).

33

34The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

35

36Article 3.
37

38Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

39

40Article 4.
41

42No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave
43trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

44

45Article 5.
46

47No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or

48degrading treatment or punishment.

49

50Article 12.
51

52No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy,

53family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and
54reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law
55against such interference or attacks.

56

57This tangible, biological man gave no willful consent to become part

58of their corporate membership! They are pulling off an elaborate
59scheme and too many souls are falling for it hook, line and sinker
60and I am calling their bluff in private with pure unadulterated facts
61where these worms have no room to wiggle out of the snare they've
62caught themselves in and have a choice to provide full Acquittence
63and Discharge of the so-called obligation or each man or woman in his
64or her Private Capacity will be held liable to the Positive
65Performance Contract & 2Statement of Liability for Willful Torts &
66Performance Fees that was sent with a letter for his or her willful
67performances of transgressions that have caused pain and suffering to
68this tangible, biological man of which their corporation is
 69foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with where they stand
70to lose much more that they can gain!
71

72no state shall make any type of payment besides gold and silver ,, Is
73your intention to conspiracy to violate federal law ,, your the court
74order for example a man named  Edward to go to the bank to retain
75lawful coin money, please explain what the county inserting there
76right to claim money from me , please certificate what you need
77payment in and what bank issue U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section
7810 - The U.S. Constitution... Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
79Section 10 - Powers Prohibited of States. << Back | Table of Contents
80| Next>>. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or
81Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit
82Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in
83Payment of Debts; pass .. ORS on this STATE OF OREGON have
84legislation 131.205 1973, Oregon administration laws 1973 chapter 836
85page is 2708 section 13 this artificial corporation law form Violate
86the original organic Constitution ,,

87

88payment instrument
89

90"Payment instrument" means any electronic or written check, draft,

91money order, traveler's check or other electronic or written
92instrument or order for the transmission or payment of money, sold or
93issued to one or more persons, whether or not the instrument is
94negotiable. "Payment instrument" does not include any credit card
95voucher, any letter of credit or any instrument that is redeemable by
96the issuer in goods or services.

97

98https://www.oregonlaws.org/.../definition/payment_instrument The
99state is a corporation, not an injured party with affidavit.
100

101Certified copy HJR 192PUBLIC LAW 10, CH.48,STAT 48-112-1.pdf Social

102Security Number
3
103

104
105https://www.scribd.com/document/293704724/Certified-copy-HJR-
106192PUBLIC-LAW-10-CH-48-STAT-48-112-1-pdf

107

108WIN! Landmark Seventh Circuit Decision Says Fourth Amendment Applies

109to Smart Meter Data

110https://www.technocracy.news/win-landmark-seventh-circuit-decision-
111says-fourth-amendment-applies-to-smart-meter-data/

112-

113This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of
114Evidence.... there must be a competent first hand witness (a body).
115There has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
116evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify.
117"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in
118the disposition of [a] case." United States v. Lovasco (431 U.S. 783,
11997 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, (06/09/77)

120

121Exculpatory Brady Material being withheld by the Prosecution "Team"

122Is a very powerful phrase.."The state is a corporation, not an
123injured party with affidavit.

124-

125This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of
126Evidence.... there must be a competent first hand witness (a body).
127There has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
128evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify.
129"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in
130the disposition of [a] case." United States v. Lovasco (431 U.S. 783,
13197 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, (06/09/77)"   
132http://new.oregontrackers.com/home.html

133

134Reference too ,, Bloom v. Richards (1853), 2 Ohio St. 387, 390, 391,
135the Supreme Court of Ohio speaking by Chief Justice THURMAN, said:

136"Neither Christianity, or any other system of religion, is a part of

137the law of the State ***
4 Thus the Statute, upon which the defendant
138relies, prohibiting common labor on the Sabbath, could not stand for
139a moment as a law of the State, if its sole foundation was the
140Christian duty of keeping that day holy, and its sole motive to
141enforce the observance of that duty."
142

143Whereas ,, All Lawful Bloodline Native Americans  Citizens have the

144right to a home and personal property, and this property cannot be
145taxed unless in accordance with the two forms of Constitutional
146taxation mentioned above."Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment
147of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights,
148which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the
149various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on,
150the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may
151not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most
152sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private
153property...and is regarded as UNALIENABLE." 16 C.J.S., Constitutional
154Law, Sect.202, p.987.

155

156Under U.S. Code, the president does have the statutory authority to
157keep anyone out of the country, for any reason he thinks best. Per 8
158USC §1182

159

160“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any
161class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the
162interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such
163period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or
164any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the
165entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

166

167Yes, the president has the authority to do exactly what trump is

168describing. And by the way, this kind of thing has happened before.

169

170The state is a corporation, not an injured party with affidavit.

171-

172This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of
173Evidence.... there must be a competent first hand witness (a body).
174There has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
175evidence before the court.
5 Corporations are paper and can't testify.
176"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in
177the disposition of [a] case." United States v. Lovasco (431 U.S. 783,
17897 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, (06/09/77)
179

180http://new.oregontrackers.com/

181

182Reference too Rule 5.1. Constitutional Challenge to a Statute

183https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_5.1

18428 U.S.C. 5.1 - Constitutional Challenge to a Statute-Notice ...

185www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title28/...

186

187Rule 5.1 - Constitutional Challenge to a Statute-Notice,

188Certification, and Intervention ... Rule 5.1 - Constitutional
189Challenge to a Statute-Notice, Certification ...

190

191

192

193

194  Reference too  ,,, MUNICIPAL LIABILITY  A "public official” has

195no rights in relation to the Lawful Bloodline Native Bloodline Native
196Americans By The Constitution laws ans native treaties  their
197employer, of the city , state or federal government Incorporation  :
198

199A local government official may be sued in his or her official

200capacity under Section 1983, where the local government may be sued
201in its own name. Monell v. Dep't of Social Services of City of N.Y.,
202436 U.S. 658, 690, n. 55, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2035-36, n. 55, 56 L.Ed.2d
203611 (1978). In Monell, the Court held that a local governing body may
204be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if its "policy or custom" was "the
205moving force of the constitutional violation." Id. at 694, 98 S.Ct.
206at 2038. The Eleventh Circuit has recently stated that "only those
207officials who have final policymaking authority may render the
208municipality liable under Section 1983." Hill v. Clifton, 74 F.3d
2091150, 1152 (11th Cir. 1996) (citing Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati,
210475 U.S. 469, 106 S.Ct.6 1292, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986)). 1It has been
211established in Florida that the Sheriff is the policymaker and final
212authority for his agency. Lucas v. O'Loughlin, 831 F.2d 232, 235
213(11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1035, 108 S.Ct. 1595, 99
214L.Ed.2d 909 (1988).
215

216"Official policy may be established by the omissions of supervisory

217officials as well as their affirmative acts." Avery v. County of
218Burke, 660 F.2d 111, 114 (4th Cir. 1981). Moreover, Section 1983
219liability arises when actions or inactions on the part of the
220municipality lead to "deliberate indifference." See City of Canton v.
221Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989);
222Woodward v. City of Worland, 977 F.2d 1392, 1399 (10th Cir. 1992).

223

224Johnson has alleged that Defendant Cannon, in his official capacity

225as Sheriff of the Pasco County Sheriff's Office, had de facto
226policies, as well as customs, which were the moving force behind the
227deprivation of her Constitutional rights. If proven, Defendant's
228alleged failure to investigate, supervise, or discipline Armstrong
229may be sufficient to constitute liability. See Rivas v. Freeman, 940
230F.2d 1491 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining that a sheriff may be liable
231for deprivation of Constitutional rights as a result of his failure
232to train, supervise, or discipline his deputies). The Court denies
233the Motion to Dismiss as to this issue. JOHNSON V. CANNON, (M.D.FLA.
2341996)United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division·947
235F. Supp. 1567 (M.D. Fla. 1996)

236

237Reference too  ,,, Who are you rage war against  he Difference
238between America’s “War flag” and The “Peace flag”   
239https://freedomhallblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/04/the-difference-
240between-americas-war-flag-and-peace-flag/  

241

242Whereas >> US Courts: “There are no Judicial courts in America and

243there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and
244Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. There
245have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been
246Administrators.” FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1
247Stat. 138-178
7
248

249 
250Reference too  ,,, The Undeniable Fact That Artificial Entities
251(Corporations) Cannot Take Oaths, They Cannot Make Affidavits. See,
252E.G., In Re Empire Refining Co., 1 F. Supp. 548, 549 (Sd Cal. 1932)
253("It Is, Of Course, Conceded That A Corporation Cannot Make An
254Affidavit In Its Corporate Name. It Is An Inanimate Thing Incapable
255Of Voicing An Oath"); Moya Enterprises, Inc. V. Harry Anderson
256Trucking, Inc., 162 Ga. App. 39, 290 S.E.2d 145 (1982); Strand
257Restaurant Co. V. Parks Engineering Co., 91 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1952); 9a
258T. Bjur C. Slezak, Fletcher Cyclopedia Of Law Of Private Corporations
259§ 4629 (Perm. Ed. 1992) ("A Document Purporting To Be The Affidavit
260Of A Corporation Is Void, Since A Corporation Cannot Make A Sworn
261Statement") - (Footnote Omitted). Rowland V. California Men's Colony
262• 506 U.S. 194, 203 (1993)."

263

264Reference too  ,,,Challenges to Judge: Universal to all cases.

265A judge who refuses our law is loyal to some other authority. Ask the
266“Judge” if he/she is a member of the “STATE BAR ASSOCIATION”. If
267so, challenge the “Judge” under 22 USC 611 as a “Foreign Agent”.
268All “Judges” are lawfully required by 28 USC 453 to have an “Oath
269of Office”. Ask the “Judge” if he/she has an “Oath of Office”.
270If yes, accept the “Oath of Office” in “Admiralty Jurisdiction”.
271Now the “Judge” is subject to criminal prosecution and civil
272litigation for any injury he/she may cause you. If no, the attorney
273is not a judge and has no lawful authority to proceed. Your State
274Representative should be informed by “Petition for Impeachment of
275Judge”. Present the facts of the case, the law is not necessary.
276Have it notarized and send it by Certified Mail. As we remove the
277unlawful judges, lawful judges will take their place

278

279Reference too,,,,  US Courts: “There are no Judicial courts in

280America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce
281Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and
282Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There
283have just been Administrators.” FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE
284261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178

285
8
286Whereas ,, The state is a corporation, not an injured party with
287affidavit.

288-
289This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of
290Evidence.... there must be a competent first hand witness (a body).
291There has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
292evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify.
293"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in
294the disposition of [a] case." United States v. Lovasco (431 U.S. 783,
29597 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, (06/09/77)

296-

297This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of
298Evidence.... there must be a competent first hand witness (a body).
299There has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
300evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify.
301"Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in
302the disposition of [a] case." United States v. Lovasco (431 U.S. 783,
30397 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, (06/09/77)

304

305  "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can
306be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." (Miranda
307v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1966))

308

309    Should any state convert any right to work into a privilege,
310issue a license and charge a fee, the same is unconstitutional, void,
311and without effect in law. (Marburry vs Madison 5 US 137 (1803))

312

313

314    "All acts of legislature apparently contrary to natural right

315and justice are, in our laws and must be in the nature of things,
316considered as void. The laws of nature are the laws of God; whose
317authority can be superseded by no power on earth. A legislature must
318not obstruct our obedience to him from whose punishments they cannot
319protect us. All human constitutions which contradict his laws, we are
320in conscience bound to disobey. Such have been the adjudications of
321our courts of justice." (Robin v. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson 109, 114
322(1772)).

323 9

324The Supreme Court has warned:

325
326    "Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface,
327many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law,
328are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance."
329(U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),

330

331

332

333Reference too ,,,,Hiring Any Attorney waives Constitutional

334Protections, makes humans wards of court with unsound mind

335WHY YOU DON’T WANT AN ATTORNEY

336

337https://govbanknotes.wordpress.com/2016/04/21/hiring-any-attorney-
338waives-constitutional-protections-makes-humans-wards-of-court-with-
339unsound-mind/

340

341WHY YOU DON’T WANT AN ATTORNEY explains your tribunal courts

342Lawyers and Attorneys Are Not Licensed To Practice Law {For Law Is An
343Open Practice}

344LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW THE NATURE OF
345LAWYER-CRAFT IN AMERICA AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; The
346practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v.
347Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239)

348The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! (Sims v.

349Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))

350The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court: ONLY authorizes, to

351practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF
352GOVERNMENT. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS
353OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.)
354"CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE to practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION, nor
355to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!

356The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!! It is a "UNION DUES CARD".

357The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL
10 ASSOCIATION";

3581. like the Actors' Union, Painters' Union, etc.

3592. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL
360ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.

3613. The State Bar district courts is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE

362ASSOCIATION - and dues must be current to sustain membership.

363The State Bar district courts is; an unconstitutional Monopoly. AN

364ILLEGAL Et CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE; Violates Article 2, Section 1,
365Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution. There is NO POWER OR
366AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive within a
367state as the BAR is attempting. BAR members have invaded all branches
368of government and are attempting to control de jure government as
369agents of a foreign entity!

370"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the

371passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights,
372nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a FIGHTING clause. It's
373benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It CANNOT BE
374CLAIMED BY ATTORNEY OR SOLICITOR. It is valid only when insisted npon
375by a BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT IN PERSON." McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S.
37690, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594,
37750 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The
378term “BAR” is an acronym for British Accredited Registry [see
379comments below]. ... There are over 30 grievances listed against the
380King of England in the .... Kerry are both descendants of Queen
381Elizabeth II as well as other British royalty. Got a Birth
382Certificate? You are a Fictitious Corporation Created.. The
383Constitution is law of the land,,, Judges enforce Law. BAR Attorneys
384enforce International Maritime Law. You should know the difference
385and how to handle it.

386FRC vs. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller vs. PE 261 U.S. 428, 1 Stat. 138
387-178) “Judges do not enforce statutes and codes. Executive
388Administrators enforce statutes and codes. If a public entity denies
389an otherwise "qualified individual" "meaningful access" to its
390"services, programs, or activities" "solely by reason of" his or her
391disability, that individual may have an ADA claim against the public
392entity. Id. (citing Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 301-02, 105
393S.Ct. 712, 83 L.Ed.2d 661 (1985) (internal citation omitted)).LEE v.
394CITY OF LOS ANGELES•250 F.3d 668, 690 (9th Cir. 2001) 

395The American Bar Association (ABA), founded August 21, 1878, is a ...
11
3962 Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages
397238, 239.

398
399Where As Agents of foreign principals 1938 Foreign Agents
400Registration Act | Department of Justice

401www.justice.gov/nsd-fara    The Foreign Agents Registration Act

402(FARA) was enacted in 1938. FARA is a disclosure statute that
403requires persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a
404political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public
405disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well
406as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those
407activitie

408

409Any agent of a person described in section 611(b)(2) of this title or

410an entity described in section 611(b)(3) of this title if the agent
411has engaged in lobbying activities and has registered under the
412Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 [2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.] in connection
413with the agent’s representation of such person or entity.

414(June 8, 1938, ch. 327, § 3, 52 Stat. 632; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 521,
415§ 2, 53 Stat. 1245; Apr. 29, 1942, ch. 263, § 1, 56 Stat. 254; Pub.
416L. 87–366, § 2, Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 784; Pub. L. 89–486, § 3,
417July 4, 1966, 80 Stat. 246; Pub. L. 104–65, § 9(2), (3), Dec. 19,
4181995, 109 Stat. 700; Pub. L. 105–166, § 5, Apr. 6, 1998, 112 Stat.
41939.)  All "public servants," officials, Congressmen, politicians,
420judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their various
421agencies, etc., are the express agents of these foreign principals -
422see Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A,
423185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii) & (iii); Treasury Delegation Order #91 
424information how to file and education  Whereas : " Failure to file
425the " Foreign Agents Registration Statement " goes directly to the
426jurisdiction and lack of standing to be before the Court and is a
427FELONY" pursuant to 18 US 219, 951 -" Failure to file the " Foreign
428Agents Registration Statement " goes directly to the jurisdiction

429and lack of standing to be before the Court and is a FELONY" pursuant

430to 18 US 219, 951 -

431

432Federal, State, County, and City Governments, agents, and principal,

433employed in service of all union

12
434Document No: 200-06172015-1 Page 3 of 10

435States for the United States of America, elected, Appointments,

436employed directly and to contracted third parties, Municipalities,
437private contractors, Intelligent or not intelligent Educators,
438Education Systems, Educational Institutional Systems and so on. All
439Elected and public employees, Foreign agents 501(c)(3) - City of
440London Water and Sewer, B.A.R. Members, aka, Barristers – Tax
441collectors for the Crown - Foreign agents, United Nations, HOLY SEE,
442VATICAN, POPE, INTERPOL, Principal, principals, directly employed,
443Organizational or contracted to do work(s) or joint ventures, in any
444way, shape, or form, wars, conflicts, for the UNITED STATES OF
445AMERICA, dba, A FEDERAL CORPORATION fraud scheme, are not exempt from
446this Demand. All aforementioned are to respond in writing to We the
447People and the one People and witnesses who presented and witnessed
448this written instrument, Demand as described above. See: Notice to
449agent is notice to principal; notice

450

451Whereas. ,,, The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S.
452Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety
453Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which
454clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform
455(Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in
456return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are
457subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract,
458Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the
459Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf
460[Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114.
461Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton
462Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their
463oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case.
464Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and
465removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating
466oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts
467along with an executive order which further defines the law for
468purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the
469actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before
470assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an
471affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5
472U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office
473during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the
474law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal
475offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in
13
476the United States Government (including members of Congress) to
477“advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

478
479U.S. Code: Title 5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES ...

480www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5

481

482“That the laws relating to the organization of the Government of the

483United States and to its civilian officers and employees, generally,
484are revised, codified, and enacted as title 5 of the United States
485Code, entitled ‘Government Organization and Employees’, and may be
486cited as ‘5 U.S.C., § ’.”

487TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES

488www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title5/pdf/...

489

490Page 3 TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES TABLE SHOWING

491DISPOSITION OF ALL SECTIONS OF FORMER TITLE 5—Continued Title 5
492Former Sections Title 5 New Sections 171 .....

493Title 5—Administrative Personnel

494www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title5-vol1/pdf/...

495

496in this volume may be found in a redesignation table under Title 5,

497Government Organization and Employees, United States Code. Part

498

499Federal Tax Practice Ethics: IRS Circular 230 Revisions | Law.com

500https://www.law.com/sites/robertjalter/2015/02/23/federal-tax-
501practice-ethics-irs-circular-230-revisions/

502

503Highlights of the IRS Circular 230 revisions governing the conduct of

504and advice given by tax practitioners.

505IRS Circular 230 - Ethics for Tax Professionals

506http://www.ceselfstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/IRS-Circular-
507230-Ethics-for-Tax-Professionals.pdf
14
508
509IRS Circular 230 |Page 1 IRS Circular 230 ... Notice This information
510is ... taxpayers before the IRS in all fifty states. Similar to
511attorneys and CPAs, ...

512Circular 230 – Regulation of Practice Before the IRS 

513http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/circular-230/

514Circular 230 contains rules governing the recognition of attorneys,

515certified public accountants, enrolled agents, and other persons
516representing taxpayers before the IRS.

517

518Treasury Department Regulations Governing Practice before the

519...www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/pcir230.pdf

520Jun 11, 2014 · Circular No. 230 (Rev. 6-2014) ... After notice and
521opportunity for a proceeding, ... Internal Revenue Service by filing
522with the Internal

523

524NEW REQUIREMENTS UNDER IRS CIRCULAR 230

525www.hancocklaw.com/p/IRS_CIRCULAR_230.pdf

526Internal Revenue Service ... Attorneys at Hancock Estabrook, ... IRS

527CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: In order to comply with the requirements

528

529Circular 230 Tax Professionals | Internal Revenue Service

530www.irs.gov/.../circular-230-tax-professionals

531Feb 12, 2018 · The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR)

532establishes and enforces consistent standards of competence,
533integrity and conduct for tax professionals enrolled agents,
534attorneys, CPAs, and other individuals and groups covered by Circular
535230.

536

537IRS Circular 230 Notice | Rivchun Law Firm rivchun.com/contact-

538us/notices/circular230

539IRS CIRCULAR 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with requirements

540imposed by the IRS, we 15
inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
541contained in this 

542
543The IRS is not who you think they are, IRS agents are neither trained
544nor paid by the United States government. Pursuant to Treasury
545Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of
546the Division of Human Resources United Nations (U.N.) and the
547Commissioner (International), by the office of Personnel Management.

548

549In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will
550find Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is
551under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations. Pursuant
552to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered a "Service
553Agreement" with the US Treasury Dept (See Public Law 94-564,
554Legislative History, pg.5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!)Plan No.
55526) and the Agency for International Development.

556

557This agency is an international paramilitary operation and according

558to the Dept of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-
5597(b) & 1-6, Sec. 1-10 (7) (c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such
560activities as, "Assumption of Full or partial executive, legislative,
561and judicial authority over a country or area."

562

563The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 Nation pact called the

564International Criminal Police organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22
565USCA 263a. The memorandum of Understanding (MOU), between the
566Secretary of Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and
567"The Bank" (International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank
568of for reconstruction and Development), indicated that the Attorney
569General and it's associates are soliciting and collecting information
570for foreign principles; the international organizations,
571corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.

572

573According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney

574General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the
575Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of
576the INTERPOL constitution, these individuals must expatriate their
577citizenship. They serve no allegiance to the United States of
578America. 16

579
580The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank". Thus it appears from
581the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service agents are
582"Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the
583"Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public,
584gain !

585

586The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The

587Fund" and "The Bank". The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection
588agency are both privately owned and operated under private statutes.
589The IRS operates under public policy, not the Constitutional Law, and
590in the interest of our nation's foreign creditors.

591

592The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It

593does not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a
594private corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the
595Federal Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF !

596

597The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the
598United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury."

599

600HUMAN CAPITAL, William J. Clinton: "Executive Order 13037— March 3,

6011997 (b) The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting,
602including: use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the
603economy at large; ownership by the Federal Government or some other
604entity; defense and nondefense capital; physical capital and
605intangible or human capital; distinctions among investments in and
606for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between
607capital to increase productivity and capital to enhance the quality
608of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting;

609

610THE LEGAL NAME IS "ID THEFT" BY LAWYERS/JUDGES by UNDISCLOSED

611CONVERSION by use of PATENTS. ***thus - any Elected SHERIFF in this
612country serving "papers" for Foreclosures is committing TREASON. -
613any unelected Police IRS revenue tax agent in this City ,country
614state  serving "papers"17 for Foreclosures is a Domestic Terrorist.

615ITS THAT SIMPLE, FOLKS. THIS IS WHY WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS -
616and why an Executive Order needs to be issued as a MILITARY
617INJUNCTION on all THEATERS impersonating government buildings..
618Trafficking of IP's via SSA Securities.
619

620Reference Too ,, An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no

621rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no
622office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had
623never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
624Boyd v. United, 116 U.S. 616 at 635 (1885) Justice Bradley, “It may
625be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest form; but
626illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing
627in that way; namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from
628legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to
629the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons
630and property should be liberally construed. A close and literal
631construction deprives them of half their efficacy, and leads to
632gradual depreciation of the right, as if it consisted more in sound
633than in substance. It is the duty of the Courts to be watchful for
634the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens, and against any stealthy
635encroachments thereon. Their motto should be Obsta Principiis.”
636Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)”It will be an evil day for
637American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law
638finds lodgement in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty
639rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all
640violations of the principles of the Constitution.” “All laws which
641are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury v.
642Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

643

644Whereas ,,, 5 CFR 2635.101 - Basic obligation of public service.

645§ 2635.101 Basic obligation of public service.

646(a)Public service is a public trust. Each employee has a

647responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens to
648place loyalty to the Constitution, laws and ethical principles above
649private gain. To ensure that every citizen can have complete
650confidence in the integrity of the Federal Government, each employee
651shall respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct set
652forth in this section, as well as the implementing standards
653contained in this part 18
and in supplemental agency regulations.

654(b)General principles. The following general principles apply to

655every employee and may form the basis for the standards contained in
656this part. Where a situation is not covered by the standards set
657forth in this part, employees shall apply the principles set forth in
658this section in determining whether their conduct is proper.

659(1) Public service is a public trust, requiring employees to place

660loyalty to the Constitution, the laws and ethical principles above
661private gain.

662(2) Employees shall not hold financial interests that conflict with
663the conscientious performance of duty.

664(3) Employees shall not engage in financial transactions using

665nonpublic Government information or allow the improper use of such
666information to further any private interest.

667(4) An employee shall not, except as permitted by subpart B of this

668part, solicit or accept any gift or other item of monetary value from
669any person or entity seeking official action from, doing business
670with, or conducting activities regulated by the employee's agency, or
671whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or
672nonperformance of the employee's duties.

673(5) Employees shall put forth honest effort in the performance of

674their duties.

675(6) Employees shall not knowingly make unauthorized commitments or

676promises of any kind purporting to bind the Government.

677(7) Employees shall not use public office for private gain.

678(8) Employees shall act impartially and not give preferential

679treatment to any private organization or individual.

680(9) Employees shall protect and conserve Federal property and shall
681not use it for other than authorized activities.

682(10) Employees shall not engage in outside employment or activities,

683including seeking or negotiating for employment, that conflict with
684official Government duties and responsibilities.

685(11) Employees shall disclose waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption to

686appropriate authorities.

687(12) Employees shall satisfy in good faith their obligations as

688citizens, including all just financial obligations, especially those
689- such as Federal, State,
19 or local taxes - that are imposed by law.

690(13) Employees shall adhere to all laws and regulations that provide
691equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race, color,
692religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicap.
693(14) Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the
694appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards
695set forth in this part. Whether particular circumstances create an
696appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall
697be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with
698knowledge of the relevant facts.

699(c)Related statutes. In addition to the standards of ethical conduct

700set forth in this part, there are conflict of interest statutes that
701prohibit certain conduct. Criminal conflict of interest statutes of
702general applicability to all employees, 18 U.S.C. 201, 203, 205, 208,
703and 209, are summarized in the appropriate subparts of this part and
704must be taken into consideration in determining whether conduct is
705proper. Citations to other generally applicable statutes relating to
706employee conduct are set forth in subpart I and employees are further
707cautioned that there may be additional statutory and regulatory
708restrictions applicable to them generally or as employees of their
709specific agencies. Because an employee is considered to be on notice
710of the requirements of any statute, an employee should not rely upon
711any description or synopsis of a statutory restriction, but should
712refer to the statute itself and obtain the advice of an agency ethics
713official as needed.

714

715REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY

716I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the beginning,
717all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in "law" or
718otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to any
719"tax file/identification number" and/or "social security number"
720assigned to me, as it pertains to my "birth certificate," and as it
721pertains to any and all other numbers, "licenses," "certificates,"
722and other "instruments" issued by any and all "government" and
723quasi-"governmental" departments or agencies, due to the use of
724various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me
725of my sovereignty and/or property.

726I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any
727alleged "benefit" or "gratuity" associated with any of the
728aforementioned numbers, "licenses," "certificates," and other
729"instruments." My use of any such numbers, "licenses,"
20
730"certificates," or other "instruments" has been for information
731purposes only, and does not grant any "jurisdiction" to anyone.
732I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or
733otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in "law" or otherwise,
734with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and
735all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in
736the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute owner and
737possess allodial title to any and all such property.

738Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the
739beginning all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or
740otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my
741behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney
742pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to,
743any and all quasi/colorable, public, "governmental" departments,
744agencies or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud,
745concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.

746

747COURTS ARE FREE IF YOU DON'T READ AND LEARN THIS YOU WILL END UP
748PAYING BETWEEN 300 AND 600 DOLLARS TO FILE A COURT CASE!

749Plaintiffs, think the easiest way to show the facts, are we the
750sovereign people, first show what a person is not; in the law. So we
751have our basis of the claim considering 28 U.S.C. 1914 –(District
752court; filing and miscellaneous fees; rules of court) which requires
753a person, or persons, to pay a filing fee. Since a person, or
754persons, must pay the filing fee; one should denote what a person, is
755according to law in the second to properly show both sides of the
756coin. Starting with the Supreme Court decisions which denote the
757sovereign American people are not a person. Please see the following

758" 'in common usage, the term 'person' does not include the sovereign
759people, and statutes employing the (word person) are normally
760construed to exclude the sovereign people.' Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442
761US653 667, 61 L Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States
762v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 85 L Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941). See
763also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 275, 91 L Ed 884, 67 S
764Ct 677 (1947)" Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d
76545, 109 S.Ct. 2304 b)

766The sovereign people are not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox,

76752 N. Y. 535, 11 Am. Rep. 751; U.S.v. Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L. Ed.
768192. 21

769A corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of that provision

770of the Constitution, which declares that the citizens of each State
771shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens of
772the several States. Special privileges enjoyed by citizens in their
773own States are not secured in other States by this provision such as
774grants of corporate existence and powers. States may exclude a
775foreign corporation entirely or they may exact such security for the
776performance of its contracts with their citizens as, in their
777judgment, will best promote the public interest.

778[Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall (U.S.) 168; 19 L.Ed 357 (1868)]

779We now know what a person is not, so let us see what a person is, the
780following definition of person was found in BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH
781EDITION PG 1028

782Person. In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though

783by statute term may include a firm, labor organizations,
784partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives,
785trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. National Labor
786Relations Act, § 2(1). Bankruptcy Act. "Person" includes individual,
787part¬nership, and corporation, but not governmental unit. Sec.
788101(30). Corporation. A corporation is a "person" within meaning of
789equal protection and due process provi¬sions of United States
790Constitution. Allen v. Pavach, Ind., 335 N.E.2d 219, 221; Borreca v.
791Fasi, D.C.Ha¬waii, 369 F.Supp. 906, 911. The term "persons" in
792statute relating to conspiracy to commit offense against United
793States, or to defraud United States, or any agency, includes
794corporation. Alamo Fence Co. of Houston v. U. S., C.A.Tex., 240 F.2d
795179, 181. Foreign government. Foreign governments other¬ wise
796eligible to sue in U.S.

797courts are "persons" entitled to bring treble-damage suit for alleged

798anti¬ trust violations under Clayton Act, Section 4. Pfizer, Inc. v.
799Government of India, C.A.Minn., 550 F.2d 396. Illegitimate child.
800Illegitimate children are "persons" within meaning of the Equal
801Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Levy v. Louisiana, 391
802U.S. 68, 88 S.Ct. 1509, 1511, 20 L.Ed.2d 436; and scope of wrongful
803death statute, Jordan v. Delta Drilling Co., Wyo., 541 P.2d 39, 48.
804Interested person. Includes heirs, devisees, children, spouses,
805creditors, beneficiaries and any others hav¬ing a property right in
806or claim against a trust estate or the estate of a decedent, ward or
807protected person which may be affected by the proceeding. It also
808includes persons having priority for appointment as personal
809representative, and other
22 fiduciaries

810repre¬senting interested persons. The meaning as it relates to

811particular persons may vary from time to time and must be determined
812according to the particular pur¬poses of, and matter involved in, any
813proceeding. Uniform Probate Code, § 1-201(20). Municipalities.
814Municipalities and other government units are "persons" within
815meaning of 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Local government officials sued in
816their official capacities are "persons" for purposes of Sec¬ tion
8171983 in those cases in which a local govern¬ment would be sue able in
818its own name. Monell v. N.Y. City Department of Social Services, 436
819U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611. See Color of law. Protected
820person. One for whom a conservator has been appointed or other
821protective order has been made Uniform, Probate Code § 5-101(3).

822Now we must examine Supreme Court decisions, to get a definitive

823answer. Do the sovereign people have to pay filling fees; or are they
824entitled to free, access of the courts?

825The courts must realize the sovereign people, are not bound to pay
826filling fees as the sovereign people, are not a person, or persons.
827The use of the word person the reason the sovereign; people have been
828paying for filling fees. It is the use of the word person in law, and
829the confusion, the word person creates for the average sovereign
830people, when used in law. A person is a corporation that is why the
831courts are not to be charging, the sovereign people to pay filling
832fees falsely. They state the under Title 28 sec 1914 that persons or
833a person must pay, so when the sovereign people, point out that only
834apply s to person or persons which is a corporation, and the
835sovereign people need the law, that says the people or a natural
836person, is required to pay filling fees, or receive free access as
837ordered by the Supreme Court. Take Mandatory Judicial Notice and
838Cognizance under (Federal Rules of Evidence 201 (d) that
839“plaintiff” ie Libellant has a lawful right to proceed without
840cost, based upon the following case law:

841The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to

842relief is “entitled to free access to the natural peoples judicial
843tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union(2 Black 620,
844see also

845Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Plaintiff (libellant) should not be

846charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to
847petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to
848relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally
849implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be
850applied to the Plaintiff
23 who is a natural individual and entitled to
851relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United
852Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747
853(1969).
854Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be
855placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her
856Constitutional Rights, his/her rights secured by the Constitution. A
857fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers
858or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith
859Gas Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law
860Dictionary 5th Ed.

861The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural person entitled to

862relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and
863public offices in every State of the Union(2 Black 620, see also
864Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35].

865Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the

866lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter
867in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing
868fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the
869State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural
870individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43,

871NOTICE AND CONCLUSION IN LAW

872So in closing it is clear petitioners /plaintiffs must have their

873funds, refunded if PLAINTIFFS have paid under Title 28 U.S.C. 1914 –
874(District court; filing and miscellaneous fees; rules of court) or
875not be charged at all, as the sovereign people are entitled to free
876access of the courts. Plaintiffs believe this is proper, in any form,
877as the people’s tax dollars fund these courts. If the people are
878not, to have free access then the tax dollars should stop flowing,
879for this purpose. Because it would mean the courts, are receiving
880enumeration twice. Once by taxes then paid, again by the people
881paying for a use of the courts, when, their tax dollars had already
882paid. Petitioners also respectfully demands the Magistrate takes
883judicial notice of all herein under RULE 201 (d) which is adjudicated
884facts.

885Petitioners also gives notice to the Magistrate, that the Magistrate

886is bound by US Supreme Court rulings please see the following.
887Howlett V. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Court
888cases apply to State court cases. (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1)
889(1958)--States are bound by United States Supreme Court Case
890decisions.
24

891I/We declare swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that, to the
892best of my knowledge and belief, the information herein is true,
893correct, and complete & pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1746 - Unsworn
894declarations under penalty of perjury
895

896/Reference too  18 U.S. Code § 8 - Obligation or other security of

897the United...

898www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/8

899

900The term “obligation or other security of the United States”

901includes all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank
902currency, Federal Reserve notes, Federal Reserve bank notes, coupons,
903United States notes, Treasury notes, gold certificates, silver
904certificates, fractional notes, certificates of deposit, bills,
905checks, ...

906

90731 U.S. Code § 3124 - Exemption from taxation | US Law | LII /...

908www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3124

909

910The tax status of interest on obligations and dividends, earnings, or

911other income from evidences of ownership issued by the Government or
912an agency and the tax treatment of gain and loss from the disposition
913of those obligations and evidences of ownership is decided under the
914Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. ...

915

91631 U.S.C. 3124 - Exemption from taxation

917www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title31/USCODE-2011-title31-
918subtitleIII-chap31-subchapII-sec3124

919

920Jan 3, 2012 ... Congressional Bills · Congressional Record ·

921History of Bills · Public and Private Laws · Statutes at Large. 31
922U.S.C. 3124 - Exemption from taxation. Download Files. Formats, Text
923(5 KB) | PDF (42 KB). Descriptive Metadata, MODS. Authenticity
25
924Metadata, PREMIS. All Format & Metadata Files, ZIP file ...

92531 U.S.C. § 3124 - U.S. Code Title 31. Money and Finance § 3124...

926codes.findlaw.com/us/title-31-money-and-finance/31-usc-sect-3124.html
927

928Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt

929from taxation by a State or political subdivision of a State. The
930exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the
931obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both , to be
932considered in computing a tax, except--. a nondiscriminatory
933franchise ...

934STATE TAXATION - Tax-Freedom.com

935www.tax-freedom.com/ta16024.htm

936

93712 USC 411. And Title 31 USC § 3121 states: 31 U.S.C. § 3124.
938Exemption from taxation. (a) Stocks and obligations of the United
939States Government are exempt from taxation by a State or political
940subdivision of a State. The exemption applies to each form of
941taxation that would require the obligation, the interest on the
942...Federal Reserve Notes - Exempt From Taxation? - Angelfire

943www.angelfire.com/ns2/briancrocker/

944

94512 U.S.C. § 411. 31 U.S.C. § 3124. Exemption from taxation. (a)

946Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are exempt
947from taxation by a State or political subdivision of a State. The
948exemption applies to each form of taxation that would require the
949obligation, the interest on the obligation, or both, to be ...

950Title 31 Section 742 Fraud Explained | Taxation In The United...

951www.scribd.com/doc/108738078/Title-31-Section-742-Fraud-Explained

952

953UNITED STATES CODE ANNOTATED TITLE 31. MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE
954III--FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 31--PUBLIC DEBT SUBCHAPTER II--
955ADMINISTRATIVE Current through P.L. 104-98, approved 1- 16-96. HERE
956IS WHY!!!!! ********************* Sec. 3124. Exemption from taxation
957(a) Stocks and ...

958TREASURY - Revenue Administrative Bulletin 1989-10

26
959www.michigan.gov/treasury/0,4679,7-121-44402_44415_44416-
960276958--,00.html

961
96231 USC 3124 indicates that states of the United States are prohibited
963from taxing any income or gain from obligations of the United States
964or its agencies if the legislation creating the federal agency or ...
965Michigan taxpayers' federal incomes are adjusted so that the state
966does not tax income exempt under 31 USC 3124.

967

968Are interest and dividends from US government obligations exempt...

969revenue.louisiana.gov/FAQ/Details/1214

970

971Interest and dividends from U.S. government obligations is prohibited

972from state taxation by 31 U.S.C. Section 3124(a) which states in
973part, “Stocks and obligations of the United States Government are
974exempt from taxation by a State or political subdivision of a State.
975The exemption applies to each form of taxation that would ...

976

977Title 86 Part 100 Section 100.2470 Subtraction of Amounts Exempt...

978www.revenue.state.il.us/legalinformation/regs/part100/100-2470.pdf

979

980interest on the obligations, from state income taxation (see 31 USC.

9813124(a)). 1). "Obligations of the United States" are those
982obligations issued "to secure credit to carry on the necessary
983functions of government." Smith v. Davis (1944) 323 U.S. 111, 119, 89
984L. Ed. 107, 113, 65 S. Ct. 157, 161. The exemption is aimed at ..

985

986US Code Title 8 Section 1325

987trac.syr.edu/laws/08/08USC01325.html

988

989(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud Any individual who

990knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of
991evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for
992not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.
27
993SOURCE (June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 8, Sec. 275 ...

994NOTICE of Fictitious Obligations - Americans Republic Party

 995americansrepublicparty.org/attachments/File/aatemplates/EXHIBIT_010_B
996_-_NOTICE_of_Fictitious_Obligations.rtf

997

998TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 25, § 514. ... The UNITED STATES CODE
999(USC) applies to all corporations of THE UNITED STATES, including
1000ANYBANK USA, etc. ... The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (presumably referred
1001to in 18 USC Section 8 as the "creditor") is a private corporation in
1002the business of "lending" private script ...

1003

1004Modern Money Mechanics - Truth Sets Us Free home page

1005www.truthsetsusfree.com/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf

1006

1007MODERN MONEY MECHANICS A Workbook on Bank Reserves and Deposit

1008Expansion Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago This complete booklet is
1009was originally produced and ...

1010Modern Money Mechanics - Wikimedia Commons

1011upload.wikimedia.org/.../Modern_Money_Mechanics.pdf

1012

1013DETENTION WITHOUT A WARRANT

1014When an individual is detained, without warrant and without having

1015committed a crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention
1016is a false arrest and unlawful imprisonment:

1017DAMAGES AWARDED

1018TREZEVANT v. CITY OF TAMPA,741 F2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984) "Motorist

1019illegally held for 23 minutes on a traffic charge was awarded $25,000
1020in damages."

1021

1022This may be even MORE applicable to those traveling with PRIVATE

1023plates on their cars. since a cop had no probable cause to stop you,
1024as you didn't have STATE plates, which ARE evidence that the car IS
1025subject to Public Policy.
28 and so engaged in COMMERCE, which is justly
1026regulated by the State.

1027
1028I.e. in order for a cop to detain you, there has to be AT LEAST a
1029suspicion of criminal activity (Terry v Ohio), and having private
1030plates can't be interpreted as such IMO, while having State license
1031plate signals the cop that you're engaged in COMMERCE, and so you can
1032be pulled over for any traffic violation.

1033

1034NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN

1035

1036Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every

1037government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of
1038the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial
1039persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is
1040foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The
1041legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any
1042law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything
1043other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between
1044them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54),

1045

1046“For every thousand men who hack at the branches of evil, there is
1047only one who is striking at the root.” Henry David Thoreau

1048

1049PUBLIC NOTICE …PRIVATE: This is Not A Public Communication! This

1050email is considered a transactional or relationship message, which is
1051specifically excluded from the federal

1052

1053law regulating email communication. Notice to Principal is Notice to

1054Agent / Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal This private email
1055message, and any attachment(s) is covered

1056

1057by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-

10582521, and is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains
1059privileged and/or confidential information. To all

1060 29

1061public servants, including but not limited to Federal, State, or

1062Local corporate government(s): I accept your oath of office as your
1063firm and binding contract between you and me, one of
1064

1065the People, whereby you have promised to serve, protect, and defend
1066me, guarantee all of my inalienable rights, and defend the
1067Constitution for the united States of America. Any/all

1068

1069political, private, or public entities, International, Federal,

1070State, or Local corporate government(s), private International
1071Organization(s), Municipality(ies), Corporate agent(s), informant(s),

1072

1073investigator(s) et. al., and/or third party(ies) working in collusion

1074by monitoring My (this email) email(s), and any other means of
1075communication without My express written permission are

1076

1077barred from any review, use, disclosure, or distribution. With

1078explicit reservation of all My rights, without prejudice and without
1079recourse to any of My rights. Any omission does not constitute

1080

1081a waiver of any and/or all intellectual property rights or reserved

1082rights.

1083

1084Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials

1085shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to
1086the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government
1087will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our
1088government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for
1089ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious.
1090If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law;
1091it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites
1092anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law
1093the end justifies the means-to declare that the government may commit
1094crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal-would
1095bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this
1096court should resolutely set its face.  US vs Olmstead

1097 30

1098
1099Re: Notice to Clerk The minute you receive any document, it is
1100recorded according to the following case site. Biffle v. Morton
1101Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S. W.2d 143, 144 (Tex.1990). " An instrument
1102is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to the clerk,
1103regardless of whether the instrument is "file-marked." *15 U.S. Code
1104§ 7001 - General rule of validity:(a) In general Notwithstanding any
1105statute, regulation, or other rule of law (other than this subchapter
1106and subchapter II), with respect to any transaction in or affecting
1107interstate or foreign commerce— (1) a signature, contract, or other
1108record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect,
1109validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form;
1110and (2) a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied
1111legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an
1112electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation..

1113

1114Notice: All Rights Reserved. Permission to distribute for non-

1115commercial purposes is hereby granted, in whole or part, provided
1116attribution and a link to this article is included. Commercial
1117distribution without the written permission of the author is
1118prohibited. This Public email message, including any attachment(s) is
1119limited to the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
1120Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political,
1121Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate
1122Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations,
1123Corporation(s), agent(s), investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al.,
1124and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or
1125monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting
1126these Communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from
1127Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution.
1128With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights,Without Prejudice and
1129Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of
1130any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rightsor Reserved Rights
1131Notice.Copy right lawful bloodline Americans , lawful Americans
11322013*The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119
1133Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,”
1134including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the
1135specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s
1136confidential and proprietary information.. The originator hereby
1137notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message
31
1138in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review,
1139dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-
1140error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete
1141the original message. Authorized carriers of this message shall
1142expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
1143v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content
1144and is not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**.
1145Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must
1146have the originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use
1147this Message.Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in
1148this Message. Otherwise Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me.
1149Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL
1150Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C, 1-207.1-308.
1151NOTICE TO AGENTS IS Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any
1152and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C, 1-
1153207.1-308. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. NOTICE TO
1154PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

1155

1156Given Name Of Said Lawful Bloodline Native Five or More Generation by

1157Constitution Law

1158The GreatSprite , Mother Earth , and Most of all the Creator

1159

1160

1161Autograph ____________________________________-Date of year

1162__________________--Seal

1163          Red ink only                           

1164Left or Right Thumb Print in Blood

1165

1166Without Prejudice :Edward-Malone: Johnston. Non-Corporation

1167Private Soil  ~1540 North Nye Street,

1168Toledo Area of the Oregon Territory

1169~ [97391-9998] DMM 602 § 1.3(e)2 Zip Code not required...

1170Phone: ~541 336 1233

1171

1172[x ] known to me, or [x ] satisfactorily proves to be the Natural

32
1173Human Being who's name is

1174
1175subscribed to this instrument, Sworn and acknowledged that he/she
1176executed the same for the stated
1177

1178purpose thereof. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and

1179Notary Seal.

1180

1181My commission expires _________________________

1182

1183__________________________________________________

1184Notary Public (Signature)

1185

1186Seal/Stamp

1187

1188Certificate of Service(s)
1189

1190Mailed with Return Receipt This Document

1191

1192Certified mail to:____________________________________________

1193Date:~____________

1194Certified Mail #~ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

1195_____

1196Date Received: ~________________Presented By: Edward-Malone:

1197Johnston, non corporation

1198

1199Certified mail to:____________________________________________

1200Date:~____________

1201Certified Mail #~ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________

1202_____
33
1203Date Received: ~________________Presented By: Edward-Malone:
1204Johnston, non corporation

1205