Subject : Environmental Engineering Statistics Lecturer : Dr. Yunita Ismail Study Program : Environmental Engineering Due Date : Wednesday, April 4th 2018 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. The following data represent the length of life, in second, of 50 fruit flies subject to a new spray in a controlled laboratory experiment: 17 20 10 9 23 13 12 19 18 24 12 14 6 9 13 6 7 10 13 7 16 18 8 13 3 32 9 7 10 11 13 7 18 7 10 4 27 19 16 8
Set up a frequency distribution table and draw the histogram
2. Suppose the diagram of an waste fluid system is as given in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Diagram of an electrical system
Note: The number as a probability for component work. What is the probability that the system works? Assume the components fail independently. 3. An waste water firms claims that the proportion of defective bacteria from a certain process is 5%. A buyer has a standard procedure of inspecting 15 bacteria selected randomly from a waste sample. On a particular occasion, the buyer found 5 bacteria defective. What is the probability of this occurrence, given that the claim of 5% bacteria defective is correct? 4. The weights of a large number of soil polluted are approximately normally distributed with a mean of 8 kilograms and a variance is 0.81 kilograms. If measurements are recorded to the nearest tenth of a kilogram, find the probability of theses soil polluted with weights a. Over 9.5 kilograms b. At most 8.6 kilograms 5. A coin is tossed 400 times. Use the normal curve approximation to find of obtaining: a. Between 185 and 210 heads inclusive b. Exactly 205 c. Fewer than 176 or more than 227 heads. (Note: Consider about Normal Approximation to the Binomial) 6. A new radar device is being considered for a certain missile defense system. The system is checked by experimenting with aircraft in which a kill or a no kill is simulated. If, in 300 trials, 250 kills occur, accept or reject, at the 0.04 level of significance, the claim that the probability of a kill with the new system does not exceed the 0.8 probability of the existing device. 7. In a controlled laboratory experiment, scientists at the University of Minnesota discovered that 25% of a certain strain of rats subjected to a 20% coffee bean diet and then force-fed a powerful cancer-causing chemical later developed cancerous tumors. Would we have reason to believe that the proportion of rats developing tumors when subjected to this diet has increased if the experiment were repeated and 16 of 48 rats developed tumors? Use a 0.05 level of significance. 8. According to Chemical Engineering, an important property of fiber is its water absorbency. The average percent absorbency of 25 randomly selected pieces of cotton fiber was found to be 20 with a standard deviation of 1.5. A random sample of 25 pieces of acetate yielded an average percent of 12 with a standard deviation of 1.25. Is there strong evidence that the population mean percent absorbency is significantly higher for cotton fiber than for acetate? Assume that the percent absorbency is approximately normally distributed and that the population variances in percent absorbency for the two fibers are the same. Use a significance level of 0.05. 9. A colony of laboratory mice consists of several thousand mice. The average weight of all the mice is 32 grams with a standard deviation of 4 grams. A laboratory assistant was asked by a scientist to select 25 mice for an experiment. However, before performing the experiment the scientist decided to weigh the mice as an indicator of whether the assistant’s selection constituted a random sample or whether it was made with some unconscious bias (perhaps the mice selected were the ones that were slowest in avoiding the assistant, which might indicate some inferiority about this group). If the sample mean of the 25 mice was 30.4, would this be significant evidence, at the 5 percent level of significance, against the hypothesis that the selection constituted a random sample? 10. There is some variability in the amount of phenobarbitol in each capsule sold by a manufacturer. However, the manufacturer claims that the mean value is 20.0 mg. To test this, a sample of 25 pills yielded a sample mean of 19.7 with a sample standard deviation of 1.3. What inference would you draw from these data? In particular, are the data strong enough evidence to discredit the claim of the manufacturer? Use the 5 percent level of significance.
(Social Science Classics) Everett C. Hughes - David Riesman, Howard S. Becker (Eds.) - The Sociological Eye - Selected Papers-Transaction Publishers (1993) PDF