Family Day 2017 Analysis

Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary
Senior High School Department
AN ANALYSIS OF THE POLICIES AND THE LEVEL OF

SATISFACTION OF THE GUESTS DURING FAMILY DAY 2017
A Research Paper
Submitted to
Edgar S. Yanga, Ph.D.
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for
APPLIED TRACK SUBJECT 2: INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH METHODS
QUANTITATIVE
By
(SOCIUS) Seminarian Dan Joseph DC. Guillermo
Members
Seminarian Justin Sean Luis Canaria
Seminarian Reynante L. Labao, Jr.
Seminarian Kenneth David S. Ricalde
Seminarian Vaughn Marion Rieza
Seminarian Jeane Ravin C. Roxas
Seminarian Jyienne Draniel N. Rueda
Seminarian Joshua C. Tolentino
Guiguinto, Bulacan
March 6, 2018
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT 1
I. THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
A. Introduction 2
B. Statement of the Problem……………………………………………………………...3
C. Conceptual Framework 3
D. Assumptions 5
E. Hypothesis……………………………………………………………………………..6
F. Scope and Delimitation 6
G. Significance of the Study 6
H. Definition of Terms 7
I. Review of Related Literature 9
II. RESEARCH METHODS

A. Research Design 15
B. Research Locale 16
C. Research Participants 16
D. Research Instruments 17
E. Data Gathering Procedure17
F. Ethical Considerations 18
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Age Range20
B. Gender of the Guests 21
C. Results of the Questionnaires on the Proposed Policies 22
D. Results on the Level of Satisfaction of the Guests 27
IV. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Summary of Findings 44
B. Conclusions 45
C. Recommendations46
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Printed Sources 47
B. Online Sources 47
APPENDICES 48
ABSTRACT
This study aims to assess the satisfaction of the guests during the Family Day and to
determine the extent of the implementation of the policies and guidelines for succeeding Family
Day celebrations. Family Day is the time when the family and friends of the seminarians gather
as one ICS family. In this gathering, there is joy and celebration in everyone’s faces as they bond
as one happy family. However, in the midst of this festive event, there comes the concern of how
the program is organized and executed. For the past years, the policies and guidelines have been
up to the organizers with due word from the form the formators. Thus, this research aims to
determine the level of satisfaction of the guests during the program as well as what are the
suggested policies that could be implemented so as to keep the program of family Day organized
and enjoyable for all. The researchers need to answer this problem by conducting this research.
To achieve this goal, they employed the quantitative research method that involved surveying the
guests. The researchers need to answer this problem because Family Day is an important event in
Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary. By doing so, it could help to improve the celebration
of Family Day in the years to come, making the program more organized and enjoyable for all.
The descriptive quantitative method-using exploratory research constitutes the
methodology employed in this research i.e. the data can be transposed into numbers, in a formal,
objective, systematic process to obtain information and describe variables and their relationships.
It is directive for it will yield accurate results from the data gathered in the survey forms
distributed.
The results the researchers found out was that the guests were satisfied with the
celebration of Family Day 2017, and the policy that the dorms will be locked when there is an
ongoing program was the policy that the guests would like to be implemented with the utmost
propriety.
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
A. Introduction
Anyone will love something if a plan comes together. Family Day is an annual event in the
Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary, in which, family and friends gather to show off their
talents, to bond as one family in Christ. It is a time for celebration, laughter, and happiness. In
line with the First Sunday of Advent, the entire ICS Family gathers to rejoice at the coming of
the Lord Jesus as the Redeemer and His Second Coming at the end of time.
However, while engaging in this festive event, there are certain policies and guidelines that the
participants would have to follow. After all, it is best to maintain order throughout
the program so that there would be no confusion and delay. Unfortunately, for the past years,
without any written policies, it often falls to the organizers to arrange the order of
the program along with the policies and guidelines, with some intervention from the
formators. The consequence is that confusion and delay occur within the program, which affects
the smooth flow of the program and the overall enjoyment of the guests. Then the guests would
not enjoy Family Day anymore.
Therefore, the researchers conducted the study on determining the policies and guidelines that
the formators ought to implement during Family Day, as well as finding ways on how to improve
the quality of the program by tallying the level of satisfaction of the guests. This is so that future
Family Day programs be more enjoyable than ever before and memorable.
B. Statement of the Problem

The following main problem and sub-problems are as follows:
Main Problem:
 What is the level of satisfaction of the guests during Family Day?
Sub-problems
1. What are the suggested policies and guidelines that could help to improve the
program of Family Day?
2. How effective is the Family Day program without a standard policy?
C. Conceptual Framework
This study employed the descriptive quantitative research method. Descriptive
quantitative research, also known as statistical research, describes data and characteristics about
the studied population or phenomenon. This type of research focuses on the survey given to the
respondents to be able to gather data that will give accurate conclusion and recommendation to
the researchers.
Although the data description is factual, accurate and systematic, the research cannot
describe what caused a situation. It is therefore not possible to use Descriptive research in order
to create a causal relationship, where one variable affects another. In other words, one used
descriptive research to have a low requirement for internal validity.
The research utilizes the description of frequencies, averages and other statistical
calculations. Often the best approach, prior to writing descriptive research, is to conduct a survey
investigation. Quantitative research often has the aim of gathering numerical data and
researchers may follow-up with examinations of why the observations exist and what the
implications of the findings are.
In short, descriptive quantitative research deals with everything that is observable and
countable. However, there are always restrictions to that. One’s research must have an impact on
the lives of the people around.
The study will also utilize the Input, Process, Output (IPO) method. The Input consists of
the respondent’s profile such as gender, age, educational attainment, profession, and the survey
forms include the rate of the satisfaction in the different areas during the Family Day and the
opinion of the respondents regarding the proposed policies. The process consists of the different
methods; survey questionnaires and statistical analysis of input variables and interpretation and
analysis of data. The output is the Developed Organization of the Family Day.
Paradigm:
lysis
Input Process Output
1. Respondent’s
Profile
1.1 Name
1.2 Educational
1. Survey
Attainment
Questionnaires
1.3 Profession 2. Documentary
1.4 Gender Analysis.
3. Statistical
2. Proposed Policies Organization of the
Analysis of Input Family Day
During Family
Variables
Day
4. Interpretation and
analysis of data
3. Satisfaction of the
5. Observation
Parents in
Different Area of
the Family Day
D. Assumptions
The study was anchored on the basis that the results of the survey were fair indices of the
subjects’ level of satisfaction and willingness to implement the suggested policies and
guidelines. Likewise, the research relied on the assumption that the researchers accomplished the
questionnaire effectively.
E. Hypothesis
The age and gender of the guests will not affect the results of satisfaction of the guests during
the Family Day 2017 and its organization. In addition, the policies will not affect the
organization of the annual family day.
F. Scope and Delimitation
This study is an assessment of the policies and guidelines during Family Day. It aims to
answer the questions: what are the currently observed general policies during Family Day and
what are the suggested policies and guidelines that could help to improve the program of Family
Day. By doing so, it can set in stone a general policy that the future organizers of Family Day
would need to follow so as to maintain orderliness and avoid confusion and delay.
Alongside this, the researchers are also evaluating the satisfaction of the visitors to help
improve the overall quality of the program and enjoyment of the guests during Family Day for
the years to come.
The data gathered to answer the research problems will be dependent on the answers that
were given by the registered visitors through survey forms distributed to the respondents. In
addition, the researchers will survey only the registered visitors; any walk-in visitors will not be
included. Thus, the respondents will consist mostly of the faculty, seminarians, their parents,
relatives, and friends who are registered for the Family Day 2017. These form the guests of
Family Day.
G. Significance of the Study

The researchers conducted the study; first, help the Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary
Community to improve the Family Day in terms of applying policies, based on the satisfaction of
the guests. Second, this study can help the guests and seminarians to obey the policies and
remain composed and organized throughout the entire program. There would be no more
confusion and delay and all would be in one place and not scattered throughout the compound.
Family Day, is in no doubt one of the most significant programs the seminary has in the
month of December, it is that one time where the family members and friends of the seminarians,
as well as the whole ICS Family, gets a chance to be together and bond. It is in line with the
season of Advent when we rejoice and await the coming of our Lord. Any confusion and delay to
this entire program could affect the future of Family Day.
For example, if for five consecutive years, the program started very late and the visitors did
not like the program, then in the future, fewer people would attend Family Day in the following
years. Alternatively, if the program was terrible, the reputation of the formators will be shaken.
People would give negative feedback to the entire program and this would turn into a larger
issue. Then the entire program would be questioned altogether.
Thus, the results of this opus would become an objective starting point for future Family Day
celebrations so that it may be more enjoyable for all that it has been for the past few years.
H. Definition of Terms
In order to understand this research, the following conceptual definitions are used:
1. Analysis - detailed examination of the elements or structure of something, typically as a
basis for discussion or interpretation.1
2. Faculty - the teaching staff of the Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary, viewed as a
body.
3. Family - this refers to the parents, relatives and even friends of a seminarian who
attended Family Day
4. Family Day – an annual event held every first Sunday of Advent in the Immaculate
Conception Seminary where the family and friends of the seminarians gather to celebrate
as one family.2
5. Formation – the process done in the seminary to mold and shape young men to become
future priests, or at least, become good Christians in the future.3
6. Formators – they are the priests who are responsible for the formation of the seminarians
within the seminarians. They consist of the Rector, Prefect of Discipline and the Spiritual
Director.4
7. Guests – in the context of this study, it refers to the people who are registered for family
Day 2017. They consist mostly of the faculty, seminarians, their parents, relatives, and
friends.
8. Guidelines - a statement by which to determine a course of action.5
1
OED Online, Oxford University Press, January 2018, www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/11125. Accessed
29 January 2018.
2
Student Handbook S.Y. 2017 – 2018 (Guiguinto: Immaculate Conception Minor Semianry, 2017), page 53.
3
Ibid, page 27.
4
Ibid, page 53.
5
OED Online, loc. cit.
9. Personnel- these are the people who are work in Immaculate Conception Seminary. They
are the staff who manage the offices as well as those who maintain the facilities such as
the kitchen.6
10. Policies - a statement of intent, and is implemented as a procedure or protocol.7
11. Satisfaction – in this study, it refers to the fulfillment of the guest's wishes, expectations,
or needs, or the pleasure derived from the program.
12. Seminarians - in this context, it refers to the students of the Immaculate Conception
Seminary.
13. Seminary - in this study, it refers to the Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary. It is a
Roman Catholic secondary boarding school for teenage boys designed to prepare them
both academically and spiritually for vocations to the priesthood and religious life.8
I. Review of Related Literature
The works used in this section are related to topics regarding Families, Seminary Formation
and, Policy Making which is essential on understanding how these factors affect each other. In
this research, the Annual Family Day of ICS has been assessed. Family Day is a common
activity especially in schools because it promotes developing close family ties with each family
and encourages opening one’s family to another family, which will make a better and happier
community.
The Seminary:
6
Student Handbook, op. cit., page 53.
7
8
As mentioned by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical AD CATHOLICI SACERDOTII, those
chosen for the priestly formation are the cream of the crop 9. This is to say that seminarians are
chosen by their formators to be worth each time they are to proceed to the next level in the
seminary. Their ordination cannot be endorsed lest they prove worthy enough and have fulfilled
their roles as a seminarian. All the aspects of the seminary formation are fulfilled worthily,
namely academics, spirituality, intellectually, and pastorally. Through the many schedules that
they go through, the seminarians become organized and more disciplined. 10 In the end, Pius XI
reminds all that the priest follows the example of Christ.11 Therefore, the formation in the
seminary is all about the human person, making the future shepherds into the person they ought
to be.
Throughout the years of the church, the seminary remains to be an institution that serves to
hone the formation of future priests.12 While at the same time, incorporating her methods and
techniques to the ways of the world and the sign of the times to continue the influx of vocations
to the priesthood.
The researchers define the seminary as a school for students or seminarians who want to
become a priest in the near future. A seminarian is formed in the seminary by the formators.
They are called formators or priests-formators because they are the one who formed the
seminarians to become good Catholics. “A slogan used by educators today is to take where there
are at.”13 It explains that every school has a slogan to advertise their school and take the people
where their future says, when you study in the university or any school, there are many students
9
Pius XI, AD CATHOLICI SACERDOTII: THE CATHOLIC PRIESTHOOD. (New York: Create Space Independent
Publishing Platform, 2016), page 48.
10
11
Pius, op.cit., page 53.
12
Student Handbook, loc. cit.
13
Fr. Eugene Duffy, Seminary Formation (Volume 40 No.8, 1989), pg. 451.
but when you study here in the seminary, you will see that there are few students. The difference
of seminary and school is that seminary has the highest standard for the student, for example, the
seminary requires high grade and when you study in the seminary, you are required to study very
hard. On the other hand, when you study in the university, they have a standard for the students,
but the problem is that the teacher or the professor could not teach the students very well because
they are many in the class, unlike here in the seminary, you will not be bored in the class.
“It is a brave person who would give a definitive description of the priesthood for which
14
the contemporary seminarian is being prepared.” Every seminarian needs a brave mind and
heart to pass the trials inside the seminary and they need to be formed by formators for the
preparation for the priesthood. A priest is the one who imitates Christ as himself when he
presides Holy Eucharistic Celebration. A priest is the one who preaches the Good News or
Gospel to other people. According to EG 132: “Proclaiming the Gospel message to diverse
cultures also involves proclaiming it to professional, scientific and academic circles. This means
an encounter between faith, reason and the sciences with a view to developing innovative
approaches and arguments on the issue of credibility, a creative apologetics which would
encourage greater openness to the Gospel on the part of all.” It explains here that the Gospel is
not only for the Catholics but in all the culture.
The Family and Seminary:
The Family is the smallest unit of the community that plays a key role in every individual’s
upbringing. A healthy, loving family produces healthy individuals. Thus, love must always be
present in every family. This love will be the foundation of all the good things the family will do.
The Catholic Church promotes having a healthy. In a recent encyclical by Pope Francis entitled
14
Ibid, pg. 453.
‘Amoris Laetitia’, he addressed the importance of love on the family and encouraged the families
in their daily commitments and challenges. In the said encyclical, the Pope has addressed many
issues regarding families.
The encyclical started with this sentence: “The joy of love experienced by families is also the
joy of the Church.”15 Procreation has always been one of the roles of the sacrament of
Matrimony. Thus, the Church promotes having a family to which love will be shared by parents
and children. Today, the sacredness of family has been neglected. There is the incidence of a
broken family or single parenthood that resulted from the loss of love. Broken families often
result from conflict between the parents. It is normal for conflicts to arise, but the love must
always be present because love endures all things with a positive attitude.16
Therefore, in the seminary, the love of the family is also given importance through activities
like Family Day. The annual family day has become an official program, in the seminary
formation of the minor seminary.
How can we value the importance of the family? Saint John Paul II understands the core
or the centrality of the family. The Holy Father mentioned that the family is “the place where the
education of the person primarily takes place.”17 In line with this continuous celebration of
Family Day in the seminary, education for the seminarians also takes place, as stated by Saint
John Paul II. Clearly, it is essential celebrating the said event because it benefits, not only the
child but the whole family itself.
This book ‘Familia et Vita’ is trying to disclose that the family is the key to the
information of the culture of life. Every human person is brought into the world through the
15
Pope Francis, Amoris Laetitia, p. 3
16
Ibid.
17
John Paul II, Familia Et Vita. (Vatican City: Pontificium Consilium Pro Familia, 2012), page 17.
loving arms of a family. The family binds us to the rest of the human community. 18 It is evidently
seen that in this book, it is reminding and teaching everyone that family plays a significant role
in every human being. In relation to the Family Day, through this kind of celebrations, it binds us
or cements our relationship to the rest of the human community and serves as a tangible reminder
of the social nature of a person.
Policy Making:
Another related factor in this research are the policies implemented in the event. With the
help of the policies, the program will be efficiently done.
All the policies can be directly attributed to the formation being done to the seminarians in
their seminary formation. In many ways, the seminary is more than just a boarding school,
designed to prepare young men for the priesthood.19 It is a place where the human aspect of a
young man is molded, in such a way that they are able to respond to Christ’s initial call. This, in
turn, strengthens one vocation and faith so that by the end of their stay in the seminary, they have
become more mature and serve as a role model for future priests or at least good Christians of the
future.,
In terms of policies, there was the consideration of health. During the family day, there
must be a certain policy that must be implemented for the event to become more effective as
expected by the guests. The policy must include the concerns in the health of the guest of the
family day. For this reason, the researchers consulted some books related to the policy-making in
health, by which it will lead the researchers in a positive outcome in making possible policy to be
implemented during the family day in the seminary.
18
Familia et Vita, op.cit., page 18.
19
The goal of the seminary was directly related to the goal of the New Guinea in terms of
health issue, to have a safe, eco-friendly and healthy organization of the annual gathering of the
ICS community which is the Family Day.
In choosing policy there must be the consideration of the place and gathering where the
policy will be implemented20. The policy that will be implemented must help the organizer to
accommodate the needs of the guest of the family day including the budget 21. Having the
infirmary inside the event will help the policy regarding health become effective.
The policy regarding health should have the support of the local government by
providing at least one medical team for the event, in case of unexpected injuries and accidents
due to some activities of and crowded place in the Family Day. Included in the study, the policy
must be appropriate for the location and the people involved in the certain event. It is a must that
the policy being implemented be compatible in terms of facilities and situation.
20
R.J. May.ed. Policy Making and Implementation: Studies from Papua New Guinea (Canberra ACT 0200,
Australia: ANU E Press) 2009, 128.
21
Ibid, 120.
CHAPTER TWO
RESEARCH METHODS
A. Research Design
The researchers used the Quantitative type of research as they gather numerical data and
statistical tables based on the survey the researchers made during the Family Day 2017. The
researchers also used Exploratory Descriptive research as they distributed survey forms to the
respondents.
The quantitative type of research-utilized data that can be transposed into numbers, in a
formal, objective, systematic process to obtain information and describe variables and their
relationships.22 In connection with the statistical analysis, the researchers arranged the data,
gathered and formulated the tables. This made it possible for them to recognize the result of their
conducted survey. This kind of research method helped the researchers to measure the gathered
data from the different variables.23
As mentioned above, the researchers also used the exploratory descriptive type of research.
This kind of research examines the relevant factors in detail to arrive at an appropriate
description of the reality of the existing situation. On the other hand, Descriptive research
provides an accurate account of characteristics of a particular individual, event or group in real-
life situations. It was in connection with the survey forms as the researchers assessed the age,
22
Leonardo N. Mercado, Research Methods in Philippine Context (Manila: Logos Publications, 2008), page 45
23
Ibid, page 49.
gender, educational attainment and the profession of the respondents. Through the exploratory
descriptive research method, the researchers were able to collect new information that may affect
the result of the study.
B. Research Locale
The research was done inside the Immaculate Conception Seminary in Tabe, Guiguinto,
Bulacan. The researchers chose to assess the Family Day 2017, for they were required to conduct
the survey to assess the satisfaction of the parents and guests who attended the event. This
seminary was the Diocesan Seminary in Bulacan, this was composed of different departments
such as the Junior High School Department and the Senior High School Department in the Minor
Seminary, and the Propaedeutic Year, Philosophy, and the Theology Departments in the Major
Seminary. Although there is an event in the given place, the researchers still pursued the
assessment, as it was the only chance for them to gather data.
Aside from forming seminarians to become a future priest, the event has the goal to have
family bonding together with the parents of the seminarians. From this perspective of the
seminary, it leads them to have Family Day annually.
C. Research Participants
The researchers conducted the assessment right after the program of the Family Day as they
distribute the survey forms to the family members of the seminarians who attended the event.
The research population for this study comprised the entire adolescent guests, up to the elderly
guests. Researchers give survey forms to the parents as well as the siblings of the seminarians. In
connection with this, they also gave survey forms to the Formators, personnel, faculty members,
and friends of the seminarians. The researchers gather data using the purposive sampling method
for them to be able to get precise responses from the guests and parents during the Family Day.
The researchers used to distribute the survey forms to the said population as they have the
compatibility answer the question prepared by the researchers that were inter-related to the study
regarding the level of the satisfaction and probable policy during the Family Day 2017.
D. Research Instruments
The instrument of this research makes the study more efficient and precise with no bias
results. The researchers used one instrument to make this study possible. The instrument used to
conduct the study was through the help of survey-questionnaire made by the researchers. This
questionnaire consists of two parts. Part One was about the policy-making which consisted of (5)
questions. The second part was regarding the satisfaction of the said topic, consisting of (11)
questions. These survey forms were designed to gather information about the respondents such
as their Name, Age, Educational Attainment, Profession, and Gender.
E. Data Gathering Procedure
This study required an interactive process with the researchers and the respondents. For the
researchers to be able to gather data from the respondents they first formulated the research
problems that became their main ground in the study.
After formulating the research problem, the researchers made a list of the information from
the respondents that may help them in forming the answer to the research problem. To be able to
gather the information needed, the researchers allowed themselves in distributing survey forms
to the persons involved in the Family Day 2017. These forms were distributed right after the
program so that the respondents are knowledgeable about the question being asked in the survey
forms. After the respondents answered the questionnaire, the researchers collected all the survey
forms distributed.
The gathered data underwent analysis that helped the researchers to formulate the study about
the level of the satisfaction in Family Day 2017 and the probable policies that may be
implemented in the annual event.
The researchers also made a statistical table that directly showed the result of the assessment
being done through the questionnaires.
F. Ethical Considerations
This opus is grounded in basic truths and nothing else but it. Any biases with regards to the
results of this study and all of the results gathered are strictly from the opinions of the
participants. The role of the researchers is limited to surveying recording and presentation of
results. Opinions regarding the results of the study may vary and the researchers respect this very
opinion. After all, it is the participants (those being surveyed) who will determine the outcome of
the results of this opus and not the researchers.
For the researchers, it would be unethical to harm anyone with regard to this research in any
retrospect. This includes deceiving the person about the true nature of the study, embarrassing
the respondent by any means, manipulating the data, emotional threat and invading their
privacy.24 Respondents may also be violated by being part of the study without their knowledge,
or by violating the promise of confidentiality. Thus the researchers will make it clear that they
respect the privacy, dignity, and intellectual property of the respondents. That is why in the
questionnaire, they have made a clear disclaimer that the private information of the respondents
24
Jose R. Perez and Francisco M. Zulueta, Methods of Research Thesis Writing and Applied Statistics.
(Mandaluyong: National Book Store, 2012), page 233.
will be respected and any significant information in this opus will be sealed and treated with
utmost respect.25
Quantitative Research, from the beginning to its conclusions, is based on numbers. There are
the old sayings that numbers don’t lie. Should any error rise from the researchers’ findings, then
the researchers must have committed an error in the tallying process. However, as stated in the
Assumptions, the researchers determined that they have accomplished their sources effectively
without error.
Originality is the key to a work. To further strengthen any claims made in this opus, the
researcher will utilize various sources in expressing certain viewpoints regarding the topic. The
researchers carefully cited each source to avoid plagiarism and maintain originality. The
researchers also respect the views of their sources, even going so far to asking permission from
the authors if need be.26
Perez and Zulueta, op.cit., page 234.

25
David Cababaro Bueno, Practical Quantitative Research Writing (Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp. Publishing
26
Corp., 2016), page 71.

CHAPTER THREE
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A. Age Range
TABLE 3.1
Frequency Distribution Table of Age of the Guests
Class Interval Tally Fi Class <cf >cf Class

Boundary Mark
65-69 I 1 64.5 - 69.5 1 60 67
60 - 64 IIII 4 59.5 - 64.5 5 59 62
55 - 59 IIII 4 54.5 - 59.5 9 55 57
50 - 54 IIII - II 7 49.5 - 54.5 16 51 52
45 - 49 II 2 44.5 - 49.5 18 44 47
40 - 44 IIII - II 7 39.5 - 44.5 25 42 42
35 - 39 IIII 4 34.5 - 39.5 29 35 37
30 - 34 IIII - I 6 29.5 - 34.5 35 31 32
25 - 29 IIII - III 8 24.5 - 29.5 43 25 27
20 - 24 IIII - I 6 19.5 - 24.5 49 17 22
15 - 19 IIII - IIII 9 14.5 - 19.5 58 11 17
10 to 14 II 2 9.5 - 14.5 60 2 12
The researchers able to gather enough data to present the frequency distribution table of the
age range of the guests who attended the Family last December 3, 2017. As presented in the table
there are sixty (60) respondents who accurately gave their age during the year 2017. From this
data above, the researchers analyze and solve for the mean or the average age of the respondents
who attended the Family Day 2017.

The researchers found out that the average age of the respondents was around 36 years old,
the estimated age of 36.05 years old. This means that there is almost balance number of
teenagers and elders from the group of respondents.
The researchers also able to solve for the modal age of the respondents, which is 18 years old.
This result leads the researcher in conclusion that there are more teenagers who were included in
the survey done by the researchers.
B. Gender of the Guests
FIGURE 3.1
PERCENTAGE OF MALE AND FEMALE GUESTS OF THE

FAMILY DAY 2017
MALE FEMALE
42%
58%
This graph was the representation of the male and female guest who attended the Family
Day 2017 that included in the survey conducted by the researchers. Through this graph, the
researchers found out that there larger numbers of female guests than the male guests during
the Family Day 2017. As presented in the graph there is fifty-eight (58) percent of female
guests. On the other hand, there are forty-two (42) percent of male guest that able to attend
the Family Day base on the data gathered by the researchers.
C. Results of the Questionnaires on Proposed Policy
Rank Representation:
1st Very Important
2nd Important
3rd Average
4th Not So Important
5th Not Important
TABLE 3.2
RESULTS REGARDING THE POLICY ON TIME MANAGEMENT
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Total

A
22 23 5 5 5 60
Mean: 2.1
Rank: 3.5th
On the assessment of the possible policies during the family day, the policy about time got the
3.5th rank out of 5 ranks. It means that the guests give slight importance on the policy about strict
time for activities. Also, through statistical analysis, the researchers get the mean of the results
which is 2.1.
TABLE 3.3
RESULTS REGARDING THE POLICY ON AMOUNT OF FOODS

B
15 20 10 7 8 60
Mean: 2.6
Rank: 5th
Based on the assessment of the possible policies during the family day, the policy regarding
the fixed amount of foods got the 3.5 th rank out of 5 ranks. It means that the guests do not give
importance in the fixed amount of food. Moreover, the guests would like to eat while the
different performance is being performed. Also, through statistical analysis of the results, the
researcher gets its mean which is 2.6.
TABLE 3.4
RESULTS REGARDING THE POLICY ON SECURITY OF DORMITORIES

C
42 7 6 3 2 60
Mean: 1.6
Rank: 1st
The policy regarding the security that it is necessary to lock the dormitories during the
program is ongoing. This policy got the 1st rank out of the 5 ranks. It means that the guests would
like all participants must be on the place of the event, plus together with this, the guests would
like to prevent any case of incidents might happen. In addition, through the statistical analysis of
the results, the researchers get it means, which is 1.6.
TABLE 3.5
RESULTS REGARDING THE POLICY ON PARKING AREAS

D
30 13 6 5 6 60
Mean: 2.1
Rank: 3.5th
Based on an assessment of the possible policies during the family day, the policy regarding
designated parking spaces got the rank of 3.5th rank out of 5 ranks. It means guests do not give
more prioritize on the policy of parking spaces. In addition, through the statistical analysis of the
results, the researchers get it means which is 3.5.
TABLE 3.6
RESULTS REGARDING THE POLICY ON PREPARATIONS

E
31 16 4 3 6 60
Mean: 2
Rank: 2nd
The policy regarding the preparations must be done ahead of the program. This policy got the
rank 2nd rank out of the 5 ranks. It means the guests gave importance to prevent the technical
problems may happen during the program. In addition, through the statistical analysis of the
results, the researchers got it means which is 2.
D. Results on the Level of Satisfaction of the Guests
Score Representation:
4.5 – 5.0 Very Satisfactory
3.5 – 4.4 Satisfactory
2.5 – 3.4 Average

1.5 – 2.4 Unsatisfactory
0.5 – 1.4 Very Unsatisfactory
TABLE 3.7
RESULTS OF THE LEVEL OF SATISFACTION IN QUESTION 1
5 4 3 2 1 Total
1
28 17 8 5 2 60
Mean: 4.1
Score Equivalent: Satisfactory
Majority of the guests believed that the Family Day was in line with the ICS Vision and
Mission. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the overwhelming
majority of all the guests believed that Family Day 2017 was appropriate to the seminary’s
VMCS, generating an average score of 4.1, which falls in the satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.2
Percentage of scores in Question 1
3%
8%
13%
47%
28%
5 4 3 2 1
In this pie graph above, the researchers saw the results of their survey. This pie graph
contains only the table 2 of the survey which is an Assessment of Satisfaction During Family
Day. 47% of the respondents give the score of 5 on the question number 1. 28% of them gives
the score of 4. Some of the respondents with 14% give a score of 3. Also, 8% of the respondents
give a score of 2 and 3% of them chose to give a score of 1.
TABLE 3.8
5 4 3 2 1 Total
2
36 14 6 3 1 60
Mean: 4.3
Majority of the guests believed that the Family Day achieved its goals and objectives. Few
gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the overwhelming majority of all
the guests believed that Family Day 2017 was a success, generating an average score of 4.3,
which falls in the satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.3
5%4%
9%
56%
26%
5 4 3 2 1
This pie graph shows the results of the answer to question 2. The respondents who give a
score of 5 consisted of (56%) or (36) participants. The respondent who gives a score of 4
consisted of (26%) or (17) participants. The respondent who gives a score of 3 consisted of (9%)
or (6) participants. The respondent who gives a score of 2 consisted of (5%) or (3) participants.
The respondent who gives a score of 1 consisted of (4%) or (1) participants.
TABLE 3.9
5 4 3 2 1 Total
3
37 19 3 1 0 60
Mean: 4.5
Score Equivalent: Very Satisfactory
Majority of the guests believed that the Family Day 2017 met the needs of the parents and
seminarians. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the
overwhelming majority of all the guests believed that Family Day 2017 fulfilled the needs of the
guests, generating an average score of 4.5, which falls in the very satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.4

5% 2%
32%
62%
5 4 3 2 1
This pie graph above shows the result of the survey in question 3. The respondents who
give a score of 5 consisted of 61% or 37 participants The respondents who give a score of 4 were
consist of 32% or 19 participants. The respondents who give a score of 3 consisted of 5% or 3
participants. The respondents who give a score of 2 consisted 2% or 1 participant. The
respondents who give a score of 1 were consist of 0% or there is no participant answered this
score.
TABLE 3.10
5 4 3 2 1 Total
4
33 20 3 3 1 60
Mean: 4.4
Majority of the guests believed that the Family Day 2017 was participative and very active.
Few gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the overwhelming majority
of all the guests believed that Family Day 2017 was fun and that the participants participated
well, generating an average score of 4.4, which falls in the satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.5

2%
5%
5%
33% 55%
5 4 3 2 1
This pie graph above shows the result of the survey that the researchers gave to their
participant, this graph shows the results of question 4. The respondents who give score of 5
consisted of 55% or 33 participants The respondents who give score of 4 were consist of 33% or
20 participants, The respondents who give score of 3 and 2 were consists of 5% or 3 participants,
and The respondents who give score of 1 consisted 2% or 1 participant.
TABLE 3.11
5 4 3 2 1 Total
5
37 12 3 5 3 60
Mean: 4.3
Majority of the guests believed that the committees were well prepared and executed their
duties well during Family Day 2017. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question.
Statistically, the overwhelming majority of all the guests believed that the committees for Family
Day 2017 were hardworking and active, generating an average score of 4.3, which falls in the
satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.6
5%
8%
5%
20%
62%
5 4 3 2 1
This pie graph shows the results of the answer to question no. 5. The respondents who
give a score of 5 consisted of 62% or 37 participants. The respondent who gives a score of 4
consisted of 20% or 12 participants. The respondent who gives a score of 3 consisted of 5% or 3
participants. The respondent who gives a score of 2 consisted of 8% or 5 participants. The
respondent who gives a score of 1 consisted of 5% or 3 participants.

TABLE 3.12
5 4 3 2 1 Total
6
26 20 6 5 3 60
Mean: 4.0
Majority of the guests believed that the celebration of Family Day 2017 was at the appropriate
time and date. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the
overwhelming majority of all the guests believed that Family Day 2017 was at the right time and
date, generating an average score of 4.0, which falls in the satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.7

5%
8%
10%
43%
33%
5 4 3 2 1
consisted of 33% or 20 participants. The respondent who gives a score of 3 consisted of 10% or
6 participants. The respondent who gives a score of 2 consisted of 8% or 5 participants. The
TABLE 3.13
5 4 3 2 1 Total
7
37 10 3 7 3 60
Mean: 4.2
Majority of the guests believed that the Family Day 2017 had well prepared and appropriate
facilities. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the overwhelming
majority of all the guests believed that the facilities and amenities for Family Day 2017 were
well maintained and appropriate for the event, generating an average score of 4.2, which falls in
the satisfactory rating.

FIGURE 3.8
5%
12%
5%
17% 62%
5 4 3 2 1

TABLE 3.14
5 4 3 2 1 Total
8
39 14 4 3 0 60
Mean: 4.5
Majority of the guests believed that the seminary resources for Family Day 2017 were
properly managed and maintained. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question.
Statistically, the overwhelming majority of all the guests believed that the seminary resources for
Family Day 2017 were properly managed and maintained, generating an average score of 4.5,
which falls in the very satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.9

5%
7%
23%
65%
5 4 3 2 1
respondent who gives a score of 1 consisted of 0% or no participants.
TABLE 3.15
5 4 3 2 1 Total
9
40 8 4 7 1 60
Mean: 4.3
Majority of the guests believed that the schedule for Family Day 2017 was being followed
properly. Few gave negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically, the overwhelming
majority of all the guests believed that the schedule for Family Day 2017 was right on time and
was followed well, generating an average score of 4.3, which falls in the satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.10

2%
12%
7%
13%
67%
5 4 3 2 1
respondent who gives a score of 1 consisted of 1% or 1 participant.

TABLE 3.16
5 4 3 2 1 Total
10
36 15 9 0 0 60
Mean: 4.5
Majority of the guests believed that the venues for Family Day 2017 were properly prepared.
Hardly any of the respondents gave any negative feedback concerning this question. Statistically,
the overwhelming majority of all the guests believed that the venues for Family Day 2017 were
properly prepared, generating an average score of 4.5, which falls in the very satisfactory rating.
FIGURE 3.11

15%
25%
60%
5 4 3 2 1
consisted of 25% or 15 participants. The respondent who gives a score of 3 consisted of 15% or
9 participants. The respondent who gives a score of 2 and 1 consisted of 0% or no participants.
TABLE 3.17
5 4 3 2 1 Total
11
39 17 4 0 0 60
Mean: 4.6
Majority of the guests believed that the activities for Family Day 2017 were properly
executed. Hardly any of the respondents gave any negative feedback concerning this question.
Statistically, the overwhelming majority of all the guests believed that the activities for Family
Day 2017 were executed properly, generating an average score of 4.6, which falls in the very
satisfactory rating. It is important to note that this question received the most positive feedback.
FIGURE 3.12

7%
28%
65%
5 4 3 2 1
participants. The respondent who gives a score of 2 and 1 consisted of 0% or no participants.

CHAPTER FOUR
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Summary of Findings
The Family Day celebration held last December 3, 2017, was a success, receiving positive
feedback from among the respondents. The findings of the researchers are as follows:
a. Gender: There are 42% of male guests who became the respondents and 58% of female
guests became the respondents for the survey and this means that there is a larger number of
female guests rather than male guests.
b. Age: The age range of the guests during Family Day from 15 years old to 65 years old and it
has the average of 36 years old. Most of the guests are around the age 18 years old.
c. Satisfaction Level: The guests’ satisfaction level appears to be high satisfaction as the
research shows that there is the range of average from 4.0 to 4.6.
d. Ranking of Possible Policies: The policy about the security of dormitories became the most
important possible policy that may be applied to the succeeding Family Day as it got the first
rank from the survey. On the other hand, policy about the amount of food got the lowest
ranking from the respondents.

B. Conclusions
1. The Family Day did last December 3, 2017, became successful in terms of satisfaction
of the guests. Base on the average or mean of every question on the survey forms
regarding the satisfaction of the guests it shows that there is high satisfaction among
the guest in different fields and events during the recent Family Day last December 3,
2017.
2. Based on the ranking gathered from the possible policies that may apply to the
succeeding Family Day it shows that the Guests gives much importance to the policy
regarding the security of dormitories. Also base on the ranking, it shows that the guest
didn’t give much importance to policy regarding the number of foods. The policy
regarding the policy must apply to the succeeding gathering of the Family Day.
3. As shown in the research there are larger numbers of female guests than male guests.
The researchers concluded that most the guest of the Family Day was consist of
mothers, female cousins, and siblings of the seminarian and female friends of the
seminarians.
4. The guests want to have a new date and schedule for the gathering of the Family Day
as the satisfaction on time and schedule of the Family Day got the Lowest average
among the questions regarding satisfaction.

C. Recommendations
1. There is a need to reconsider the date for Family Day as the date and time of Family Day
received the lowest score in the level of satisfaction of the guests during Family Day
2017. If necessary, during meetings, a later date should be picked so that more guests can
attend and that gathering Family Day will not have to be a hassle for the guests.
2. It is recommended to conduct surveys yearly during Family Day to evaluate the
celebration for that year. This would also serve as a basis the organizers could use on
how to further improve future celebration of Family Day.
3. It is also recommended that the formators implement the suggested policies so as to make
the celebration of Family Day more organized, and so that confusion and delay be
avoided.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Printed Sources:
Books
Birkland Thomas A., An Introduction to the Policy Process Theories, Concepts, and Models of
Public Policy Making. New York: Routledge, 2011
Bueno, David Cababaro, Practical Quantitative Research Writing. Mandaluyong City: Books
Atbp. Publishing Corp., 2016.
John Paul II, Familia Et Vita. Vatican City: Pontificium Consilium Pro Familia, 2012.
Mercado, Leonardo N., Research Methods in Philippine Context. Manila: Logos Publications,
2008.
Perez, Jose R. and Francisco M. Zulueta, Methods of Research Thesis Writing and Applied
Statistics. Mandaluyong: National Book Store, 2012.
Pius XI, AD CATHOLICI SACERDOTII: THE CATHOLIC PRIESTHOOD. New York: Create
Space Independent Publishing Platform, 2016.
Pope Francis, Amoris Laetitia. New York: Our Sunday Visitor, 2016.
R.J. May. ed. Policy Making and Implementation: Studies from Papua New Guinea. Canberra
ACT 0200, Australia: ANU E Press, 2009.
Student Handbook S.Y. 2017 - 2018. Guiguinto: Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary, 2017.
B. Online Sources:
Books
OED Online, Oxford University Press, January 2018, www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/

11125. Accessed 29 January 2018.
APPENDICES
TABLE 1
PROPOSED POLICIES 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH
A. Strict time policies will be implemented.
Latecomers may be penalized by being
excluded from some activities.
B. There will be fixed amount of food. Having a
second share of food will not be allowed until
all have gotten their share and there are still
leftovers.
C. Dorms will be locked in a program is
ongoing. All must be present when watching
the program.
D. Parking spaces will be designated to avoid
accidents, traffic, and blocking the driveway.
E. Preparations will be done ahead of the
program so that technical problems may be
avoided.
Legends:
1st- Most Important
2nd- Second Most Important
3rd- Third Most Important
4th- Not so Important
5th- Not Important
TABLE 2
An Assessment of the Policies During Family Day
QUESTIONS 5 4 3 2 1
1.The Family Day was in line with the ICS Vision
and Mission.
2. The Family Day achieved its goal and objectives.
3. The Family Day met the need of parents and
seminarians.
4. The activities were well- participated by the
parents and seminarians.
5. The committees performed their service.
6. The date and time were appropriate for the
Family Day.
7. The facilities of the seminary were appropriate for
the Family Day.
8. The Seminary resources were properly managed.
9. Is the schedule being followed?
10. Are the venues properly prepared for the events?
11. Were the activities successfully executed?
Legends:
5- Outstanding
4- Very Good
3- Satisfactory
2- Fair
1- Poor
Rev. Fr. Joselin L. San Jose

Rector
Immaculate Conception Seminary
Tabe, Guiguinto, Bulacan
Dear Fr. Rector,
We, the grade 11 students of the Applied Track Subject 2: Quantitative Research would
like to ask for your permission to conduct a survey on December 3, 2017, during the family day
for our research and assessment on the policies of the events. We would ask 60 respondents or
participants wherein they will be asked regarding the satisfactory level of the parents and the
policies that were possible to implement during the annual Family Day.
In connection with this survey, we would also like to ask your permission for the use of
laptops and wifi during this assessment as we gather data through online process.
The members of our group are
Respectfully Yours,
Sem. Dan Joseph Guillermo
1
CANARIA, Justin Sean Luis

canarialuis@yahoo.com
+639273128144
#494 Villa Lourdes Subd. Brgy. Sto. Domingo, Orion, Bataan
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age: 16 years old

Date of Birth: May 14, 2001
Height: 5’7
Weight: 65 kg
Gender: Male
Religion: Roman Catholic
Nationality: Filipino
Civil Status: Single
Language Proficient: English and Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Senior Secondary
2017- Present Immaculate Conception Seminary
Junior Secondary
2013 - 2017 St. Joseph’s College of Balanga
Balanga, Bataan
Primary
2005 – 2013 Bataan Montessori School Inc.
Balanga, Bataan
KEY SKILLS AND PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS

 Oration, Emceeing, Singing, Driving
 Speech and Communication Skills
- Fluent in English and Filipino
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
2017 Catechetical Research

(Immaculate Conception Seminary)
2017- 2018 An Analysis of the Policies and the Level of

Satisfaction of the Guests During Family Day 2017
2
GUILLERMO, Dan Joseph DC.

danjosephguillermo@yahoo.com.ph
+639273417618
#455 Camangyanan, Sta Maria, Bulacan
Age: 17 years old

Date of Birth: October 18, 2000
Height: 6’0
Weight: 57 kg
Gender: Male
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
2013 - 2017 Sto. Niño Academy
Biñang 2nd, Bocaue, Bulacan
Primary
2007 – 2013 Patubig Elementary School
Patubig, Marilao, Bulacan

 Painting, Drawing, Sketching, Playing Musical Instrument, Driving Skills, Writing
Poetry, Photo Editing and Baking.
 Photo Journalism and Editorial Cartooning
 Playing Darts and other Outdoor Sports
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE

3
LABAO, Reynante Jr. L

labao.rey@yahoo.com
+639172017975
#218 Barcial St., M. Sapa, Sta. Maria, Bulacan
Age: 17 years old

Date of Birth: October 08, 2000
Height: 5’7
Weight: 55 kg
Gender: Male
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
2013 - 2017 Immaculate Conception Seminary
Primary
2005 – 2013 St. Paul School of Sta. Maria
Sta. Maria, Bulacan

 Journalism, Scrabble, Verbal Skills
 Leadership skills
- Ability to delegate, inspire and communicate effectively
 Ability to Work Well Under Pressure
- Would always comply to any work given even if the deadline is short
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE

4
RICALDE, Kenneth David S.

kennethricalde@yahoo.com
+639323390339
#252 M.H. Del Pilar, Maysilo, Malabon City
Age: 17 years old

Date of Birth: November 25, 2000
Height: 5’6
Weight: 76 kg
Gender: Male
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
2013 - 2017 St. Mary’s College of Meycauayan
Meycauayan, Bulacan
Primary
2007- 2013 St. Mary’s College of Meycauayan
Meycauayan, Bulacan
 Singing, Pool, Computer Literate

RESEARCH EXPERIENCE


5
RIEZA, Vaughn Marion

bonnrieza@icloud.com
+639275229871
#250 Esguerra St. Longos, Pulilan, Bulacan
Age: 18 years old

Date of Birth: January 11, 2000
Height: 5’6
Weight: 58 kg
Gender: Male
Language Proficient: English, Filipino, Latin, Spanish, Arabic
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
Primary
2004 – 2005 St. Francis de Assisi Montessori School
Plaridel, Bulacan
 Calligraphy, Basketball, Typography

RESEARCH EXPERIENCE


6
ROXAS, Jeane Ravin C.

Jeane.Ravin01@gmail.com
+639955092393
#041 Pinagbarilan, Baliuag, Bulacan
Age: 16 years old

Date of Birth: March 01, 2001
Height: 5’6
Weight: 85 kg
Gender: Male
Language Proficient: English, Filipino, and Latin
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
Primary
2005 – 2013 Montessori School of Immaculate Conception
Baliuag, Bulacan
 Computer Literate
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE


7
RUEDA, Jyienne Draniel N.

jayernnavarro@gmail.com
+639166662844
#142 F. Fort Santiago St. Bago Bantay, Quezon City
Age: 17 years old

Date of Birth: August 04, 2000
Height: 5’7
Weight: 51 kg
Gender: Male
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
2013 - 2017 Quezon City Science High School
Quezon City
Primary
2007 – 2013 Sto. Cristo Elementary School
Quezon City
 Painting, Computer Literate

 Leadership skills
- Ability to delegate, inspire and communicate effectively
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
2015 – 2016 Efficiency of Chicken and Swine Manure as Alternative
Nitrogen Source for Culturing Scenedesmus quadricauda
(Quezon City Science High School)
8
TOLENTINO, Joshua C.
joshytolentino1428@gmail.com
+639175695052
#0910 San Pedro, Bustos, Bulacan
Age: 17 years old

Date of Birth: February 14, 2001
Height: 5’8
Weight: 75 kg
Gender: Male
Language Proficient: English, Filipino, Latin, and French
Senior Secondary
Junior Secondary
Primary
2007 – 2013 St. Mary’s College of Baliuag
Baliuag, Bulacan
 Playing Sports, Playing Guitar and Drums, Movie Analyst

RESEARCH EXPERIENCE



Family Day 2017 Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Family Day 2017 Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary

Senior High School Department

AN ANALYSIS OF THE POLICIES AND THE LEVEL OF

II. RESEARCH METHODS

The descriptive quantitative method-using exploratory research constitutes the

participants would have to follow. After all, it is best to maintain order throughout

the program so that there would be no confusion and delay. Unfortunately, for the past years,

without any written policies, it often falls to the organizers to arrange the order of

the program along with the policies and guidelines, with some intervention from the

not enjoy Family Day anymore.

Family Day programs be more enjoyable than ever before and memorable.

B. Statement of the Problem

 What is the level of satisfaction of the guests during Family Day?

This study employed the descriptive quantitative research method. Descriptive

descriptive research to have a low requirement for internal validity.

implications of the findings are.

the lives of the people around.

organization of the annual family day.

F. Scope and Delimitation

the years to come.

G. Significance of the Study

this entire program could affect the future of Family Day.

issue. Then the entire program would be questioned altogether.

1. Analysis - detailed examination of the elements or structure of something, typically as a

basis for discussion or interpretation.1

attended Family Day

future priests, or at least, become good Christians in the future.3

8. Guidelines - a statement by which to determine a course of action.5

10. Policies - a statement of intent, and is implemented as a procedure or protocol.7

or needs, or the pleasure derived from the program.

I. Review of Related Literature

not only for the Catholics but in all the culture.

The Family and Seminary:

issues regarding families.

formation of the minor seminary.

child but the whole family itself.

of the social nature of a person.

help of the policies, the program will be efficiently done.

implemented during the family day in the seminary.

ICS community which is the Family Day.

the policy being implemented be compatible in terms of facilities and situation.

data from the different variables.23

provides an accurate account of characteristics of a particular individual, event or group in real-

the result of the study.

assessment, as it was the only chance for them to gather data.

seminary, it leads them to have Family Day annually.

as their Name, Age, Educational Attainment, Profession, and Gender.

E. Data Gathering Procedure

problems that became their main ground in the study.

implemented in the annual event.

being done through the questionnaires.

the results of this opus and not the researchers.

the authors if need be.26

Perez and Zulueta, op.cit., page 234.

Corp., 2016), page 71.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Frequency Distribution Table of Age of the Guests

Class Interval Tally Fi Class <cf >cf Class

who attended the Family Day 2017.

teenagers and elders from the group of respondents.

the survey done by the researchers.

B. Gender of the Guests

PERCENTAGE OF MALE AND FEMALE GUESTS OF THE