Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EdTech 504
March 2019
practice and are of great interest to me. I have spent the past eight years transforming my
instruction into a primarily Project Based Learning (PBL) model with methodologies that
discovering more about how these methodologies are embedded in constructivism learning
theories and how collaboration and authenticity are at the heart of pedagogy of both individual
and social theories of constructivism. With the amalgamation of technology in our lives, my
focus for this research is to learn about effective ways that technology can foster collaborative
learning environments and authentic learning experiences to meet the needs of all my learners.
technology.
In this article, the author identifies connections between authentic educational settings,
living authentically, and how learners need an inquiry-based environment with an emphasis on
Page 1|8
relationships and relevance. He stated that what lies at the heart of education is the “richness of
the relationships that we enter into when we are, or become, students.” (p.136) He questions if
we use objects authentically as they were intended be used. Can one play music authentically as
it was written hundreds of years ago or play a Stradivarius as it was played in the 1600’s? He
connects learning theory to the research of Newmann, Dewey, Vygotsky, and others. He
discusses Newmann’s authentic pedagogy that involves students using prior knowledge to
connect learning with real problems, tasks, and challenges and relate them outside the classroom.
He investigated how disciplined inquiry drives knowledge construction in learners, and how
authenticity, disciplined inquiry, and real world can be defined. He stresses the importance of
inviting experts into a learning environment and that authentic learning is when “student-
generated inquiry meets key standards for disciplinary content and disciplinary process.” (p.
140) He believes that work and learning should be fulfilling and cites Dewey’s thoughts on
meaning and fulfillment in learning. He concludes the article with, “Classrooms could, and
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the
154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
This article discusses the lack of theory and structure that guides research in teaching and
technology integration. It explains the need for teachers to gain content knowledge in
technology. The authors describe the importance of understanding what teachers know and need
Page 2|8
to know about teaching with technology. Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) are two separate entities. The authors
found connections between technology content knowledge and subject matter content knowledge
and described how TPCK is a "unique body of knowledge". (p. 50) The article introduced
technology instruction. The research suggested that when teachers had a better understanding of
how to transform instruction with technology, learners were able to grasp concepts that had been
concluded that technology integration with instruction, when delivered intentionally and with a
focus, provides evidence that teacher technological pedagogical content knowledge is its own
entity.
Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to
https://search.proquest.com/docview/218031840/citation/5062BD274FF4460BPQ/1
In this article, the author challenges the idea that educational technology professionals
understand the concepts of constructivism and the role of authenticity in learning environments.
The author mentions that Resnick (1990) claimed the classroom is an artificial environment,
avoiding group-based activities and shared problem-solving that happens in the real world. He
describes how learners should discern between authentic learning environments and ones that
simulate an authentic environment. He notes that technologists should create real-world learning
opportunities to replace simulations. He mentions Dewey and Vygotsky and how their learning
Page 3|8
theories on collaborative and group learning are essential for social learning and benefit a
learner’s understanding of the process learning. Because they both focused on the connection
with language as learning tools and social learning linked to human development, the author
believes that technology is an essential support tool for collaborative and authentic learning. The
author mentions that students need to have the opportunity to fail, which is an essential element of
191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475
This article discusses the transformative learning theory and how it impacts adult learning
that transformative learning theory research studies are repetitive in nature with minimal author
collaboration, but some research stood out that involved technology integration. Adult learners
who were asked to show evidence of learning through photographic or video evidence showed
promise in capturing learning and memory of the learning experience, leading to transformative
learning opportunities. He found that culture, gender, and age differences were overlooked in
most studies. He made a connection between teachers critically reflecting on their practice as a
move towards authenticity. Those who “critically reflect on self, other, relationships and context
are more likely to be working towards being authentic.” (p.7). Taylor revealed that relationships
are an important element of the transformative learning experience and when he looked at
Carter’s 2002 study of mid-career women’s learning it showed relationships fostered success.
Taylor stated that, “Love, memory and self-dialogue relationships proved significant to
Page 4|8
transformative learning, with intimate relationships as most significant.” (p. 179) His research
showed trust in collaboration and dialogue, with voluntary participation and equalization of
power, support authentic conversations. Technology support and theory was lacking in this
article, although he mentions how writing and journaling is a powerful tool for transformative
Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective
from http://oro.open.ac.uk/6983/
This article provides connections between e-learning many learning theories and includes
was to identify how instructional practice should clearly reflect learning theory. The authors
state, “There is currently little evidence of how these models or theories are applied to effective
pedagogically driven e-learning.” (p.18) This article maps the learning theories in an organized
manner with charts that make connections between theories and how they might be applied to e-
learning. The authors propose a model for designing e-learning in which learning theories are
situated within the framework of learning design. They refer to structuring learning as using
toolkits and they mention, “By definition, all toolkits include an expert model of a process
derived from recognised theory and best practice.” (p. 22) The authors state that, “The current
researchers and practitioners alike.” (p. 32) They are adamant there should be certainty in the
application of learning theory to e-learning. They insist these should be in place during the
This article discusses indexical language and its importance in conversation and learning
and how collaboration and authenticity are essential to student learning. They define "indexical"
words and explain that advanced learners should read index words and understand that they refer
to specific situations. The authors explain that most schools have not connected learning to
authentic real-world experiences. They describe the differences in reasoning, actions, problem-
solving and producing in three realms: Students, Practitioners, and JPF (just plain folks). The
authors refer to conceptual knowledge as a set of tools (p.33) and continue to discuss how "it is
quite possible to acquire a tool but to be unable to use it." (p.33) This is similar to Vygotsky's
communication. When we teach and reteach communication and collaboration skills then provide
feedback and assess these skills, that is possibly when we see the growth and learning in students
theories is not mentioned specifically but the set of tools used with technology would be a
Shutkin, D. (2004). Thinking of the other: Constructivist discourse and cultural difference in the
com.libproxy.boisestate.edu/docview/213798031?accountid=9649
Page 6|8
This article reveals the ethical dilemma of education in the United States regarding access
to technology and appropriate constructivism approaches for learners. The author is critical of
constructivism practices with technology approaches due to the lack of equity in resources and
quality instructional practices in schools. He explores the divide that technology learning has
created for underserved populations, low income students, and populations historically
marginalized in society. The author explains the system in place in society is primarily one of
white culture and his research includes findings that privileged schools have more access to
better technology and prepared instructors with constructivist and technology experience.
Students in lower income schools had technology for limited use and testing scenarios. He says
that schools that employ constructivist models of technology are using the western culture of
power and he believes the technology learning designs in schools do not include references to
race, cultural, or social differences. He states schools must consider culturally relevant teaching
when developing technology in learning environments. His research on the origin of the mastery
of reasoning dates to the 17th century writings of philosopher John Locke which was only for
white European men. The author states that the perpetuation of this idea continues to effect not
only society today and those marginalized by society, but the system of power in place effects
access to technology. He makes a solid case for culturally relevant teaching which he says should
Paily, M. U. (2013). Creating constructivist learning environment: Role of "web 2.0" technology.
http://libproxy.boisestate.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.libproxy.boisestate.edu/docview/1346942900?accountid=9649
Page 7|8
This article is recent within the past six years and contains current technology
connections with pedagogical approaches. The author provides a detailed review of the
characteristics of constructivist learning theory and explains the role of the teacher and the
learning environment. The author discusses the role of information and communication
technology in education today and how learning can be transformed with technology for students
to provide evidence of learning in new ways using technology. The article provides information
on Web 2.0 tools and the characteristics of the tools and how they can be used to facilitate,
support and scaffold learning activities. There is a chart that organizes a variety of different Web
2.0 tools on pages 4-6. The author explains some approaches to constructivist approaches with
Collaboration group reflection was missing from the stages, although it can be incorporated in
the same stage as individual reflection. The author has included a lesson example on animal
Page 8|8