IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS)

e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 17, Issue 7 Ver. 6 (July. 2018), PP 30-43
www.iosrjournals.org

Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

Ankita Jangde1, Ashish Garg2, Bhavna Virang3, Samprita Sahu4
1
Post-Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya
Pradesh, India.
2
Professor & Head, Department of Orthodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh,
India.
3
Reader Department of Orthodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
4
Reader Department of Orthodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Corresponding Author: Ankita Jangde

Abstract: With the consistently advancing orthodontic practices, the idea of self-ligation is promptly
acknowledged by clinicians over the globe. Before long, stainless steel and elastomeric ligatures will turn into
an obsolete clearing a path for more comfortable and easy to use self-ligating appliances. Self ligating
framework gives an additional preferred standpoint of diminished ligation time and diminished friction in this
manner decreasing anchorage demand. Considering the upsides of self-ligating brackets for the clinician, staff,
and patient, they may well turn into the ―conventional‖ appliance system of the 21st century. This article
features different self-ligating systems from the past to present to help in selection of choice in order to utilize
this current system features to the best possible extent.
Keywords: Self ligating brackets; conventional appliance system; Friction; Anchorage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Date of Submission: 30-06-2018 Date Of Acceptance: 13-07-2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

I. Introduction
Over the last couple of decades, several types of brackets have evolved which have used conventional
ligation like elastomeric ligature and stainless steel ligature to secure the arch wire in the bracket slot. The
inalienable limitation forced by the bracket – ligature – arch wire relationship at last compromises the clinical
productivity of the appliance. The dependency of these appliances on degradable elastomeric ligatures and full
sized arch wires for control comes at the price of predictability and clinical efficiency. The frictional property of
elastomeric ligatures additionally has a tendency to restrain treatment advance. Notwithstanding the
degeneration, an unhygienic nature of elastomeric ligatures requires that they should be maintained ceaselessly
in this manner compromising clinical productivity.
A progressive change in the history of brackets was simply the presentation of the ligating brackets.
The idea of self-ligating brackets isn't new, with the main outlines going back to the l930s, with the introduction
of The Russell Attachment, by Dr. Jacob Stolzenberg1. Since 1970, there has been a steady undertaking to
idealize self-ligating brackets.
Self-ligating brackets are supposed to be advantageous in that they provide greater patient comfort,
reduced friction between bracket and arch wire, shortened treatment time and reduced chair time. They offer
precise control of tooth translation, reduced overall anchorage demands, rapid alignment and more certain space
closure. There is reduced incidence of soft-tissue lacerations and also associated with improved oral hygiene.

II. Evolution of Self ligating brackets

An attempt in the past has also been made to describe self-ligating systems along with their individual
design, advantages and draw backs. In this article we highlight current knowledge regarding the origin, the
stepwise development and the frequent use of self-ligating brackets in day today clinical practice with each
bracket claiming better treatment efficiency with their changing designs(Table 1).

Table .1- Evolution of self ligating brackets

Year Bracket Active/passive Available Mechanism
1935 Russel lock Active No Circular thread opening
1972 Ormco Edgelok passive No Rigid sliding clip
1980 Forestadent Mobil-Lock passive No Rigid rotational disk
1980 Strite Industries SPEED Active Yes Flexible spring clip
1986 “A” Company Activa passive No Rigid rotational arm
1996 AdentaTime Passive Yes Rigid rotational arm
1996 “A” Company Damon SL passive Yes Solid indented slide

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 30 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update
1998 Ormco TwinLock Passive No Solid labial slider
2000 Ormco/“A” Co. Damon 2 passive Yes Solid indented slide
2000 GAC In- Ovation Active Yes Flexible spring clip
2001 Gestenco Oyster Passive Yes Unique snap-on cap
2002 Forestadent Philippe Passive Yes Flexible tie wing
lingual bracket
2002 GAC In- Ovation R Active Yes Flexible spring clip
2002 Adenta Evolution LT passive Yes Rotating flexible type
clip
2004 Ultradent OPAL Passive Yes Flexible hinge
2004 Ormco Damon 3 passive Yes Rigid solid slide
2004 3 M Unitek SmartClip Passive /active Yes Mesial and distally
placed Flexible clips
2005 Ormco Damon 3 MX Passive Yes Rigid solid slide
2006 Ultradent OPAL metal Active /passive Yes Flexible Hinge
2006 Forestadent Quick Passive Yes Snap flexible spring
2006 Lancer Praxis Glide passive Yes Removable multiplanar
clip
2006 GAC system C passive Yes Flexible clip
2006 GAC inovation L passive Yes Flexible clip
2006 GAC innovation C passive Yes Flexible clip
2007 3m unitek clarity SL Active / passive Yes Flexible clip
2007 American Orthodontics passive Yes Flexible clip
vision LP
2007 Dentauraum discovery Passive Yes Flexible lid
2009 Ormco Damon Q passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2009 Ormco Damon aesthetic passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2009 Smartclip sl3 Active/passive yes Mesial and distal flexible
clips
2010 Cabriolet Active/passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2011 Harmony lingual Active/passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2012 Sensation Ceramic Active Yes Flexible sliding clip
2014 BioQuick Passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2014 Carriere SLX Passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2015 ProGate I Passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2016 Empower 2 Active/passive Yes Flexible sliding clip
2017 In-Ovation X Active Yes Flexible sliding clip
2017 Lotus Plus DS Active/Passive Yes Flexible sliding clip

 Russell lock edgewise attachment:

To begin with Self-ligating sections were presented in the mid-1930s as the Russell attachment by
Newyork orthodontic pioneer Dr. Stolzenberg1. The section had a flat head screw situated cozily a roundabout,
threaded opening in the face of the bracket that allows for quick and Simple arch wire changes. Flat screw could
be tightened or loosened with a little watch repair screw driver to get the desired tooth movement(Fig.1).
Loosening the screw made the framework passive and permitted bodily translation on a round wire while
tightening it made it active and gave root torquing on a square or a rectangular wire.
Points of interest - The section framework was more agreeable for the patient and shorter office visits and
shorter treatment time.

Figure 1: Russell attachment (A).open (B) close positions

 Edgelock bracket4 :
The first modern passive self-ligating section (Edgelok-Ormco ) was presented in the early 1970's
which had a round body with a rigid labial sliding cap. An uncommon opening device was utilized to move the
slide occlusally for archwire inclusion. At the point when the cap was shut over the archwire with Finger
Pressure, the section opening was changed over to a tube. The inflexibility of this external fourth divider
rendered the section "passive" in its transaction with the archwire. (Fig. 2)

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 31 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

It is having adequate strength, Smooth for the tissues, Low profile, Automatic locking and unlocking, Reliable
activity and finish control in all planes of space. But having some drawbacks like Imprecise in their capacity to
control tooth development.

Figure 2: Edgelok appliance (A).open (B) close positions.

 Mobilock bracket :
In 1974, Dr. Franz Sander5created Mobil-lock Brackets (Forestadent, Germany) which had a rigid
Semicircular labial disk, which was turned over with a screwdriver to open and close covering some portion of
the labial surface of the slot. The wire could be firmly or loosely engaged by the degree of rotation of the cam.
(Fig. 3)
Similarly, as with the Edgelok the passive external wall changed the bracket slot into a tube that loosely
contained the archwire. Clockwise rotation of eccentric cam, bringing about the variable slot (0016-0.022-inch
in the occluso gingival direction), which might be balanced by the utilization of a key which is developed with a
'ratchet' framework to such an extent that the arch wire is engaged in just up to a specific pressure, after which
the ratchet will slide. The Edgelok & the Mobil-lock did not gained much of the popularity due to simultaneous
introduction of elastomeric ligatures.
Its great focuses were - Free-sliding, where the depth of the slot is 0.022-inch and allows most extreme
play of the arch wire. Additionally turning of the cam prompts slow commitment of the arch wire up to the point
of locking the arch wire, it is possible to manage the amount of torque and tip transmission to the tooth.
It's downsides were-Narrowness of the labial face of the slot gave extremely poor rotational control, to the
degree that upper incisor sections were given twin cams to expand the powerful section width and trouble of
access to open and close premolar sections with the straight screwdriver.

Figure 3: Mobil-lock (A)open (B) close positions

 Speed bracket6 :
SPEED is a fully pre-adjusted miniaturized edgewise appliance that uses a super-elastic nickel titanium
&are specifically designed for each individual tooth (Fig. 4). Each attachment consists of upto Five components-
1. Multislotted bracket body.
2. An in-out adapter.
3. Permanently installed super elastic nickel titanium spring clip
4. Micro-Retentive Mesh bonding base.
5. An Integral Mushroom Hook

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 32 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

Points of interest-
1.Highly flexible nickel titanium spring clip gives exact 3-D tooth control.
2.Minimal friction during sliding mechanics.
3. Extended range of activation due to energy stored in spring clip.
4. large inter-bracket span.
5. Spring clip won't fatigue or plastically deform under ordinary treatment conditions.
6. Horizontal auxiliary slot upgrades segmental mechanics.
Adantages for the patient include it is Smooth, rounded, simple for all patients to clean, comfortable as small in
size as well as wingless design, esthetically appealing.

Figure 4: SPEED bracket (A)open (B) close positions

 Activa bracket:
In 1986, Dr. Erwin Pletcher7 developed Activa bracket (“A ”company). Activa bracket had an
inflexible, curved arm that rotates occluso-gingivally around the cylindrical bracket body. The arch wire is held
by a strong clip that turns into a holding groove gingival to the arch wire, situating two straps labial to the wire
and making a bracket that is fundamentally the same as mechanically to a molar tube with twin channel tops.
The clips can be opened and closed with an extensive variety of usually utilized hand instruments including
ligature tuckers, flat plastics, and Mitchell's trimmers. All brackets have vertical slots behind the arch wire
channel. (Fig. 5)
A vertical slot is a valuable element in a bracket without Tie wings. T-formed locking pins are a
preformed auxiliary utilized as a part of the slot for -
1. Closure of diastema with T pins and elastic chain.
2. Ligature association of palatal canine to buccal sectional wire.
3. Pivoting spring used to over-rotate a canine.

Higher bond failure rate due to-

1.Operators who are new to these brackets have a tendency to neglect to completely situate them on the teeth.
2. Bases are somewhat smaller than most of the brackets.
3. The absence of tie-wings implies that a little percentage of the bracket base is joined to overlying section and
this may potentially prompt less rigid nature of the bracket base and simpler bending of the base and subsequent
bond failure under external loading force.
4. Less convenient with power chain.
5. Breakage of arch wire holding clips.

Figure 5: Activa bracket (A) open (B) close positions

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 33 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

 Time bracket:
In 1994 Dr.Wolfgang Heiser8, developed the Time bracket which is similar in appearance to the
SPEED bracket, but are significantly different in design & mode of action. It is the first one-piece self-ligating
system, was developed using CAD/CAM technology. It is described as hybrid self ligating bracket. Time
features a rigid, curved arm that wraps occluso-gingivally around the labial aspect of the bracket body.The Time
bracket can be opened either with a dental probe or with its special instrument. It is utilized to rotate the arm
gingivally into the slot-vacant position or occlusally into the slot-shut position. (Fig. 6)
The time bracket has a clip that turns into position around the gingival tie wing and pivots towards the
occlusal rather than the gingival wall of the slot. The spring clip opens sufficiently far for a wire to be
embedded, yet the opening is constrained by a stop between the clip and the bracket body. Obstruction will be
felt when the full opening is achieved, opening the clip farther could deform it enough that it would need to be
replaced. On the off chance that important, the spring clip can be evacuated by over opening it or by sliding it
mesially or distally. This will enable the bracket to be utilized with conventional ligatures.
Advantages -
1. Designed to be both passive(minimal force and friction in beginning time of treatment) and active(torque and
rotational control in center and finishing stage), Controlled torque and revolutions, Simple to open all through
treatment and more clean for Patients.
2. Its little mesio-distal width empowers it to be put in the most severely Crowded lower anterior cases.
3.A easy to open-close clip component for simplicity of wire changes
4. The ability to accomplish finishing details in a controlled way in every one of the three planes of space. Due
to its intrinsic simplicity of design, just a short portrayal of the Time bracket is important to enlarge the figures
displayed.

Figure 6: Time bracket (A) open (B) close positions.

 Damon bracket:
These brackets are introduced in 1996 by Dwight Damon9.
Damon SL 10 - It had a slide, which moved vertically on the labial Surface of an otherwise fairly conventional
twin tie-wing bracket.The slide clicked into a positive open or shut position and opened in a downward direction
in both jaws to give a full view of the slot. A tiny U-shaped wire spring lay under the slide and clicked into the
two labial 'bulges' on the slide to provide positive open and shut positions (Fig. 7). These brackets were a major
Step forward, but had two problems;
1. The slides sometimes opened inadvertently and
2. They were prone to Breakage.

Figure 7: Damon SL bracket. A. Open. B. Close.

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 34 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

Damon 2 bracket - The blemishes in the Damon SL brackets prompted the improvement of Damon 2
brackets(2000) which hold a similar vertical slide activity and U-shaped spring to control the opening and
closing, however, put the slide inside the shelter of the tie-wings. Joined with the metal injection moulding
manufacture, which allows closure tolerances, these advancements have totally disposed of incidental slide
opening or slide breakage. Albeit special and excellent slide-opening devices are given these brackets, they can
after some training be effectively opened and shut with conventional light-wire pliers in blend with the Cool-
Device archwire-seating instrument.
Preferred standpoint of damon 2 bracket-
1.Reduce the general size of the bracket and consequently the larger inter- bracket span produces lower forces.
2.Slide opens from the clinician, permitting clear visibility into the Slot.

Damon 3 brackets(2004) - From previous damon brackets, these brackets have three major changes -
1. Upper tie wing & tooth colored composite resin base reduces the visual impact of the bracket.
2. A totally new vertically placed chair molded clip behind the slide. This has delivered a slide which is
amazingly simple and steady to open and close. The slide is shut with finger pressure and has a positive tactile
and audible signal when completely shut.
3. It is opened with an exceptional opening apparatus resembling a modified blunt dental probe. The method is
to slide the point of the tool down the V-shaped ramp on the front of the slide until it engages in the small hole
at the base of the slide, pressing inwards while proceeding to press downwards release the clip.
4. A rhomboidal shape of the bracket and slide which encourages bracket sitting.

Disadvantages-
1. The high rate of bond failure.
2. Separation of metal from reinforced resin components.
3. Fracture of tie wings.

Damon MX brackets (2005) - These brackets are on the whole metal and have basically an indistinguishable
mechanism from D3 with further refinements. They are intended to be completely compatible with D3. They
have a vertical slot behind the archwire slot into which pre-assembled click in auxiliary hooks can be added to
any brackets as required. Its advantages are easy-to-use slide component, Ultra-smooth self-ligation forms and
rounded edges for the maximum bracket, patient comfort has enhanced, contoured base design for strong,
reliable bond retention.

 Twinlock bracket:
In 1998, Dr. Jim Wildman4 developed TwinLock bracket. Its flat, rectangular slide, housed between
the tie wings of an edgewise twin brackets. Passive slide moved gingivally with finger pressure to entrap the
arch wire in a passive configuration & it is moved occlusally into the slot-open position with a universal scaler.
Additional benefits include improved hygiene and patient comfort, smooth and clean labial surface. Drawback
include mobility of the slide during opening and closing obsolete its commercial achievement (Fig. 8).

Figure 8: TwinLock bracket (A)open (B) close positions

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 35 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

 GAC - Inovation bracket11 :

These brackets are introduced by Micheal CAlpern in 2000. These are very similar to speed brackets
in concept and design, but are of-
1. Twin configuration .
2. Bracket manufactured with metal injection moulding.
3.V –Tool(Tweezer) is used for opening the clip.
4. Active clip which is made from cobalt chromium alloy is highly resistant to fracture.
5. Slot Blocker: It prevents archwire from escaping from the bracket and enhancesTorque Expression.
6. Horizontal Slot :This Slot runs through the occlusal wings which can be used for Rotation and uprighting
springs or Segmental wire .
7. Super mesh Base: This houses a wide mesh over a tight mesh which enhances retention.

 Innovation:
The standard In-ovation bracket.

Innovation R -These brackets are narrow in width than in-ovation brackets. This increase benefit of their use in
small tooth, lower anteriors. impacted tooth, partially erupted tooth.(Fig. 9).

Innovation C - Esthetic innovation brackets (Fig. 9).

Innovation L MTM - With these lingual braces indirect bonding of anterior teeth (3-3) can be carried out.

Innovation L - lingual innovation braces.

These brackets are like the SPEED brackets in origination and configuration, yet are of a twin
arrangement .They are a decent, robust design, and no breakage of the clips has been actually tested or reported.
Some moderately minor drawbacks in bracket handling are-
1. A few brackets are difficult to open. This is unpredictable but more typical in the lower arch where the
gingival end of the spring clip is hard to visualize.
2. These brackets are to a great degree simple to close before the archwire is in position, more probable in the
lower arch.

Figure 9: In-ovation R & In-ovation C Bracket

 Gestenco Oyster brackets:

This was the first translucent self ligating Bracket which was introduced in 2001. The Oyster bracket is
semi-translucent polycarbonate bracket and it resists discoloring as it is made from strong, fiber glass reinforced
composite polymer S. Use of Super elastic and Beta arch wires are strongly recommended. The unique snap-on
cap allows arch wires to be placed easily, since the cap is convertible, it can be removed if necessary and the
bracket will function as a regular twin. Mushroom Hook is present for auxiliary attachment. Its drawback was
high friction that is equivalent to Conventional stainless steel brackets, So not used now.

 Adenta Evolution brackets12:

It is developed by Dr. Hatto Loidl and C. Schendell (2001). Unlike many other self ligating brackets
that only lock closed and no longer play a role, the Adenta self ligating lingual bracket was designed with non-
locking rotating clip resulting in unique flexibility. Customized to hold even a non-situated wire safely with
simply the appropriate measure of pressure, consistently pushing the archwire to the base of the bracket slot.
This steady pressure delivers the torque, angulation and in-out control required to complete your cases rapidly
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 36 | Page
 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

and productively. Slot for horizontal arch wire inclusion in the front and one of a kind processed really One-
piece bracket outline. Smooth round edges giving most noteworthy patient comfort and oral hygiene. The self-
ligating clip is utilized as a bite plane quickening bite opening (Fig. 10).

Figure 10: Adenta Evolution lingual bracket

 Philippe lingual self ligating bracket 12 :

Philippe passive self ligating bracket developed (forestadent) by Aldo Macchi(2002) . Philippe 2D
self-ligating lingual brackets providing 2-dimensional control, were suggested for the correction of simple
malocclusions, such as minor crowding or spacing with the lingual technique. The primary preferred standpoint
of the Philippe brackets is their position of safety and their comfort to the patients. They are reasonable for basic
cases that don't require 3-dimensional control since they have no slot.
These brackets can be bonded straightforwardly to the lingual surface of the tooth. These brackets have
no slot, they incorporate little wings welded to the base of the bracket. Four kinds of Philippe brackets are
accessible standard medium twin, a limited single-wing bracket for lower incisors, a large twin and a three-wing
bracket. Bracket wings used to secure the archwire to slot, are opened with Haideman spatula and shut with
Weingart plier (Fig. 11).

 Opal brackets13:
It is a completely non metallic bracket, designed and developed (ultradent) by Dr. Norbert Abels
(2004). Completely nonmetallic (resin) Bracket work as a compelling slot and sufficiently flexible in pivot
region to open and close. The opal configuration is somewhat brilliant in this regard however mind must be
taken not to fatigue fracture the hinge portion of the bracket by the repeated full opening of the cap. The
brackets like most resin, are maybe most appropriate for the short course of treatment where these issues of
lifespan are less of an issue. There are no tie wings , so elastic chain is put in before shutting the cap.
 Smart clip14 :
It is introduced and developed (3M Unitek) by Gary L. Weinberger in 2004. It consists of two nickel titanium
clips i.e., mesial and distal tie wings that open and close through elastic deformation of the material when the
arch wire exerts a force on the clip. The bracket contains no moving door or latch. The feature of no moving
doors or latches can eliminate problems such as sticking, spontaneous opening, or plaque build-up that are
associated with other types of self ligating brackets(Fig. 12).

Figure 11: Philippe 2D self ligating lingual bracket Figure 12: SmartClip Self ligating Bracket

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 37 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

 Opal metal bracket:

It is a hybrid self ligating bracket consist of metal and ceramic componets.
1.Polymer snap - on door for easy and fast closing or opening - also protects in trauma situations.
2.Ceramic body for strength and secure bonding – slim design with low profile.
3.CentredT hook for elastics and fits all NiTi chains.
4.Both passive and active.
5.Stainless steel hinge.
6.Metal insert for reduced wire- friction.
7.Radius in base for easier de-bonding.
8.FDI notation in base for easy identification

 Forestadent quick:
It is developed by Dr.Bjorn Ludwig (2006). It available both active (bioquick) and passive
(biopassive). Externally passive brackets differentiated from active by a vertical marks on metal ligature wing.
It consist of snap flexible spring, is opened with probe from the gingival end. Optimized, anatomically
positioned base prevents rocking of the bracket when it is pressed on the tooth (Fig. 13).


Lancer praxis glide3 :
It is developed by Dr. Robert Lokar and team of Lancer Orthodontic engineers is truly an innovative
low friction hybrid twin system, are manufactured using the latest robotic Technology. Praxis Glide is a proven
torque-in-the base twin bracket, with a removable multiplanar clip. PraxisTSTM bracket is the latest mid
aesthetic appliance now offered by LANCER (Fig. 14).
Features-
1.Open Lumen bracket, passive at the first stage of treatment.
2.Total control using a ligature over the clip
3.Anatomical design for each tooth (11 different bracket shapes)
4.Easy positioning (avoiding any repositioning of the bracket)
5.Low profile, smooth and ergonomic, optimal comfort for the patient
6.Rapid leveling and alignment.

Figure 13: Forestadent Quick Figure 14: Lancer Praxis glide

 Smart Clarity SL bracket(2007) :

It is ceramic version of smartclip bracket with improved clip forces(Fig. 15).

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 38 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

Figure 15: Smart Clip SL3 & Smart Clarity SL

 Vision LP15:
These brackets are fully passive, having low profile, no bio-debris binding as it has very small contact
point & located at the face of bracket so that it can be cleaned everytime the patient brushes. Along with
maintaining low friction mechanics it also provides high, standard & low torque options for customized
treatment. Vision LP brackets has strong & durable clip which was designed such that it is easy to open & close
Opened with instrument by simple rotation & closed by clicking gently with instrument or fingernail. It is
having individual color coding & maximum retention technology bonding base (Fig. 16).

 Discovery brackets:
It is developed by dentauram in 2007 using CAD – CAM technology (Fig. 17). Features are-
1.Best therapy results with minimal size for aesthetic treatment.
2. High degree of user convenience due to easy locking mechanism
3.Improved, flexible lid stop keeps the lid open for quick, smooth archwire change.
4.New opening mechanism in the direction of force guarantees numerous perfect opening and closing
operations.
5.Revised bracket geometry to ensure that the lids always open straight. This prevents buckling of the lid.
6.Super smooth surfaces provide excellent intraoral comfort for the Patient.
7. FDI notation on the base ensures easy assignment to each tooth.

Figure 16: Vision LP Figure 17: Discovery Bracket

 Damon Q(2009):
These are the most recent variant of Damon framework, sliding component is intended to be simpler ,
more secure and more comfortable to the patient when opened and shut and resistant to the impacts of calculus
accumulation. These brackets likewise smaller in all measurements than their predecessors and space has been
found for horizontal and vertical slot. Spintec cool – opening tool(Fig. 18).

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 39 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

Figure 18: Damon Q & Damon Aesthetic

 Damon Aesthetic (2009):

The new Damon Clear bracket is a translucent passive self-ligation bracket with no metal insert. The
bracket's totally clear design is Planned to meet patients desires for aesthetics, while its strong development
addresses clinicians' issues for functionality and quality. The completely stylish bracket body and slide are made
of strong polycrystalline alumina (PCA), an inert material impervious to staining or discoloration. The slide of
the SL bracket constitutes a fourth wall, which makes a passive lumen to hold the arch wire set up with low
ligation force while encouraging rotational control. A nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) spring component keeps up the
slide in the open and close positions and shields the slide from isolating from the bracket body (Fig. 18).

 Smart clip SL3(2009):

It is like Smartclip bracket, distinction is less clip force reduction. Additionally accessible in adhesive
precoated framework with fluoride discharge property. Familiar Twin-Wing configuration takes into
consideration treatment adaptability and specific bracket or tie-wing ligation, expanding between bracket width
when Needed (Fig. 15).
Archwire addition is finished with finger pressure and disengagement finished with separation device
has two hooks to engage the wire, and its central part holds over the buccal surface of the mesial and distal
wings. By methods for pressing the handles together, the wire withdraws from the bracket slot.
Tandem Archwires Significant outcomes have been seen in adjusting rotations and making leveling and
alignment when utilizing Tandem arch wires with 3M Self Ligating Appliances.
Points of interest of SmartClip SL3 Brackets –
1. Reduction in friction, which brings about more proficient sliding mechanics than customarily ligated brackets.
2. Improvement in oral cleanliness with an open slot and end of ligature Ties.
3. Reduced seat time for archwire insertion & removal.
4. No plaque entrapment in sliding component and bracket slot.
5. Treatment flexibility of twin tie-wing design.

 Cabriolet Self-Ligating Bracket16 (2010):

The Cabriolet passive-active self-ligating bracket includes a ceramic body and stain steel hinge for
quality, a metal slot inserts for lessened friction, and a polymer snap-on door for simple opening and shutting
and enhanced patient comfort. Each bracket incorporates a centered T-hook for elastics. The bases are intended
for simplicity of debonding.

 Harmony lingual self-ligating bracket system17 (2011):

The harmony lingual self-ligating bracket framework creates completely modified bonding pads and
mechanically shaped archwires that move teeth productively and precisely, as indicated by the company. The
bracket body is intended to ensure its self-ligating clip, which offers passive, interactive, or active ligation,
depending upon wire size.

 Sensation Active Ceramic Self-Ligating Bracket18 (2012):

The Sensation Active Ceramic Self-Ligating Bracket is created from a durable and translucent ceramic
material and highlights a rhodium-covered treated steel clip. A one of a kind guide rail settles opening and
shutting forces of the bracket clip, bringing about quicker archwire changes (Fig. 19).

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 40 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

 BioQuick Self-Ligating Bracket19 (2014):

Forestadent's BioQuick self-ligating bracket presently includes a lower profile and rounder edges for
enhanced patient comfort. The upgraded clip's thickness has been expanded by 20%, making it more strong and
ready to withstand disfigurement while giving better control of angulation, rotation, and torque (Fig. 20).

Figure 19: Senasation active ceramic bracket Figure 20: Bio-Quick Bracket

 Carriere SLX Self-Ligating Bracket System20 (2014):

The new Carriere SLX Self-Ligating Bracket system from Henry Schein Orthodontics offers an
advanced variant of the Damon solution with enhancements in bracket arrangement, torque control, and
accuracy finishing. The bracket includes an amazingly low profile and occlusally opening doors; visual signs
including six horizontal and five vertical references are intended to help guarantee exact bracket arrangement
(Fig. 21).

 Empower 2 21(2016):
An overhauled variant of Empower self-ligating bracket system, now known as Empower 2. New
highlights incorporate micro-etched bonding pads, intended to enhance bond strength by 15-30% over different
bases, and a thicker clip to expand wire-seating power while staying away from clip disfigurement (Fig. 22).

Figure 21: Carriere SLX bracket Figure 22: Empower 2

 In-Ovation X22,23 (2017):

In-Ovation X, Dentsply Sirona's most recent expansion to its self-ligating In-Ovation line, holds a
similar core design and treatment standards, with improvements including a streamlined shape and a diminished
profile and occlusal impression. There is an updated encased-clip system and shut gingival bracket base will
decrease the calculus develop that can hinder with clip function (Fig. 23).

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 41 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

Figure 23: In-ovation X

III. Clinical tips when using self ligating brackets

1. Helps to arch wire commitment - It is essential to connect with the wire completely in the bracket before the
clip closure, rather than simultaneously attempt to close and engage the wire.
2. Wire can be held set up with various tools, special plier and devices have been suggested both for shutting
and in addition opening bracket clips by various manufacturers.
3. Self Brackets utilize pushing force as opposed to pulling force while engaging the arch wire.
4. In severely rotated teeth, first convert to a molar tube. i.e. it is advisable to first close the clip and than thread
the arch wire.
5. Prevent wire pokes: Low friction permits simple sliding of wire through brackets. It is important to turn the
ends of wire safely.
6. V shaped notches in arch wire or stops additionally are prescribed.

IV. Conclusion
As of now accessible self-ligating brackets offer the exceptionally profitable combination of a great
degree low friction and secure full bracket engagement and they are adequately powerful and easy to use to
deliver most of the potential advantages of this sort of bracket. The center points of interest of self-ligation are
currently settled and promptly accessible. These advancements offer the likelihood of a noteworthy
diminishment in normal treatment times and maybe also in anchorage requirements, especially in cases
requiring substantial tooth developments. Proof of better treatment adequacy exists however is incomplete.
While further refinements are desirable and additionally examines fundamental, current brackets seem ready to
convey quantifiable advantage effortlessly of utilization.

References
[1]. Stolzenberg J: The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. Int J Orthod Dent Child 21:837-840, 1935
[2]. Harradine NWT: Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod 2003;30:262-273
[3]. Nigel Harradine The History and Development of Self-Ligating Brackets Seminars in Orthodontics, Vol 14, No 1
(March), 2008: pp 5-18 5
[4]. Wildman, A.J.; Hice, T.L.; Lang, H.M.; Lee, I.F.; and Strauch, E.C. Jr.: Round Table: The Edgelok bracket, J. Clin.
Orthod.1972; 6:613-623
[5]. Harradine NWT: Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod 2003;30:262-273
[6]. Hanson, G.H.: JCO Interviews on the SPEED bracket, J. Clin. Orthod. 1986;20:183-189
[7]. Nigel T Harradine, David J Birnie: The clinical use of Activa self-ligating bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1996; 109:319-28.
[8]. Wolfgang Heiser. A new orthodontic philosophy. J Clin Orthod 1998; 35: 44-53
[9]. Dwight H. Damon. It begins with the face. www.Ormco.com
[10]. Dwight H. Damon. New generation bracket for improved function. www.Ormco.com.
[11]. GAC. Self-Iigating braces.www.gacintl.com.
[12]. S. Geron, Self-Ligating Brackets in Lingual Orthodontics, Seminars in Orthodontics, Vol 14, No 1 (March), 2008: pp
64-72
[13]. Aus: Ludwig, Self-Ligating Brackets in Orthodontics, Current Concepts and Techniques 2012 Georg Thieme Verlag
KG
[14]. Trevisi and Bergstrand: The SmartClip Self-Ligating Appliance System; SeminOrthod2008;14:87-100.
[15]. Why Self Ligation? www.americanortho.com.
[16]. Cabriolet the clear hybrid, self-ligating ortho appliance, www.gestenco.com.
[17]. Saini P, Sharma H, Kalha AS, Chandna AK. The current evidence and implications of lingual orthodontics. J Indian
Orthod Soc 2016;50:S4-9.
[18]. Sensation™ Active Ceramic Self-Ligating Bracket System, www.orthotechnology.com.

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 42 | Page

 Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update

[19]. Ron Roncone. Self-Ligating Brackets: To Use or Not to Use? Jan 2014 www.orthodonticproductsonline.com
[20]. What are self-ligating braces? Carriere SLX Self- Ligating Braces, www.HenryScheinOrtho.com.
[21]. American Orthodontics’ Empower® 2 Self Ligating metal brackets, march 2017, www.americanortho.com
[22]. In-Ovation X Self-Ligating Metal Bracket Design Features and Advantages, dentsplysirona.com.
[23]. Jerry R. Clark, Jack Gebbie, BS, Datatex Market Research Report Summary: Increasing Practice Efficiency and
Profitability Using In-Ovation Self-Ligating Brackets, March, 2007. Council of American Survey Research
Organizations.

Ankita Jangde "Self Ligating Brackets From Past to Present: An Update."IOSR Journal of
Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), vol. 17, no. 7, 2018, pp 30-43.

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707063043 www.iosrjournals.org 43 | Page