Developments Soil Microbiology

Geoderma 100 Ž2001.
389–402
www.elsevier.nlrlocatergeoderma
Developments in soil microbiology since the

mid 1960s
Heribert Insam)
Institute of Microbiology, UniÕersity of Innsbruck, Technikerstrabe 25, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Received 10 January 2001; received in revised form 19 February 2001; accepted 22 February 2001
Abstract
Since the 1960s, soil microbiology underwent major changes in methods and approaches and
this review focuses on the developments in some selected aspects of soil microbiology. Research in
cell numbers of specific bacterial and fungal groups was replaced by a focus on biochemical
processes including soil enzyme activities, and flux measurements of carbon and nutrients.
Ecologists focused on soil microbial pools whereas soil microbial biomass as an important source
and sink of nutrients were recognized in agriculture. Soil microbiologists started to use structural
components like phospholipid fatty acids for quantification of specific microbial groups
without the need to cultivate them. In the last decade, molecular approaches allowed new insights
through the analysis of soil extract DNA showing an unexpected diversity of genomes in soil. At
the end of the review a brief outlook is given on the future of soil microbiology which ranges from
in situ identification of bacteria, to routine assays of microbial communities by microarray
technology. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Soil microbiology; Review; Enzymes; Microbial biomass; N turnover; Molecular ecology
1. Introduction
Microbial ecology, and more specific, soil microbiology is a dynamic and

growing subdiscipline of soil science. There are a number of new journals in this field but
also traditional soil science journals increasingly attract soil microbiological papers.
In 1967 the first issue of Geoderma was published. Thirty-four years is a long time
span in most scientific fields and during these years soil microbiology has
developed from a playground of soil scientists, microbiologists and soil chemists to
an own subdiscipline. This review on soil microbiology on the occasion of 100
volumes of
)
Tel.: q43-512-507-6009; fax: q43-512-507-2928.
E-mail address: Heribert.insam@uibk.ac.at ŽH. Insam..
0016-7061r01r$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII:
S0016-7061Ž01.00029-5
390 H. InsamrGeoderma 100 (2001) 389–402 390
Geoderma aims to introduce to soil scientists the importance of microbiological aspects

of the soil and the new insight offered by new techniques. It gives a brief
historical overview of the developments within soil microbiology, and some
thoughts on future prospects.
2. Driven by methods
Soil is very complex with diverse niches offered to soil microorganisms. Having to
deal with solid, liquid and gaseous phases, soil microbiologists were in need of suitable
methods for studying their subject since the beginnings of this field. ‘Ecology of
soil microorganisms’ ŽParkinson et al., 1971. was the standard reference for soil
microbiologists 30 years ago and it was a relatively thin booklet with 116 pages.
Nowadays, methods books in soil microbiology are abound and they usually exceed 500
pages Že.g., Weaver et al., 1994; Alef and Nannipieri, 1995; Schinner et al., 1996; Van
Elsas et al.,
1997; Hurst et al., 1997.. New windows into the black box are being opened ŽFig. 1..
In soil microbiology it was realised that simply extracting soils and counting
microorganisms is not enough to characterise the soil microbiota and its significance for
the functioning of soils Že.g., Macura, 1974.. Prevalent methods of cell
enumeration account for a very small fraction of the total number of microbes,
and reveal no information about the activity of the counted organism. Both methods of
extraction and enumeration are subject to bias and differences may be as large as
three orders of
Fig. 1. The soil as a Black Box. Soil microbiologists open up new windows to investigate soil
microbial
communities, their composition and ŽCLPP, Community level physiological profiles;

functions PLFA,
Phospholipid fatty acids; details see text..
Table 1
Ža. Effect of extraction method on total microbial counts ŽSmith and Stribley, 1994.
Method of extraction Bacterial numbers per gram
inorganic matter
Dispersed soil Žcontrol. 8.5=108
Repeated centrifugation and resuspension 1.5=109
ŽHopkins et al., 1991.
Aqueous two-phase partitioning 1.3=1010
ŽSmith and Stribley, 1994.
Žb. Total, viable, and culturable soil bacteria of a barley field soil ŽWinding et al., 1994.
Žsimple extraction.
Method of counting Bacterial numbers gy1 soil
Acridine orange direct count ŽAODC. Žtotal bacteria.
1=109
CTC reducing bacteria Žmetabolically active bacteria.
3.5=107
Microcolony-forming units Žmicro-CFU.
Žbacteria that are able to perform a few, 2.5=107
but not more cell divisions on agar.
Žviable but not culturable bacteria.a
Colony-forming units ŽCFU. on agar plates 7=106
Žculturable bacteria.a
a
Longer incubations, up to 64 days, increased the numbers of CFUs.
magnitude ŽTable 1.. Despite this shortcoming, cell enumeration methods have
long been the prime choice for soil microbiologists to obtain quantitative data.
Counting methods do have virtue in cases when a specific organism is studied but it is
advisable to crosscheck the figures on microbial numbers in relation to the
applicability of the analytical method.
The data in Table 1 show that with traditional cultivation methods on agar plates only
a small percentage of the total microflora is accounted for, and for the remaining 99%
physiologic and taxonomic information is lacking. For most soil microbiologists
such data were not satisfactory for understanding soil functioning and the consequence
was to attempt to measure processes like enzyme activities or N fixation and
nitrification, or more unspecific processes like CO2 evolution or heat generation.
3. Soil enzymes
Enzymes in soil may be extra- or intracellular. Extracellular enzymes are necessary
for the breakdown of organic macromolecules, like cellulose, hemicelluloses or
lignin whereas intracellular enzymes are responsible for the breakdown of smaller
molecules like sugars or amino acids. Soil enzymes are predominantly of microbial origin
and are closely related to microbial abundance andror activity. Biochemical tools that
allowed rapid measurement of soil enzyme activities made soil enzymology
fashionable in the late 1960s, and such tools remained widely used for 20 years.
Numerous enzymes have been tested on their suitability for soil investigations; the choice
of method will largely
depend on the geochemical cycle Že.g., C, N, P or S. under investigation. Using
databases from the Institute of Scientific Information ŽISI. it has been attempted
to quantify which enzyme tests are most frequently used today and these are
urease
ŽTabatabai and Bremner, 1972., phosphatase ŽHoffmann, 1967. and dehydrogenase
ŽTrevors, 1984., indicating the acceptance of the methods in the scientific community.
A major weakness of enzyme tests is that the actual microbial activity of a soil is not
well reflected. Moreover, the tests show ‘historic’ features of enzymes bound to
soil organic matter or clay minerals. Therefore, Visser and Parkinson Ž1992.
disputed the suitability of enzyme assays for microbial activity and soil quality
assessments, with the exception of dehydrogenase because its biological properties
make it unlikely to be present in soil in an extracellular state ŽSkujins, 1978..
To overcome the interpretation problems of single enzyme tests, Beck Ž1984.
proposed a soil microbiological index calculated from microbial biomass, reductase and
hydrolase activities. This index, however, never became popular. In another attempt to
propose such an index, Trasar-Cepeda et al. Ž1998. found a very close relation of total N
with a linear combination of soil microbial biomass C, mineralised N, phosphomo-
noesterase, b-glucosidase and urease activity. This test set was proposed as a soil quality
index closely related to soil sustainability. The problem with both Beck’s Ž1984.
and Trasar-Cepeda et al.’s Ž1998. approaches is that the usefulness of the enzyme tests
used as components of their indices is disputed, and universally accepted enzyme
tests are still lacking.
The use of fluorogenic substrates has recently been proposed for studying microbial
activities. Miller et al. Ž1998. used 4-methylumbelliferyl N-acetyl-b-D-
glucosaminide, that, when hydrolysed, releases 4-methylumbelliferone which
fluoresces and can be detected in nanomolar concentrations. This test specifically
determines fungal chiti- nolytic activities. Assays using labelled substrates directly test
for substrate degradation and may be performed in microplates, they need smaller
sample sizes than traditional enzyme tests and allow measurement of many parallels in
one assay.
Community-level physiological profiling ŽCLPP., which is another type of ‘enzyme
assay’, has been proposed by Garland and Mills Ž1991.. With this method, the ability of
microbial communities to degrade a set of up to 95 different substrates is tested in one
single assay. A redox indicator in the Biologw microtiter plates indicates if the specific
substrate is used as an energy source. CLPPs have been shown to be very
sensitive indicators of disturbances Že.g., Mayr et al., 1999; Yan et al., 2000 . and
microplates ŽEcoPlates. especially designed for environmental applications ŽInsam,
1997. are now available.
Summarizing, soil enzyme assays, including CLPPs, are never stand-alone
parameters. They are quick monitoring tools, but cannot give answers on
functionality. To characterize the soil, or to understand differences among soils,
additional methods Žaddressing pools and fluxes. are necessary.
4. Fluxes
Enzyme tests cannot be used to estimate in situ matter fluxes as they are an estimate of
the potential to use a certain substrate under optimised conditions. In ecology, the
work of Odum Ž1969. has been very influential. Pools and fluxes were measured
and calculated for catchments and whole ecosystems and this caused direct flux
measurements to become important for soil microbiologists. In the 1970s and 1980s,
respiratory CO2 evolution was indispensable for soil microbiological work in
ecosystem research. Carbon dioxide evolution, a traditional method since the early days
of soil microbiology is still the best index of gross metabolic activity of mixed
microbial populations ŽStotzky, 1997.. While in situ determinations are preferred
for ecosystem studies, in vitro tests have proven to be sufficient for other purposes like
decomposition studies or more general soil characterisation.
Concerns about soil acidification caused by atmospheric inputs of N, NO 3,
move- ments from soil to groundwater, and the contribution of N gases Že.g., N2O and
NO. to the climate change and ozone destruction have triggered detailed
investigation on N transformation in soils ŽMyrold, 1997.. Biological nitrogen fixation
has been considered as a factor to increase agricultural production and to mitigate hunger
in the world. Both symbiotic and nonsymbiotic nitrogen fixation have been studied
intensely since the
1970s, and the significance of nitrogen fixation for the yield of several crops and for the
sustainability of farming systems has been emphasised repeatedly Že.g., Paul and Clark,
1996.. Today, soil microbiologists work on genetically engineering plants and microor-
ganisms to further improve the benefits of biological nitrogen fixation.
Nitrogen turnover measurements are essential for understanding ecosystem dynamics
and agricultural productivity, because N occurs in soils, oceans and the atmosphere and
its cycling has global implications. Nitrogen is also often the limiting factor for
microbial activity. Many traditional methods, like N mineralisation tests, potential
nitrification, or the acetylene inhibition method for denitrification are still widely used.
15
As with C turnover studies, the use of an isotope tracer Ž N. may give detailed insight in
the allocation of N within the soil, or even within the soil microbial community. It is,
however, beyond the scope of this review to address all the different methods for
measuring rates of N cycle transformations which can be found in Weaver et al. Ž1994.
or Alef and Nannipieri Ž1995..
Most nutrient flux measurements are not performed in the field but in the laboratory.
The problem of in vitro tests and plot investigations is the extrapolation of
measured values. Spatial heterogeneity is a considerable problem in soil microbiology but
excel-
lent geostatistical tools are available to deal with this problem ŽGoovaerts, 1998..
Bruckner et al. Ž1999. studied physico-chemical and soil biological parameters Žrespira-
tion, microbial biomass and N-mineralisation. and detected three different scales of
spatial variability in a temperate coniferous forest: Ž1. a fine-scale pattern -1m due to
retarded decomposition of Picea abies Žspruce. litter, and lacking bioturbation by
earthworms, Ž2. a mesoscale pattern Ž1.0–1.5 m., reflecting the influence of individual
trees, and Ž3. unexplained long-range trends of N min and water content exceeding
the transect length of the study. Specific turnover processes do occur in specific niches,
e.g. in certain aggregate size classes only ŽStemmer et al., 1999.. Rasiah and Kay
Ž1999. found that management-induced changes in compaction, spatially variable
textural characteristics and soil organic matter had strong influence on microbial
biomass N. This effect was stronger on soils amended with red clover shoot
biomass than in unamended soils. Stenberg et al. Ž1998. showed that the variability of
most microbiolog-
ical parameters within one single agricultural field was as large as for a set of 26
different Swedish soils.
5. Pools
Biomass Že.g., plant root and shoot biomass, faunal biomass . and other organic pools
Žlitter, soil organic matter. are important components for the functioning of an ecosys-
tem. Due to a lack of suitable and sufficiently standardised methods in soil micro-
biology, the microbial biomass pool was long neglected or estimated based on microbial
counts. This largely changed through the work of Jenkinson Ž1976., who proposed
a method for indirect microbial biomass determination encompassing ecological and
microbiological thinking. The idea was to kill and lyse microbial cells in a soil sample by
chloroform fumigation. Following re-inoculation with soil, the respiration is mea-
sured for some 10 days. Compared to an unfumigated control the fumigated
sample
shows an enhanced CO2 production which is attributed to the killed and subsequently
decomposed microbial biomass C. The method was named fumigation–incubation ŽFI.
method.
Another physiological approach was proposed by Anderson and Domsch Ž1978., the
so-called substrate-induced respiration ŽSIR. method. The idea was derived from
pure culture studies. Microorganisms respond to the supply with a readily available
substrate, i.e. glucose, with an immediate response in respiration that was supposed to be
linearly correlated with biomass C.
Both the FI and SIR methods have drawbacks. The FI method takes 10 days and is
generally unsuitable for acid soils. SIR has originally been calibrated against FI
and several different calibration factors have been proposed. The calculation of
microbial biomass C from the SIR data is therefore often disputed Že.g., Sparling, 1995..
A more direct way to estimate microbial biomass P and N has been proposed
by Brookes et al. Ž1982, 1985.. After chloroform fumigation soil samples are
extracted Žfumigation–extraction ŽFE. method. and biomass P or N are measured
directly. The method has also been adapted for biomass C measurements ŽVance et al.,
1987., and has become the most frequently used method for microbial biomass
determination. The FE method requires correction factors for different soils and for
the different elements analysed. The determination of these correction factors is
laborious for routine analyses. The different methods to estimate microbial biomass are
frequently used as revealed by
a survey of recent publications ŽFig. 2.. Apart from their use in scientific studies,
fumigation–extraction and SIR have also been adopted by national authorities Že.g., in
Germany. for routine soil surveys. Advantages and disadvantages of the methods
are summarised in Table 2.
One of the main concepts of Odum’s theory on ecosystem development was the
energetic optimisation during succession ŽOdum, 1969.. According to Odum,
the
ecosystem respiration-to-biomass ratio decreases during maturation of an ecosystem.
Since all C from primary production eventually reaches the soil C pool, this concept was
adopted for the soil compartment of an ecosystem ŽAnderson and Domsch, 1986; Insam
and Haselwandter, 1989.. For many environmental studies, the so-called metabolic
Fig. 2. Number of SCI citations of original papers ŽJenkinson and Poulsen, 1976; Anderson and
Domsch,
1978; Vance et al., 1987; Brookes et al., 1982, 1985 . on microbial biomass determination during the
last 3 years. This gives a rough estimate on the relative frequency of use of the four selected methods of
biomass determination.
quotient Žmg CO2 –C respired gy1 Cmic hy1. ŽAnderson and Domsch, 1986. has proven to
be more sensitive than the measurement of microbial biomass or respiration alone.
Microbial pool sizes have proven to be reliable indicators of soil quality, and
contribute to the understanding of nutrient dynamics, both on the long term and season by
season. Microbial biomass is a robust parameter that may rapidly, and reproducibly, be
determined. It allows gross comparisons of soils, and reflects soil management
changes, or pollution impact. If, however, only certain functions or specific microorgan-
isms are affected, microbial biomass is not a sufficiently sensitive parameter. In
that case, fluxes, or the community composition need to be investigated in more detail.
Table 2
Advantages and disadvantages of the most frequently used methods of microbial biomass determination
in soils
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Fumigation–incubation Direct, biological measurement, Long duration Ž10 days.
no toxic chemicals needed
Not suitable for acid ŽpH-6.0. soils
Substrate induced Good reproducibility Calibration with another method
respiration necessary Žindirect estimate.
No toxic chemicals needed Not suitable for soils that received
fresh organic amendments
Rapid Ž-8 h.
Fumigation–extraction Good reproducibility C measurement requires expensive
equipment
Rapid Ž-24 h.
6. Recent developments
Despite all attempts to measure fluxes and gross microbial pools, the soil and
its microbiota still remained a black box, with only a few tiny windows opened up for the
organisms that were isolated, cultured and identified. Actors determining the mass and
nutrient flows were unknown. The change in approaches for studying the soil microbiota
is reflected by the change of keywords found in the titles of publications ŽFig. 3.. While
‘enzyme’ and ‘microbial biomass’ are found in ISI databases from 1991 to 2000
in constant frequency, ‘respiration’ and, first of all, ‘microbial community’ occur increas-
ingly since a few years.
Initial attempts in the 1970s for opening up the black box were the separation
of bacterial and fungal biomass, for example by the selective inhibition technique
ŽAnder- son and Domsch, 1975.. In this method, fungal or bacterial growth was inhibited
by the addition of specific antibiotics and the fungalrbacterial ratio was calculated
from the extent of inhibition. More successful was the determination of ergosterol
ŽWest et al.,
1987. in soils, which is still used if fungal biomass is to be quantified. Ergosterol is the
main sterol of most Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes and Fungi imperfecti, and thus
an indicator of fungal biomass. This was recently disputed by Ruzicka et al. Ž2000.. They
found that a universal conversion factor of ergosterol content to fungal biomass remains
elusive and problematic and is not a measure of fungal biomass, but rather an indicator of
the extent of fungal membranes in soils. Still, ergosterol is able to give a an estimate on
the extent of fungal colonization of a soil.
Muramic acid, in contrast to ergosterol, is only found in Prokaryotes and has
been suggested as an indicator for bacterial and cyanophyte biomass ŽMillar and
Cassida,
1970. but the method has not received wide acceptance because the extraction parame-
ters ŽHCl concentration, time. need to be optimised for each soil, and because of
the
Fig. 3. Frequency of publications that have the word soil and, in addition, certain other keywords
Žsearch terms. in their title. These few examples show a constancy in papers on microbial biomass and
enzymes, and a clear increase in studies on microbial communities during the last 10 years. Unfortunately, the
Science Citation Index does not date back further than 1991.
Table 3
Phospholipid fatty acids may be used to determine the community composition of the soil microbiota ŽZelles
and Alef, 1995.. This table shows a summary of the most important signature phospholipid fatty acids.
Microbial group Phospholipid fatty acid signatures
Archaebacteria Fatty residues are ether-linked to glycerol
Anaerobic bacteria Contain sphingolipids which are largely absent from aerobes
Bacteria, in general Saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids ester-linked to glycerol
Gram-negative bacteria Contain more hydroxylated fatty acids
Gram-positive bacteria Contain more branched fatty acids
Cyanobacteria Žand eucaryotes. Lipids containing polyunsaturated fatty acids
Fungi A specific PLFA, 18:2v6 ŽFrostegard and Ba˚a˚th, 1996.
suspicion that muramic acid might mainly be present in dead cell material ŽZelles and
Alef, 1995..
For the microbiologist a differentiation between bacteria and fungi is not
enough because within these two groups many taxonomic and functional subgroups do
exist that deserve special attention. Certain functions, like nitrification, may be impaired
by some management measure like the use of nitrogen fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides,
while the total bacterial or fungal biomass remains unaffected.
A breakthrough in the use of biomarkers for community characterisation were
the phospholipid fatty acids ŽPLFA., which are found in the membranes of all living
cells and can be used for the determination of the community composition ŽZelles
et al.,
1992; Guckert and White, 1986; Petersen et al., 1997.. Bacterial groups and fungi can be
characterised according to their lipid composition ŽTable 3..
All biomarkers have in common the problem of extractability and unknown stability in
the soil. Therefore, it is not easy to judge if data derived from biomarkers are related to
living cells only, or that they also include dead cell material. The stability of
biomarkers in the soil largely depends on temperature, moisture and other
conditions directly related to degradation processes. Furthermore, the physiological
status of microorganisms often determines the content of different components.
Summarizing, biomarkers were an acceptable tool as long as no better alternatives were
available, but in the near future, biomarkers for community characterization are likely to
be replaced by molecular approaches.
7. Soil microbiology and DNA
In her seminal paper, Torsvik Ž1980. was able to obtain DNA from soil sufficiently
pure to allow hybridisation techniques, and in 1990 they showed by DNArDNA
hybridisation that 1 g of soil contained more than 4000 different genomes of
bacteria ŽTorsvik et al., 1990.. Most of the diversity was found in the fraction that could
not be isolated and cultured by standard and sophisticated plating techniques.
For obtaining pure DNA from the soil, two procedures may be followed: Ž1. initially,
cells are extracted by repeated suspension–centrifugation steps and then the cells
are
lysed for DNA recovery; Ž2. the DNA is directly extracted from the soil after lysis of the
cells. The advantage of the first procedure is that the DNA is purer whereas in
the second procedure a more complete extraction is obtained which is more likely
to represent the total community. Currently, most researchers extract the DNA
directly from the soil because improved purification procedures are available that avoid
inhibition of polymerase chain reaction ŽPCR. of humic acids.
Several methods are used today to study soil DNA or RNA. Soil molecular ecologists
use the unique feature of prokaryote 16S rDNA that contains conserved and
variable regions. The 16S rDNA is a strand of about 1500-bp length. The
conserved regions deviate only among taxonomically distant groups, while the variable
regions may show differences even among different strains of a single species. The
extracted DNA is purified, and amplified by polymerase chain reaction ŽPCR.. The
primers determine the region that is amplified, so that an analysis may either give a rough
overview or detailed insight into a specific group. The amplification products are
analysed by gel electrophoresis. One of the approaches is denaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis ŽMuyzer et al., 1993. that allows the separation of amplificates according
to their GqC content. On a formamide denaturing gradient gel ŽDGGE. Žor,
alternatively, a temperature gradient gel, TGGE. genes with a lower GqC content are
denatured earlier and do not travel far. Genes with different GqC contents yield
distinct bands. The pattern of the bands is different in different communities. If more
detailed information is required, bands may be excised, cloned, sequenced and compared
to known organisms in databases. Results of such investigations showed that many of the
detected sequences were not matched by any known isolate and they represent new,
uncultured species. A similar approach has been proposed by Schwieger and Tebbe
Ž1998., using a method called single strand conformational polymorphism, which is
superior when sequences are different but GqC contents are similar among species.
These methods are, however, qualitative. Quantitative PCR methods are tedious and
still need to be improved for environmental applications ŽOgram, 2000..
Recent publications have shown that soil science and molecular ecology are
inti- mately linked. An example is the growing concern about environmental and
health effects of genetically engineered crops, particularly in Western Europe.
Saxena and Stotzky Ž2000. and Saxena et al. Ž1999. demonstrated that insecticidal
toxin in root exudates from genetically modified maize plants is strongly bound to soil
clay minerals and may persist for a long time. The unpredictable release of the toxin may
constitute a hazard to non-target organisms. It seems that the DNA encoding for this toxin
may bind to expandable clay minerals like montmorillonite ŽStotzky, personal
communication., and upon their expansion the DNA is rendered susceptible to
uptake by competent bacteria. It is unresolved if these genes, after renewed uptake,
may then render weeds resistant.
8. Future outlook
Perspectives for soil microbiologists are bright because new, mainly molecular
techniques offer new insight into the soil black box so that microbial community
composition and microbial activities can be investigated, and even localized on a

microscale. In situ hybridisation is able to show where bacteria and fungi are
existing Že.g., Lu¨beck et al., 2000., and even where they are active. Of particular interest
for the future are the study of microbial hot spots, as they do occur in the guts of
soil microfauna, or around root surfaces. It is assumed that in hotspots the
majority of
turnover processes takes place, and microbial loops are formed ŽClarholm, 1994..
Microbial loops are long known from marine waters. For soils, the microbial loop has
been described as the rhizosphere flora, where bacteria that utilize root-derived carbon,
bind inorganic nutrients transported to the roots Žby mass flow and diffusion..
The bacteria are grazed by protozoa, who then release one third of the bacterial N
as ammonium available for plant uptake, while two thirds form protozoan biomass or are
egested in organic forms ŽClarholm, 1994., and thus become inaccessible for plant
uptake.
Microarray technology will soon enable us to assess community diversity in soils by
directly exposing and hybridising oligonucleotides fixed on membranes ŽGuschin et al.,
1997; Ogram, 2000.. Another aim will be to relate community structure with community
function by using messenger RNA. Due to the short half-life of mRNA this is currently
not possible, but it has several advantages. If combined with PCR amplification it will be
more sensitive than any enzyme test, it provides information about the metabolic state at
the moment of testing, and, if combined with analysis of rDNA, very detailed
information may be obtained about the involvement of certain populations in a particular
metabolic activity ŽGottschal et al., 1997.. The very small sample sizes Žin the range of a
few milligrams. allow a very small-scale spatial resolution. Soil will no longer be
a black box, but we will be able to see where the microbes live, what their role
in soil processes is, and how their abundance and activity is influenced by soil physical
and soil chemical properties. Thus, today, in soil microbiology questions like who is
active and where are the activities located are answered that have been asked many years
ago. Soil management may aim to successfully establish desired microbial
populations. Such microorganisms may be degraders of xenobiotics, nitrogen fixers,
or pathogen antago- nists. In the not-so-far future a single key Žbiological. player in soil
may be altered in a desired way, thus altering soil functions in a beneficial way to man.
This will hopefully increase the sustainability of agricultural systems on the long run, and
also enable us to successfully remediate polluted soils and protect natural ecosystems.
References
Alef, K., Nannipieri, P. ŽEds.., 1995. Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry.
Academic
Press, London, 576 pp.
Anderson, J.P.E., Domsch, K.H., 1975. Measurement of bacterial and fungal contributions to respiration
of selected agricultural and forest soils. Can. J. Microbiol. 21, 314–322.
Anderson, J.P.E., Domsch, K.H., 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial
biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 215–221.
Anderson, T.H., Domsch, K.H., 1986. Carbon assimilation and microbial activity in soil. Z. Pflanzenernaehr.
Bodenkd. 149, 457–468.
Beck, T., 1984. Mikrobiologische und biochemische Charakterisierung landwirtschaftlich genutzter Bo¨den: I.
Mit. Die Ermittlung der Bodenmikrobiologischen Kennzahl. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 147, 456–466.
Brookes, P.C., Powlson, D.S., Jenkinson, D.S., 1982. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 319–329.
Brookes, P.C., Landman, A., Pruden, G., Jenkinson, D.S., 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil
nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 17, 837–842.
Bruckner, A., Kandeler, E., Kampichler, C., 1999. Plot–scale spatial patterns of soil water content, pH,
substrate-induced respiration and N mineralization in a temperate coniferous forest. Geoderma 93,
207–223.
Clarholm, M., 1994. The microbial loop in soil. In: Ritz, K., Dighton, J., Giller, K.E. ŽEds.., Beyond
the
Biomass. Wiley, New York, pp. 221–230.
Frostegard, A˚ ., Ba˚a˚th, E., 1996. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal
biomass in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 22, 59–65.
Garland, J.L., Mills, A.L., 1991. Classification and characterisation of heterotrophic microbial communities on
the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilisation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57,
2351–2359.
Goovaerts, P., 1998. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and
physico-chemical soil properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils 27, 315–334.
Gottschal, J.C., Meijer, W.G., Oda, Y., 1997. Use of molecular probing to assess microbial activities in natural
ecosystems. In: Insam, H., Rangger, A. ŽEds.., Microbial Communities. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 10–18.
Guckert, J.B., White, D.C., 1986. Phospholipid, esther-linked fatty acid analysis in microbial ecology.
In: Megusar, F., Gantar, G. ŽEds.., Perspectives in Microbial Ecology. Proceedings of the 4th
International
Symposium on Microbial Ecology, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 455–459.
Guschin, D.Y., Mobarry, B.K., Proudnikov, D., Stahl, D.A., Rittmann, B.E., Mirzabekov, A.D., 1997.
Oligonucleotide microchips as genosensors for determinative and environmental studies in microbiology.
Appl. Env. Microbiol. 63, 2397–2402.
Hoffmann, 1967. Eine photometrische Methode zur Bestimmung der Phosphatase-Aktivit ¨at in Bo¨den. Z.
Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 118, 193–198.
Hopkins, D.W., Macnaughton, S.J., O’Donnell, A.G., 1991. A dispersion and differential centrifugation
technique for representatively sampling microorganisms from soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 217–225.
Hurst, C.J., Knudsen, G.R., McInerney, M.J., Stetzenbach, L.D., Walter, M.V. ŽEds.., 1997. Manual of
Environmental Microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, 894 pp.
Insam, H., 1997. A new set of substrates proposed for community characterization in environmental samples.
In: Insam, H., Rangger, A. ŽEds.., Microbial Communities. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 259–260.
Insam, H., Haselwandter, K., 1989. Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession.
Oecologia 79, 174–178.
Jenkinson, D.S., 1976. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil: IV. The decomposition
of fumigated organisms in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 203–208.
Lu¨beck, P.S., Hansen, M., Sorensen, J., 2000. Simultaneous detection of the establishment of seed-inoculated
Pseudomonas fluorescens strain DR54 and native soil bacteria on sugar beet root surfaces
using
fluorescence antibody and in situ hybridization techniques. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33, 11–19. Macura, J.,
1974. Trends and advances in soil microbiology from 1924 to 1974. Geoderma 12, 311–329. Mayr, C., Miller,
M., Insam, H., 1999. Elevated CO2 alters microbial communities in alpine grassland. J.
Microbiol. Methods 36, 35–43.
Millar, W.N., Cassida, L.E., 1970. Evidence for muramic acid in the soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 18, 299–
304. Miller, M., Paloj¨arvi, A., Rangger, A., Reeslev, M., Kjoller, A., 1998. The use of fluorogenic
substrates to
measure fungal presence and activity in soil. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 64, 613–617.
Muyzer, G., de Wall, E., Uitterlinden, A., 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by DGGE
of
PCR-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 59, 695–700.
Myrold, D.D., 1997. Quantification of nitrogen transformations. In: Hurst, C.J., Knudsen, G.R.,
McInerney, M.J., Stetzenbach, L.D., Walter, M.V. ŽEds.., Manual of Environmental Microbiology.
ASM Press, Washington, pp. 445–451.
Odum, E.P., 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270.
Ogram, A., 2000. Soil molecular microbial ecology at age 20: methodological challenges for the future. Soil
Biol. Biochem. 32, 1499–1504.
Parkinson, D., Gray, T.R.G., Williams, S.T., 1971. Ecology of Soil Microorganisms. Blackwell, Oxford,
p.
116.
Paul, E.A., Clark, F.E., 1996. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p. 340.
Petersen, S.O., Debosz, K., Schjonning, P., Christensen, B.T., Elmholt, S., 1997. Phospholipid fatty
acid profiles and C availability in wet-stable macro-aggregates from conventionally and organically
farmed
soils. Geoderma 78, 181–196.
Rasiah, V., Kay, B.D., 1999. Temporal dynamics of microbial biomass- and mineral-N in legume
amended soils from a spatially variable landscape. Geoderma 92, 239–256.
Ruzicka, S., Edgerton, D., Norman, M., Hill, T., 2000. The utility of ergosterol as a bioindicator of fungi in
temperature soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 989–1006.
Saxena, D., Stotzky, G., 2000. Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of
transgenic Bt corn in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33, 35–39.
Saxena, D., Flores, S., Stotzky, G., 1999. Transgenic plants-insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn.
Nature 402, 480.
Schinner, F., O¨ hlinger, R., Kandeler, E., Magesin, R. ŽEds.., 1996. Methods in Soil Biology. Springer, Berlin,
426 pp.
Schwieger, F., Tebbe, C.C., 1998. A new approach to utilize PCR-single strand-conformation polymorphism
for 16s rRNA based microbial community analysis. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 64, 4870–4876.
Skujins, J., 1978. History of abiotic soil enzyme research. In: Burns, R.G. ŽEd.., Soil Enzymes.
Academic
Press, New York, pp. 1–49.
Smith, N.C., Stribley, D.P., 1994. A new approach to direct extraction of microorganisms from soil. In: Ritz, K.,
Dighton, J., Giller, K.E. ŽEds.., Beyond the Biomass. Wiley, New York, pp. 49–55.
Sparling, G.P., 1995. The substrate induced respiration method. In: Alef, K., Nannipieri, P. ŽEds.., Methods in
Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp. 397–404.
Stemmer, M., von Lu¨tzow, M., Kandeler, E., Pichlmayer, F., Gerzabek, M.H., 1999. The effect of maize straw
placement on mineralization of C and N in soil particle size fractions. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50, 73–85.
Stenberg, B., Pell, M., Torstensson, L., 1998. Integrated evaluation of variation in biological, chemical
and physical soil properties. Ambio 27, 9–15.
Stotzky, G., 1997. Quantifying the metabolic activity of microbes in soil. In: Hurst ŽEd.., Manual of
Environmental Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp. 453–458.
Tabatabai, M.A., Bremner, J.M. et al., 1972. Assay of urease activity in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 4, 479–487.
Torsvik, V.L., 1980. Isolation of bacterial DNA from soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 12, 15–21.
Torsvik, V.L., Goksoyr, J., Daae, F.L., 1990. High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl. Env. Microb. 56,
782–787.
Trasar-Cepeda, C., Leiros, C., Gilsotres, F., Seoane, S., 1998. Towards a biochemical quality index for
soils—an expression relating several biological and biochemical properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils
26,
100–106.
Trevors, J., 1984. Dehydrogenase activity in soil: a comparison between the INT and TTC assay. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 16, 673–674.
Van Elsas, J.D., Trevors, J.T., Wellington, E.M.H. ŽEds.., 1997. Modern Soil Microbiology. Marcel Dekker,
New York, 683 pp.
Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., Jenkinson, D.S., 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial
biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 703–707.
Visser, S., Parkinson, D., 1992. Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: soil microorganisms. Am.
J. Altern. Agric. 7, 33–37.
Weaver, R.W., Angle, J.S., Bottomley, P.S. ŽEds.., 1994. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Microbiological
and Biochemical Properties. SSSA, Madison, 1121 pp.
West, A.W., Grant, W.D., Sparling, G.P., 1987. Use of ergosterol, diaminopimelic acid and
glucosamine content of soils to monitor changes in microbial populations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 607–612.
Winding, A., Binnerup, S.J., So¨rensen, J., 1994. Viability of indigenous soil bacteria assayed by
respiratory activity and growth. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 60, 2869–2875.
Yan, F., McBratney, A.B., Copeland, L., 2000. Functional substrate biodiversity of cultivated and uncultivated
A horizons of vertisols in NW New South Wales. Geoderma 96, 321–343.
Zelles, L., Alef, K., 1995. Biomarkers. In: Alef, K., Nannipieri, P. ŽEds.., Methods in Applied Soil
Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp. 422–439.
Zelles, L., Bai, Q.Y., Beck, T., Beese, F., 1992. Signature fatty acids in phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides
as indicators of microbial biomass and community structure in agricultural soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24,
317–323.

Developments Soil Microbiology

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Developments Soil Microbiology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geoderma 100 Ž2001.

Developments in soil microbiology since the

Microbial ecology, and more specific, soil microbiology is a dynamic and

Geoderma aims to introduce to soil scientists the importance of microbiological aspects

communities, their composition and ŽCLPP, Community level physiological profiles;

7. Soil microbiology and DNA

composition and microbial activities can be investigated, and even localized on a

You might also like