Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSUMPTIONS
The building involved in this project is assumed to be subjected to the
following conditions:
1. The building will be constructed at a domestic hilly area in Malaysia.
2. It will be designed to withstand 50 years of working life.
3. It will be designed against lean concrete.
4. The quality control of the building will be normal due to being only 50
years of working life.
5. The exposure condition in Malaysia will be XC4 because to avoid
corrosion induced by carbonation whereby sometimes the concrete
surface will subjected to water contact. However, it is subjective when it
comes to the compartments of the structure itself.
6. The maximum aggregate size will be 20mm.
Question:
Figure 1 is showing a reinforced concrete building. The building is
single story. Assume with proper justification all the needed data,
perform the following:
A - Design the concrete cover for all the RC components:
Solutions:
The following general assumptions are applied to all footings, beams,
and columns. This is done in order to display a sense of consistency
among the components and also to simplify calculations by using the
same set of parameters for all components. Additional parameters
will also be given for each specific case. The general assumptions
used are as below:
- Strength class = 40/50 MPa
o This value is used as a standard of a worst case scenario.
- Main bar diameter = 32mm
o This value is used as a standard given in most examples and also to ease
the calculation process.
- Exposure condition = XC3
o Described as an environment with moderate humidity, this condition was
used as it fits the description of a normal outdoor condition any structure
generally faces.
- Maximum aggregate size = 20mm
- Design working life = 50 years
o This value is used as a standard since most structures are designed to
work for at least 50 years.
- Quality control = Normal
o The quality control for this structure is normal and requires no special
maintenance.
For footing:
Assumptions:
- Main bar diameter = 32mm,
- Casted on lean concrete,
For strength class for XC3 = C35/45 which is the minimum strength class,
The strength class provided (40/50) is adequate since it exceeds the
minimum.
Structure class of S4 is assumed to be the norm as recommended in the
Eurocode 2. However, since the strength class provided exceeded the
minimum strength class, the structure class becomes S3. The exposure
condition is XC3 as stated.
Cnom = Cmin + ΔCdev;
ΔCdev = 10mm as a standard;
Cmin = max {Cmin,b ; Cmin,dur + ΔCdur,γ - ΔCdur,st - ΔCdur,add, 10mm}
Cmin,b is the main bar diameter = 32mm;
Cmin,dur = 20mm from Table 4.4N of the Eurocode, based on S4 and XC3;
Cmin = max {32, 20, 10} = 32mm,
Cnom = 32 + 10 = 42mm;
Since it is casted on lean concrete, the Cnom must be at least 40mm to be
accepted. Since Cnom = 42mm > 40mm, then the Cnom is adequate.
For column:
Assumptions:
- Stirrup diameter = 10mm
From table E.1N at class XC3,
Since both minimum strength class and provided strength class = C40/50, the
strength class provided is adequate;
Structure class of S4 is assumed to be the norm as recommended in the
Eurocode 2. The exposure condition is XC3 as stated.
Cnom = Cmin + ΔCdev;
ΔCdev = 10mm as a standard;
Cmin = max {Cmin,b ; Cmin,dur + ΔCdur,γ - ΔCdur,st - ΔCdur,add, 10mm}
For the cover to the stirrups:
Cmin,b is the stirrup diameter = 10mm;
Cmin,dur = 25mm from Table 4.4N of the Eurocode, based on S4 and XC3;
Cmin = max {10, 25, 10} = 25mm,
Cnom = 25 + 10 = 35mm;
For the cover to the main bar:
Cmin,b is the main bar diameter = 25mm;
Cmin,dur = 25mm from Table 4.4N of the Eurocode, based on S4 and XC3;
Cmin = max {25, 25, 10} = 25mm,
Cnom = 25 + 10 = 35mm;
Since Cnom,bar = 35mm, Cnom,stirrup = 35mm, the Cnom,stirrup is superior since
the it covers only until the stirrup, not the main bar. So, C nom= 35mm + 10mm
(which is the stirrup diameter) = 45mm.
For beam:
Assumptions:
- Bottom longitudinal bars = φn
- Stirrup diameter = 10mm
∅ n=∅ √ nb < 55mm, Φ = 20mm;
For slab:
For strength class for XC3 = C40/50 which is the minimum strength class,
The strength class provided (40/50) is adequate since it satisfies the condition.
Structure class of S4 is assumed to be the norm as recommended in the
Eurocode 2. The exposure condition is XC3 as stated.
Cnom = Cmin + ΔCdev;
ΔCdev = 10mm as a standard;
Cmin = max {Cmin,b ; Cmin,dur + ΔCdur,γ - ΔCdur,st - ΔCdur,add, 10mm}
Cmin,b is the main bar diameter = 32mm;
Cmin,dur = 25mm from Table 4.4N of the Eurocode, based on S4 and XC3;
Cmin = max {32, 25, 10} = 32mm,
Cnom = 32 + 10 = 42mm;
Since it is the slab cover which has no conditions, the Cnom = 42mm.
To summarize the design, the following displays the nominal concrete cover
for their respective components:
The footing cover = 42mm,
The column cover = 45mm,
The beam cover = 48.28mm,
The slab cover = 42mm.
CONCLUSION
To conclude, the measurement of the concrete covers is no simple
straightforward task as it involves many criteria and conditions subjected to
the structure itself. By following the procedure taught to us by Dr Bashar and
his assistants, I am able to compile and complete the task given by him by
determining the concrete covers of the compartments of the building design
provided as stated above. Also, bear in mind that my assumptions used in this
project are merely theoretical in order to achieve the objective of this project.
With this in mind, the objective of this project, which is to properly design the
concrete cover for the building design has been achieved.
B) Design all the RC beams for flexural and shear and also evaluate
their deflections:
By applying the concept of worst case scenario, several cases where the
loadings with the highest possibility of failing are imposed onto each
other to determine the best indication of the bending moment and
shear diagram. In a nutshell, the highest respective value at each known
point of the beam will represent the respective envelope diagram.
For Beams 1(A-C) and A(1-3):
CASE 1: Max–Max:
WMax = 35kN/m WMax = 35kN/m
1 2 3
−wl 2 −(35)(5)2
FEM23 =
8
= = -109.375 kNm;
8
Moment Distribution:
Shear Force
Calculation:
CASE
2: Max-Min:
WMax = 35kN/m WMin = 22.5kN/m
The end joints are assumed to be pinned with no moment reactions.
FEM12 = FEM32 = 0,
2
wl 2
FEM21 =
8
= (35)(5) = 109.375 kNm,
8
−wl 2 −(22.5)(5)2
FEM23 =
8
= = -70.3125 kNm;
8
Moment Distribution:
Moment Distribution:
The ultimate bending moments and ultimate shear forces for the
beams 1(A-C) and A(1-3) are as below:
Ultimate Moment = 109.375kNm
-69.09kNm -69.09kNm
69.53kN 109.375kN
-109.375kN -69.53kN
CASE 1: Max1–Max:
WMax1 = 70kN/m WMax2 = 35kN/m
Shear Force
Calculation:
CASE 2: Max-Min:
WMax1 = 70kN/m WMin = 22.5kN/m
The end joints are assumed to be pinned with no moment reactions.
FEM12 = FEM32 = 0,
wl 2 (70)(5)2
FEM21 =
8
= = 218.75 kNm,
8
2
−wl 2
FEM23 =
8
= −(22.5)(5) = -70.3125 kNm;
8
Moment Distribution:
−wl 2 −(21)(5)2
FEM23 =
8
= = -109.375 kNm;
8
Moment Distribution:
1 2 3
−wl 2 −(21)(5)2
FEM23 =
8
= = -109.375 kNm;
8
Moment Distribution:
Shear Force
Calculation:
CASE 5: Max-Min:
WMax5 = 35kN/m WMin = 22.5kN/m
The end joints are assumed to be pinned with no moment reactions.
FEM12 = FEM32 = 0,
2
wl 2
FEM21 =
8
= (21)(5) = 109.375 kNm,
8
−wl 2 −(13.5)(5)2
FEM23 =
8
= = -70.3125 kNm;
8
Moment Distribution:
The ultimate bending moments and ultimate shear forces for the beams 3(A-
B) and C(1-2) are as below:
Ultimate Moment = 164.0625kNm
-152.45kNm -69.09kNm
142.188kN 120.3125kN
-207.813kN -69.53kN
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.99 d >Zmax =0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.988 d >Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.977 d > Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.99 d >Zmax =0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.983 d >Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.983 d >Zmax=0.954 d ;
ρo = √ fck∗0.1=( √ 30 )∗0.1=0.55;
Since ρ is less than ρo,
3 /2
l ρo ρo
d [
=K 11+1.5 √ fck
ρ
+3.2 √ fck( ρ
−1 ) ]
Given that:
l/d = span / depth of the beam,
K = the factor taken into account of different structural systems (Table 7.4N),
ρo = the reference reinforcement ratio,
ρ = the tension reinforcement ratio at mid span in order to resist the applied
moment,
ρ’ = the required compression reinforcement ratio at mid span in order to
resist the applied moment;
3
l ρo ρo
d [
=1.3 11+1.5 √ 30
ρ
+3.2 √30 (ρ
−1 ) ]=310.79;
2
l
The actual d = 5000/441.72 = 11.32 < 310.79,
Therefore, the depth of the beam, d and length of the beam, l are adequate
with respect to the deflection.
ρo = √ fck∗0.1=( √ 30 )∗0.1=0.55;
Since ρ is less than ρo,
3
l ρo ρo
d [
=1.3 11+1.5 √ 30
ρ
+3.2 √30 (ρ
−1 ) ]=370.75;
2
l
The actual d = 5000/441.72 = 11.32 < 370.75,
Therefore, the depth of the beam, d and length of the beam, l are adequate
with respect to the deflection.
ρo = √ fck∗0.1=( √ 30 )∗0.1=0.55;
Since ρ is less than ρo,
3
l ρo ρo
d [
=1.3 11+1.5 √ 30
ρ
+3.2 √ 30( ρ
−1 ) ]=108.83;
2
l
The actual d = 5000/441.72 = 11.32 < 108.83,
Therefore, the depth of the beam, d and length of the beam, l are adequate
with respect to the deflection;
ρo = √ fck∗0.1=( √ 30 )∗0.1=0.55;
Since ρ is less than ρo,
3
l ρo ρo
d [
=1.3 11+1.5 √ 30
ρ
+3.2 √ 30( ρ
−1 ) ]=361.17 ;
2
l
The actual d = 5000/441.72 = 11.32 < 361.17,
Therefore, the depth of the beam, d and length of the beam, l are adequate
with respect to the deflection;
ρo = √ fck∗0.1=( √ 30 )∗0.1=0.55;
l
The actual d = 5000/441.72 = 11.32 < 169.1,
Therefore, the depth of the beam, d and length of the beam, l are adequate
with respect to the deflection;
ρo = √ fck∗0.1=( √ 30 )∗0.1=0.55;
Since ρ is less than ρo,
3
l ρo ρo
d [
=1.3 11+1.5 √ 30
ρ
+3.2 √ 30( ρ
−1 ) ]=184.81;
2
l
The actual d = 5000/441.72 = 11.32 < 184.81,
Therefore, the depth of the beam, d and length of the beam, l are adequate
with respect to the deflection.
cotθ+ tan θ
When θ = 21.8˚, VRd,max = 144.75kN > VEf = 68.14kN; therefore, the θ = 21.8˚
and no diagonal compression struts are required in the design.
As assumed before, the diameter of the steel is 20mm,
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=4845.52 mm;
S 0.78 d (fyk)( cotθ)
Since Asw/S = 0.146 > Asw,min/S = 0.088, then the S = 4845.52 is accepted,
Smax = 0.75d = 331.29mm;
Since S = 4845.52 > Smax = 331.29mm, then S = Smax = 331.29mm;
Therefore, use shear link size of 20mm @ 331.29mm C/C.
2. Shear force at the middle support = 109.375kN on 5000mm span beam,
cotθ+ tan θ
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=3080.15 mm ;
S 0.78 d (fyk)( cotθ)
Since Asw/S = 0.204 > Asw,min/S = 0.088, then the S = 3080.15 is accepted,
Smax = 0.75d = 331.29mm;
Since S = 3080.15 > Smax = 331.29mm, then S = Smax = 331.29mm;
Therefore, use shear link size of 20mm @ 331.29mm C/C.
cotθ+ tan θ
When θ = 21.8˚, VRd,max = 144.75kN > VEf = 143.172kN; therefore, the θ =
21.8˚ and no diagonal compression struts are required in the design.
As assumed before, the diameter of the steel is 20mm,
Area of steel =2¿ ) = 628.32mm2;
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=2305.93 mm ;
S 0.78 d ( fyk)(cotθ)
Since Asw/S = 0.272 > Asw,min/S = 0.088, then the S = 2305.93mm is accepted,
Smax = 0.75d = 331.29mm;
Since S = 2305.93> Smax = 331.29mm, then S = Smax = 331.29mm;
Therefore, use shear link size of 20mm @ 331.29mm C/C.
4. Shear force at the middle support = 207.813kN on 5000mm span beam,
cotθ+ tan θ
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=830.192mm ;
S 0.78 d (fyk)(cotθ)
End span 2:
1. Shear force at the middle support = 120.3125kN on 5000mm span beam,
cotθ+ tan θ
When θ = 21.8˚, VRd,max = 144.75kN > VEf = 117.91kN; therefore, the θ <
21.8˚ and no diagonal compression struts are required in the design.
As assumed before, the diameter of the steel is 20mm,
Area of steel =2¿ ) = 628.32mm2;
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=3123.1 mm ;
S 0.78 d (fyk)(cotθ)
Since Asw/S = 0.201 > Asw,min/S = 0.088, then the S = 3123.1mm is accepted,
Smax = 0.75d = 331.29mm;
Since S = 3123.1> Smax = 331.29mm, then S = Smax = 331.29mm;
Therefore, use shear link size of 20mm @ 331.29mm C/C.
2. Shear force at the end supports = 69.53kN on a 5000mm span beam,
cotθ+ tan θ
When θ = 21.8˚, VRd,max = 144.75kN > VEf = 68.14kN; therefore, the θ = 21.8˚
and no diagonal compression struts are required in the design.
As assumed before, the diameter of the steel is 20mm,
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=4845.52 mm;
S 0.78 d (fyk)( cotθ)
Since Asw/S = 0.146 > Asw,min/S = 0.088, then the S = 4845.52 is accepted,
Smax = 0.75d = 331.29mm;
Since S = 4845.52 > Smax = 331.29mm, then S = Smax = 331.29mm;
Therefore, use shear link size of 20mm @ 331.29mm C/C.
cotθ+ tan θ
When θ = 21.8˚, VRd,max = 144.75kN > VEf = 51.63kN; therefore, the θ = 21.8˚
and no diagonal compression struts are required in the design.
As assumed before, the diameter of the steel is 20mm,
Asw VEd∗10 3
= , S=6394.67 mm;
S 0.78 d (fyk)( cotθ)
Since Asw/S = 0.098 > Asw,min/S = 0.088, then the S = 6394.67 is accepted,
Smax = 0.75d = 331.29mm;
Since S = 6394.67 > Smax = 331.29mm, then S = Smax = 331.29mm; therefore,
use shear link size of 20mm @ 331.29mm C/C.
Given:
- Slab cover = 42mm,
- Fck = 30 N/mm2,
- Fyk = 500 N/mm2,
- Steel bar diameter, φ = 20mm,
- Characteristic live load = 10kN,
- Characteristic dead load = 5kN;
Assume:
- Width of slab, bw = 1000mm,
- Slab thickness, h = 200mm,
- Ly = 5m,
- Lx = 5m;
Ultimate load, n = 1.35DL + 1.5LL = (1.35)(10) + (1.5)(5) = 21kN/m2,
For Slab A:
Given Ly/Lx = 1 < 2, therefore the slabs are two-way slabs;
From the Moment Coefficient and Shear Coefficient tables,
When Ly/Lx = 1.0 and the slab is two-adjacent edges discontinuous,
- Long span, Βsx:
o Continuous edge = 0.047,
o Middle span = 0.036,
- Short span, Bsy:
o Continuous edge = 0.045,
o Middle span = 0.034,
- Long span, Bvx:
o Continuous edge = 0.4,
o Discontinuous edge = 0.26,
- Short span, Bvy:
o Continuous edge = 0.4,
o Discontinuous edge = 0.26,
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.974 d > Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.966 d > Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.967 d > Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.9556 d > Zmax=0.954 d ;
ρ0 =( 10−3 ) √ f ck =0.00055 ,
l 5000
= =33.78 ,
d actual 148
l l
Since d < d ,
actual basic
Then the thickness of the slab is adequate with respect to the deflection.
Since VRd,c < VRd,c min, therefore VRd,c = VRd,c min = 80.25kN;
For Slab B:
Given Ly/Lx = 1 < 2, therefore the slabs are two-way slabs;
From the Moment Coefficient and Shear Coefficient tables,
When Ly/Lx = 1.0 and the slab is three edges discontinuous (one short edge
continuous),
- Long span, Βsx:
o Edges = 0,
o Middle span = 0.042,
- Short span, Bsy:
o Continuous edge = 0.058,
o Discontinuous edge = 0,
o Middle span = 0.044,
- Long span, Bvx:
o Discontinuous edges = 0.29,
- Short span, Bvy:
o Continuous edge = 0.45,
o Discontinuous edge = 0.31,
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.97 d > Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.9 57 d >Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.95 7 d >Zmax=0.954 d ;
l 5000
= =33.78 ,
d actual 148
l l
Since d < d ,
actual basic
Then the thickness of the slab is adequate with respect to the deflection.
V sx =( 0.29 )( 21 ) ( 5 )=30.45 kN ;
V sy continuous=( 0. 45 ) ( 21 )( 5 ) =4 7.25 kN ;
V sy discontinuous=( 0. 3 ) ( 21 )( 5 ) =3 1.5 kN ;
Since VRd,c < VRd,c min, therefore VRd,c = VRd,c min = 69.404kN;
For Slab C:
Given Ly/Lx = 1 < 2, therefore the slabs are two-way slabs;
From the Moment Coefficient and Shear Coefficient tables,
When Ly/Lx = 1.0 and the slab is three edges discontinuous (one long edge
continuous),
- Long span, Βsx:
o Continuous edge = 0,
o Discontinuous edge = 0.057,
o Middle span = 0.043,
- Short span, Bsy:
o Discontinuous edges = 0,
- Long span, Bvx:
o Continuous edge = 0.45,
o Discontinuous edges = 0.3,
- Short span, Bvy:
o Discontinuous edge = 0.29,
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.969 d >Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.9581 d> Zmax=0.954 d ;
[ √
Z=d 0.5+ 0.25−
k
1.134 ]
=0.9 5 67 d> Zmax=0.954 d ;
ρ0 =( 10−3 ) √ f ck =0.0055 ,
l 5000
= =33.78 ,
d actual 148
l l
Since d < d ,
actual basic
Then the thickness of the slab is adequate with respect to the deflection.
Check for Shear:
V sx =β vx n l x , V sy =β vy n l x ;
3 1
V Rd ,c min =[ 0.0035 ( K ) ( f
2
ck
2
]
) bd=80.248 kN ;
Since VRd,c < VRd,c min, therefore VRd,c = VRd,c min = 80.248kN;
Given:
- Height of the column = 4m = 4000mm,
- All beam size = 300 x 600mm,
- All column size = 300 x 300mm,
- All footing size = 2000 x 2000mm,
- All slab thickness = 200mm,
- Column cover = 45mm,
- Fck = 30 N/mm2,
- Fyk = 500 N/mm2,
- Steel bar diameter, φ = 20mm,
- Characteristic live load = 10kN,
- Characteristic dead load = 5kN;
- Link size = 8mm,
b h3 0.3 ×0. 33
k column=
12 L column [
=
12 ×3.4 ]=0.000198 ,
w l 2 35 ×5 2
FE M y =FE M z= = =72.92kNm ,
12 12
k column
M y =M z= ( FEM )=0.2683 x 72.92=19.563 kNm ,
∑k
N Ed l o 1 75 ×1.85
M Ed , y =M Ed , z=M z + =1 9.563+ =2 0.372 kNm ;
400 400
8. Determine the existence of biaxial bending on the column:
Mz M 19.563
ez = =e y = y = =0.112 m ,
N Ed N Ed 17 5
e e ( 0.1 12/300 )
( b) ( h)
y z
Since at least one condition is determined to be more than 0.2, the column is
proven to be subjected to biaxial bending.
9. Determine the area of steel reinforcement required:
H’ = b’ = h – cover – (φ/2) = 300 – 45 – 20/2 = 245mm,
N Ed 175
[ ] [
β=1−
bh f ck
=1−
( 300 )( 300 )( 30 )]=0.935 ,
h'
'
[]
M =M z + β ' M y =20.372+0.935 ( 1 ) ( 20.372 )=39.42 kNm ,
z
b
N Ed 175 ( 1000 )
[ ][
bh f ck]=
( 300 ) ( 300 ) ( 30 )
=0.0648 ,
M Ed 39.42 ( 10 )6
[ ][
b h2 f ck
=
( 300 ) ( 300 )2 ( 30 )]=0.0 487 ,
0.1 ( 1 75 ×1000 )
A s ,min = =40.23 mm 2 ;
0.87 ×500
1
Minimum link size = 4 × 20 = 5𝑚𝑚
Since the provided link size is 8 mm > 6 mm, then the link size is sufficient.
Maximum link spacing should be lesser of;
20 x Compression bar size = 20 x 20 = 400mm
Least lateral dimension of column = 300 mm
400 mm
𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑠 300𝑚𝑚 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 a 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑓
0.6 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 the 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 is 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑟 than its 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛.
For Columns A2 and B1:
1. Determine the clear height of the column:
Height of the column = 4m, height of the beam = 600mm;
Clear height ,l = 4m – 0.6m = 3.4m;
2. Determine the relative flexibilities of the rotational restraints at the ends
of the column:
b h3
I column= =(300)¿ ¿
12
3
b h3 (300)(600)
I beam= = =5.4 x 109 mm4 ,
12 12
3
bh
I footing = =(2000)¿ ¿
12
b h3 0.3 ×0. 33
k column=
12 L column
= [12 ×3.4 ]
=0.000198 ,
wmax l 2 35 ( 5 2)
FE M y = = =72.92kNm ,
12 12
k column
Mz= ( FEM )=0. 2683 x 26.04=6.987 kNm ,
∑k
k column
M y= ( FEM )=0.2683 x 72.92=19.56 3 kNm
∑k
N Ed l o 262.5 ×3.4
M Ed , y =M z + =6.987+ =9.22 kNm ;
400 400
N Ed l o 262.5 ×3.4
M Ed , z=M y + =1 9.563+ =21. 794 kNm ;
400 400
Mz 6.987
'
= =0. 029 ,
b 245
My 19.563
'
= =0.0 798 ,
h 2 45
N Ed 262.5 ×1000
β=1− =1− =0.9 03 ;
bh f ck 300 ×300 ×30
h 300 φ 20
2
−d 2=
2 2 (
− cover+ =150− 45+
2 )
=95 mm , ( )
Since the eccentricity, e > (h/2 – d2), the area can be designed through the
simplified method;
N Ed 262.5 ( 1000 )
[ ][
bh f ck
=
( 300 ) ( 300 ) ( 30 ) ]
=0.0 972 ,
M Ed 25.871 ( 10 )6
[ ][ 2
b h f ck
=
( 300 ) ( 300 )2 ( 30 ) ] =0.0 3 19,
1
Minimum link size = 4 × 20 = 5𝑚𝑚
Since the provided link size is 8 mm > 6 mm, then the link size is sufficient.
Maximum link spacing should be lesser of;
20 x Compression bar size = 20 x 20 = 400mm
Least lateral dimension of column = 300 mm
400 mm
𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑠 300𝑚𝑚 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 a 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑓
0.6 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 the 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 is 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑟 than its 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛.
For Column B2:
1. Determine the clear height of the column:
Height of the column = 4m, height of the beam = 600mm;
Clear height ,l = 4m – 0.6m = 3.4m;
2. Determine the relative flexibilities of the rotational restraints at the ends
of the column:
b h3
I column= =(300)¿ ¿
12
3
b h3 (300)(600)
I beam= = =5.4 x 109 mm4 ,
12 12
b h3
I footing = =(2000)¿ ¿
12
ez ey 0.0 285
( ) ( ) (
h
=
b
=
300
=1> 0.2
)
ey ez 0.0 285
( )( ) (
b h 300 )
Since at least one condition is determined to be more than 0.2, the column is
proven to be subjected to biaxial bending.
Mz 6.987
'
= =0. 029 ,
b 245
My 6.987
'
= =0.029 ,
h 245
N Ed 350 ×1000
β=1− =1− =0.87 ;
bh f ck 300 ×300 ×30
h 300 φ 20
2
−d 2=
2 (
− cover+ =150− 45+
2 2) =95 mm , ( )
Since the eccentricity, e < (h/2 – d 2), the area cannot be designed
through the simplified method and must use the chart method;
N Ed 350 ( 1000 )
[ ][
bh f ck
=
( 300 ) ( 300 ) ( 30 ) ]
=0. 1296 ,
M Ed 13. 07 ( 10 )6
[ ][
b h2 f ck
=
( 300 ) ( 300 )2 ( 30 ) ]
=0.0 16 1,