You are on page 1of 7

Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Parkinsonism and Related Disorders


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/parkreldis

How well do Parkinson's disease patients turn in bed? Quantitative


analysis of nocturnal hypokinesia using multisite wearable inertial
sensors
Jirada Sringean a, Poonpak Taechalertpaisarn a, Chusak Thanawattano b,
Roongroj Bhidayasiri a, c, *
a
Chulalongkorn Center of Excellence for Parkinson Disease & Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
b
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathumthani, 12120,
Thailand
c
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Background: Nocturnal hypokinesia/akinesia is a distressing symptom in patients with Parkinson's dis-
Received 5 August 2015 ease (PD). However, it is difficult to accurately monitor these symptoms based on clinical interviews
Received in revised form alone.
17 October 2015
Objectives: To quantitatively compare nocturnal movements of PD patients with their spouses by using
Accepted 1 November 2015
multisite inertial sensors and to correlate these parameters with disease severity scores.
Methods: Nocturnal movements in 19 PD couples (mild-moderate stage) were assessed and compared
Keywords:
using wearable sensors (limbs and trunk) for one night at their homes. Nocturnal parameters included
Nocturnal hypokinesia
Nocturnal akinesia
number, velocity, acceleration, degree, and duration of rolling over, number of getting out of bed, and
Parkinson's disease limb movements. Each activity was compared to sleep diary, and video recording for accuracy.
Rolling over Results: PD patients significantly had fewer rolling over (p ¼ 0.048), turned with smaller degree
Getting out of bed (p ¼ 0.007), less velocity (p ¼ 0.011), and acceleration (p < 0.001), but had more episodes of getting out of
Sensors bed (p ¼ 0.03, nocturia) when compared to their spouses. Moderate and significant correlations were
observed between the mean duration of rolling over and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-
Axial score, and Nocturnal Akinesia Dystonia and Cramp Score. The number of leg movements (pre-
dominant side) significantly correlated with REM behavior disorder single-question screen. Episodes of
nocturia correlated with total and bedtime levodopa equivalent dose. Several other correlations were
also observed.
Conclusion: Our study was able to demonstrate quantitatively the presence of nocturnal hypokinesia in
PD patients. This problem correlated with daytime axial motor and nonmotor symptoms. Treatment
strategy for PD should be based on a comprehensive review of both day- and nighttime symptoms.
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction physicians to utilize a 24-h treatment strategy to adequately


monitor and control symptoms that occur both during the day and
Nocturnal symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) contribute at night [3,4]. This concept is particularly important since as high as
significantly to a reduced quality of life for both patients and their 96e98% of PD patients suffer from disease-related nocturnal
caregivers [1,2]. It is considered to be a good practice for treating problems [1,5]. Depending on the study methods used, common
and troublesome symptoms identified in most studies were noc-
turia (57e80%), sleep disorders (40e80%), nocturnal hypokinesia
(50e82%), neuropsychiatric and cognitive disorders (30%) [1,5e9].
* Corresponding author. Chulalongkorn Center of Excellence on Parkinson Dis-
ease & Related Disorders, Chulalongkorn University Hospital, 1873 Rama 4 Road,
Nocturnal hypokinesia/akinesia is a condition where PD patients
Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. have difficulty in moving their body during sleep so that rolling
E-mail address: rbh@chulapd.org (R. Bhidayasiri). over or turning in bed and getting out of bed is restricted. The

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.11.003
1353-8020/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
J. Sringean et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16 11

consequence of these long periods of immobilization and difficulty study were developed under the collaboration of CUPD and the
changing position includes the development of pressure ulcers, National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, Thailand.
predisposition to aspiration pneumonia, and asphyxia, which is a The details of technical development and experimental verification
potential cause of death in PD patients [10]. Furthermore, it can also of the NIGHT-Recorder have been described elsewhere [16]. The
be a burden to caregivers, which contributes to a poor quality of life sensor module consists of 16-bit digital-output triaxial integrated
[2,11]. Due to the nocturnal nature of these symptoms, patients and microelectromechanical system (iMEMS) accelerometer and gyro-
caregivers often are unable to observe and report them accurately scope that are capable of measuring linear and angular accelera-
resulting in a low recognition of nighttime problems in clinical tions in three translational planes (x,y,z). The recordings were
practice [3,12]. obtained using a 10-Hz sampling rate with a low pass filtering at
The issues of nocturnal hypokinesia and inability to get out of 12 Hz.
bed have been raised as the most common nighttime problems in All participant clinical characteristics were evaluated by a
PD in two original studies between 1987 and 1988 [5,12]. In the movement disorder neurologist (RB). The severity of PD was eval-
study by Lees et al., the inability to turn over in bed was experi- uated by two independent neurologists (JS and OJ) to include the
enced by 65% of PD patients and was rated as the most troublesome Hoehn & Yahr (HY) staging, and the Unified Parkinson's Disease
problem in 39% of patients from a national survey of 220 PD pa- Rating Scale (UPDRS). Both physicians had to agree on their rating
tients [5]. Subsequent studies observed a similar finding in which assessments. In the case of a discrepancy, both physicians assessed
patients attributed their impaired mobility at night to general the evidence again, and arrived at a consensus. The UPDRS axial
movement difficulties, pain or stiffness, or weakness and they score was calculated as the summation of the items 18, 22, 27, 28,
utilized different strategies to overcome these problem [8]. Not 29, and 30 of the UPDRS Section Section 3 [17]. To quantify the
only PD patients turned less frequently than their spouses, their severity of nocturnal symptoms, the Nocturnal Akinesia Dystonia,
turns were also slower with smaller amplitudes [13]. A recent study and Cramp Score (NADCS), and the Modified Parkinson's Disease
also identified the problem of nocturnal hypokinesia negatively Sleep Scale (MPDSS) were recorded in the patient group [18,19]. The
affects sleep quality in PD [6]. MPDSS has been validated and tested in Thai PD patients and
In clinical practice, the acquisition of information about demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's alpha ¼ 0.842) [1,19].
nocturnal hypokinesia by history taking, a physical examination, or The presence of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep Behavior Dis-
a questionnaire is often very difficult and inaccurate. Moreover, the order (RBD) was identified from a single-question screen (RBD1Q)
lack of awareness of nocturnal symptoms by PD patients, caregivers, as proposed by Postuma et al. (a sensitivity of 93.8% and a speci-
and their physicians often will result in these problems being ficity of 87.2%) [20]. The RBD1Q consists of a single question,
overlooked. With the advances in sensor technology, wearable answered “yes” or “no”, as follows: “Have you ever been told, or
sensors have been developed to monitor movement patterns in the suspected yourself, that you seem to ‘act out your dream’ while
daily life of individuals and this capability has now been extended to asleep?”. This question was translated into Thai by RBD expert in-
PD patients [14,15]. The advantages of wearable sensors are their vestigators (RB and OJ) fluent in English and Thai languages. The
ability to capture real-time data, thereby documenting real-life sit- RBD1Q has also been validated and tested in Thai PD patients
uations, allowing physicians to obtain precise, accurate, and quan- demonstrating good reliability (Cronbach's alpha ¼ 0.866). The
titative data. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (RLS) was made if subjects
patterns of nocturnal hypokinesia and the ability of getting out of fulfilled all the four essential diagnostic criteria for RLS of the Na-
bed in PD patients by utilizing multisite wearable sensors and to tional Institute of Health-International Restless Legs Syndrome
correlate these findings with standardized clinical rating scales. Study Group (NIH-IRLSSG) [21]. Levodopa equivalent dose was
determined by using a standardized protocol. Bedtime LED was
2. Patients and methods calculated from the amount of dopaminergic medications that
patients took at bedtime using the same protocol.
2.1. Patients Both patients and spouses wore the triaxial accelerometers on
both wrists, both ankles, and trunk for one night in their normal
Participants in this study were patients at Chulalongkorn Centre bedroom environment. The orientation of axis x,y,z on the patient is
of Excellence on Parkinson's Disease & Related Disorders (CUPD) shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Signal processing was performed
with the diagnosis of PD according to the Unified Kingdom Par- using a forward derivative method on the angular data to obtain its
kinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria who had spouses derivatives on the Sleep Motion Analyzer software (version 1.0)
whose age did not differ from the patients by more than 10 years. running on MATLAB (Version 7.8.0.347, R2009a). The detailed
Exclusion criteria were: 1) patients and/or spouses who were technical analysis of the data was described in the prior literature
bedridden; 2) a history of other neurological disorders or other [16]. Subjects were instructed to complete a sleep diary for sleep
muscle and joint diseases; and 3) a history of hypnotic or sedative times and the episodes of getting out of bed if awakened. All sub-
drugs use. In addition, all spouses were carefully examined by two jects were also videotaped during sleep. Sleep times were defined
independent neurologists (JS and OJ) to detect any signs of as the period that the subjects were in bed excluding the first and
parkinsonism or any of the above exclusion criteria so that they the last 5 min. If any discrepancies occurred between sleep times as
could represent healthy controls. Spouses were selected as controls provided by subjects' records and sleep times registered by the
because they shared similar sleeping environments as well as accelerometer, the registration by the accelerometer was syn-
nighttime activities to PD patients. The study was approved by the chronized with the data reported by the subjects. All PD subjects
Human Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chula- were allowed to continue on their usual medications.
longkorn University. All subjects gave informed consent before Nocturnal parameters that were included in this study consisted
entering the study in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. of the numbers of times the subjects rolled over, the number of
This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02352727). times they got out of the bed, and limb movements. Supplementary
data 1 describes different outcome parameters in categories, de-
2.2. Methods scriptions, and units. The characteristics of rolling over include
degrees, duration, velocity, and acceleration. Rolling over in bed is
Multisite inertial sensors (the NIGHT-Recorder) used in this defined as a series of unconscious motions during sleep involving
12 J. Sringean et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16

rotational body movements [22]. In our study, we adopted the spouses (5 M, 14F, mean age 64.32 ± 8.46 years) participated in the
operational definition of rolling over as a series of at least a 15- study. Demographic data and disease characteristics of all subjects
degree rotational movements of the trunk from one static posi- are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between
tion to another static position that is sustained for at least 5 min in a the age, weight, body mass index (BMI), and sleep duration be-
y-axis plane. This criterion was applied in some previous studies tween patients and their spouses. In PD patients, the mean disease
although the period of sustained duration varied [13,15]. Limb duration was 10.05 years (SD ¼ 5.23) with the mean HY staging of
movement is defined as a change of at least 15 from the previous 2.53 (SD ¼ 0.42). The mean UPDRS-III and UPDRS axial scores
position, but not necessarily sustained. These movements were not during ‘on’ period were 23.26 (SD ¼ 8.2), and 5.53 (SD ¼ 3.73)
part of rolling over. We identified getting out of bed activities from respectively. One each out of 14 male patients (7.1%) and five male
the recording by a rapid rise of acceleration in the x-axis of more spouses (20%) were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
than 45 from either static or rotational movements [23]. The One out of 19 PD patients (5.3%) fulfilled the NIH-IRLSSG essential
purpose of getting out of bed was then identified from the sleep diagnostic criteria for RLS while none of the spouses had RLS. All
diary of each subject. To ensure the accuracy of the interpretation of participants were able to complete a one-night assessment with
each movement from the NIGHT-Recorder, each subject's video the NIGHT-Recorder without any adverse events.
recording was reviewed by two independent neurologists (JS and The comparison of nocturnal parameters between PD subjects
RB). Both physicians had to agree on their interpretation to arrive at and their spouses are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. We found that PD
a consensus. patients significantly had fewer episodes of rolling over than their
spouses (6.16 ± 4.88 vs. 10.63 ± 7.34, p ¼ 0.048) and the degree of
rolling over was significantly smaller in PD patients (56.84 ± 21.75
2.3. Statistical analysis
vs. 76.65 ± 15.98 , p ¼ 0.007). While the duration of turns between
the two groups was not statistically significant, PD patients rolled at
Baseline characteristics of both PD patients and their spouses
a significantly slower speed (0.10 ± 0.06 vs. 0.15 ± 0.05 radiance/sec,
were summarized using either means, standard deviation, or fre-
p ¼ 0.011) and acceleration (0.08 ± 0.04 vs. 0.19 ± 0.04 radiance/
quencies and percentages as appropriate. Paired t-test was used for
sec2, p < 0.001) in comparison to their spouses. In contrast, PD
comparison of outcome parameters between PD patients and their
patients significantly had more episodes of getting out of bed than
spouses. Correlations between nocturnal parameters and the clin-
their spouses, identified from sleep diary as nocturia (1.84 ± 1.21 vs.
ical severity as determined by rating scales were tested with
1.21 ± 1.08, p ¼ 0.03). There was no significant difference of the
Pearson's correlation coefficients. A p value less than 0.05 was
limb movements between the predominant and less affected sides
considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was per-
(Arms: p ¼ 0.72; Legs: p ¼ 0.645). However, PD patients had
formed using SPSS version 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL).
significantly more arm movements than their spouses
(218.4 ± 142.9 vs. 138.58 ± 91.2, p ¼ 0.038) while a significant
3. Results difference of leg movements was not observed (p ¼ 0.377).
Correlations were performed between the nocturnal
19 PD patients (14 M, 5F, mean age 64.63 ± 7.95 years), and 19

Table 1
Demographic data and disease characteristics of 19 Parkinson's disease patients pairs.

Parkinson's disease patients Spouses

Mean (SD) Mean (SD)

Age (years) 64.63 (7.95) 64.32 (8.46)


Weight (kg) 61.13 (13.84) 62.63 (10.86)
BMI (kg/m2) 2.27 (3.65) 2.48 (4.14)
Age of onset (years) 54.53 (9.95) e
Duration of disease (years) 10.05 (5.23) e
H&Y stage 2.53 (0.42) e
Stage 1.5 1/19
Stage 2 3/19
Stage 2.5 9/19
Stage 3 6/19
UPDRS e
Part I 2.37 (1.80)
Part II 112.58 (5.99)
Part III 23.26 (8.20)
Part IV 3.47 (2.84)
UPDRS axial scores 5.53 (3.73) e
UPDRS item 28 (posture) 0.89 (0.57) e
Side more affected by Parkinsonian symptoms Left side: 13 patients (68.4%) e
Right side: 6 patients (31.6%)
History of motor fluctuations 14 (73.7%) e
Total LED (mg/ day) 999.61 (483.77) e
Bedtime LED (mg/day) (14/19 PD patients used controlled release levodopa.) 67.1 (49.3) e
Nocturnal akinesia score 1.74 (1.18) e
Nocturnal dystonia score 0.55 (0.85) e
Nocturnal cramp score 0.79 (0.95) e
Total MPDSS 142.89 (28.96) e
Total NADCS 3.05 (2.25) e
RBD1Q (‘yes’ answer) 7 (36.8)

BMI: Body mass index; UPDRS: H&Y: Hoehn & Yahr; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; LED: Levodopa equivalent dose; NADCS:
Nocturnal Akinesia Dystonia and Cramp Score; MPDSS: Modified Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale; RBD1Q: A single-question screen for
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.
J. Sringean et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16 13

Table 2
The comparison of nocturnal parameters between PD patients and their spouses.

Mean (SD) Patient Spouse p value

Duration of sleep (min) 498.21 (81.33) 453.21 (70.02) 0.063


Number of rolling over 6.16 (4.88) 10.63 (7.34) 0.048*
Degree of rolling over (degree) 56.84 (21.75) 76.65 (15.98) 0.007*
Velocity of rolling over (radiance/sec) 0.10 (0.06) 0.15 (0.05) 0.011*
Acceleration of rolling over (radiance/sec2) 0.08 (0.04) 0.19 (0.04) <0.001*
Duration of rolling over (sec) 15.4 (11.8) 17.2 (19.7) 0.536
Number of getting out of bed (Nocturia) 1.84 (1.21) 1.21 (1.08) 0.030*
Number of limb movements (times/night)
 Arm movements (times/night) Bilateral arms Bilateral arms 0.038*
218.4 (142.9) 138.58 (91.2)
More vs less affected arm Right vs left arm
110.7 (78.5) vs 107.7 (68.7) 65.4 (45.9) vs 73.2 (46.7)
p ¼ 0.720 p ¼ 0.047
 Leg movements (times/night) Bilateral legs Bilateral legs 0.377
75.4 (36.9) 93.6 (70.2)
More vs less affected leg Right vs left leg
41.8 (22.6) vs 39.8 (16.8) 45.5 (38.3) vs 48.1 (32.4)
p ¼ 0.645 p ¼ 0.288

Statistical significance (*) is defined by p  0.05.

parameters, and H&Y staging, NADCS, UPDRS-III, UPDRS axial, exhibited less efficient rolling over by not only fewer turns, but also
MPDSS, and RBD1Q scores. The interpretation of correlation co- smaller, slower turns, and less acceleration when compared to their
efficients indicated that there was a moderate correlation between spouses. Moreover, our studies extended the findings to identify
duration of rolling over and UPDRS axial score (r ¼ 0.619, p ¼ 0.005) the objective evidence of getting out of bed as being nocturia. While
as well as NADCS score (r ¼ 0.68, p ¼ 0.001), and its akinesia sub- axial rotation at night was shown to be less in PD patients, limb
score (r ¼ 0.46, p ¼ 0.047). Similar correlations were observed movements of PD patients manifested the opposite finding when
between degree, velocity, acceleration, and item 28 of UPDRS on compared to their spouses, but even more so in the arms. Impor-
posture (r ¼ 0.447, p ¼ 0.039; r ¼ 0.666, p ¼ 0.002; r ¼ 0.617, tantly, our data on nocturnal movements also correlates with
p ¼ 0.005 respectively). Moderate and significant correlations were several domains of standard clinical rating scales supporting the
demonstrated between the episodes of getting out of bed (noctu- validity of our technique. The duration of rolling over has been
ria), and UPDRS-III (r ¼ 0.579, p ¼ 0.009) as well as UPDRS axial shown to significantly correlate with UPDRS axial and postural
score (r ¼ 0.498, p ¼ 0.03), total LED (r ¼ 0.475, p ¼ 0.04), and scores while other parameters of rolling over (degree, velocity, and
nighttime LED (r ¼ 0.554, p ¼ 0.014). The number of leg movements acceleration) correlate with postural scores of UPDRS. Moreover,
on the predominantly affected side also correlated with RBD1Q disease severity as reflected by UPDRS-III correlates with nocturia,
(r ¼ 0.472, p ¼ 0.041), the total NADCS (r ¼ 0.493, p ¼ 0.032), and its particularly on axial symptoms. The presence of nocturia also cor-
cramp subscore (r ¼ 0.475, p ¼ 0.04). Other correlations are shown relates with total and bedtime LED, supporting its potential adverse
in Table 3. effect on bladder function [25]. The association between leg
movements on the affected side and RBD1Q probably suggests that
4. Discussion at least part of leg movements in these patients represent limb
movements in RBD. A recent study involving surface EMG activity
In this study, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of the during REM sleep showed that EMG activity in the mentalis,
NIGHT-Recorder for capturing nocturnal movements in patients extensor muscle group of the forearms, and anterior tibialis was
with PD compared to their spouses. Our findings provided the associated with RBD severity [26]. The presence of periodic limb
quantitative data in the ambulatory settings supporting previous movements in sleep could also contribute to a higher number of
studies using clinical interviews and questionnaires that nighttime limb movements in PD patients than their spouses. The application
symptoms of PD, in particular nocturnal hypokinesia, and nocturia, of our study may be extended to asymptomatic early patients as a
exist, and are very common [1,5,6,8,9]. potential biomarker when combined with other instruments (e.g.
There have been very few studies in the medical literature that heart rate variability), or identification of those who are at risk of
were dedicated to the quantitative measurement of rolling over in being bed bound so that early interventions can be undertaken.
PD patients. The original study used a rotational sensor attached There are several possible explanations for nocturnal hypo-
over the sternum showing that PD patients changed their position kinesia in PD. From a pathological viewpoint, neurodegeneration in
less frequently than did their spouses [13]. The most recent study PD involves motor pathways that control axial movements,
aiming at early PD patients (HY  2.5) demonstrated that the mean including reticulospinal and vestibulospinal tracts [27]. This is
acceleration of nocturnal movements was lower in 11 patients different from the control of limb movements via corticospinal
compared to controls while frequency and speed did not differ [15]. tracts, which are less likely to be affected in PD and for this reason,
Their attempt to identify nocturnal movements as a preclinical it may explain why limb movements in our PD patients were
marker among high-risk individuals did not yield significant re- relatively preserved in comparison to axial movements. Consid-
sults. Other studies also identified impaired body rotation in PD ering from neurotransmitter perspective, nocturnal dopamine level
patients, but the examinations were performed when patients in PD patients should be very low due to a lack of dopamine
were awake and in the upright position [24]. In our study, we secretory peaks at night and a loss of storage capacity due to
conducted a comprehensive assessment of nocturnal movements nigrostriatal degeneration [28]. This observation has therapeutic
by applying wearable sensors not only on the trunk as in previous implications since a number of studies have demonstrated that
published studies, but also on the limbs [13,15]. We were able to replacing dopamine or stimulating dopaminergic receptors at night
demonstrate that PD patients in the mild to moderate stage already have been shown to improve a range of nocturnal symptoms in PD
14 J. Sringean et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16

Fig. 1. Bar graphs representing the raw data of the number of rolling over (2A), getting out of bed (2B), arm (2C), and leg movements (2D) of 19 Parkinson's disease pairs.

patients [29]. Mechanistically, abnormal postural alignment in PD, mechanisms that influence axial and limb movements at night may
including Pisa syndrome, camptocormia, or scoliosis, can also be different. Moreover, we were able to identify significant corre-
contribute to movement difficulties at nighttime [30]. Lastly, the lations between various nocturnal parameters and daytime clinical
effect of aging should also be considered since aging has been severity, suggesting the spectrum of day- and night-time symp-
shown to contribute most to the severity of axial impairment in PD toms of PD should all be considered when planning for treatment of
patients [31]. PD patients. The monitoring was performed in the patients' own
The main strength of our study was the application of multisite sleeping environment without any alterations of the surroundings
accelerometers that can evaluate not only axial movements, but in order to eliminate the effect of a change in sleeping environment
also limb movements in the same patient suggesting that the on sleep patterns. Our limitations include the assessment of only
Table 3
Correlations between nocturnal parameters and clinical demographics of Parkinson's disease patients. Numbers in bracket represent p values. Bold figures indicate statistical significant results.

Parameters and Rolling over: Rolling over: Rolling Rolling Rolling over: Getting out Movements of Movements of Movements of Movements of less
demographic data Number Degree over: Duration over: Velocity Acceleration of bed predominantly less affected predominantly affected leg
(nocturia) affected arm arm affected leg

Age (years) 0.414 0.135 0.259 0.118 0.129 0.302 0.426 0.510 0.496 0.023
(0.078) (0.502) (0.285) (0.690) (0.599) (0.209) (0.069) (0.026) (0.031) (0.926)
Age of onset (years) 0.294 0.420 0.117 0.108 0.003 0.081 0.182 0.184 0.283 0.040

J. Sringean et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16


(0.047*) (0.865) (0.633) (0.660) (0.991) (0.742) (0.456) (0.451) (0.240) (0.871)
Disease duration 0.047 0.277 0.117 0.369 0.163 0.290 0.271 0.386 0.181 0.105
(0.850) (0.251) (0.633) (0.120) (0.504) (0.229) (0.262) (0.102) (0.458) (0.668)
Body weight (kg) 0.059 0.066 0.180 0.098 0.164 0.016 0.003 0.184 0.267 0.226
(0.812) (0.790) (0.461) (0.690) (0.502) (0.948) (0.989) (0.451) (0.269) (0.353)
H&Y stage 0.112 0.337 0.441 0.288 0.208 0.440 0.387 0.560 0.157 0.139
(0.648) (0.158) (0.059) (0.232) (0.394) (0.059) (0.101) (0.013*) (0.520) (0.569)
UPDRS-III 0.018 0.444 0.133 0.267 0.266 0.579 0.435 0.474 0.232 0.098
(0.941) (0.057) (0.588) (0.269) (0.272) (0.009*) (0.063) (0.040*) (0.340) (0.689)
UPDRS axial score 0.066 0.407 0.619 0.248 0.266 0.498 0.462 0.659 0.541 0.012
(0.981) (0.084) (0.005*) (0.306) (0.272) (0.030*) (0.046*) (0.002*) (0.017*) (0.962)
UPDRS# 28 0.106 ¡0.447 0.452 ¡0.666 ¡0.617 0.055 0.473 0.707 0.385 0.068
(Posture) (0.667) (0.039*) (0.052) (0.002*) (0.005*) (0.822) (0.041*) (0.001*) (0.104) (0.782)
NADCS 0.048 0.052 0.680 0.162 0.122 0.359 0.206 0.324 0.493 0.089
(0.845) (0.834) (0.001*) (0.507) (0.618) (0.132) (0.398) (0.177) (0.032) (0.718)
NADCS-akinesia 0.156 0.277 0.460 0.166 0168 0.395 0.233 0.304 0.266 0.06
subscore (0.523) (0.250) (0.047*) (0.496) (0.491) (0.094) (0.337) (0.206) (0.271) (0.979)
NADCS- dystonia 0.093 0.233 0.345 0.028 0.009 0.062 0.009 0.025 0.363 0.183
subscore (0.706) (0.338) (0.104) (0.910) (0.972) (0.799) (p ¼ 0.970) (0.919) (0.126) (0.452)
NADCS- cramp 0.029 0.010 0.679 0.093 0.028 0.283 0.174 0.371 0.475 0.001
subscore (0.905) (0.968) (0.001*) (0.704) (0.909) (0.240) (0.475) (0.118) (0.04*) (0.996)
MPDSS 0.103 0.014 0.105 0.042 0.102 0.424 0.118 0.115 0.144 0.127
(0.674) (0.955) (0.688) (0.866) (0.679) (0.07) (0.641) (0.651) (0.569) (0.616)
RBD1Q 0.164 0.231 0.062 ¡0.544 ¡0.562 0.083 0.337 0.409 0.472 0.540
(0.502) (0.341) (0.802) (0.016*) (0.012*) (0.737) (0.159) (0.082) (0.041*) (0.017*)
Total LED 0.011 0.144 0.142 0.282 0.131 0.475 0.074 0.193 0.270 0.142
(p value) (0.965) (0.565) (0.561) (0.242) (0.592) (0.04*) (0.764) (0.428) (0.264) (0.562)
Bedtime LED 0.020 0.446 0.082 0.383 0.354 0.554 0.184 0.298 0.290 0.067
(0.935) (0.056) (0.74) (0.106) (0.137) (0.014*) (0.451) (0.261) (0.229) (0.785)

* Denoted statistical significant results with p  0.05.


H&Y: Hoehn& Yahr stage; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; LED: Levodopa equivalent dose; NADCS: Nocturnal Akinesia Dystonia and Cramp Score, MPDSS: Modified Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale.

15
16 J. Sringean et al. / Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 23 (2016) 10e16

one night, which may not represent overall nighttime problems of [10] H. Matsumoto, R. Sengoku, Y. Saito, Y. Kakuta, S. Murayama, I. Imafuku,
Sudden death in Parkinson's disease: a retrospective autopsy study, J. Neurol.
individual patients. A lack of simultaneous polysomnographic re-
Sci. 343 (2014) 149e152.
cordings could limit a full interpretation on the nature of limb [11] P. Martinez-Martin, M.J. Forjaz, B. Frades-Payo, A.B. Rusinol, J.M. Fernandez-
movements. Garcia, J. Benito-Leon, V.C. Arillo, M.A. Barbera, M.P. Sordo, M.J. Catalan,
In conclusion, our study was able to provide quantitative data of Caregiver burden in Parkinson's disease, Mov. Disord. 22 (2007) 924e931 quiz
1060.
nocturnal movements in mild-moderate stage PD patients by using [12] A. Laihinen, J. Alihanka, S. Raitasuo, U.K. Rinne, Sleep movements and asso-
multisite accelerometers. Our results suggested that PD patients ciated autonomic nervous activities in patients with Parkinson's disease, Acta
moved less axially than their spouses while the number of limb Neurol. Scand. 76 (1987) 64e68.
[13] C. Weller, S.G. Bowes, C.A. Kirk, P.W. Nicholson, R.J. Dobbs, S.M. Dobbs,
movements did not differ. The accelerometer data of nocturnal Measurement of axial rotation: its relevance to screening for night-time
hypokinesia correlated significantly with various domains of clin- hypokinesia in old age and parkinsonism, Age Ageing 20 (1991) 3e7.
ical rating scales, in particular UPDRS axial score and UPDRS item [14] W. Maetzler, J. Domingos, K. Srulijes, J.J. Ferreira, B.R. Bloem, Quantitative
wearable sensors for objective assessment of Parkinson's disease, Mov. Dis-
28 on posture, supporting the validity of our study. Since nighttime ord. 28 (2013) 1628e1637.
problems are often neglected and underreported by patients and [15] M. Louter, W. Maetzler, J. Prinzen, R.C. van Lummel, M. Hobert, J.B. Arends,
caregivers, ambulatory nocturnal monitoring in patients' own B.R. Bloem, J. Streffer, D. Berg, S. Overeem, I. Liepelt-Scarfone, Accelerometer-
based quantitative analysis of axial nocturnal movements differentiates pa-
home may provide a practical method of nighttime assessment, tients with Parkinson's disease, but not high-risk individuals, from controls,
identifying significant symptoms that warrant therapeutic in- J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 86 (2015) 32e37.
terventions. Larger studies are needed to determine the relation- [16] R. Bhidayasiri, J. Sringean, P. Taechalertpaisarn, C. Thanawattano, Capturing
nighttime symptoms in Parkinson's disease: technical development and
ship between nocturnal and daytime symptoms so recognition of
experimental verification of inertial sensors for nocturnal hypokinesia,
nighttime symptoms can be improved, followed by specific thera- J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. (2015) (in press).
peutics being implemented for distressing symptoms throughout [17] B.P. Bejjani, D. Gervais, I. Arnulf, S. Papadopoulos, S. Demeret, A.M. Bonnet,
the day and night. P. Cornu, P. Damier, Y. Agid, Axial parkinsonian symptoms can be improved:
the role of levodopa and bilateral subthalamic stimulation, J. Neurol. Neuro-
surg. Psychiatry 68 (2000) 595e600.
Conflict of interest [18] F. Stocchi, L. Barbato, G. Nordera, A. Berardelli, S. Ruggieri, Sleep disorders in
Parkinson's disease, J. Neurol. 245 (Suppl. 1) (1998) S15eS18.
[19] S. Tanasanvimon, N.I. Ayuthaya, K. Phanthumchinda, Modified Parkinson's
None. Disease Sleep Scale (MPDSS) in Thai Parkinson's disease patients, J. Med.
Assoc. Thai. 90 (2007) 2277e2283.
Acknowledgments [20] R.B. Postuma, I. Arnulf, B. Hogl, A. Iranzo, T. Miyamoto, Y. Dauvilliers,
W. Oertel, Y.-E. Ju, M. Puligheddu, P. Jennum, A. Pelletier, C. Wolfson, S. Leu-
Semenescu, B. Frauscher, M. Miyamoto, V.C. De Cock, M.M. Unger, K. Stiasny-
This study was supported by the Ratchadapiseksompoj Kolster, M.L. Fantini, J.Y. Montplaisir, A single-question screen for rapid eye
Endowment Fund of Chulalongkorn University (RES560530136 & movement sleep behavior disorder: a multicenter validation study, Mov.
Disord. 27 (2012) 913e916.
RES560530137-HR), the grant from the National Research Council [21] R.P. Allen, D. Picchietti, W.A. Hening, C. Trenkwalder, A.S. Walters,
of Thailand (GRB-APS-13-58-30-10), research unit grant RA57/119 J. Montplaisi, Restless legs syndrome: diagnostic criteria, special consider-
of Chulalongkorn University, and Cerebos award grant of Cerebos ations, and epidemiology. A report from the restless legs syndrome diagnosis
and epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health, Sleep. Med. 4
Thailand. We would like to thank Dr. Onanong Jitkritsadakul for her
(2003) 101e119.
assistance with the clinical evaluation of subjects. [22] H. Miwa, S. Sasahara, T. Matsui, Roll-over detection and sleep quality mea-
surement using a wearable sensor, Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 2007
Appendix A. Supplementary data (2007) 1507e1510.
[23] C. Weller, P.W. Nicholson, S.M. Dobbs, S.G. Bowes, A. Purkiss, R.J. Dobbs,
Reduced axial rotation in the spouses of sufferers from clinical idiopathic
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http:// parkinsonism, Age Ageing 21 (1992) 189e194.
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.11.003. [24] M. Vaugoyeau, F. Viallet, R. Aurenty, C. Assaiante, S. Mesure, J. Massion, Axial
rotation in Parkinson's disease, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 77 (2006)
815e821.
References [25] E. Iacovelli, F. Gilio, G. Meco, F. Fattapposta, N. Vanacore, L. Brusa,
E. Giacomelli, M. Gabriele, A. Rubino, N. Locuratolo, C. Iani, F. Pichiorri,
[1] R. Bhidayasiri, P. Mekawichai, O. Jitkritsadakul, P. Panyakaew, L. Kaewwilai, C. Colosimo, A. Carbone, G. Palleschi, M. Inghilleri, Bladder symptoms assessed
N. Boonrod, S. Petchrutchatachart, P. Jagota, K. Boonpeng, with overactive bladder questionnaire in Parkinson's disease, Mov. Disord. 25
S. Singmaneesakulchai, S. Setthawatcharawanich, Nocturnal journey of body (2010) 1203e1209.
and mind in Parkinson's disease: the manifestations, risk factors and their [26] L.M. Chahine, S.R. Kauta, J.T. Daley, C.R. Cantor, N. Dahodwala, Surface EMG
relationship to daytime symptoms. Evidence from the NIGHT-PD study, activity during REM sleep in Parkinson's disease correlates with disease
J. Neural Transm. 121 (Suppl. 1) (2014) 59e68. severity, Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 20 (2014) 766e771.
[2] P. Viwattanakulvanid, L. Kaewwilai, O. Jitkritsadakul, N.R. Brenden, [27] H. Braak, K. Del Tredici, U. Rub, R.A. de Vos, E.N. Jansen Steur, E. Braak, Staging
S. Setthawatcharawanich, N. Boonrod, P. Mekawichai, R. Bhidayasiri, The of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease, Neurobiol. Aging
impact of the nocturnal disabilities of Parkinson's disease on caregivers' 24 (2003) 197e211.
burden: implications for interventions, J. Neural Transm. 121 (Suppl. 1) (2014) [28] F. Stocchi, P. Stirpe, The relevance of dopaminergic level in nocturnal
15e24. disability in Parkinson's disease: implications of continuous dopaminergic
[3] K.R. Chaudhuri, The basis for day and night-time control of symptoms of stimulation at night to treat the symptoms, J. Neural Transm. 121 (Suppl. 1)
Parkinson's disease, Eur. J. Neurol. 9 (Suppl. 3) (2002) 40e43. (2014) S79eS83.
[4] P. Medcalf, Good practice in the assessment and management of nocturnal [29] C. Trenkwalder, B. Kies, M. Rudzinska, J. Fine, J. Nikl, K. Honczarenko,
Parkinson's disease symptoms, Age Ageing 34 (2005) 435e438. P. Dioszeghy, D. Hill, T. Anderson, V. Myllyla, J. Kassubek, M. Steiger,
[5] A.J. Lees, N.A. Blackburn, V.L. Campbell, The nighttime problems of Parkinson's M. Zucconi, E. Tolosa, W. Poewe, E. Surmann, J. Whitesides, B. Boroojerdi,
disease, Clin. Neuropharmacol. 11 (1988) 512e519. K.R. Chaudhuri, Rotigotine effects on early morning motor function and sleep
[6] M. Louter, M. Munneke, B.R. Bloem, S. Overeem, Nocturnal hypokinesia and in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
sleep quality in Parkinson's disease, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 60 (2012) 1104e1108. (RECOVER), Mov. Disord. 26 (2011) 90e99.
[7] C. Pacchetti, R. Manni, R. Zangaglia, F. Mancini, E. Marchioni, C. Tassorelli, [30] K.M. Doherty, B.P. van de Warrenburg, M.C. Peralta, L. Silveira-Moriyama,
M. Terzaghi, M. Ossola, E. Martignoni, A. Moglia, G. Nappi, Relationship be- J.P. Azulay, O.S. Gershanik, B.R. Bloem, Postural deformities in Parkinson's
tween hallucinations, delusions, and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disease, Lancet Neurol. 10 (2011) 538e549.
disorder in Parkinson's disease, Mov. Disord. 20 (2005) 1439e1448. [31] G. Levy, E.D. Louis, L. Cote, M. Perez, H. Mejia-Santana, H. Andrews, J. Harris,
[8] E.L. Stack, A.M. Ashburn, Impaired bed mobility and disordered sleep in Par- C. Waters, B. Ford, S. Frucht, S. Fahn, K. Marder, Contribution of aging to the
kinson's disease, Mov. Disord. 21 (2006) 1340e1342. severity of different motor signs in Parkinson disease, Arch. Neurol. 62 (2005)
[9] E. Tandberg, J.P. Larsen, K. Karlsen, A community-based study of sleep disor- 467e472.
ders in patients with Parkinson's disease, Mov. Disord. 13 (1998) 895e899.

You might also like