Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright
Contents Page
1 Feature overview 2
1.1 Introduction 2
1.2 Background 2
1.3 What can be achieved 2
2 Technical description 2
2.1 Algorithm 2
2.2 Main changes in Ericsson GSM system R7/BSS R7.0 6
2.3 Main changes in Ericsson GSM system R7/BSS R7.1 6
3 Engineering guidelines 6
3.1 General considerations 6
3.2 Parameter setting 7
3.3 Influence from E- and R-GSM bands 9
4 Parameters 9
4.1 Main controlling parameters 9
4.2 Additional parameters 9
4.3 Value ranges and default values 10
5 References 10
SEIF v1.2,
OPEN INFORMATION
E User Description 2 (10)
Datum — Date Rev Dokumentnr — Document no
1 Feature overview
1.1 Introduction
The logic of the Cell Load Sharing feature is an integrated part of the
Locating algorithm (see ref. 1) and is implemented in the Base
Station Controller (BSC).
1.2 Background
The Cell Load Sharing feature distributes the traffic load more evenly
in a network and reduces the probability of congestion in a cell. This
is achieved by moving established connections to neighbour cells and
thereby reducing the high load peaks in the cell. A higher average
load can be allowed while the grade of service (allowed congestion
level) remains the same. The trunking efficiency of a BSC is thus
greater, resulting in an increase in carried traffic and better resource
utilisation.
2 Technical description
2.1 Algorithm
2.1.1 Overview
The Cell Load Sharing feature is limited to Traffic Channels (TCHs)
carrying speech or data. It consists of the following activities:
Cell Load Sharing needs to be activated at both BSC and cell level
for Cell Load Sharing evaluations to be attempted. The performance
of the feature is regulated by parameters which are changeable by
operator commands.
When the result of the Cell Load Sharing evaluations in a cell indi-
cates that a connection should be moved to a neighbour cell, the
traffic load in the target cell is examined. To accept an incoming han-
dover due to Cell Load Sharing the cell must both indicate that it
accepts incoming Cell Load Sharing handovers according to the HO-
CLSACC parameter and have a low enough traffic level. The
following criterion for the traffic level in a target cell is relevant:
Note that the amount of idle traffic channels is counted as if only full-
rate channels exist. This means that if one of a pair of half-rate
channels in a dual rate channel is busy, and the other is idle, the en-
tire dual-rate channel is counted as busy. However, both connections
using a full rate channel and a half rate channel respectively can be
selected for load sharing handovers. Cell Load Sharing evaluations
are not performed at all for channels in multislot configurations. Also,
the E-GSM and R-GSM band channels can be included in the Cell
OPEN INFORMATION
E User Description 4 (10)
Datum — Date Rev Dokumentnr — Document no
The cell load sharing evaluation is performed after the normal locating
evaluation of the neighbouring cells. This means that new ranking cal-
culations, apart from the normal locating evaluations, are performed
for all the connections having the number of idle traffic channels in a
cell below parameter CLSLEVEL. It is repeated for every measure-
ment period as long as the traffic load in the cell is below parameter
CLSLEVEL. In the recalculations, reduced hysteresis values (for the
different hysteresis parameters) are used. If a neighbour cell be-
comes better ranked than the serving cell for any of the connections
as a result of this new cell ranking, a Cell Load Sharing handover is
requested for that connection. This implies that only neighbour cells
ranked worse than the serving cell by the normal locating evaluation
can be considered for Cell Load Sharing handovers. A regular inter-
cell handover will still be performed if the normal locating evaluation
indicates a better ranked neighbour cell for a connection.
The locating recalculations due to Cell Load Sharing are done with a
linear ramping down of the hysteresis with a percentage that is given
by parameter RHYST. The ramping down is performed during a time
defined by parameter CLSRAMP, or until the number of idle traffic
channels increases above CLSLEVEL. The actual hysteresis h used
at each time is given by:
(t - t 0 )
h = H [1 - 2(RHYST/100) ], (1)
CLSRAMP
where:
h h
(cell B = target cell) (cell A = serving cell)
RHYST = 100%
Handover border, RHYST = 75%
cell A to cell B
RHYST = 50%
without reduction
RHYST = 25%
RHYST = 0%
hysteresis area
• Locating conditions:
It is possible to select both full rate and half rate channels for Cell
Load Sharing handovers. New default value for the parameter
CLSRAMP.
3 Engineering guidelines
The gain in terms of capacity that can be expected when using the
Cell Load Sharing feature depends on how many subscribers that will
be situated in the region where they can be subject for the evalua-
tions, i.e. the region defined by the locating hysteresis parameters
KHYST (and/or LHYST and TRHYST, see ref. 1) and the hysteresis
reduction parameter RHYST .
Even for low locating hysteresis values there will be a large area
where cell load sharing can be performed. Assume that the "normal
cell radius" is 1.0 km. A calculation using standard propagation mod-
els gives a path loss of approximately 125 dB. At 1.5 dB lower path
OPEN INFORMATION
E User Description 7 (10)
Datum — Date Rev Dokumentnr — Document no
loss (corresponding to a shift from the nominal cell border to the edge
of the hysteresis area, see figure 1 and figure 2) the cell radius is 0.9
km. For an omnicell this is equal to a difference of about 20 % in
terms of cell area. Thus, for KHYST = 3, a significant part of the cell
area will be subject for evaluations.
If RHYST = 100 the maximum region for load sharing is obtained, see
figure 1 and figure 2. With this setting maximum capacity gain is
achieved. The drawback is that the risk increases that a connection
that has been transferred to another cell, might be handed back to
the old cell again very soon (when TINIT has expired). The aim for
RHYST should be 100%. However, in the process of tuning, the rate
of handover back to the old cell within ten seconds should be care-
fully monitored. If this rate is considered too high, RHYST should be
set to a lower value.
CLSACC
CLSLEVEL
Maximum load
sharing region
Example:
Assume that two cells have three TRXs each and that one cell tends
to be congested more than its neighbour.
As can be seen in table 2, this means that when the cell with high
load has only three or less idle TCHs (CLSLEVEL = 15), the cell will
start to perform load sharing evaluations. Its neighbour will accept in-
coming load sharing-triggered handovers if it has six or more idle
TCHs (CLSACC = 25).
No. of 10 % 15 % 20 % 25 % 30 % 35 % 40 %
TRXs
1 (7 TCHs) 0 1 1 1 2 2 2
2 (14 TCHs) 1 2 2 3 4 4 5
3 (21 TCHs) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
4 (28 TCHs) 2 4 5 7 8 9 11
5 (36 TCHs) 3 5 7 9 10 12 14
If the number of TCHs is very low, a change in only one idle channel
causes the percentage of idle TCHs to change greatly. Thus a situa-
tion can occur where the percentage of idle TCHs changes from
above CLSLEVEL to below CLSACC by handover of only one single
connection. This may lead to ping-pong handover, unless the
parameter values are adjusted with the described effect in mind.
OPEN INFORMATION
E User Description 9 (10)
Datum — Date Rev Dokumentnr — Document no
A suitable value for CLSRAMP is eight seconds. This will give a slow
enough hysteresis reduction in order to guarantee that connections
closest to the cell border are transferred first.
With the introduction of the E-GSM and R-GSM bands in a cell, the
number of free TCH channels that are used in the CLS evaluation
algorithm might be inadequte if the exchange property ERBANDSIN-
CLUDED is set to ON. The reason for this is that the algorithm does
not consider that all MSe are not capable of using the E- and R-GSM
bands. The possible amount of E-GSM and R-GSM band capable
MSs should be considered when using CLS. If there are 100 % E-
GSM and R-GSM MSs, ERBANDSINCLUDED should be set to ON.
With 100 % P-GSM (standard GSM900) MSs it should be set to OFF.
When there is a mixture of MSs with different capabilities, the opera-
tor has to consider the benefit and possible degradation by including
E-GSM and R-GSM TCHs in the CLS evaluation algorithm.
4 Parameters
Table 3
5 References