Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Of Blood and Milk: gender and the corruptive body in early modern English witchcraft
It is July of 1645 and an Essex woman lays in bed at night, suckling the small thing at her
breast. She will do this daily because she must. Some promises may not be broken. She strokes
its head and finds it soft. For many, it is a small black dog. As rumour follows, others a squirrel
or a hare. Elizabeth Clarke’s imps however, had names: Sacke and Sugare, Pyewackett, Vinegar
Tom, Grizzel Greedigut... Two of these she shared with Anne West down the road.1 When it is
done, this thing familiar to her leaves a mark – a teat of sorts in its reddish-purple. This mark
would serve as both payment and reminder of her covenant with the devil, nurtured nightly as a
Formally accused by neighbour John Rivet on 21 March 1645 for the unnatural sickness
of his wife the winter prior, Elizabeth Clarke was arraigned for the crime of witchcraft.
Deposition records of witchfinders Mathew Hopkins and John Sterne report Clarke produced
these imps in their presence during an interview in her home. While evidence was predominately
local testimony, it was precisely these suckling marks for which she was inspected. They, as with
the majority of accused witches in early modern England, were found “about the lower parts of
her body.”3 The body was the site of contestation articulated in its capacity for the literal and
ideological corruption of individuals and the world at large.4 This nature was concerned with the
body and its markings as signifiers of connection with witchcraft. Its corruptive nature was
informed by gendered understandings of the female body as predisposed to sinfulness and thus,
1
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations, examinations,
and confessions of the late witches, arraigned and executed in the county of Essex,
(London: Printed by M.S., 1645), Early English Books Online. Accessed 15 November 2019.
2
Darren Oldridge, ed. The Witchcraft Reader (London; New York: Routledge, 2008): 278-9.
3
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 6.
4
Merry E. Weisner, ed. Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe (Boston; New York: Houghton
Mifflin Company, 2007): 186.
Chisamore 2
demonic intervention.5 This translated to evil transmitted by the witch’s mouth and its most
dangerous organ, the tongue. I am concerned not only with the gender and body of a witch itself
but further, the role of the witch in early modern hierarchy and its anti-thesis. I argue the early
modern woman, designated as producer (of children, of household, of faith) we see inverted in
the characterization of the witch constructed primarily through the corruptive body.6
The case of Elizabeth Clarke is one of numerous deposition records which occurred
during the English witch-panic of 1645-7. The cases informing this study however, range from
1601-1649. All bear a similar title for their widespread readership: “A Strange and Most True
Report,” “A strange and most true trial,” “Witches lately arraigned.” With exception of a
singular German record of 1601, these works were published in London and sold for widespread
readership. Trials were of public concern and contributed to existing anxieties in the public
sphere. The majority of these cases involve six accused on average, while others recount
eighteen to thirty. As evidentiary practices become more stringent in the period, trials were
centred around fewer examinants with extensive depositions by local witnesses. For Elizabeth
Clarke, this meant her own trial witnesses included visiting witch-hunters, accusing neighbours,
and those female neighbours arraigned alongside her. Some of these accused, such as Anne West
with whom she supposedly shared impish familiars and “hath been suspected a Witch many
yeers since,” Clarke incriminated through her own confessions.7 Clearly concerns of witchcraft
were long-standing even at a local level, but why were suspected individuals such as West,
5
Helen Rodnite Lemay, Women’s Secrets: a translation of Pseudo-Albertus Magnus’ De
secretis mulierum with commentaries (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992): 1,
67; Gerhild Scholz Williams, Defining Dominion: the discourses of magic and witchcraft in
early modern France and Germany (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995), 49;
Sarah Ferber, “Ecstasy, Possession, Witchcraft,” in The Witchcraft Reader, ed. Darren
Oldridge (London; New York: Routledge, 2008), 230.
6
Jonathan Gil Harris, Foreign bodies and the body politic: discourses of social pathology in
early modern England. (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998): 120.
7
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 4, 7.
Chisamore 3
Clarke, and others tried in spring of 1645 rather than years earlier? Not unlike the preceding
continental panics peaking during the Reformation, it is this same context we find in early
modern English trials with the Civil War. Public anxieties increased with distributed records
contributing to the climate, and concerns began to incorporate political-theological threats to the
body politic.8 These evils manifested in satanic infiltration through the corruptive body of one’s
local witch.9
The worldview framing the context of this witch-panic was an early modern cosmology
which structured the heavens and earth in the intricate hierarchy found in the medieval
inheritance of the Great Chain of Being. This divine ordering of the world also informed its exact
opposite. Evil was not only demonological intervention but an active and disruptive force.
Binaries of good/evil, order/disorder, and a very real church/ antichurch dominated the early
modern imagination. Printed in 1487, Kramer and Sprenger’s Malleus Maleficarum (The
Hammer of the Witches), reformed witchcraft in the early modern imagination as a formal
ceremony with the Devil and his demonic representatives. This developed a singularly structured
anti-Church through which already susceptible individuals converted to witchcraft.10 Through its
theological lens, witchcraft was understood through this exclusive binary as the Malleus
the cosmos”.11 For the Continent these fears manifested in the anti-Mass, wherein the Witches’
Sabbath involved debauchery, copulation with the Devil, and sharing stewed children. It
included a mirror desecration of the sacramental communion: “The witch enters a covenant with
Satan who mark her and draws blood; the Devil then provides a familiar who regularly sucks
8
Harris, Foreign bodies and the body politic, 107-8.
9
Harris, Foreign bodies and the body politic,121.
10
Herzig Tamar, “Flies, Heretics, and the Gendering of Witchcraft,” Magic, Ritual, and
Witchcraft 5, no. 1 (2010): 57.
11
Ronald Hutton, The Witch: A History of Fear, from Ancient Times to the Present (London:
Yale University Press, 2017), 27.
Chisamore 4
blood from the resulting wound, drawing it into a teat this inverted Eucharist is designed to ‘put
her in mind of’ the original transaction.”12 In other examples, the witch was said to desecrate the
Host itself by theft and trampling by night.13 This blood-giving is not only an inversion of
sacrament; it is also an inversion of proper gendered behaviour whereby the domestic body
serves as the concrete intermediary between evil and its growth in the world.
It is these frameworks which were reached and reshaped in the context of early modern
England. Unlike their continental counterparts, English witches did not have a Sabbath of their
own and instead individually engaged with the devil or their society of witches in their homes
locally, often at night. Rebecca West was arraigned for witchcraft in Essex of 1645, with the
devil arriving “when she was going to bed, the Divil appeared unto her againe in the shape of a
handsome young man, saying that he came to marry her.”14 That same year, deposition records
of Joan Cariden of Kent record the Devil came to her “in the shape of a blacke rugged Dog, in
the night time, and crept into the bed to her [and] the next night it came to her againe, and
required this examinant to deny God […] and he would revenge her of any one she owed ill will
to.”15 In all of these, the devil in the shape of man or animal would suck from a teat to confirm
the transaction. In many of these records, the devil’s consumption is replaced with a demon,
called an Impe, in the form of a small animal who will suckle the accused. The covenant and
marking however, are maintained becoming definitive of English witchcraft. It has been
suggested this anti-Mass is translated to reflect the puritan experience, mimicking its Protestation
Oath and Solemn League Covenant. Witches were commonly said to have entered into ‘a solemn
12
Bejan, Mere Civility, 252-5; Larner, “Was Witch-hunting Woman-Hunting?” in The
Witchcraft Reader, 278-9.
13
Hans Broedel, “The Malleus Maleficarum and the Construction of Witchcraft,” in The
Witchcraft Reader, 45.
14
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 2.
15
Anonymous, The examination, confession, triall, and execution, of Joane Williford, Joan
Cariden, and Jane Hott, 3..
Chisamore 5
league’ with the devil.16 This appeared only in the later deposition and trial records examined in
this study, with the peak of English witch-panics approaching 1645-7 and thereafter.17
The Civil War continued and fears ran high. In his work on England’s corresponding
witch-panics, Witchfinders: an early modern English tragedy, Malcolm Gadskill recounts: “In
August [of 1642] Charles raised his standard at Nottingham, branding his opponents ‘rebels’ in
response to Parliament’s declaration that royalists were ‘traitors’. The battle-lines were
ideological, even metaphysical, the fighting thought to mirror the conflicts of the celestial sphere,
where Christ would vanquish the forces of evil. […] For puritans, these really were the last days
of mankind, the war was an actual prologue to Armageddon, and the king was a real agent of
Antichrist.”18 And so witchcraft came to be another force to be eliminated in the course of the
It is precisely this intersection of the body, gender and witchcraft with which I am
texts of the 1970s and 80s – are limited in gendered analysis. Hugh Trevor-Roper in his essay
“European Witchcraze of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries” (1967) and Keith Thomas
with his 1971 Religion and the Decline of Magic, pointed toward larger categories of deviancy
and “unassimilable” social groups. This emphasized witchcraft as a created ‘reality’ framed
through the good/evil dialectic of the early modern mindset. It is in this way women were
amalgamated into a wider anti-social category of analysis. Witchcraft gained legitimacy but it is
in the push-back of theorists such as Larner who asserted primacy of gender, citing statistical
16
Malcolm Gadskill, Witchfinders: A Seventeenth-Century English Tragedy (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 2005): 3.
17
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 2.
18
Gadskill, Witchfinders: A Seventeenth-Century English Tragedy, 22.
19
Gil Harris, Foreign bodies and the body politic, 107, 121.
Chisamore 6
studies and imagery/language overwhelmingly directed at female witches. She highlights gaps in
the canon at the time which negated the validity of gender as a category of analysis and
emphasizes patriarchal control over women’s body and reproduction, citing gendered power
dynamics as the core of witchcraft persecution.20 Likewise, Diane Purkiss in her 1996 book, The
Witch in History, outline the role of women in the domestic sphere and the witch as a subversion
of this.21 It is this work on early modern gender dynamics, social roles, and Purkiss’ emphasis on
the corruptive anti-Mother/anti-Wife of the Witch, that informs my work presented to you today.
For medieval and early modern medical authorities, the tongue was a signifier of health.
Pores were regularly examined for swelling. Packets of tea were rubbed on it for healing.22 If you
raised it to find unnatural colour, then illness was afoot. Perhaps it is appropriate then, that the
tongue was of concern to the body politic. The body itself served a role in the hierarchy within
the Great Chain of Being. The biblical phrase from proverbs (18:21) appears with frequency:
Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.
Erasmus, writing Lingua in the eight years after Martin Luther’s Theses, complains about
sectarian vitriol: “‘Love your enemies…and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you.’…
Good God, how far they are from this rule, when they slander the undeserving with harmful
tongues?”23 The tongue was central in the production of instability and inevitably disorder. In
1656 Kent, an accused witch made just that accusation. The record states: “She further saith that
20
Christina Larner, “Was Witch-hunting Woman-Hunting?” in The Witchcraft Reader, ed.
Darren Oldridge (London; New York: Routledge, 2008), 175.
21
Diane Purkiss, “Women’s Stories of Witchcraft in Early Modern England: The House, the
Body, the Child,” in Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe, ed. Merry E. Weisner (Boston; New
York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007), 179.
22
Jack Hartnell, Medieval Bodies: life and death in the Middle Ages ( New York: Versa, 2018):
75.
23
Teresa M. Bejan, Mere Civility: disagreement and the limits of toleration (Cambridge;
London: Harvard University Press, 2017): 23.
Chisamore 7
Goodwife Dadson, Joan Argoe, William Arges wife, Goodwife Cox have very bad tongues”.24
This meaning they were also ‘in solemn league’ and actively corrupting the community in which
they reside.
Erasmus goes on to introduce its paralleling sexual corruption: “the tongue and the genitals
[are] the two most rebellious organs.”25 And it is the established susceptibility of women to
sinfulness – in language and sexuality – which makes them dangerous to the social body. Just as
the Malleus notes a woman menstruating might poison a child with a glance or tarnish a mirror, a
woman’s tongue was likewise poisonous. In volume two of the Harleian Miscellany (or, a
collection of scary, curious, and entertaining pamphlets and tracts), there is an essay titled On
the Anatomy of a Woman’s Tongue. While the original was printed in 1638 – prior to the witch
panics of the 1640s – the print version I worked with was from 1744. The work saw five reprints
within its initial five years and continued to be published over a century later. A woman’s
tongue, the anonymous author writes, is divided into five parts: a medicine, a poison, a serpent,
fire, and thunder. I would like to draw attention to the coding of proper gendered behaviour. A
woman would be capable of stopping her husband from vice and maintaining the household. The
24
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of thirty witches at Chensford [sic] in
Essex, 5.
25
Carla Mazzio, "Sins of the Tongue in Early Modern England." Modern Language Studies 28,
no. 3/4 (1998): 101.
26
E. Harley Oxford and Oldys, W., The Harleian miscellany, or, A collection of scarce,
curious, and entertaining pamphlets and tracts (London: Printed for T. Osborne, in Gray’s-
Inn, 1744), 169.
Chisamore 8
The proper role of a woman as discussed earlier, is doting wife and pious mother. The tongue
was a signifier of illness and as the popularity of this collection suggests, possessed the capacity
for spreading social illness likewise. With the potential to heal, a woman’s tongue gone awry as
with witchcraft, might be inverted to corrupt. A woman’s tongue defined as poison reveals just
this:
The titular Serpent speaks for itself in biblical analogy and more directly aligns with the evils of
a corruptive body to be wrangled, as Erasmus emphasizes. The section on Fire draws parallels to
Evil was a real, corruptive presence which was introduced and spread by the tongues of
witches and those people whose sinfulness encouraged demonic intervention. Emblems were
produced expressing these concerns in the public sphere directly [Fig. 1]. Medical frameworks of
the woman’s body in De secretis underscore this potentiality. Despite the real presence of evil in
the world, the physicality of demons was a frequent point of debate. Earlier periods suggest they
functioned as spirits to influence a person of ill-health and appear in or controlling visions before
them.29 Walter Stephens posits was this engraving by Schongauer (produced circa 1480-1490) an
early example of the emerging corporeality of demons in the early modern imagination [Fig. 2].30
27
E. Harley Oxford and Oldys, W., The Harleian miscellany, 170.
28
E. Harley Oxford and Oldys, W., The Harleian miscellany, 171.
29
Sabine MacCormack, "Demons, Imagination, and the Incas," in Representations, no. 33
(1991): 123.
30
Walter Stephens, Demon Lovers: Witchcraft, Sex, and the Crisis of Belief (Chicago; London:
The University of Chicago Press, 2002), 2.
Chisamore 9
For the first time Saint Anthony’s Temptation by these hybrid-creatures was suspended in air,
only St. Anthony being lifted in air which is novel, but too the physical contact between human
and demon. Some artistic renditions are more explicit in the corporeal connection between
witches and demons [Fig. 3]. Hans Baldung Grien’s Witch and Dragon illustrates a witch
penetrating herself through the body of the demon. The work itself becomes serpentine in form
with twisting, connected figures reminiscent of an ouroboros. The body of the witch and its
connection to evil is not only visible in the sexual relations but is compounded by use of a literal
and figurative tongue. Here, we see artistic parallels to deposition records wherein examinants
are accused of copulating with the devil to secure covenant. The witch is characterized by
physical and moral failings which, as this image articulates, invert proper behaviours.
For those of early modernity, it was a demon’s transformative powers which remained
debated. This debate occurs even in the prelude of trial records in 1645 Essex: could a witch be
turned into a creature by the power of demons?31 This power appears concerning witches
themselves. In Munich of 1601, a witch was said to have suddenly taken the feet of an
administrative secretary prior to killing him with magic.32 On a perhaps comforting note for their
readers, Aquinas suggests otherwise: “In some manner they can transfer the forms [or
perceptions] stored in the sensory organs, so that [by means of] these [stored forms] certain
Manningtree (Essex) illustrates this same concern: “Devils cannot create any nature or
31
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, ii.
32
Anonymous, A strange report of sixe most notorious vvitches who by
their diuelish practises murdred aboue the number of foure hundred small children,
London: Printed by W[illiam] W[hite] for T. Pauier, 1601, Early English Books Online.
Accessed 15 November 2019, 3.
33
Stephens, Demon Lovers, 294-5.
Chisamore 10
substance, but in juggling them show, or seemingly only, whereby false shadows covering those
things which are created of God to cause them to seem that which they are not indeed.”34 Thus
the primary concern is not what demons or Impes are capable but rather that they are present and
converting with devilish covenants the suspicious woman down the road. She in turn, with a
poisonous tongue, would convert others and spread the disease of witchcraft communally. Their
power was capable of corrupting the bodies of others through magical illusion and as records
suggest, death.
Referencing the role of gender in nation-making Joane Nagel states women are
institution within this binary network of good-evil or order-disorder, the productive role of
witches extends into the body politic. Through body and blood, the witch’s family and wider
community may be converted to bloody covenant. In many cases, a mother converts her daughter
to witchcraft.36 In others, her husband and rarer yet, her sons.37 Returning to Erasmus, the evil
tongue is certainly more dangerous than the genitals and equally as reproductive.
In the 1645 case of Thomas Evererd A. Cooper and his wife, Mary, their corruption had
communal reach: their Suffolk Brewhouse at Halfworth was said to be bewitched. “The
odiousness of the infectious stink of it was such so intolerable that by the poisonese of the scent
34
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, ii.
35
Joane Nagel, “Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of
Nations,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21, no. 2 (1998): 252-3.
36
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 11-12, 14; Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of
thirty witches at Chensford [sic] in Essex, 1; Anonymous.
VVitches apprehended, examined and executed, for notable villanies […] (London:
Imprinted by M.F., 1635), Early English Books Online. Accessed 15 November 2019, 5;
Margaret Flowers, Witchcrafts, strange and wonderfull […] (London: Imprinted by M.F.,
1635), Early English Books Online. Accessed 15 November 2019, 17.
37
Anonymous, A strange report of sixe most notorious, 2-3.
Chisamore 11
at taste many people died.”38 The pair confessed to covenant with the devil and were found to
have the teats from which Impes suckled. I quote: “Some of them had such teats or dugs under
their arms, some under their tongue, some in the roof of their mouth, some on the crown of the
head, some among the toes…”39 Of the records examined in this study, female witch marks were
consistently found on either their breasts or near the genitals. A pattern emerges of male witches
and married women possessing teats in less sexualized places (such as those of Thomas and
Mary) than their unmarried or widowed counterparts. Where absent, the devil is shown to take
the place of the male patriarchal figure. This further reveals the gendered body of the witch with
It is in this vein witchcraft might further serve a literal reproductive role. Some women
were said to have used love magic in an attempt to gain a husband. In 1635 Rutland and Beaver
Castle Margaret Flower was brought into witchcraft by her mother, whereby she helped her
“That finding a glove about two or three years since, […] buried it in the yard and said a
mischief soul to it, and it promised to do her good and Cause Thomas Simpson to love her.”40
Ten years later in August, a Suffolk woman “confessed that they have had carnal copulation
with the Devil, one of which said that she (before her husband died) conceived twice by him, but
as soon as she was delivered of them they run away in most horrid and ugly shapes.”41 Likewise,
interrogated by Mathew Hopkins and John Sterne, Elizabeth Clarke of Manningtree answered as
her familiars appeared in many animal-like forms: “What, do yee think I am afraid of my
children?”42 Women were capable of literally reproducing evil in the world as a mother inverted.
38
Anonymous. A true relation of the araignment of eighteene vvitches […] in Suffolk
(London: Printed by I.H., 1645), Early English Books Online. Accessed 15 November 2019, 2.
39
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of eighteene vvitches […] in Suffolk, 4.
40
Flowers, Witchcrafts, strange and wonderfull, 16.
41
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of eighteene vvitches […] in Suffolk, 5.
42
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 3-4.
Chisamore 12
These imps were constructed as figurative and literal children send to spread evil in the world. It
is on the blood of these witches – the inverted milk of the mother – on whom they would sustain.
In the ten deposition records examined, and the seventy-sum individuals accused
contained within them, a total of over four hundred children were said to have died of
bewitching. In 1600 Munich (then, Manchen) alone, the trial of Anne Gamperle and her family
saw them accused of hundreds each.43 In later cases, the latest of these being 1649 at the end of
the English witch-panic, nearly all cases involved infanticide. With stricter regulation of
sufficient evidence, many involved a singular child who had taken ill, with numerous witnesses
and a notably longer trial process. This was in part due to the illegal status of torture in England
at this time.44 Judiciary processes required more than confession, and come mid-seventeenth
century, cases involve fewer accused, numerous community witnesses, and individual interaction
This same Suffolk deposition mentions 120 witches still awaited trial in Gaole.45 This
represents a drastic shift from executions following the day of arrest in records twenty forty to
fifty years prior. The consideration too, seems to be centred around making sense of parental
suffering and in its retribution, order. The Great Chain and social order were upset by witches.
As earlier cases discussed in this article have shown, many of these predominately unmarried
women were said to have not only copulated with but even married the Devil. Rather than
conforming to their (re)productive social designation of the period, they subvert it. To return to
Purkiss, in accusation these witches were not nurturing but rather destructive as an anti-
43
Anonymous, A strange report of sixe most notorious, 1-3.
44
Stephens, Demon Lovers, 103-4.
45
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of eighteene vvitches […] in Suffolk, 5.
46
Purkiss, “Women’s Stories of Witchcraft in Early Modern England: The House, the Body, the
Child,” in Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe, 180-1.
Chisamore 13
The figure of a witch is a failed mother, either by lack of husband, children out of
wedlock, or corrupting her immediate family. The retributions for such failures were harsh,
particularly earlier in the century. Returning to Munich of 1600, Anne Gamperle was made to
suffer, not unlike the unmaking of a knight in the medieval period. Symbolic and corporeal, she
was brought before the town and placed between her two sons and “had both her Breasts cut off:
with which Breasts the executions struck her three times about the face: and in the manner of her
two sons, who fate on side of her were likewise beaten about the face with their mother’s Breasts
three times apiece.”47 This was the first of two further punishments inflicted. This staggering
violence was performative. Not only were her symbols of maternal nurturance publicly removed
but her sons were placed alongside, marked failures as children. On the surface, this might seem
a graphic warning for the watching public and indeed on one level it was. But this family was
accused of infanticide in the hundreds and Anne herself a hundred alone. The corruptive witch, a
failed woman in body and morals, was made to suffer so as to give order to the infant mortality
of the region. This was catharsis for those grieving mothers watching. As Roland Barthes writes
of wrestling in Mythologies: “What is thus displayed for the public is the great spectacle of
Suffering, Defeat, and Justice. […] Suffering appears as inflicted with emphasis and conviction,
for everyone must only see that the man suffers, but also and above all understand why he
suffers.”48
It is this failure and devilish subversion of motherhood we find in all cases. Pseudo-
physiognomic texts reprinted in early modernity established the inherent corruptive nature a
Roland Barthes, “The World of Wrestling,” Mythologies (New York: Hill and Wang, 1972):
48
19-20.
Chisamore 14
Women are so full of venom in the time of their menstruation that they poison animals by
their glace; they infect children in the cradle; they spot the cleanest mirror; and whenever
men have sexual intercourse with them, they are made leprous and sometimes
cancerous.49
Women lacked the integral body to contain its sanguine humours, and it is this embodied failing
which informs those moral ones.50 This is only further compounded by intersections of the
domestic sphere and witchcraft. Diane Purkiss writes: “When this [domestic] process is disrupted
by witchcraft, the authority and identity of the housewife concerned are put in question. […]
Witchcraft characteristically produces an estranging and shaming effect or utter disorder, dirt and
pollution: milk behaves like white of egg, ale turns sour and smells vile, cows produce blood
instead of milk, and pease becomes stinking and uneatable.”51 Again, the witch is not only a
failure in controlling her gendered disposition but is further corruptive of the household and
Instead of milk for her child, a witch suckles imps with blood at her breast. Most cases in
this study contained evidentiary examinations revealing teats in the genital region, in addition to
the breasts. I suggest these connections align with the life-giving capacity of womanhood or
rather its anti-thesis, in addition to those sexualized associations qualifying satanic covenant.
Like Elizabeth Clarke and other examinants on whom marks were found, this intentional loss of
blood mimics the menstrual corruption of their sex. For a witch, bodily and moral failings work
in tandem to intentionally nuture evil in the world. Humoral theory understood milk as blood
adequately heated inside the body, referred to in De secretis as “better cooked and digested”.52
counterparts), it is the witch whose body fails to produce even the heat adequate for breast milk.
49
Lemay, Women’s Secrets, 60.
50
Bettina Bildhauer, Medieval Blood. (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2006), 91.
51
Purkiss, “Women’s Stories of Witchcraft in Early Modern England: The House, the Body,
the Child,” in Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe, 179.
52
Lemay, Women’s Secrets, 64.
Chisamore 15
This same humoral framework aligned evil with coldness, as the Devil appeared “in the shape if
a little blacke dog [which] leaped into her lap,& kissed her three times, but she felt them very
cold.”53 This was reported further as the Devil copulating with the witch to secure covenant, in
many cases marrying the Examinant in an inversion of the sacrament.54 Here we find an English
In many cases, older women were accused for attempting to subvert the role of a mother
herself. Witches would, as Purkiss again suggests, “they feed them, stroke them, take too much
interest in them, know too much about them.” Returning to the menstruating women tarnishing a
mirror, there is danger in the gaze. More importantly, it is their physical contact which is
essential. This might take the form of a touch or a piece of food. Margaret Moone, another 1645
Essex (Manningtree) resident offered a child an apple in exchange for labour; he quickly took
ill.55 Likewise Mary Johnson “took occasion of her own accord to commend the said Child,
saying it was a pretty child, and stroaked it upon the face, and gave it a peece of bread and
butter”.56 Here as in all cases, the child was said to have begun “shrieking and tearing itself” and
died shortly thereafter. Through touch the body of the witch becomes even further corruptive and
Concerning evidence, nearly all cases involved inspection of the body by older women
(perhaps in self-protection in light of this last example) designated as searchers. In line with the
increasing evidentiary requirements, a case from 1646 Huntington reads many cases “taken up
53
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of thirty witches at Chensford [sic] in
Essex, before Iudge Coniers, fourteene whereof were hanged on Friday last, Iuly 25. 1645
(London: Printed by I.H., 1645), Early English Books Online. Accessed 15 November 2019: 2.
54
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of thirty witches at Chensford [sic] in
Essex, 2.
55
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 22.
56
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 20.
Chisamore 16
by heresay and report, which frequently prove untrue.”57 This required more evidence. In
Suffolk the year prior, this was also the case. Searchers would strip and search the witch for teats
and, anticipating the eventual arrival of an imp needing suck, would make them stand on a stool
Many accusations emerged from local rivalry (revenge for reprimanding their child or
jealousy), or financial concern. Many victims were poor even by the standards of their
neighbourhood. In 1645, Elizabeth Clarke’s accuser, John Taylor, blamed his wife, Mary’s,
illness and its “unnatural” symptoms “because she said Mary refused to give the said Elizabeth
some Beergood.”59 Perhaps this emerges from intersections of impoverished and so jealous
individuals with broader social concerns of gendered behaviour. This corruption was regarded as
extending into community and beyond, whereby the body of the witch has the capacity to infect
family units, cattle, crops, and weather. Even reproduction was damaged on an environmental
level: cows suffering miscarriages and producing blood rather than milk. She does not feed
children but imps. She does not sustain livestock but infects it. Their very physical presence
Just as in the Great Chain of Being, the local community is a microcosm of the larger
natural order. The political turmoil ensuing in the context of the English Civil War only
increased anxieties through which all order seems to be made chaos. Through this gendered
examination, the body of the witch – medically, theologically, and ideologically – bears the
corruptive power to transmit and sustain evil in the world. The witch subverted natural gendered
57
Anonymous. The witches of Huntingdon, their examinations and confessions […] (London:
Printed by W. Wilson, for Richard Clutterbuck, 1646), Early English Books Online. Accessed
15 November 2019, i.
58
Anonymous, A true relation of the araignment of eighteene vvitches […] in Suffolk, 6.
59
Anonymous, A true and exact relation of the severall informations […] in the county of
Essex, 9.
Chisamore 17
order and was understood to transmit this dangerous subversion into the public sphere. A
menstruating woman might corrupt with a glance but it is the flesh of a witch whereby the body
Appendix 1
Chisamore 18
Figure 1. Emblem of the “Evill Tongue” from George Wither, Collection of Emblemes (London,
1634).
Image sourced: Mazzio, Carla. "Sins of the Tongue in Early Modern England." Modern
Language Studies 28, no. 3/4 (1998): 95.
Appendix 2
Chisamore 19
Figure 2. Didacus Valades, The Great Chain of Being from in Rhetorica Christiana, 1579.
Illustration.
Chisamore 20
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Figure 4. Hans Baldung Grien, Witch and Dragon, 1515. Pen on brown tinted paper. Staatliche
Kunsthalle, Karlsruhe.
Chisamore 22
Bibliography
http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-
2003&res_id=xri:eebo&rft_id=xri:eebo:citation:99851026
Barthes, Roland. “The World of Wrestling,” in Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.
Bejan, Teresa M., Mere Civility: disagreement and the limits of toleration. Cambridge; London:
Harvard University Press, 2017.
Harris, Jonathan Gil. Foreign bodies and the body politic: discourses of social pathology in
early modern England. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Hartnell, Jack. Medieval Bodies: life and death in the Middle Ages. New York: Versa, 2018.
Hutton, Ronald. The Witch: A History of Fear, from Ancient Times to the Present. London: Yale
University Press, 2017.
Mazzio, Carla. "Sins of the Tongue in Early Modern England." Modern Language Studies 28,
no. 3/4 (1998): 95-124.
Oldridge, Darren, ed. The Witchcraft Reader. London; New York: Routledge, 2008.
Oxford, E. Harley., Oldys, W. The Harleian miscellany, or, A collection of scarce, curious, and
entertaining pamphlets and tracts: as well in manuscript as in print, found in the late early of
Oxford’s library. Interspersed with historical, political, and critical notes; with a table of
contents, and an alphabetical index. London: Printed for T. Osborne, in Gray’s-Inn.
Stephens, Walter. Demon Lovers: Witchcraft, Sex, and the Crisis of Belief. Chicago; London:
The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Tamar, Herzig. “Flies, Heretics, and the Gendering of Witchcraft.” Magic, Ritual, and
Witchcraft 5, no. 1 (2010): 51-80.
Weisner, Merry E., ed. Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Boston; New York: Houghton
Mifflin Company, 2007.