Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEMINAR
ON
SUBMITTED BY
GAYATHRI .P
1ST YEAR MDS
1
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION
HAZARDS
AND CONTOURS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
2
INTRODUCTION:
The contacts and contours of each tooth will vary from one
individual to another and from one tooth to another.
3
A positive relationship should exist between the contacts to
resist food impaction and to protect the gingival tissue.
Height of Contour:
Gingival Embrasure:
1. Tapering teeth.
2. Square type.
3. Ovoid type.
4
Tapering (wide
Contact crowns and narrow Square (boxed) Ovoid (transitional)
cervices)
1. Between incisors Contact starts at Start at incisal ridge 1. Slightly lingual to
the incisal ridge incisally and in line with the incisal ridge,
incisally and a little it labio-lingually. labio-lingually.
towards the labial,
labio-lingually.
2. Mesial contacts
start at 1/4 of the
crown inciso-
gingivally.
3. Distal contacts
start 1/3 to 1/2 of
the crown inciso-
gingivally.
5
3. Large cusps.
5. Molar distal contact 1. Buccal periphery More lingually deviated Buccal periphery in
at the middle third. than the mesial but not to line with the central
the extent of the tapering groove in the
teeth. occlusal surface.
2. Occlusal
periphery at the
middle third.
3. Distal contact fo
first molar is
variable due to
position of distal
cusps.
6. Embrasures 1. Wide variations. 1. Incisal, lingual occlusal 1. Incisal, buccal,
and buccal embrasures labial and occlusal
are nil. embrasures are
wider and deeper
than the others.
6
II. Marginal Ridges:
A. Contact size:
9
A loose (open) contact creates continuity of the embrasures with
each other and with the interdental col.
B. Contact Configuration:
C. Contour:
D. Marginal Ridge:
12
2. Marginal ridge with an exaggerated occlusal embrasures.
13
The horizontal component, AH will drive the restored tooth away
from the contacting tooth and the vertical component will drive debris
inter-proximally. Even in the presence of force B, with its horizontal
component acting on the marginal ridge, there will be some separation
of teeth as the surface hold for force B is too small to counteract that
of force A. By constructing a restoration with a marginal ridge lower
than the adjacent over the same thing will occur, but the major
movement will be in the non-restored tooth.
In this case, the two adjacent marginal ridges will act like a pair
of tweezers grasping food substance passing over it. Although debris
may not be forced inter-proximally, it will be very difficult to remove
once it is trapped.
14
2. Increases the height of the marginal ridge in the center making it
amenable to the adverse effects of the horizontal components of
force.
15
g. A thin marginal ridge in its mesio-distal bulk will be susceptible to
fracture or deformation leading to the problems of the previously
mentioned faulty marginal ridge.
16
Tooth movement:
18
a. Elliot separator:
Is indicated for short duration separation that does not
necessitate stabilization.
It is useful in examining proximal surfaces or in final polishing
of restored contacts.
b. Wood or Plastic Wedges:
These are triangular shaped wedges usually made of medicated
wood or synthetic resin.
Wedges leading to separation include;
a. Wooden Wedges
b. Metal Wedges
c. Silver Wedges
d. Celluloid or plastic wedges
e. Medicated wood wedges
2. Traction Method:
This is always done with mechanical devices which engage the
proximal surfaces of the teeth to be separated by means of holding
arms.
Examples of the traction method include;
Non-interfering true separator developed by Dr.Harry.
This device is indicated when continuous stabilized separation is
required during the dental operation.
Its advantages are, the separation can be increased or decreased
after stabilization and the device is non-interfering.
Ferrier double-bow separator.
The separation is stabilized throughout the operation. Its
advantage is that the separation is shared by the contacting teeth and
not at the expense of one tooth.
19
Slow or delayed tooth movement.
When teeth have drifted and / or tilted considerably rapid
movement of teeth to the proper position will endanger the periodontal
ligaments. Therefore, slow tooth movement over a period of weeks will
allow the proper repositioning of teeth in a physiologic manner.
Methods:
1. Separating wires.
2. Oversized temporizes
3. Orthodontic appliances
4. Wood
5. Rubber
6. Base plate
7. Gutta-percha
8. Copper wire
After repositioning of teeth by any of the afore mentioned delayed
tooth movement techniques, it is necessary to use one or more of the
immediate tooth movement techniques just before or during the
restoration fabrication to create space and to compensate for the
thickness of the band materials, if a proximal matrix is involved.
Matrix:
The matrix is derived from the Latin work “Mater” which means
mother. It was introduced in the year 1871 by Dr.Louis Jack.
The matrix is a device used to contour a restoration to simulate
that of a tooth structure, which it is replacing.
Evolution of matrices:
Early matrices:
The early advocates of contoured fillings included W.H.Atkinson,
M.H.Webb and S.H.Guilford.
20
They recognized that to fill a prepared cavity and produce a
contoured filling the practitioner required assistance in containing the
filling material. The assistance came in the form of a matrix, which
provided for the missing walls of the prepared tooth.
The original matrix is the 1st matrix used. It was introduced by
Dwinello (1855). The matrix consisted of a band made from a broad,
thin piece of dense gold.
Improvements on the original matrix:
With the new concept of contoured fillings, the matrix took on
added significance.
Jack matrix introduced in 1871 was accepted as the 1 st matrix to
satisfy the concept of contoured fillings.
The others included the Huey, Perry and Brunton matrices. As a
group, these matrices used various materials of unspecified thickness
for the band.
The materials included steel, platinum plate or foil, brass,
copper, Phosphor bronze,german bronze,silver and tin. Few of these
were precontoured.
Classification:
They can be classified in two ways:
1. Based on mode of retention
a. Mechanically retained matrices.
b. Self retained.
2. Based on transparency
a. Non-transparent
b. Transparent
Matricing:
Matricing is the procedure whereby a temporary wall is created
opposite to the axial walls, surrounding areas of tooth structure that
were lost during preparation.
21
It is used with restorative materials that were introduced in the
plastic state.
The matrix should have the following qualities.
1. The matrix should be easy to apply and remove without altering
the tooth or the restoration.
The matrix wall should possess the exact 3-dimensional contour of
the future restoration.
2. The proximal contour should be reproduced with minimal carving.
3. The strip should be fine enough to allow firmness and contour in
the contact area.
4. The matrix should control the gingival extrusion of the alloy and
accept the wedge for rigidity and control.
5. The material should not be costly and should be reusable.
6. It should be immobile during the setting of the restorative material
and also it should not react with or adhere to the restorative
material.
The matrix is always formed of 2 parts.
The band which is a piece of metal or polymeric material used to
support and give form to the restorative material during its
introduction and hardening and the retainer, which is a device by
which the band can be retained in its designated position and shape.
The retainer could be a mechanical device, a wire, dental floors and /
or compound.
Matrices are commonly supplied as strips of different
dimensions.
They may be 0.001 (0.25 mm) or 0.002 (0.05 mm) thick. The
width of the matrix band may be 1/4, 3/8, 5/16 or 1/8. They are also
supplied as crown forms, split crown forms, hollow cylinders, and
curved bands with one or more cervical extension.
22
Objectives of Matrix:
The objective should:
1. Displace the gingival and rubber dam away from the cavity
margins during introduction of the restorative material. This will
assure maximum wetting and adaptation of the restorative
material to the preparation details.
2. Assure dryness and non-contamination of the details and the
space to be covered with and occupied by the setting restorative
material.
3. Provide shape for the restoration during setting of the restorative
material i.e. the hand materials should be unyielding to the
energies of insertion.
4. Maintain its shape during hardening of the material.
5. Confine the restorative material within the cavity preparation and
pre-determined surface configuration. Therefore, the matrix
should provide a temporary wall of resistance during introduction
of the restorative material. It should also resist and compensate
for the dimensional change in the material during its setting by
applying a positive pressure against it at this stage.
Types of matrix:
Matrices for class-II cavity preparation universal matrix.
The universal matrix system designed by B.M.Tofflemire is
ideally indicated when three surfaces of a posterior tooth have been
prepared (mesial, occlusal, distal) of a posterior tooth have been
prepared. It is commonly used for the two surface class-II
restorations. A definite advantage of the tofflemire matrix retainer is
that it may be positioned on the facial and / or lingual aspect of the
tooth. Lingual positioning however requires the contra-angled design
of the retainer even though the universal retainer is a versatile
instrument it does not meet all the requirements of the ideal retainer
and band. Proximal surfaces restored using the tofflemire band may
require more carving than those restored with the compound
supported matrix.
23
Pre-contoured bands for universal retainer are available
commercially and need little or no adjustment before placing in the
retainer. Although they are more expensive the difference in cost
seems justified because they require less chair side time.
The non-contoured bands are available in two thickness 0.002
(0.05 mm) and 0.0015 (0.38 mm). Burnishing the thinner band to
contour is more difficult.
The junction of the retainer and the hand should be located next
to unprepared intact tooth surface to insure its stability and prevent
unnecessary accumulation of excessive restoration material.
Ivory matrix No.1:
The hand encircles a posterior proximal surface so it is indicated
in unilateral class-II cavities. The hand is attached to the retainer via
a wedge-shaped projection, which engages with the tooth embrasures
of the unprepared surface.
Ivory Matrix No.8:
The band encircles the entire crown of the tooth, so it is
indicated for bilateral class-II cavities.
Soldered band or seamless copper band matrix indicated for
badly broken down teeth, especially those receiving pin retained
amalgam restoration with large buccal and lingual ext.
Auto-matrix (L.D.Chauk Company)
The automation is a retainer less matrix system with four types
of bands designed to fit all teeth regardless of circumference. The
hands vary in height from 3/16 to 5/66 inch and are supplied in two
thicknesses, 0.015 inch and 0.02 inch. The indicated use of this
matrix is for extensive class-II preparation, especially those replacing
two or more cusps.
Advantage: The auto lock loop can be positioned either on the facial
or lingual surface with equal ease.
Dis-advantage: The bands and not pre-contoured and dev. of
physiological proximal contour is difficult.
24
S-shaped matrix band.
T-shaped matrix band.
Matrices for a cavity preparation for amalgam restoration on the
distal of the cuspid.
S-shaped matrix band.
T-shaped matrix band.
Matrices for class-II direct tooth coloured restoration.
These are usually transparent plastic matrix strips. For silicate
cement they are usually celluloid strips and for resins they are
cellophane strips. Mylar material may be used for both.
Matrices for class-II preparation for direct tooth coloured
material.
Plastic strip for incise proximal cavities.
Aluminium foil.
Transparent crown forms matrices.
Anatomic matrix.
Modified S-shaped band.
Matrices for class-II amalgam restoration.
They are usually not indicated except for very wide cavities
occluso gingivally or / and mesiodistally.
Window matrix:
This matrix is formed using either a tofflemire matrix or a copper
band matrix.
S-shaped matrix:
Matrices for class-V preparation for direct tooth coloured
restorations.
a. Anatomic matrix for non-light cured direct tooth coloured material.
b. Aluminium or copper collars.
c. Anatomic matrix for light cured direct tooth coloured material.
25
Anatomic matrix for non-light cured direct tooth coloured
matrix.
Procedure:
The class-V cavity may be filled with inlay wax or gutta percha
and trimmed to the proper contour. The wax and the tooth are then
coated with cocoa butter on Mylar strip and compound expression is
taken of the tooth surface to the restored. Adjacent surfaces are to be
included in the impression. After the compound has cooled it is
removed and the wax is removed from the cavity.
A mix of the restoration material is made and placed into the
cavity and the compound matrix is placed into position and held
securely in place until the material sets.
Matrix retainers:
Matrix retainers are gadgets used to retain the matrix bands in
position. Some matrices do not need any special mechanical devices to
hold them in position. Some matrices could be simple retainers like
wires, silk thread, dental flors and impression compound. Some
matrices need special mechanical retainers.
Mechanical retainers: Various types of mechanical retainers used are
as follows:
a. Nystrom’s retainer.
b. Ivory matrix I & 8.
c. Steele’s siqveland self-adjusting matrix clamp.
d. The Tofflemire Universal Dental matrix band retainer.
Wedges:
Wedges are the 3rd component of the matrix system.
Wedges serve the following purposes:
Prevents surplus amalgam being forced into the gingival crevice.
Assists in contouring the cervical part of the proximal surface.
26
Separates the teeth to compensate for the thickness of the matrix
band such that a proximal contact is reestablished when the band
is removed.
Produce temporary homeostasis and minimizes moisture
contamination in the area of restoration.
Stabilize the matrix.
Protect the inter-proximal gingival from unexpected trauma.
Wedges are made of wood or plastic. Wooden wedges are
preferred because;
They are easy to trim with a scalpel and they adapt well to the tooth
surface.
Classification of Wedges:
27
Occlusally however the wedges must not be too thick as this may
influence to proximal contour.
If the wedge is not high enough only point contact between the
wedge and the band is achieve. This may lead to poor contour or
displacement of the wedge during condensation. This may had to poor
contour or displacement of the wedge during condensation.
Loss of contact point may occur if the cross-sectional height of
the wedge is too large. A uniform tapering of the wedge is needed in
order to render sufficient and even contact throughout the proximal
embrasure.
They should be approximately 9 mm in length for anterior teeth
and 1.2 cm for posterior teeth. The wedging action between the teeth
should provide enough separation to compensate for the thickness of
the matrix band. This will ensure a positive contact relationship after
the matrix is removed following the condensation and initial carving of
the amalgam.
Wedge placement:
Insert the pointed tip from the facial, lingual embrasure,
whichever is larger slightly gingival to the gingival margin.
If the wedge is significantly apical to the gingival margin, a
second usually smaller wedge may be “piggy-backed” on the 1 st to
wedge adequately the matrix against the margin. “Piggy-back” wedging
is particularly useful in patients with recession of inter-proximal tissue
level.
Occasionally ‘double-wedging’ is permitted if access allows
securing the matrix when the proximal box is wide facio-lingually.
Double wedging refers to inserting two wedges one from the lingual
and a second from the facial embrasure.
28
Occasionally a concavity may be present on the proximal surface
gingivally of the contact and extending as fluting on the root. To wedge
a matrix band tight against such a margin, a second pointed wedge
can be inserted between the 1st wedge and the band by ‘wedge
wedging.’
Evaluation of different matrix techniques:
It is clear that no matrix technique is capable of the exact
replication of normal anatomic contour of restored teeth overall, the
anatomic matrix procedure most closely reproduces normal tooth
contours. Wedging is universally imperative in order to eliminate
cervical flash of restorative material.
Although matrix contouring in the absence of wedging produces
a more rounded contour especially on square type teeth it does not
reduce cervical overhangs with tapering type teeth an accurate
reproduction of the proximal surface can be achieved without
contouring (i.e. using wedging alone). Ovoid teeth are the most
difficult to reproduce.
Too many human variables come into play in trying to trim
overhangs and to change proximal contours after removal of a matrix.
Of clinical significance is the fact that circumferential matrix
bands retained by tightening devices (e.g. tofflemire) have been shown
to elastically deform tooth structures. Immediately after removal of the
matrix band, tooth structures then regain their original dimension
resulting gaps between the tooth and the hardened restorative
material. These gaps may range from 11.4 to 25 microns. The width
of this gap is directly proportional to the width of the preparation, the
pressure applied with the matrix and postoperative contraction of the
particular restorative material used.
Passively inserted matrix bands, like anatomic matrix and T-
shaped bands etc. have no deformative effect on the remaining tooth
structure.
29
II. Extra Oral Procedures:
1. Wax Patterns:
especially at the contact area to allow for the finishing and polishing
surface losses.
of facal and lingual bulge of an artificial crown the more the plaque
and lingual crown contours should be flat and not fat usually <0.5mm
access for interproximal plaque control as well as ample space for the
interdental papilla.
narrows and the intracrevicular contours of the tooth become the flat
contours of the root rather than the convex surface of the anatomic
crown do not mimic the root but depend on the adjacent gingival
morphology.
esthetics, but this flare of the crown is far away from the gingival
The gingiva adjacent to the flat root surface develops thick free
gingival margin when the underlying bone is thick and often presents
31
with a slight, chronic marginal gingivitis despite of minimal plaque
to clean.
2. Cast adjustments:
CONCLUSION:
32
and the restoration of proximal surface. The health of the periodontal
33
REFERENCES:
1st edition.
34
35