Case Study Presentation:

1. Please review the lab text on page xvii “Introducing Case Studies, Or Finding Your Way
Through a Case Study”.

2. For your assigned case study, prepare to lead the discussion in class. Divide the workload
among your teammates. This may include a power point presentation, but not required!
Answer these key questions:
a. What is the key MNT take home message?
b. What lessons did you learn?
c. What are gaps in the current literature for practice in the area?
d. Include the demographics, economic status, and access to healthcare /RD.

3. Suggest 10 questions from the lab text for your classmates to complete. Review those with me
and we will finalize 1 week prior to the class. These will be posted on Blackboard before class.
You will also turn in your answers to the questions for full credit (10 points).

4. If there are materials you would like the class to review other than the assigned text, let me
know. Please provide those citations for the class, either ahead of time or during the class
period.

5. During your assigned case study class session, you will guide the discussion of the case.

6. Prepare an ADIME note and turn in under CASE STUDY on Blackboard (50 points).

I am available as a resource, so please do not hesitate to ask!

2019
 Outstanding
45-50 points
 QUANTITY AND QUALITY: All questions are present
 Group has included appropriate number of questions (10) and include info
 Incorporation of topics related in required text for the course presented in lab AND
 Equal participation of all team members textbook.
 PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND SYMPTOMS Clear explanation of
 Pathophysiology and/or procedures are clearly explained pathophysiology,
 Appropriate explanation of patient symptoms procedures, symptoms,
 Clear description of medical terminology and/or medical
terminology.
 Pertinent history described.
 ASSESSMENT Assessment of nutrition
 SGA and or nutrition assessment with supporting criteria. status with 2 criteria. All
Identification of significant lab values and interpretation. pertinent lab values are
 Accurate estimation of protein, EER and fluid needs. included with clear
 BMI, UBW , IBW, %UBW interpretation. Accurate
estimation of protein,
EER, and fluid needs.
 ADIME PES statements clearly
 Accurate PES statements using standardized language written in correct format
and codes provided.
for the NCP (At least 2)
Excellent description of
 Evidenced Based Intervention(s) Provided? intervention, monitoring
 Appropriate plan for monitoring and evaluation and evaluation that
 Tracks patient outcome relevant to nutrition dx relate to diagnosis.
2019
Meets Expectations Below Expectations
40-45 points <40 points Score
Incomplete or unclear Missing questions and
discussion of questions/ missing expansion
minimal expansion beyond textbook material.
beyond textbook
material.
Explanation of Missing explanation or
procedures, unclear explanation of
pathophysiology, pathophysiology,
symptoms, and/or procedures, symptoms,
medical terminology and/or medical
terminology.
Assessment present. Assessment missing or
Includes most of the lab lacking criteria. Missing
values and lab values and
interpretation. interpretation. Missing or
Estimates for protein, inaccurate estimations of
EER, and fluid present. protein, EER, and fluid.
PES statements Missing PES statements.
provided. Appropriate No plan for
description of monitoring monitoring/evaluation.
and evaluation. Nutr care outcome not
relevant to nutr dx,
intervention, &/or
plans/goals.