Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Sep 2018. | This topic last updated: Jun 15, 2018.
INTRODUCTION — The development of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has greatly expanded the diagnostic
and therapeutic capabilities of gastroenterologists. Adequate patient tolerance is essential for successful
completion of a safe examination and compliance with subsequent follow-up. As a result, endoscopists have
developed skills in administering a variety of sedative and analgesic agents to facilitate procedures and
enhance patient comfort. However, a number of adverse events related to procedural sedation have been
described.
This topic review will focus on the adverse events related to procedural sedation for GI endoscopy. An
overview of procedural sedation for endoscopic procedures, issues related to endoscopic procedures without
sedation, and the management of patients who are difficult to sedate are discussed elsewhere. (See
"Overview of procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy" and "Sedation-free gastrointestinal
endoscopy" and "Alternatives and adjuncts to moderate procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy".)
Aspiration — The main concern related to topical pharyngeal anesthesia is inhibition of the gag reflex and
the risk of aspiration. Oversedation may exacerbate this risk. This is particularly important in the management
of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Endotracheal intubation for airway protection
should be considered to prevent life-threatening aspiration in patients with active hematemesis. It may also be
advisable to avoid topical inhibition of the gag reflex in such patients and in other individuals at high risk for
aspiration (table 1). (See "Aspiration pneumonia in adults", section on 'Predisposing conditions'.)
Local anesthetic toxicity — Systemic effects such as arrhythmias and seizures due to absorption of the
topical local anesthetic have been observed, although they are uncommon [1]. These drugs have also rarely
been associated with the development of methemoglobinemia (benzocaine more than lidocaine) [1-3]. (See
"Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of methemoglobinemia".)
1 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Pulmonary and cardiovascular adverse events — The most frequent and serious adverse events of
procedural sedation are cardiopulmonary. Risk factors for the development of cardiopulmonary adverse
events include advanced age, underlying comorbid illness (especially pulmonary disease), dementia, anemia,
obesity, significant cardiovascular disease (eg, heart failure or severe valvular disease), and endoscopy
performed for emergent indications [4]. Adverse events resulting from oversedation include hypoventilation,
airway obstruction, hypoxemia, hypercarbia, hypotension, vasovagal episodes, arrhythmias, and aspiration.
The frequency of such unplanned cardiopulmonary events has been shown to be associated with increasing
American Society of Anesthesiologists scores [4].
The overall incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events is low, but important. In a prospective survey of
14,149 upper endoscopies and a retrospective study of 21,011 procedures, the rate of early cardiopulmonary
events was 2 to 5.4 per 1000 cases, and the mortality rate, which included cases of aspiration pneumonia,
pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction, was 0.3 to 0.5 per 1000 cases [5,6].
Hypoxemia — One of the potential causes of cardiopulmonary adverse events is arterial oxygen
desaturation, which can result from oversedation. (See 'Use of reversal agents' below.)
Hypoxemia is common during endoscopic procedures. As patients reach deeper levels of sedation,
hypoxemia may result from either decreased respiratory drive or from loss of protective airway reflexes. This
was illustrated in a study in which arterial oxygen saturation was measured in 236 consecutive patients
undergoing elective endoscopy [7]. A drop in the oxygen saturation to below 90 percent was observed in 40
percent of individuals having an upper endoscopy and 54 percent of those having a colonoscopy. A similar
incidence of oxygen desaturation (41 percent) was observed in another report of 103 consecutive
colonoscopies [8]. In the case of upper endoscopy, oxygen desaturation is largely related to the use of
sedation rather than the passage of an endoscope along the airway [9]. (See "Procedural sedation in adults
outside the operating room", section on 'Complications' and "Anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy in
adults", section on 'Propofol'.)
Some degree of hypoxemia can be noted during endoscopy, even in patients who do not receive procedural
sedation [10-12]. In one study, for example, 9 percent of individuals undergoing unsedated flexible
sigmoidoscopy had an episode of hypoxemia [12]. Causes of hypoxemia in this setting may include
breathholding or comorbid illnesses.
● The combination of a benzodiazepine and opioid, which significantly increases the risk of hypoxemia
compared with midazolam alone [13].
● A high frequency of oxygen desaturation (up to 50 percent) is seen with procedures of longer duration,
such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, providing a rationale for the routine use of
supplemental oxygen [12,14,15].
Other patient characteristics that may increase the risk of sedation-induced hypoxemia during endoscopy
include baseline oxygen saturation less than 95 percent, emergent indication for endoscopic procedure, long
duration of procedure, and comorbid illness [16]. In contrast, patients with cirrhosis do not appear to be at
increased risk [17]. In addition, most studies suggest patients with obstructive sleep apnea are not at
increased risk [18-22].
2 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Routine pulse oximetry is suggested in all patients undergoing endoscopy since the variables discussed
above are not sufficiently precise to predict which patients are at risk for becoming hypoxic [7-9,12,23]. (See
"Overview of procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy", section on 'Monitoring'.)
A potentially important limitation of pulse oximetry is that it is a delayed indicator of airway obstruction and
hypoventilation due to respiratory depression, particularly in patients receiving supplemental oxygen. Thus,
hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis resulting from airway obstruction and respiratory depression occur prior
to desaturation. (See "Overview of procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy", section on
'Monitoring' and "The evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of the adult patient with acute hypercapnic
respiratory failure".)
The risk of hypoventilation is increased with obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and the use of high
doses of opioids or benzodiazepines [14]. In addition to their sedative effects, opioids and benzodiazepines
inhibit the central responsiveness to carbon dioxide, leading to decreased respiratory drive.
The degree to which different benzodiazepines inhibit the respiratory drive is variable. In a comparison of
midazolam and diazepam for procedural sedation, the rate of respiratory depression, as indicated by elevated
end-tidal CO2 pressure, was slightly higher with midazolam during the first 45 minutes after drug
administration, but higher with diazepam during the recovery period [24].
Cardiac arrhythmias — The risk of cardiac arrhythmias during endoscopy depends upon the patient's
age, underlying medical conditions, the incidence of significant arterial oxygen desaturation (see 'Hypoxemia'
above), and the type of procedure. Some of these issues were illustrated in a study in which Holter monitoring
was used to detect cardiac arrhythmias in 164 patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy who were
randomly assigned to one of three groups that differed in either endoscope diameter or use of sedation [9].
The overall incidence of arrhythmias was higher among individuals with prior cardiovascular disease
compared with those without cardiovascular disease (30 versus 6 percent). The most common arrhythmia
was sinus tachycardia, which correlated with patient tolerance of the procedure. Among patients receiving
sedation, arrhythmias were more common in patients who experienced oxygen desaturations compared with
patients who did not experience oxygen desaturations (75 versus 46 percent). There were also more
electrocardiographic abnormalities during examinations with larger endoscopes. Vasovagal reactions are
another frequent adverse event, occurring in up to 16 percent of colonoscopies [25].
Hypotension — Hypotension is a potential complication of procedural sedation. In one study of the effects
of midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy, hypotension developed in 19 percent (compared with 3 to
7 percent of patients in the control groups) [26]. Consequences of hypotension can include ischemia and
infarction in susceptible organs (eg, the brain and heart in patients with vascular disease).
The risk of developing hypotension varies depending on the patient’s underlying risk factors for hypotension
(eg, use of antihypertensive medications) and on the medication given for sedation. These issues are
discussed in greater detail separately. (See "Procedural sedation in adults outside the operating room" and
"Anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults", section on 'Choice of drugs for sedation/analgesia'.)
Other events — Aspiration pneumonia is a rare complication of upper endoscopy, and the preprocedure
assessment includes identifying risk factors for aspiration (table 2). Conditions that increase the risk of
aspiration and management of patients at risk are discussed separately. (See "Anesthesia for gastrointestinal
endoscopy in adults", section on 'Airway management' and "Overview of procedural sedation for
gastrointestinal endoscopy", section on 'Pre-procedure preparation and assessment'.)
3 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Phlebitis — Intravenous administration of sedatives and analgesics is associated with a small risk of
phlebitis. The risk appears to be higher with diazepam compared with midazolam [27]. The risk of phlebitis
from diazepam is increased with injection into a small caliber vein and increasing duration of infusion [28].
Administration of medications through a running intravenous line may reduce pain at the infusion site.
Propofol, which is used for deeper sedation, can cause pain on injection, particularly when administered
through a small vein, but does not cause phlebitis. This may be averted by the pre-administration of a small
amount of lidocaine (10 to 20 mg).
USE OF REVERSAL AGENTS — Agents to treat oversedation may be needed if patients exhibit signs of
respiratory depression, such as hypoxemia or decreased ventilation, despite supplemental oxygen or gentle
stimulation. Naloxone is given to reverse the effects of opioids, and flumazenil is given to reverse the effects
of benzodiazepines. These agents have also been looked at to reduce recovery times [29,30]. However, it is
not our practice to use them to speed recovery due to, at best, marginal benefits, added cost, and risk of
resedation when the reversal agents wear off.
There is no reversal agent for oversedation due to propofol, an agent used to achieve deeper levels of
sedation. Oversedation due to propofol must be managed by supportive measures, including proper airway
management, until the drug rapidly wears off. (See "Alternatives and adjuncts to moderate procedural
sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy", section on 'Propofol'.)
With both naloxone and flumazenil, patients are at risk of resedation since the half-lives of these medications
can be shorter than the medications that they antagonize (table 3). This requires postprocedure monitoring if
one of these agents is used. We recommend that patients be monitored for a prolonged observation period
(at least 90 minutes) after receiving one of these medications for the treatment of oversedation.
Naloxone — Naloxone is an opioid antagonist that is used to reverse the respiratory depression and sedation
caused by opioid agents (usually fentanyl or meperidine). Appropriate additional supportive measures such
as fluid resuscitation and even vasopressor agents may be required to manage cardiovascular compromise
resulting from opioid overdose. (See "Acute opioid intoxication in adults", section on 'Basic measures and
antidotal therapy'.)
Administration of naloxone causes the release of catecholamines and thus should be used with caution in
older adults and those with cardiac disease to avoid cardiovascular adverse events. In addition,
administration to patients who regularly take opioid agents, prescribed or otherwise, may result in
considerable pain and precipitate an acute withdrawal syndrome.
The usual dose of naloxone given to reverse an oversedated patient with respiratory depression is 0.2 to 0.4
mg given intravenously (table 3). Smaller doses may be used for older adults. (See "Acute opioid intoxication
in adults", section on 'Basic measures and antidotal therapy'.)
Because naloxone may be cleared faster than fentanyl and meperidine, individuals who require naloxone
reversal must be observed carefully for a prolonged observation period (at least one hour) to detect the
development of resedation. Recovery room personnel should be alerted when naloxone has been given so
that resedation will be detected quickly.
4 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
be used cautiously in patients who chronically use benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, carbamazepine, or high-
dose tricyclic antidepressants, because it may induce seizures or withdrawal.
An initial dose of 0.1 to 0.3 mg is given as an intravenous bolus (table 3). This can be followed with additional
boluses or an infusion (0.3 to 0.5 mg per hour) to prevent resedation. (See "Benzodiazepine poisoning and
withdrawal", section on 'Antidote (flumazenil)'.)
The average duration of antagonism is one hour. However, the effects of midazolam may persist for 80
minutes or longer, so, as is the case with naloxone, patients receiving flumazenil must be observed carefully
for signs of resedation.
● Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy include hypoxia,
hypotension, and cardiac arrhythmias. (See 'Adverse events related to medications used for sedation'
above.)
● Naloxone is an opioid antagonist that can be used for opioid-induced respiratory depression. (See
'Naloxone' above.)
● We suggest that patients who have received reversal agents be observed for a minimum of 90 minutes to
monitor for signs of resedation (Grade 2B). (See 'Use of reversal agents' above.)
REFERENCES
1. Patel D, Chopra S, Berman MD. Serious systemic toxicity resulting from use of tetracaine for pharyngeal
anesthesia in upper endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34:882.
2. Khan NA, Kruse JA. Methemoglobinemia induced by topical anesthesia: a case report and review. Am J
Med Sci 1999; 318:415.
3. Collins JF. Methemoglobinemia as a complication of 20% benzocaine spray for endoscopy.
Gastroenterology 1990; 98:211.
4. Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, et al. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after
GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66:27.
5. Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, et al. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two
regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods. Gut 1995; 36:462.
6. Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE, Benjamin SB. Results from the American Society for
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication
rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:421.
7. O'Connor KW, Jones S. Oxygen desaturation is common and clinically underappreciated during elective
endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36:S2.
8. Bilotta JJ, Floyd JL, Waye JD. Arterial oxygen desaturation during ambulatory colonoscopy:
5 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
6 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
intravenous diazepam utilizing a standardized conscious sedation technique. Part II: Effects of injection
site. J Periodontol 1983; 54:680.
29. Bartelsman JF, Sars PR, Tytgat GN. Flumazenil used for reversal of midazolam-induced sedation in
endoscopy outpatients. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36:S9.
30. Wille RT, Chaffee BW, Ryan ML, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of flumazenil for routine outpatient
EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51:282.
7 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
GRAPHICS
Altered consciousness
Alcoholism, seizures, head trauma, general anesthesia, drug overdose
Dysphagia
Esophageal disorders including stricture, neoplasm, diverticula, tracheoesophageal fistula, incompetent cardiac
sphincter, achalasia, oropharyngeal obstruc on, xerostomia
Neurologic disorder
Cerebrovascular accident, mul ple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, myasthenia gravis, pseudobulbar palsy,
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Mechanical disruption of the usual defense barriers
Nasogastric tube, endotracheal intubation, tracheostomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, bronchoscopy
Other
Protracted vomiting, gastric outlet obstruction, large-volume nasogastric tube feedings, pharyngeal anesthesia,
general debility, recumbent position, ascites, gastroparesis, ileus, glo c insufficiency (eg, vocal cord paralysis)
8 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Hiatal hernia
Esophageal pathology
Bowel obstruction
9 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Initial Repeat
Onset Duration
Agent dose dose ¶ Effects
(minutes) (minutes)
(adult)* (minutes)
Benzodiazepines
Opiate analgesics
Sedative-hypnotic anesthetic
10 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Data from:
1. Cohen LB, DeLegge MH, Aisenberg J, et al. AGA institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology 2007;
133:675.
2. Gahart BL, Nazareno AR. Intravenous medications 27th ed, Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, MO 2011.
11 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.
Adverse events related to procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endosc... https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.unbosque.edu.co/contents/adverse-ev...
Contributor Disclosures
Jonathan Cohen, MD Speaker's Bureau: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals [Helicobacter pylori breath testing];
Ferring Pharmaceuticals [Gastrointestinal endoscopy (bowel preparation)]. Consultant/Advisory Boards:
Boston Scientific [ERCP]; Olympus [Gastrointestinal endoscopy (narrow band imaging)]. Equity
Ownership/Stock Options: GI Windows [magnetic anastomosis (stock)]; Virtual Health Partners
[obesity]. John R Saltzman, MD, FACP, FACG, FASGE, AGAF Consultant/Advisory Boards: Iterative scopes
[Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to polyp detection during colonoscopy]. Girish P Joshi, MB, BS, MD,
FFARCSI Speaker's Bureau: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals [pain management (intravenous acetaminophen)];
Baxter [anesthesia (desflurane)]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Pacira Pharmaceuticals [pain management
(bupivacaine); Merck [anesthesia (sugammadex)]. Kristen M Robson, MD, MBA, FACG Nothing to disclose
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are
addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be
provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform
to UpToDate standards of evidence.
12 de 12 31/10/2018, 1:20 p. m.