Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LABOUR DIVISION
AT ARUSHA.
ARUSHA ART:…………………………………………………………..APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
VICENT LUCAS:………………………………………………………RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT.
2. THAT, the Respondent herein was the Applicant in the Mediation Case
styled CMA/MED/44/2009 which was decided exparte on the Applicant
failure to avail himself to the Tribunal.
3. THAT, the Applicant had a good cause for non attendance to the
mediation for reason that his failure was engineered by the circumstance
beyond his control (force majure) i.e. the fire incident that broke unto the
applicant’s offices, for which even the Respondent herein conceded to had
known.
6. Basing on this cooked story he has won the sympathy of this honourable
Court which have granted the warrant of attachment while the real fact is
that the Decree Debtor is not to be blamed in any manner whatsoever for
the delay of proceedings at CMA.
8. THAT, the Applicant has a solid and sufficient defense in support of the
termination which and ever since, he has not been afforded the chance to
avail it to the commission due to Respondents defaults and refusal to avail
himself to the commission.
9. THAT, unless this Honourable Court intervene and stay the execution the
Applicant herein stand to suffer irreparably he shall be condemned
without being heard, the act which is against the spirit of justice.
………………………………………
GUNVANTRAI SHANTILAL SACHDEV
BEFORE ME;
……………………………………
COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS.
…………………………………
REGISTRY OFFICER
VICENT LUCAS,
P.O.BOX 1330,
ARUSHA.