You are on page 1of 1

CDB4313/CDB4313Z GROUP PROJECT SCORE SHEET

GROUP NO.

Criteria for
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Marks
Judging Quality
Description of Poor understanding of the process and Sufficient understanding of the process Substantial understanding of the Clear and complete understanding of
process heating incorrect data extraction for heat and major deficiencies in data process and minor deficiencies in data the process and correct data extraction
and cooling and integration analysis extraction for heat integration analysis extraction for heat integration analysis for heat integration analysis
data extraction
(10) (< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Energy targeting No application of Pinch Analysis Erroneous application of Pinch Substantial application of Pinch Comprehensive application of Pinch
(10) method(s) for minimum energy Analysis method(s) for minimum Analysis method(s) for minimum Analysis method(s) for minimum
targeting and no improvement in the energy targeting and little improvement
energy targeting and significant energy targeting and maximum
energy performance in the energy performance improvement in the energy improvement in the energy
performance performance
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Utilities placement Poor placement of utilities yielding Acceptable placement of utilities Good placement of utilities yielding Excellent placement of utilities yielding
(10) unreasonable utility cost yielding acceptable utility cost economical utility cost minimum utility cost
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
HEN design for No application of Pinch rules for MER Erroneous application of Pinch rules Comprehensive application of Pinch Comprehensive application of Pinch
MER (using design, ∆Tmin violation in HEN for MER design, ∆Tmin violation in rules for MER design, minor ∆Tmin rules for MER design, no ∆Tmin
HINT) (10) design violation in design violation
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
HEN optimisation Incorrect loop and path analysis for Major mistakes in loop and path Minor mistakes in loop and path Correct loop and path analysis for HEN
(10) HEN optimisation with many ∆Tmin analysis for HEN optimisation with analysis for HEN optimisation with optimisation with no ∆Tmin violation
violation some ∆Tmin violation little ∆Tmin violation
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Economic analysis No economic analysis for the proposed Major mistakes in the economic Minor mistakes in the economic Comprehensive economic analysis for
(10) HEN design and utilities analysis for the proposed HEN design analysis for the proposed HEN design the proposed HEN design and utilities
and utilities and utilities
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Placement of Incorrect placement of column yielding Incorrect placement of column yielding Incorrect placement of column yielding Correct placement of column yielding
distillation column poor energy performance little improvement in energy significant improvement in energy maximum improvement in energy
(10) performance performance performance
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Placement of heat Incorrect placement of heat engine Incorrect placement of heat engine Incorrect placement of heat engine Correct placement of heat engine
engine (10) yielding poor energy performance yielding little improvement in energy yielding significant improvement in yielding maximum improvement in
performance energy performance energy performance
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Placement of heat Incorrect placement of heat pump Incorrect placement of heat pump Incorrect placement of heat pump Correct placement of heat pump
pump (10) yielding poor energy performance yielding little improvement in energy yielding significant improvement in yielding maximum improvement in
performance energy performance energy performance
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
Process Incorrect process modifications Incorrect process modifications Incorrect process modifications Correct process modifications yielding
modifications (10) yielding poor energy performance yielding little improvement in energy yielding significant improvement in maximum improvement in energy
performance energy performance performance
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10 )
TOTAL SCORE 0
/100

You might also like