Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chelsea Mason
Executive Summary
On February 17th at 3:00pm Chelsea Mason met with Justin Hua, the Assistant Director
for Residential Student Success and Retention, at Georgia State University. In additional Hua
serves as the co-chair for the assessment and evaluation committee within the University
Housing department. Below is an executive summary highlighting the topics and notable
Questions
Educational Background
Justin Hua started his career at Davidson College (Davidson, North Carolina). He
pursuing his Ph.D. in Counselor Education and Supervision at the University of Georgia
Career Information
Admission Counselor, Davidson College (2011-2013)
Assistant Dean of Admission, Davidson College (2013-2014)
Graduate Assistant, Office of Inclusion Initiatives and Cultural Competence, Vanderbilt
University (2014-2016)
o Graduate Coordinator, Office of Housing and Residential Education (2015-2016)
Conference Coordinator, Conference Services, Emory University (Summer 2015)
Residence Hall Director, Georgia State University (July 2016-December 2019)
Assistant Director, Residential Student Success and Retention, Georgia State University
(January 2020-present)
Justin Hua highlighted some of the following points during the interview. These points
led a meaningful interview and presented many opportunities to critically think about the
purpose of assessment and evaluation specifically within Georgia State University Housing and
beyond.
Critical Reaction
Justin Hua currently serves within the University Housing Department at Georgia State
University as the Assistant Director for Student Success and Retention. He also serves as the
coordinator for the assessment and evaluation committee within the department. Justin is
primarily responsible for the responsible for creating, implementing and assessing the student
success initiatives and programs within our residence halls. For this reason, I was interested to
hear about Justins unique perspective on assessment, evaluation and specifically how this
impacts his role within the system of higher education. My key take aways from this interview
revolved around how we can utilize assessment in the housing department, what challenges exist,
Considering that we are colleagues in the same department, it was refreshing to hear a
impressed by Justin Hua’s ability to connect assessment and evaluation within his role to a larger
context of higher education as a whole. Hua states, “Measurement and assessment initiatives
opinion is an inclusive purpose statement. In a time framed by budget cuts and the increasing
need to validate budget lines and a even broader campaign to understand what is valuable, what
is equitable, and what is essential, while also measuring impact, satisfaction, and learning
In the context of his role, Justin has a great understand of how assessment and evaluation
is useful. Specifically, utilizing analyzing data presented from verbal feedback, formal
evaluations such as the SkyFactor Benchworks Resident Satisfaction Survey, retention statistics
for both student and staff, etc. Highlighting the SkyFactor Benchworks Resident Satisfaction
Survey, which is used to collect and analyze data within our residential community, we use this
INTERVIEW REPORT 5
inform what physical spaces or resources need immediate, interim replacement or need to be
queued up to replace. Justin was able to outline some other uses of this data within our
department. This included using the Skyfactor data to inform “student staff training, inform some
policy recommendations impacting residents, student staff, and/or professional staff, and lastly,
to inform timelines for when critical departmental functions must/ought to occur.” This brought
progress, and growth. Georgia State University has been using SkyFactor for approximately
eight years, and it has proven extremely useful as it allows for easy assess and methods in which
multifaceted conversation which included challenges facing higher education, our institution and
our department. Such challenges within our department include an imbalanced flow of crises-
response-restoration. Using a solution minded framework for this conversation we discussed how
data has already proven useful. Based on an evaluation of our on-call protocol, we were able to
identify areas of growth. We analyzed the frequency of incidents on campus, location, and staff
feedback and as a result proposed a update to the protocol. Other challenges discussed included
students/families.
Lastly, Justin Hua and I were able to reflect on how this model of assessment and
evaluation can help the institution as a whole. Assessment and evaluation can support
institution’s student success and retention initiatives. This would require, as Hua suggests that
INTERVIEW REPORT 6
we meet, identify mutual interests and measures, co-develop an assessment plan, implement
department, and how we support progress. We were able to engage in meaningful conversation
that clearly correlated with the question I asked. For this reason I believe I was able to get all
questions answered fully and thoughtfully, and have no follow-up questions. I do however
believe this was a great first step towards making assessment and evaluation a priority in my
position.