Professional Documents
Culture Documents
7. Some species of microorganisms can become resistant to silver Chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant has the advantage that it
ions. They can remove metal from their systems or convert it to directly reacts with the cell wall of microorganisms. This reaction
a less toxic product. These microorganisms can become is not dependent on reaction time or concentration. In contrast to
resistant to copper-silver ionization. non-oxidizing disinfectants, chlorine dioxide kills microorganisms
Although it is suggested that Legionella bacteria can develop even when they are inactive. Therefore the chlorine dioxide
resistance to copper-silver ionization, this disinfectant still concentration needed to effectively kill microorganisms is lower
appears to be effective for Legionella deactivation. than non-oxidizing disinfectant concentrations. Microorganisms
8. To affectively kill pathogenic microorganisms, copper and silver cannot build up any resistance against chlorine dioxide.
ions should be present in the entire water system. When the
system is used little and the water flow is quite slow, or when For the pre- oxidation and reduction of organic substances
there are dead-end points in the system, this can causes between 0,5 and 2 mg/L of chlorine dioxide is required at a
problems for disinfection. contact time between 15 and 30 minutes. Water quality
determines the required contact time. For post- disinfection,
concentrations between 0,2 and 0,4 mg/L are applied. The
residual byproduct concentration of chlorite is very low and there
are no risks for human health. At the concentrations required for
disinfection, chlorine dioxide is not corrosive.
9. Comparison of Chlorination and Copper-Silver Ionization for It is more effective as a disinfectant than chlorine in most
Legionella Control in a French University Hospital Hot Water circumstances against water borne pathogenic microbes such
Distribution System as viruses, bacteria and protozoa – including the cysts of
Giardia and the cysts of Cryptosporidium.
Continuous disinfection of hot water distribution systems
achieved a significant reduction in Legionella contamination with The use of chlorine dioxide in water treatment leads to the
a higher efficacy of chlorination as compared to silver-copper formation of the by-product chlorite which is currently limited to a
ionization in our hospital. maximum of 1 ppm in drinking water in the USA. This EPA
standard limits the use of chlorine dioxide in the USA to
relatively high quality water or water which is to be treated with
iron based coagulants (Iron can reduce chlorite to chloride)
It can also be used for air disinfection, and was the principal
agent used in the decontamination of buildings in the United
States after the 2001 anthrax attacks. After the disaster of
Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, Louisiana and the
surrounding Gulf Coast, chlorine dioxide has been used to
eradicate dangerous mold from houses inundated by water from
massive flooding.
10. The application of ionisation will need to be properly assessed, Chlorine dioxide is less corrosive than chlorine and superior for
designed and maintained as part of an overall water treatment the control of Legionella bacteria. Chlorine dioxide is far superior
programme. The Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations and to copper-silver ionization for Legionella control because unlike
Private Supply Regulations prescribe a maximum value for the copper-silver ionization, chlorine dioxide is:
level of copper and silver ions in drinking water supplies. It is
important that installers of ionisation systems are aware of the 1. EPA approved biocide.
need to avoid any breach of these Regulations and maintain 2. Not negatively impacted by pH
copper and silver levels below the maximum allowable 3. Does not lose efficacy over time because the bacteria grow
concentration. The local water company may need to be resistant to the biocide and
consulted to check that the installation complies with the 4. Not negatively impacted by silica and phosphate which are
requirements of the Water Regulations commonly used potable water corrosion inhibitors.
11. It should be noted that in hard water systems, silver ion Not affected by water hardness and chloride.
concentrations can be difficult to maintain due to build-up of
scale on the electrodes, and the high concentration of dissolved
solids precipitating the silver ions out of solution. For both hard
and soft water, the ionisation process is pH sensitive and it is
difficult to maintain silver ion concentrations above pH 7.6. The
build-up of scale and concentration of dissolved solids therefore
needs to be carefully controlled so that suitable ion levels are
consistently maintained throughout the system. This may need
extra water treatments.
12. For most systems, routine inspection and maintenance will Easy to monitor. On line chlorine dioxide monitors are available
usually be sufficient to ensure control if the following parameters for the accurate measurement and control.
are also monitored at regular intervals and remedial action taken Less maintenance is required for chlorine dioxide units when
when necessary, with details of all actions being recorded: compared to Copper silver ionization.
(a) The rate of release of copper and silver ions into the water
supply;
(b) The silver ion concentrations at sentinel outlets should be
checked monthly - this should be at least 20μg/l at outlets;
(c) The measurement of silver ion concentrations at
representative taps selected on a rotational basis once each
year - this should be at least 20μg/l at outlets;
(d) The condition and cleanliness of the electrodes; and
(e) The pH of the water supply.