PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance appraisal is the process of obtaining, analyzing and recording information about the relative
worth of an employee. The focus of the performance appraisal is measuring and improving the actual
performance of the employee and also the future potential of the employee. Its aim is to measure what an
employee does.

According to Flippo, a prominent personality in the field of Human resources, “performance appraisal is the
systematic, periodic and an impartial rating of an employee’s excellence in the matters pertaining to his
present job and his potential for a better job." Performance appraisal is a systematic way of reviewing and
assessing the performance of an employee during a given period of time and planning for his future.

OBJECTIVES OF Performance appraisal:

 To review the performance of the employees over a given period of time.

 To judge the gap between the actual and the desired performance.
 To help the management in exercising organizational control.
 Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior – subordinates and
management – employees.
 To diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the individuals so as to identify the training and
development needs of the future.
 To provide feedback to the employees regarding their past performance.
 Provide information to assist in the other personal decisions in the organization.
 Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the functions to be performed by the
employees.
 To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource functions of the organization such as
recruitment, selection, training and development.
 To reduce the grievances of the employees.
Process of Performance Appraisal

 ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The first step in the process of performance

appraisal is the setting up of the standards which will be used to as the base to compare the actual
performance of the employees. This step requires setting the criteria to judge the performance of the
employees as successful or unsuccessful and the degrees of their contribution to the organizational
goals and objectives. The standards set should be clear, easily understandable and in measurable
terms. In case the performance of the employee cannot be measured, great care should be taken to
describe the standards.

 COMMUNICATING THE STANDARDS: Once set, it is the responsibility of the management to

communicate the standards to all the employees of the organization. The employees should be
informed and the standards should be clearly explained to them. This will help them to understand
their roles and to know what exactly is expected from them. The standards should also be
communicated to the appraisers or the evaluators and if required, the standards can also be modified
at this stage itself according to the relevant feedback from the employees or the evaluators.
  MEASURING THE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE: The most difficult part of the Performance
appraisal process is measuring the actual performance of the employees that is the work done by the
employees during the specified period of time. It is a continuous process which involves monitoring
the performance throughout the year. This stage requires the careful selection of the appropriate
techniques of measurement, taking care that personal bias does not affect the outcome of the process
and providing assistance rather than interfering in an employees work.

 COMPARING THE ACTUAL WITH THE DESIRED PERFORMANCE: The actual performance
is compared with the desired or the standard performance. The comparison tells the deviations in the
performance of the employees from the standards set. The result can show the actual performance
being more than the desired performance or, the actual performance being less than the desired
performance depicting a negative deviation in the organizational performance. It includes recalling,
evaluating and analysis of data related to the employees’ performance.

 DISCUSSING RESULTS: The result of the appraisal is communicated and discussed with the
employees on one-to-one basis. The focus of this discussion is on communication and listening. The
results, the problems and the possible solutions are discussed with the aim of problem solving and
reaching consensus. The feedback should be given with a positive attitude as this can have an effect
on the employees’ future performance. The purpose of the meeting should be to solve the problems
faced and motivate the employees to perform better.

 DECISION MAKING: The last step of the process is to take decisions which can be taken either to
improve the performance of the employees, take the required corrective actions, or the related HR
decisions like rewards, promotions, demotions, transfers etc.

Pre-requisites for Effective & Successful Performance Appraisa

The essentials of an effective performance system are as follows:

 Documentation – means continuous noting and documenting the performance. It also

helps the evaluators to give a proof and the basis of their ratings.

 Standards / Goals – the standards set should be clear, easy to understand, achievable,
motivating, time bound and measurable.

 Practical and simple format - The appraisal format should be simple, clear, fair and
objective. Long and complicated formats are time consuming, difficult to understand, and
do not elicit much useful information.
  Evaluation technique – An appropriate evaluation technique should be selected; the
appraisal system should be performance based and uniform. The criteria for evaluation
should be based on observable and measurable characteristics of the behavior of the
employee.

 Communication – Communication is an indispensable part of the Performance appraisal

process. The desired behavior or the expected results should be communicated to the
employees as well as the evaluators. Communication also plays an important role in the
review or feedback meeting. Open communication system motivates the employees to
actively participate in the appraisal process.

 Feedback – The purpose of the feedback should be developmental rather than

judgmental. To maintain its utility, timely feedback should be provided to the employees
and the manner of giving feedback should be such that it should have a motivating effect
on the employees’ future performance.

 Personal Bias – Interpersonal relationships can influence the evaluation and the decisions
in the performance appraisal process. Therefore, the evaluators should be trained to carry
out the processes of appraisals without personal bias and effectively.

Challenges Of Performance Appraisal

In order to make a performance appraisal system effective and successful, an organization

comes across various challenges and problems. The main challenges involved in the performance
appraisal process are:

 Determining the evaluation criteria: Identification of the appraisal criteria is one of the
biggest problems faced by the top management. The performance data to be considered
for evaluation should be carefully selected. For the purpose of evaluation, the criteria
selected should be in quantifiable or measurable terms

 Create a rating instrument: The purpose of the Performance appraisal process is to judge
the performance of the employees rather than the employee. The focus of the system
should be on the development of the employees of the organization.

 Lack of competence: Top management should choose the raters or the evaluators
carefully. They should have the required expertise and the knowledge to decide the
criteria accurately. They should have the experience and the necessary training to carry
out the appraisal process objectively.

 Errors in rating and evaluation: Many errors based on the personal bias like
stereotyping, halo effect (i.e. one trait influencing the evaluator’s rating for all other
 traits) etc. may creep in the appraisal process. Therefore the rater should exercise
objectivity and fairness in evaluating and rating the performance of the employees

 Resistance: The appraisal process may face resistance from the employees and the trade
unions for the fear of negative ratings. Therefore, the employees should be
communicated and clearly explained the purpose as well the process of appraisal. The
standards should be clearly communicated and every employee should be made aware
that what exactly is expected from him/her.

Purpose of Performance Appraisal

Performance Appraisal is being practiced in 90% of the organizations worldwide. Self-appraisal

and potential appraisal also form a part of the performance appraisal processes.

Typically, Performance Appraisal is aimed at:

 To review the performance of the employees over a given period of time.

 To judge the gap between the actual and the desired performance.

 To help the management in exercising organizational control.

 To diagnose the training and development needs of the future.

 Provide information to assist in the HR decisions like promotions, transfers etc.

 Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the functions to be performed

by the employees.

 To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource functions of the organization such
as recruitment, selection, training and development.

 To reduce the grievances of the employees.

 Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior – subordinates

and management – employees.

 The most significant reasons of using Performance appraisal are:

 Making payroll and compensation decisions – 80%

 Training and development needs – 71%

 Identifying the gaps in desired and actual performance and its cause – 76%

 Deciding future goals and course of action – 42%

  Promotions, demotions and transfers – 49%

 Other purposes – 6% (including job analysis and providing superior support, assistance
and counseling).

The Balanced Scorecard

To evaluate the organizational and employee performance in Performance appraisal

management processes, the conventional approach measures the performance only on a few
parameters like the action processes, results achieved or the financial measures etc. The
Balanced scorecard –an approach given by Kaplan and Norton- provides a framework of various
measures to ensure the complete and balanced view of the performance of the employees.
Balanced scorecard focuses on the measures that drive performance.

The balanced scorecard provides a list of measures that balance the organizations internal and
process measures with results, achievements and financial measures.

The two basic features of the balanced scorecard are:

 A balanced set of measures based on. the four perspectives of balanced scorecard

 Linking the measures to Employee Performance

The four Perspectives recommended by Kaplan and Norton for the managers to collect
information are:

 The financial measures – The financial measures include the results like profits, increase
in the market share, return on investments and other economic measures as a result of the
actions taken.

 The customers’ measures - These measures help to get on customer satisfaction, the
customer’s perspective about the organisation, customer loyalty, acquiring new
customers. The data can be collected from the frequency and number of customer
complaints, the time taken to deliver the products and services, improvement in quality
etc.

 The internal business measures – These are the measures related to the organization’s
internal processes which help to achieve the customer satisfaction. It includes the
infrastructure, the long term and short term goals and objectives, organisational processes
and procedures, systems and the human resources.

 The innovation and learning perspective. The innovation and learning measures cover the
organisation’s ability to learn, innovate and improve. They can be judged by employee
skills matrix, key competencies, value added and the revenue per employee.
BENEFITS OF BALANCED SCORECARD

The benefits of the balanced scorecard approach in measuring performance are:

 Gives the complete picture of the employee as well as the organisational performance.

 It guides users in determining the critical success factors and performance indicators.

 Strategic review or analysis of the organisational capabilities and performance.

 Focusing the whole organisation on the few key things needed to create breakthrough
performance.

 Integrating and directing the performance and efforts from the lowest levels in the
organisation to achieve excellent overall performance.