Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Tapered, or conical sections appear commonly in turbo- angle increases, the significance of this violation will also in-
machinery, occasionally forming a significant portion of the crease, as the normal component of unsupported axial stress
overall geometry. See Fig. 1 for some examples of conical becomes greater. Should the wall thickness decrease, however,
geometries appearing in modern gas turbine rotors. For the the ability for the nonplanar stresses to be supported within
dynamic characteristics, i.e., critical speeds and forced re- the wall diminishes, thus resulting in what is commonly known
sponses, to be predicted accurately, an accurate mass-elastic as shell behavior.
model [1] of these rotors must be established, as well as proper A recent work performed by the authors [2] involved the
bearing and damping parameters. A valid mass-elastic model
is one which matches, as closely as possible, the measured
natural frequencies and mode shapes, or modal model, of the
rotor alone, independent of rotation or bearing effects. In
order to accomplish this, the bending and shear behavior of
each section of the rotor must be accurately represented. A
difficulty arises from the fact that Timoshenko beam theory,
which most accepted rotordynamic codes in use today are based
upon, is not appropriate for shaft sections which contain sig-
nificant changes in diameter along their length. The reason for
this is illustrated in Fig. 2, where a differential element in a
conical section is shown. Using the assumption of Timoshenko
beam behavior, the axial stress variation due to a pure bending
load is shown to be linear. This distribution can be decomposed
into two separate components at the surface, one of which is Fig. 1 Examples of conical section geometries in gas turbine rotors
normal to the surface of the taper, here labeled a„. This com-
ponent has no means of being supported, and thus bending
and shear stresses are produced within the wall to provide static
equilibrium which requires a„ to be zero. These internal stresses
produce out-of-plane deformation, thus violating the planar
cross section assumption used in beam theory. As the taper
| Warped Cross
/ Section
Contributed by the Design Engineering Division for publication in the JOURNAL
OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received October 1989. Fig. 2 Conical section stress distribution
Fig. 3(a) FE model used for flexibility study and (o) example of warping
deformation 0.0 0.2 0,4 0.6 O.B 1.0
T/RM
Fig. 4(a) Ratio of FE/beam conical section flexibility (b) definition of ij
use of 3D finite element, FE, models to study the behavior of
hollow conical sections in detail. It was expected that there
would exist a trend from beam-like to shell-like response as sition curves, the off-diagonal terms may be better represented
wall thickness, and possibly angle, were varied. In order to by the use of a cubic spline fit. Further study on the hybrid
produce results which would be directly applicable to conical element will concentrate on establishing the most reliable
sections in actual shafting, the FE models developed included method of extraction and interpolation for these terms, such
two cylindrical segments as shown in Fig. 3(a). Bending and that the complete element can be utilized.
shear loads were prescribed at the end of the smaller cylindrical At the present time, it is recognized that the dominant term,
section such that either a pure bending or pure shear load for lateral shaft vibrations, is the rotation due to bending
resulted at the small end of the taper. The end of the larger moment, of S22. This term is deemed dominant since a given
cylinder was clamped so as to provide a cantilever, and the change in its value will cause a much larger change in the effect
lengths of the straight sections were varied until no stress con- the conic section has on the overall rotor behavior than the
centrations due to the loading or boundary conditions existed same relative change in any of the other terms. The FE results
at the cylinder-cone interfaces. for S22 showed that the conical beam model [3, 4] now found
The goal of the modeling effort was to determine the ef- in several modern rotordynamic programs consistently under-
fective bending and shear flexibilities of the conic section and estimates the flexibility of a conical section, for a wide range
to compare these with those predicted by an exact beam and of angles and wall thicknesses. Consider the plot in Fig. 4 (a),
a membrane shell theory, with the idea being to cast a hybrid which shows the ratio between the flexibilities of the analytical
element. By prescribing unit loads, the terms of the flexibility beam model and the FE estimate. The effects of thickness have
matrix, as given below, were determined. It was found that been normalized by the average mid-plane radius, as defined
for the "direct" terms, Sn and S22, the FE results showed as Fig. 4(b), in order to render the curves nondimensional. As
consistent trends between the beam and shell predictions as can be seen, as the angle increases, or i\ decreases, the dis-
the thickness was varied, while the "indirect" terms, S12 and crepancy between the beam approximation and the FE result
S21, showed somewhat volatile transitions. increases. The data in this plot is used as the basis for an
empirical correction procedure outlined below. This represents
only a partial implementation of the hybrid element proposed
Sn Sl2 above, but it will be shown to provide significant improvements
S2i S22 nevertheless.
Nomenclature
a = taper angle (radians) A = L/RM T = thickness (L)
E = Youngs modulus (ML" 'T" 2 ) M = bending moment (ML2T~2) d = angular rotation (radians)
v = T/RM RM = average mid-plane radius (L) V = shear load (MLT~2)
L = length (L) a = normal stress (ML"'T -2 ) y = vertical deflection (L)
"0 80
~
<; -& n = .60
"0 ..... n = .35
...o
Eo< 60
-0- n = .20
ClJ -o-n=.10
en
~
c 40
<J
...
U
<J
~
20 +--"'--,---'--r---'---.-~----,r-----'--"
o 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage of Total Length
Fig. 5 Distribution of flexibility in conical sections
(8)
that its flexibility, or stiffness, coincides with that indicated
in the parametric FE study.
It should be pointed out that although the conical modulus
is cast in nondimensional form, it is not truly applicable for
any general geometry because there is a length dependency,
typified by a third nondimensional variable, A, which is equal
to L/RM. The IO and 20 degree cases were computed using a
A value of 2.0, while the 30 and 40 degree cases used a value
of 1.0 for A. The discrepancy between the beam solution and
the FE result changes when A is varied, and thus it is recom-
mended that the conical modulus not be applied to sections
whose A values are much greater or less than the values used
in the FE study. In conical sections with very large values of
A, the majority of the rotation created by a bending moment
occurs at the small end, while the larger portion of the section
remains predominantly undeformed. Therefore, the overall
behavior of the conical section will- actually be governed by
the local value of A at the small end. To quantify this concept,
the percentage of the total rotation incurred by a bending
moment was computed for an example conical section of 20 (b)
degrees for several values of 1). The results are shown in Fig. Fig. 6(8) Static and (b) dynamic experiment setups
5. From this plot, it can be seen that for a wide range of 1)
values, a major portion of the rotation takes place in the first
IO percent of the length, and the majority of the flexibility is
concentrated in the first 20 percent, with the percentage de- this was not surprising in light of the FE results which also
creasing with larger wall thickness. This indicates that a proper indicated such an effect.
modeling technique would be to use short stations or elements Though accurate results were not obtained with the current
at the small end of a long tapered conical section since the static testing procedure, a qualitative verification was made of
overall behavior will be dominated by the local value of 1) a singular behavior of thin-walled conical sections. For an angle
there. of 40 degrees, membrane shell theory predicts that the off-
diagonal terms are negative, and this was verified in the FE
results. In an attempt to experimentally observe this, the 40
Experimental Correlations degree conical section shown was machined until its 1) value
With the goal of the correction method outlined being to was approximately 0.03 and then loaded with a shear load at
produce more accurate mass-elastic models, static and dynamic the end of the taper. Consistent with the FE results, the rotation
experiments were carried out. The static experiments were per- of the indicator rod was opposite in direction to that which
formed on representative 20 and 40 degree conical sections would be predicted using a beam analysis.
machined from flexible polycarbonate. Tensile testing of sam- The dynamic experiments were performed on a test shaft
ples of the plastic used showed that creep effects, which would containing two opposing 20 degree conical sections. The shaft
adversely affect any deflection measurements, were negligible was supported on foam as shown in Fig. 6(b). The shaft was
at room temperature. The static test setup is shown in Fig. created by machining two separate pieces and then carefully
6(a). An indicator rod was clamped at the end of the conical welding them together to ensure as uniform a joint as possible.
section and used to determine rotation values while a dial A large countersink was constructed and used to hollow each
caliper measured vertical deflections. Accurate measurements half so that a constant thickness geometry resulted. To study
proved very difficult to obtain using the setup shown. The the effects of varying wall thickness, material was successively
assumption that the rotation of the small conical face was removed by machining from each of the conical sections. A
equal to the rotation of the clamp attached to the indicator detailed study of the step geometries resulting from this ma-
rod proved to be unrealistic. Also assuming that the vertical chining process showed that their effects were much smaller
deflection of the bottom surface of the conical end was equal than the effect of the conical behavior, and thus they were
to the centerline deflection was quantitatively unreliable; and ignored.
-1.0-
5 10 15 0 10 20
Length I / Wall Thickness
Fig. 9 Mode shape 5 and percent error in natural frequency