Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M. Nikolic
e-mail: marija.nikolic@imperial.ac.uk Response Analysis of Mistuned
E. P. Petrov
e-mail: y.petrov@imperial.ac.uk Bladed Disks
D. J. Ewins The problem of estimating the mutual interaction of the effects of Coriolis forces and of
e-mail: d.ewins@imperial.ac.uk blade mistuning on the vibration characteristics of bladed disks is addressed in this
paper. The influence of different degrees of mistuning on forced response and amplifica-
Mechanical Engineering Department, tion factors are studied in the presence of Coriolis forces and then compared to their
Centre of Vibration Engineering, non-Coriolis counterparts using a computationally inexpensive, yet representative, model
Imperial College London, of a bladed disk. The primary objective of the study reported in this paper is to establish
South Kensington Campus, whether current mistuned bladed disk analyses should incorporate Coriolis effects in
London SW7 2AZ, UK order to represent accurately all the significant factors that affect the forced response
levels. 关DOI: 10.1115/1.2720866兴
730 / Vol. 129, OCTOBER 2007 Copyright © 2007 by ASME Transactions of the ASME
Fជ Coriolis = − m共2
ជ ⫻ ṙជ⬘兲 共2兲 Fig. 1 The action of Coriolis forces: 3ND mode shapes of a
bladed disk: „a… blade tangential vibration; and „b… blade radial
where Coriolis force, Fជ
Coriolis, normal to the rotating frame veloc- vibration
ជ
ity, ṙ⬘, and to the rotation vector, ជ , causes the blade particle
velocity to change direction, but not the magnitude, and is thus a
deflecting force.
Hence, in the investigation of the Coriolis forces’ influence on q共t兲 = et, where q共t兲, , 苸 RN 共6兲
vibration characteristics, we confine ourselves to study the in-
plane radial and tangential blade vibrations only, as there is no Substituting Eq. 共6兲 into Eq. 共4兲, we obtain an expression for the
coupling between out-of-plane and in-plane blade vibrations due dynamic stiffness matrix
to Coriolis forces. The effects of Coriolis forces arising from si-
共兲 = 0, where 共兲 = 共2关M兴 + ⍀关G兴 + 关K兴兲 共7兲
multaneous rotation and in-plane tangential or in-plane radial vi-
bration of the bladed disk are illustrated in Fig. 1 for the case of a A set of N homogenous algebraic equations possesses a nontrivial
three nodal diameter 共3ND兲 mode shape. solution if, and only if, the determinant of the coefficients van-
ishes
Rotating Bladed Disk System With the Effects of Coriolis det 共兲 = 0 共8兲
Forces. For rotating bladed disks, the general equation of motion
for forced vibration in the time domain is known to be “nonself- The solution to Eq. 共8兲 constitutes the eigenvalues, r, and the
adjoint” 关5,6兴 and is presented as associated two different kinds of eigenvectors due to asymmetry
of the velocity- and displacement-dependent matrices: “right” and
关M兴兵q̈共t兲其 + 关G共⍀兲 + 关D兴兴兵q̇共t兲其 + 共关K兴 + 关KS共⍀兲兴 + 关M共⍀兲兴兲兵q共t兲其 “left” eigenvectors, both of which are complex 关8兴. A right-hand
eigenvector, r, satisfies 共r兲r = 0, while the left-hand eigenvec-
= 兵f共t兲其 共3兲
tor, l, complies with Tl 共r兲 = 0. While the former vector is gen-
where, in a fixed frame of reference, 兵q其 is a response of the erally known as the “mode shape,” the latter is the second set of
system; 兵f其 is the vector of applied external forces; ⍀ is rotation eigenvectors that contains the information regarding the ability of
speed; 关M兴, 关K兴, and 关D兴 are mass, stiffness, and damping matri- excitation forces to produce a vibration corresponding to a spe-
ces, respectively; 关G共⍀兲兴 is a speed-dependent skew-symmetric cific mode when applied to the structure 关8兴.
matrix due to Coriolis forces; and 关KS共⍀兲兴 is a speed-dependent It is known that the eigenvalues of Eq. 共8兲 consist of N complex
stress stiffening matrix due to centrifugal forces; and 关M共⍀兲兴 is a conjugate pairs and, correspondingly, the eigenvectors also occur
speed-dependent spin softening matrix. in complex conjugate pairs 关7兴. Thus, it is possible to express the
Assuming, for the sake of simplicity, that there is no structural eigenvector as r = y + iz, where y is the real part and z is the
damping and that the mass and stiffness matrices are speed inde- imaginary part of the eigenvector, r. Hence, by premultiplying
pendent, Eq. 共3兲 becomes Eq. 共7兲 by rT, we obtain
关M兴 = 关M兴T, 关K兴 = 关K兴T, 关G兴 = − 关G兴T 共5兲 2m + 2i⍀g + k = 0 共10兲
We shall seek the free response solution of Eq. 共4兲 in the form 关7兴 where
Lumped Parameter Mass Model Analysis Table 1 Measured and predicted natural frequency splits for
first 2ND „a… and 3ND „b… mode pair
Model Description. In view of the lack of finite element codes
capable of forced response analysis of rotating bladed disks with 2ND % diff.
Coriolis forces and blade mistuning included, a simple lumped
parameter mass model was chosen to study the mutual influence
共a兲 Speed Measured versus
of Coriolis forces and blade mistuning. It is believed that a small 共rpm兲 Measured Predicted predicted
system will serve as a useful tool to explore the underlying phys-
ics of the complex combined effect of the two phenomena. Since 300 1.29 1.81 +28.73
there is no coupling between out-of-plane and in-plane blade vi- 330 1.50 1.96 +23.47
brations due to Coriolis forces, the model includes in-plane radial 510 1.51 1.78 +15.17
and tangential vibration only. Thus, a suitable lumped parameter 700 1.65 1.67 +1.20
model of bladed disk dynamics must comprise four DOF per sec- 900 0.95 1.70 +44.12
tor with two DOF per mass. The bladed disk chosen for this study 1300 — — —
contains 24 sectors. The model, depicted in Fig. 5, contains two 3ND % diff.
masses representing the blade and the disk segments and a series
of springs in the x and y directions representing radial and tangen-
tial vibrations. It is assumed that the springs in the radial direction 共b兲 Speed Measured versus
共rpm兲 Measured Predicted predicted
are much greater than those in the tangential direction. The values
for the lumped parameter mass model are listed in Table 2. It 300 1.05 1.51 +30.46
should be noted that these values are not intended to represent any 330 1.32 1.65 +20.00
particular bladed disk, but are chosen with the aim of demonstrat- 510 1.78 1.51 −15.17
ing the appropriate physics. Therefore, no units are connected 700 1.76 1.44 −18.18
with these values, simply the assurance that they are consistent. 900 1.64 1.49 −9.15
The most important feature of this model is related to the added 1300 1.14 1.35 +15.56
disk-to-disk cross-coupling stiffness terms, which simulate the
再 冎 冋 册再 冎 冋 册再 冎
the number of nodal diameters, which in turns reduces the effects
F1 k11 k12 q1 k11 k11RT q1 of Coriolis forces.
= = T 共14兲
F2 k21 k22 q2 Rk11 Rk11R q2 Forced Response Considerations. In this section, the main
where forced response characteristics of the combined system, including
冋 册
the effects of Coriolis forces and mistuning, are presented. The
cos ␥ − sin ␥ coupling parameter ␥ was initially set to 0.005, so that the influ-
R=− 共15兲 ence of Coriolis forces only on tuned natural frequencies was
sin ␥ cos ␥
再冎 再冎
relatively small 共2ND split being approximately 1%兲. A random
x Fx mistuning pattern, denoted in Fig. 8 as “ref. mist. pat.,” was cho-
q1,2 = and F1,2 = 共16兲 sen as a reference pattern and was generated within a frequency
y 1,2 Fy 1,2 mistuning range of ±5%, which is typical for bladed disks. Sub-
Blade-to-disk cross-coupling stiffness terms are expressed in a sequently, several other frequency mistuning patterns were created
similar way. in order to study the effect of increasing mistuning ranges on the
The choice of the form of stiffness matrix in Eq. 共14兲 is not forced response of a system with Coriolis forces. These patterns
unique and is just one of the ways of representing the degree of were based on a reference pattern, but spanned different mistuning
coupling. A parameter of radial–tangential coupling, which will be ranges. The secondary patterns were obtained by multiplying in-
further referred to as “coupling parameter,” or ␥, is used as a
control parameter to regulate the Coriolis forces’ strength: the
higher the value of ␥, the stronger the effect of Coriolis forces.
For the case when ␥ = 0, there is no radial–tangential coupling
and, as a result, no Coriolis forces effect. This is demonstrated in
Figs. 6 and 7 and Table 3.
The choice of coupling parameter value was determined by the
desired shape of the natural frequency versus number of nodal
diameters plot. As the coupling parameter is increased from 0.005
to 0.062, the split of the otherwise identical double natural fre-
quencies due to Coriolis forces only in the 2ND mode pair has
increased from 1% to 11%. While a similar increase in the split of
natural frequencies is observed for 5ND and 10ND mode pairs,
the actual split magnitudes are much smaller than that correspond-
ing to the 2ND mode pair. The reason for such a result is due to
dividual blade mistuning values in the reference pattern by an Eq. 共14兲兲. If the model had no tangential–radial coupling, then
identical multiplier for all blades. The following values of these mistuned forward and backward forced responses would have
multipliers were considered: 0.25, 0.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0, which been identical to each other. Moreover, envelopes of the maxi-
cover wide and practically attainable mistuning ranges. A rela- mum forced responses are clearly dissimilar for the cases of cal-
tively large blade mistuning of 17% is represented for the mistun- culations with and without Coriolis forces included.
ing pattern resulting from the multiplier 4.0, and while not very The results in Fig. 11 demonstrate that the individual 共specifi-
common, it is not implausible in practice for bladed fan disks, cally, blade No. 10, which is representative of the others兲 fre-
where large differences may exist from blade to blade 共see e.g., quency response functions are different when the Coriolis forces
Ref. 关10兴兲. are present compared to their non-Coriolis counterparts, which
The damping loss factor was set to 0.003. A simple engine could provide an explanation for a mismatch observed sometimes
order forcing field was applied of the form between theoretical predictions and experimental data for bladed
F共,t兲 = F0eiEO共⍀t±兲 共17兲
where F0 is the force amplitude; EO is the engine order; ⍀ is the
rotating speed; t is time, and is the circumferential position
around the disk. A forward 共response backward兲 traveling wave
was obtained by applying a positive imaginary term in Eq. 共17兲.
Forced response levels were calculated from the following
equation
兵Q其 = 共关K兴 − 2共关M兴 + 关⌬M兴兲 + i关D兴 + i关G兴兲−1兵F其 共18兲
where 兵Q其 is the forced response; 关K兴 is the system stiffness ma-
trix; 关M兴 + 关⌬M兴 represents mass-mistuned system; 关D兴 = 关K兴 is
the structural 共hysteretic兲 damping matrix; is the damping loss
factor; 关G兴 is the Coriolis matrix; and 兵F其 is the applied force.
Tuned bladed disk backward 共EO= + 2兲 and forward 共EO= −2兲
forced responses,1 with and without Coriolis forces, are shown in
Fig. 9. The so-called “forward” traveling wave response does not
have immediate practical interest, but is physically possible under
certain circumstances. As expected, in the case of a tuned system Fig. 10 Envelope of the mistuned forced responses, coupling
without Coriolis forces, the responses to the backward and for- parameter ␥ = 0.005, 2EO
ward waves are identical, whereas the presence of Coriolis forces
generates the forced responses at distinct frequencies.
Normalized mistuned forced responses and their envelopes,
with and without Coriolis forces taken into account, are illustrated
in Fig. 10, with response normalization being made with respect
to the maximum tuned response levels in the frequency range of
interest. It can be observed from Fig. 10 that the backward and
forward mistuned traveling wave responses obtained for 2EO with
Coriolis forces are “nearly” mirror images of each other. A lower
amplitude peak in each mistuned frequency response function
共FRF兲 with Coriolis forces can be considered as a small contribu-
tion of a traveling wave component to the main stationary com-
ponent. Mistuned responses without Coriolis forces are also not
identical due to the blade mistuning which has been introduced
and to the coupling between tangential and radial vibrations 共see
1
“Forward” and “backward” forced responses are defined with respect to rotating Fig. 11 Individual blade No. 10 mistuned forced responses,
frame of reference. coupling parameter ␥ = 0.005, 2EO
disks.
The amplitude distribution as a function of blade number, de-
picted in Fig. 12, shows that the maximum blade amplitude can be
higher by 14% when the Coriolis forces are included in the analy-
sis compared to that for a mistuned-only system.
Conclusions
For the first time, the experimental validation of the natural
frequency splits due to Coriolis forces has been made, and the
mutual influence of the effects of Coriolis forces and blade mis- Fig. 15 Envelopes of mistuned forced responses for different
tuning on forced response characteristics of bladed disks has been blade frequency mistuning ranges, coupling parameter ␥
studied. A simple, yet representative, lumped parameter model has = 0.062; „a… 2EO; „b… 5EO
been developed to demonstrate the effects of Coriolis forces for The results obtained in this study indicate that in some of the
varying strengths of in-plane blade-to-blade coupling, which was cases considered the additional effects of Coriolis force could be
found to be the most significant feature that affects the maximum considered as “minor” in comparison with the typical blade mis-
forced response amplification factors of the combined Coriolis- tuning influence on maximum amplification factors attainable in
mistuned system. bladed disks. However, there are particular designs of bladed
disks with a prominent radial flexibility where the Coriolis force
effects could not be neglected and require careful examination.
Such systems were found to have maximum forced response lev-
els with the Coriolis effects included much higher 共approximately
40% in the case of frequency mistuning within a ±5% range兲 and
their statistical distributions significantly different from those cor-
responding to a mistuned-only system. Moreover, the variation
Fig. 18 Statistical 2EO results for the maximum mistuned Fig. 20 Histograms of maximum mistuned forced responses
forced response for each blade for ␥ = 0.062 with „star… and with and without Coriolis forces for: ␥ = 0.005 and ␥ = 0.062 for:
without „circle… Coriolis forces „a… 2EO; and „b… 5EO