Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0.05
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
1
2
0 1 1 2 2 3
100
110
120
130
140
70
80
90
Welding Horn
Disk
Ring Disk
Fixture Base
The model relates the weld strength to process and design factors, models the variation for each factor, and
forecasts the product performance in relation to the engineering specifications. Modeling a response based on
multiple factors can often be accomplished by generating a statistically significant function through experimental
design or multiple regression analysis.
Weld Pressure
Weld Time
Trigger Point
Amplitude Transfer Function Response(s)
Frequency
In this example, @RISK simulates the variation using normal distributions for each factor. @RISK distributions
support cell referencing so that you can easily set-up a tabular model that can be updated throughout a product
and process development lifecycle. The output is Weld Strength (N) in the Design & Process Performance
section, and contains a RiskSixSigma property functions that include the Lower Specification Limit (LSL) and
Upper Specification Limit (USL) specified. These are used to calculate Six Sigma statistics. The output results
were generated using @RISK Six Sigma functions for Cpk-Upper, Cpk-Lower, Cpk, and PPM Defects (or DPM),
as well as @RISK statistics functions.
The @RISK output distribution displays the expected performance based on the design and process input
variation and shows LSL, USL, and Target with markers. You can easily access the output statistics using the
reporting features or through @RISK functions. The @RISK Sensitivity Analysis clearly shows that the Weld
Time and Amplitude parameters are driving the weld strength variation.
The next steps for this problem could include two options: The engineer can attempt to reduce or better control
the variation within the Weld Time and Amplitude, or use RISKOptimizer to find the optimal process and design
targets to maximize yield or reduce scrap cost.
variation and shows LSL, USL, and Target with markers. You can easily access the output statistics using the
reporting features or through @RISK functions. The @RISK Sensitivity Analysis clearly shows that the Weld
Time and Amplitude parameters are driving the weld strength variation.
The next steps for this problem could include two options: The engineer can attempt to reduce or better control
the variation within the Weld Time and Amplitude, or use RISKOptimizer to find the optimal process and design
targets to maximize yield or reduce scrap cost.
Design Factors
Design Variable Range
Parameter Distribution Nominal StdDev Min Max
Disk Thickness (mm) #ADDIN? 2 0.05 1 5
Ring Wall Thickness (mm) #ADDIN? 5 0.1 2 10
Horn Length (mm) #ADDIN? 125 1 100 200
Process Factors
Set Point Range
Parameter Distribution Nominal StdDev Min Max
Weld Pressure (N) #ADDIN? 500 10 400 1500
Weld Time (ms) #ADDIN? 0.35 0.04 0.1 1
Trigger Point (ms) #ADDIN? 0.25 0.04 0.1 1
Amplitude (kHz) #ADDIN? 25 1.2 15 40
Frequency (kHz) #ADDIN? 22 0.75 20 30
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
1
2
0 1 1 2 2 3
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
onto a ring (see Figure 1). The
al use, and it must separate if
Experimental Design
Matrix
2
130
3
140