Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Dimensions of Personality
- OCEAN (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism)
Organizational culture
- BVA (Beliefs, values, assumptions)
Strong cultures:
- Assets = CCF (coordination, conflict resolution, financial success)
- Liabilities = RCP (resistance to change, culture clash, pathology)
Socialization
- Say Hi To Rebecca Even Out Running (selection, hazing, train, reward, expose to
culture, organizational folklore, role models)
Decision-making process
- ISDECIM (identify, search, develop, evaluate, choose, implement, monitor)
Extinction
- used when you want gradually dispose of a certain behaviour followed by the termination of
reinforcement to that behaviour or substitute for a different reinforcement for another desired
behaviour
Punishment
- the application of an aversive stimulus to decrease the probability of an unwanted behaviour
- Related problems can be temporary
can sometimes not demonstrate what is the
wanted behaviour
can provoke strong emotional reaction
- Effective punishment limit emotions involved
provide alternatives to the behaviour
punish at adequate time
Social cognitive theory (mental, thinking about the job, seeing consequences, what works,
what doesn’t, just being like a thinking person... )
- learning by observing the behaviours of others
- Manage own behaviours by thinking of the consequences of their actions, setting goals,
monitoring performance, rewarding themselves for accomplishing goals
Observational learning
- seeing the consequences they experienced, thinking what will happen if they act the same
way
- imitating same behaviour if we see a favourable consequence
Self-efficacy
- belief that people have about their abilities to successfully perform a specific task. Has four
sources: performance mastery, observation, verbal persuasion/encouragement, and
physiological state
Self-regulation
- observing own behaviour comparing to standard model, can improve learning and training
- discrepancy reduction (motivates to change behavior to reduce gap)
- discrepancy production (set even higher goals when goals are meet
Perceiver
- past experiences lead the perceiver to develop expectations that affect current perceptions
- needs unconsciously influence perceptions by causing us to perceive what we wish to
perceive
- emotions, such as anger, happiness, or fear, can influence our perceptions
Perceptual defense
- The tendency for the perceptual system to defend the perceiver against unpleasant emotions
- People often “see what they want to see” and “hear what they want to hear”
- Our perceptual system works to ensure we do not see or hear things that are threatening
Target
- ambiguous targets are especially susceptible to interpretation and the addition of meaning
- perceivers have a need to resolve ambiguities
- the perceiver does not or cannot use all the information provided by the target
- reduction in ambiguity might not be accompanied by greater accuracy
Situation
- perception occurs in some situational context, and this context can affect what is perceived
- the most important effect that the situation can have is to add information about the target
- the perception of a target can change with the situation even when the perceiver and target
remain the same
Attribution theory
- process by which we assign causes or motives to explain people’s behaviour
- situational attributions suggest that the external situation or
environment in which the target person
exists was responsible for the behaviour
eg. bad weather, good luck, proper tools,
good advice, etc
- dispositional attributions suggest that some personality or intellectual
characteristic unique to the person is responsible for
the behaviour
eg. intelligence, greed, friendliness, or laziness
Attribution cues
- We rely on external cues and make inferences from these cues when making attributions
- consistency cues ( engage in behaviour regularly)
- attribution cues that reflect how consistently a person engages in a behaviour
over time
- high consistency behaviour leads to dispositional attributions
- When behaviour occurs inconsistently, we begin to consider situational
- consensus cues (do others also engage in that behaviour)
- attribution cues that reflect how a person’s behaviour compares with that of
others
- low consensus behaviour leads to dispositional attributions
- the informational effects of low-consensus behaviour are magnified when the
actor is expected to suffer negative consequences because of the deviance
- distinctive cues (does the person engage that behaviour in many situations? Or is it
distinctive to one particular situation)
- attribution cues that reflect the extent to which a person engages in some
behaviour across a variety of situations
- low distinctiveness behaviour leads to a dispositional attribution.
- when a behaviour is highly distinctive, in that it occurs in only one situation,
we are likely to assume that some aspect of the situation caused the
behaviour.
Attribution biases
- Although observers often operate in a rational, logical manner in forming attributions about
behaviour, this does not mean that such attributions are always correct.
- attribution error
- the tendency to overemphasize dispositional explanations for behaviour at
the expense of situational explanations.
- we often discount the strong effects that social cues can have on behaviour.
- we often observe people in constrained and constant situations and fail to
realize that observed behaviour is distinctive to a particular situation.
- actor-observer effect
- the propensity for actors and observers to view the causes of the actor’s
behaviour differently.
- actors are prone to attribute much of their own behaviour to situational factors
while observers are more likely to invoke dispositional causes.
- why are actors prone to attribute much of their own behaviour to situational
causes?
- self serving bias
- the tendency to take credit for successful outcomes and to deny responsibility
for failures.
- people will explain the very same behaviour differently on the basis of events
that happened after the behaviour occurred.
- self-serving bias can reflect intentional self-promotion or excuse making or it
might reflect unique information on the part of the actor.
(1922-1945)
Work centrality
- Work is valued differently across cultures
- There are cross-national differences in the extent to which people perceive work as a central
life interest
- People for whom work was a central life interest work more hours.
- Cross-cultural differences in work centrality can lead to adjustment problems for foreign
employees and managers
- Out of 76 countries and regions, Canada and the United States rank 15 and
16, falling on the low power distance side of the average.
- Uncertainty avoidance (comfortability with uncertain and ambiguous situations)
- The extent to which people are uncomfortable with uncertain and ambiguous
situations.
- Strong uncertainty avoidance cultures stress rules and regulations, hard
work, conformity, and security.
- Cultures with weak uncertainty avoidance are less concerned with rules,
conformity, and security, and hard work is not seen as a virtue and risk taking
is valued.
- Canada and the United States are well below average on uncertainty
avoidance.
- Masculinity/femininity
- Masculine cultures clearly differentiate gender roles, support the dominance
of men, and stress economic performance.
- Feminine cultures accept fluid gender roles, stress sexual equality, and stress
quality of life.
- In Hofstede’s research, Japan is the most masculine society followed by
Austria, Mexico, and Venezuela.
- The Scandinavian countries are the most feminine.
- Canada ranks about mid-pack and the United States is fairly masculine falling
about halfway between Canada and Japan.
- Individualism/collectivism
- Individualistic societies stress independence, individual initiative, and privacy.
- Collective cultures favour interdependence and loyalty to family or clan
- The United States, Australia, Great Britain, and Canada are among the most
individualistic societies.
- Venezuela, Colombia, and Pakistan are among the most collective, with
Japan falling about mid-pack.
- Subsequent work with Canadian Michael Bond that catered more to Eastern cultures resulted
in a fifth dimension:
- Long-term/short-term orientation
- Cultures with a long-term orientation stress persistence, perseverance, thrift,
and close attention to status differences.
- Cultures with a short-term orientation stress personal steadiness and stability,
face-saving, and social niceties.
- China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea tend to be characterized
by a long-term orientation.
- Canada and the United States are more short-term oriented.
- Hofstede and Bond argue that the long-term orientation, in part, explains
prolific East Asian entrepreneurship.
Exporting OB Theories
- Organizational behaviour theories, research, and practices from North America might not
translate well to other societies.
- The basic questions remain the same – it is just the answers that will differ.
- Managers in North America encourage participation in work decisions by employees which
corresponds to a fairly low degree of power distance.
- This might not transfer to cultures that value high power distance.
Importing OB theories
- Not all theories and practices that concern organizational behaviour are designed in North
America or even in the West.
- The most obvious examples are “Japanese management” techniques, such as quality circles,
total quality management, and just-in-time production.
- Difficulties can arise due to basic value differences between Japan and North America.
- Organizations need to tailor management practices to the home culture’s concerns.
Attitudes
- an attitude is a fairly stable evaluative tendency to respond consistency to some specific
object, situation, person, or category of people.
- more specific than values
- Behaviour is most likely to correspond to attitudes when people have direct experience with
the target of the attitude and when the attitude is held confidently.
- “My job is interfering with my family life.” (Belief)
- “I dislike anything that hurts my family.” (Value)
- “I dislike my job.” (Attitude)
- “I’ll search for another job.” (Behaviour)
- not always consistent with behaviour
- Values + beliefs (can change) -> attitudes -> behaviour
Job satisfaction
- collection of attitudes and feelings that have about many facets of their jobs
- Facet satisfaction (satisfied with various/some aspects of their job)
- Overall satisfaction (summary indicator that goes over all aspects of the job)
Job Descriptive Index
- It is designed around five facets of satisfaction: people, pay, supervision, promotions, and the
work itself.
- Employees respond “yes” “no” or “?” in describing whether a particular word or phrase is
descriptive of particular facets of their jobs.
Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire
- Respondents indicate how happy they are with various aspects of their job on a scale
ranging from “very satisfied” to “very dissatisfied”
Discrepancy theory
- function between job outcomes people want vs outcomes they perceive they obtained (what
you want vs what you get)
- Fairness
- Distributive (receive the outcome they think they deserve from job)
- Procedural (is the fairness that occurs when the process to determine work
outcomes is seen as reasonable)
- interactional (fairness that occurs when people feel they have received
respectful and informative communication about outcome (treatment) )
- Disposition
- people have different traits that allow them to be more or less satisfied
despite changes in discrepancy and fairness
- Mood – less intense than emotion but longer term feeling
- Emotions – Intense, short term feeling
- Job satisfaction is a function of all of the above mentioned
· Relationship between job satisfaction and: absenteeism, turnover, performance,
organizational citizenship behaviour, customer satisfaction
o Job satisfaction (adequate pay, mentally challenging work, career opportunities,
friendly helpful people/colleagues) decreases absenteeism and turnover and
increases better performance
o Organizational Citizenship Behaviour – individual behaviour that is voluntary,
spontaneous, contributes to organizational effectiveness (helping co-workers,
volunteering for extra work, attention to detail)
· Affective, continuance, and normative commitment
o Affective commitment – commitment based on a person’s identification and
involvement with the organization (you want to be there)
o Continuance commitment – based on the cost of leaving the organization (you have to
be there)
o Normative commitment – based on the ideology of a feeling of obligation (you feel you
should be there)
Chapter 6
· Money as a motivator
o Money can be a motivator to the extent that it satisfies a variety of needs, its
valent, clearly tied to performance, it’s a controlled motivation
· Job design as a motivator
o Attempts to capitalize on intrinsic motivation
o Identify the characteristics that make some tasks more motivating than others
and utilize that in the design of jobs (job scope – Breadth (number of
activities) and Depth (degree of discretion/control)
· Job Characteristics Model:
o Skills variety Outcomes:
o Task identity - intrinsic M.
o Task significance - performance
o Autonomy - satisfaction
o Feedback
· Job enrichment
o Manipulating one or more of the five job characteristics to make the job more
interesting
· Goal-setting and Management by Objectives
o MBO – elaborate, systematic, ongoing program to facilitate goal establishment,
goal accomplishment and employee development
o Objectives for the organization are developed by top management and diffused
down the organization through the MBO process
· Alternative work schedules and employee diversity
o Flex time
o Compressed workweek
o Job sharing and work sharing
o Telecommuting
Chapter 13
Interpersonal conflict: the process that occurs when one person, group, or
organizational subunit frustrates the goal attainment of another.
Group identification and intergroup bias: people have more positive attitudes towards
people of their own group and be leery of out-group people.
Interdependence: subunits are dependant of each other to accomplish their own goals
gives potential for conflict to occur .
Conflict can erupt when parties differ significantly in power, status and culture.
Power: dependence is not mutual but one way, potential for conflict increases. A
needs B, but B doesn’t need A, thus antagonist may develop. B has power over A, and
A has nothing to which to bargain with.
Status: people are socialized to expect different levels of status. But conflict can
arise if say; junior staff is more adept with information technology, which makes
senior staff feel defensives about this reversal of roles.
Culture: two or more cultures develop in an organization and they clash. For
example, some hospital caregivers have a culture entered on efficiency and cost
effectiveness, while others are about giving excellent patient care at any cost.
Ambiguity: about goals, jurisdiction and performance criteria can lead to conflict.
Scare resources: differences in power are magnified when resources are scared.
Role overload: the requirement for too many tasks to be performed in too short a time
period.
Process conflict: disagreements about how work should be carried out and be
accomplished.
Withdrawal: w
ithdrawal from the stressor is one of the most basic reactions to stress. For
example, this can be in the form of absence or turnover. Withdrawal avoids confronting the
stressor head on.
Mediation: This occurs when a neutral third party helps to facilitate a negotiated agreement
by aiding the process of bargaining or by intervening in the content of the negotiation.
Arbitration: This occurs when a third party is given the authority to dictate the terms of
settlement of a conflict.
Stressors: e
nvironmental events or conditions that have the potential to induce stress.
Stress: a psychological reaction to the demands inherent in a stressor that has the potential
to make a person feel tense or anxious.
Stress reactions: the behavioural, psychological and physiological consequences of stress
Negative affectivity: tendency to see the world, including oneself and other people in a
negative light.High negative people tend to report more stressors in the work environment
and feel more subjective stress.
Role overload: the requirement for too many tasks to be performed in too short a time
period.
Defence mechanisms: a
psychological attempts to reduce the anxiety associated with
stress.
Job re-design: organizations can redesigns jobs to reduce their stressful characteristics.
For example, an executives might be given an assistant to reduce the number of tasks he or
she performs. (Increase challenge, autonomy)
Social Support: t he support of others can help us deal with stress, those with good social
networks are likely to cope more positively. Thus, the social network acts as a buffer against
stress. One's spouse, family, and friends as well as co-workers can provide needed social
support to stress-prone individuals. Co-workers and superiors might be the best sources of
support for dealing with work-related stress.
"Family Friendly" HR policies: in order to reduce stress associated with dual careers,
child care, and elder care, many organizations are beginning to institute "family friendly"
human resource policies. These policies usually include some combination of formalized
social support (newsletters, support groups), material support (corporate daycare), and
increased flexibility (flex-time, telecommuting, and job sharing) to adapt to employee needs.