Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inquiry Report-Converted 1
Inquiry Report-Converted 1
Dr. Alexander
ED122
15 November 2018
Inquiry Report
One of the many controversial topics surrounding education is classroom size. Some
believe that smaller classroom sizes create higher quality learning. There are several important
questions surrounding this topic. To begin, is there any clear correlation between class size and
student success, and does it vary based on age? Also, how can teachers effectively teach larger
classes and what can schools do to deal with overcrowding issues? Lastly, how do college
freshman adjust to large lectures, does their background aide or hinder their success.
The two main arguments for smaller classroom sizes are 1. Smaller classroom sizes show
positive effects for students, and 2. Classroom size has no effect, focus should be put on teacher
quality. However, the evidence to support opinion one is much more compelling and convincing
but not in the way I intended. Most of the evidence that supports this school of thought does not
focus on the students individually, but what the teacher can do for smaller classes. First, it was
in Australia, that teachers were able to do more with their students. “Teachers were more able
not only to complete their lessons in smaller classes, but to develop their lessons in more depth;
teachers moved through curricula more quickly and were able to provide additional enrichment
activities; teachers reported that they managed their classes better, and classes functioned more
smoothly as less time was spent on discipline and more on learning”. Furthermore, Zyngier also
writes about the effects smaller class sizes has on the students themselves, “ Students received
students were more attentive to their classwork; students had to wait less time to receive help or
have their papers checked, and they had more opportunities to participate in group lessons”.
Beyond Zyngier’s essay there is also very important information reported out by the
Student/Teacher Achievement Ration Project or Project STAR. Project STAR was a study done
in Tennessee that focused on student who started off in smaller classes and their achievement
later in school. Project STAR took students and put them into “groups”, the students were either
put into classes of 13-17 students, 22-25 students, and 22-25 students with a full-time teacher
aide, then their progress throughout the rest of school was recorded. here are some of the results
from Project STAR, “When the students reached the third grade, they were re-integrated into an
average sized classroom. The study sought to find the difference between local, in school test
scores, and standardized test scores” … “In the first four years of the study, the African
American students in the smallest classrooms average test scores increased by 7-10 percentile
points, and white students’ scores increased by 3-4 percentile points”. Another important statistic
that Project STAR recorded was the percent of student who took college placement exams “ The
exact numbers show that African Americans who were always in the regular sized classroom
were 31.8% likely to take the college entrance exam, and their counterparts who studied in the
smaller classroom were 41.3% likely to take the exam.” A separate study done in an Indiana
public school had similar findings, their students who were kept in smaller classes scored higher
on standardized and local tests. Even thought Dr. Zyngier’s essay and Project STAR are on
opposite sides of the earth and do not directly correlate to each other, I believe when the two are
looked at as “here are the results and why” it gives enough probable cause to believe that smaller
class sizes do impact student performance and it should be continued to be studied and
Even though smaller class sizes have shown positive effect, it is not always an option for
schools. Therefore, it is important to look into how teachers and schools can be effective with
large groups of students. With larger classrooms teachers have to be warry of student
disengagement, staying on top of grades, logistical issues, and cheating. There are several ways
University’s Center for Teaching is my favorite. This method is extremely versatile and can be
used at almost any age level, some of my current professors use it in class. Essentially, the
teacher or instructor presents a prompt or question, the students think about it individually. Next,
they pair up or form small groups for a discussion, after the group discussion each group reports
out. Another interesting method for creating student engagement is called “clicker question”,
these are multiple choice questions that every student answer. The results are then displayed
anonymously, this allows the instructor to cover possible confusion without students singling
themselves out. The Website Kahoot! Is a very strong platform for this method. As a teacher
when dealing with large groups you must have a strong, caring demeanor, you must stay on top
of discipline but also show them you care, rule with an iron fist, and a caring heart. The
Instructor must also be actively grading and not let assignments pile up.
Overall, smaller class sizes have proven to have positive effect on students’ educational
career and achievement. If possible schools should try and keep the classrooms as small as
possible. In some cases small classrooms are not an option, if this is the case the school should
make sure the teachers are equipped with the knowledge to effectively teach a large group.
Works Cited
“Class Size DOES Make a Difference: Latest Research Shows Smaller Classes Have Lasting
Https://Doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7720.” doi:10.3897/bdj.4.e7720.figure2f.
Mcdaniel, Rhett. “Teaching Large Classes.” Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt University, 7 May
2018, cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-large-classes/.