You are on page 1of 7

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR

SOIL MECHANICS AND


GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of


the International Society for Soil Mechanics and
Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is
available here:

https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library

This is an open-access database that archives thousands


of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and
maintained by the Innovation and Development
Committee of ISSMGE.

The paper was published in the proceedings of the 17th


African Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Geotechnical Engineering and was edited by Prof. Denis
Kalumba. The conference was held in Cape Town, South
Africa, on October 07-09 2019.
Proceedings of the 17th African Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 7, 8 & 9 October 2019 – Cape Town

Static and cyclic triaxial tests on medium sand and tire chips mixtures
G. Banzibaganye, A. Becker & C. Vrettos
Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany

ABSTRACT: The mixing of recycled rubber with silica sand provides a novel composite material for geotech-
nical applications. The end-of-life tyres are shredded into specific size that are mixed with sand for ease of
experimental testing. Several pilot studies have demonstrated the suitability of this new geomaterial as backfill
behind gravity walls, fill in pavement construction and also as liquefaction remedial measure. However, the
influence of the chip size, the grain size distribution of the matrix material, the mix ratio, and the moisture
content still need further investigation for the material optimisation. In a previous study, compactibility, per-
meability, compressibility, and shear strength in direct shearing were determined for a medium sand at typical
mix ratios. This study covers static and dynamic cyclic triaxial tests on a more uniform medium sand mixed
with rubber chips 5-15 mm at various proportions. The static triaxial test results revealed an improvement of
the shear strength of sand reinforced with rubber chips. While the maximum shear strength is mobilised at
higher strain level for the increased rubber chips content. 20% chips by dry weight was identified as an optimum
to reinforce medium sand. Cyclic loading in unsaturated sand rubber mixtures resulted in the post cyclic shear
strength increase.

1 INTRODUCTION The data demonstrated the suitability of this compo-


site material in pavement construction, as backfill be-
Dumping of waste tyres is unacceptable due to their hind gravity walls, fill and also as liquefaction reme-
bulk and non-biodegradability characteristics. Once dial measure. Specifically, with relation to strength
illegally dumped, they may induce fire risk and health enhancement one may mention the work by Foose et
hazard as well as environmental pollution. The Euro- al. (1996), Wu et al. (1997), Zornberg et al. (2004),
pean Union, through its directive 1991/31/EC, Ghazavi (2004), Rao & Dutta (2006), Bałachowski &
banned all waste tyres to landfills, and suggested that Gotteland (2007) and Balunaini et al. (2014). They
every member state has to find the appropriate tech- reported that the shear strength of sand-rubber mix-
nology to manage this waste. tures increases with the increase of rubber content.
The main usage of the end of life tyres includes For pure tyre chips / shred the internal angle of fric-
rubber recovery, tyre derived fuel, civil engineering tion ranges between 19° and 30o. It increases from 32o
projects etc. Constructing highways with waste tyres for pure sand to 67o for sand reinforced with 30 %
in form of shreds/chips mixed with sand soils may of- tyre shred / chip content by dry weight. The latter con-
fer technical, environmental and economical profits. stitutes an optimum with higher values leading to a
These include saving of energy and natural resources, reduced performance.
cleaning of the environment, reduction of compressi- With respect to the cyclic behaviour due to re-
bility and settlement of the soil, and increase of sta- peated loading and the associate degradation and set-
bility of structures on soft soils (Humphrey & Sand- tlement only few studies are available (Mashiri et al.
ford 1993, Edil & Bosscher 1994). The composite 2013). The influence of the chip size, the grain size
material may also increase damping in the ground distribution of the matrix material, the mix ratio, and
when pavement structures are subject to vibratory the moisture content still need further investigation
loading from earthquake, heavy traffic, etc. for the material optimisation. In a previous study,
Extensive research has been focusing on the use of compactibility, permeability, compressibility, and
the ground improvement technique. Studies carried shear strength in direct shearing were determined for
out include the basic soil mechanical properties, com- a medium sand at typical mix ratios (Becker & Vret-
pression tests as well as direct shear and triaxial test- tos 2011).
ing to evaluate the strength of rubber-sand mixtures.

163
17th ARC Conference 2019

In the sequel, strain controlled static triaxial and stress


controlled cyclic triaxial tests on medium sand mixed
with rubber chips at various proportions and moisture
contents are reported and the essential findings are
summarized.

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS


2.1 Soil material
Typical uniformly distributed medium sand was used
in this investigation, Figure 1. Mean grain size, coef-
ficient of uniformity and specific gravity are:
0.32 mm, 1.7 and 2.65, respectively.
Figure 2. Dynamic triaxial testing system
2.4 Sample preparation
Prior to the preparation of the specimen, the two
halves of a metal split mould were first assembled to-
gether. Then the latex membrane was placed to cover
the inner surface of the wall. The assembled mould
with the porous plate at the bottom was placed on the
rigid platen pedestal. To ensure the clinging of the la-
tex membrane to the wall of the mould, a vacuum
pressure was applied between them. The specimens
were 100 mm in diameter and 150 mm in height. The
selection of a large diameter was dictated by the chip
size. The weight of the sand rubber-chips composite
Figure 1. Particle size distribution for sand and rubber material is determined in dependence on the rubber
chips content by dry weight in percentage χ.
2.2 Waste tyre For moist material a water content w = 5 % was
Tyre grains were obtained from a local tyre recycling selected in this study. Moist samples were produced
company and were free of steel, wires and fibres. by adding the necessary amount of water to the al-
Their grain size distribution is shown in Figure 1. The ready mixed sand rubber chips. Rubber chips percent-
particle size of the rubber that is used, ranges between age, dry density of the composite material ρd and void
5 mm and 15 mm and are described herein as rubber ratio e are given in Table 1 for different values of χ.
chips. Their specific gravity and density are 1.05 and The density corresponds to the value of the standard
0.506 g/cm3, respectively. These parameters are close Proctor curve at 5 % water content. The same dry den-
to those obtained by Humphrey & Sandiford (1993). sities were reproduced also for dry material.
For dry material only significant segregation of
2.3 Equipment sand-rubber particles was noticed for the mixtures
Enterprise Level Dynamic Triaxial Testing System with rubber content beyond 20 %. This effect was
(ELDYN) as depicted in Figure 1 was used to perform also reported by Anastasiadis et al. (2011). To avoid
static and cyclic strength tests. This equipment was this problematic behaviour, the total mass of material
manufactured and supplied by GDS. The axial load was divided into equal five portions and the quantity
applied by an electro-mechanical actuator was meas- of rubber chips was calculated for each portion that
ured by load cell, while the induced deformation by was then placed into the mould and compacted until
high accuracy external linear displacement transducer a thickness equal to one fifth of the specimen height
(strain gauge). was obtained. It should be pointed out that for the
moist mixtures at all rubber contents used no segre-
gation of sand-rubber grains occurred even if the sam-
ple is compacted in one portion. For the purpose of
stabilizing the dry test specimen, a small vacuum
pressure equal to 15 kPa was applied immediately af-
ter the specimen preparation. The procedure de-
scribed above was followed in all triaxial tests.

164
G. Banzibaganye, A. Becker & C. Vrettos

Table 1. Soil density and void ratio in the triaxial tests three confining stresses an increase in chips content
χ [%] ρd [g/cm3] e [-] yielded an increase in the axial strain at failure.
0 1.515 0.749 In general, the contribution of rubber chips to the
10 1.479 0.684
20 1.374 0.696 behaviour of the composite soil is significant. The
30 1.283 0.691 mixture derives its improved shear strength from the
interaction between rubber and sand particles and the
2.4 Testing reinforcement effect along shear failure planes. Up to
Static tests were performed strain-controlled accord- the percentage investigated (30 %) the shear strength
ing to ASTM D7181-11. Cyclic tests were performed increases continuously for the range of confining
stress-controlled according to ASTM D 5311– stresses tested (53 kPa to 203 kPa). Increasing the
92/2004. Three similar specimens were prepared content of rubber chips results in a more ductile be-
from all type of mixtures and consolidated under haviour of the composite material. An optimum value
three different confining stresses equal to 53 kPa, of 20% in rubber content is recommended for engi-
103 kPa and 203 kPa. The applied vacuum pressure neering applications considering the fact that higher
was slowly released immediately after the application concentrations will lead to particle segregation.
of 30 kPa confining pressure. For the static tests a The dilatant behaviour of sand rubber chips mix-
strain rate of 0.1 mm / min was applied. In some of tures is obviously influenced by confining stress level
the tests a strain hardening behaviour with no explicit and the chips content. It can be observed from Fig-
peak was observed. The stress at failure was taken ure 5 and Figure 6 show that pure sand exhibits initial
equal to the peak deviatoric stress or the maximum compression followed by dilation. From some speci-
value at 15 % axial strain whichever comes first, as mens, a higher strain level it required for the dilation
recommended in ASTM D7181-11. to occur. Increasing the chips content yields a more
The obtained maximum shear strength from the contractive behaviour. At 30. % and above no dilation
static monotonic tests was utilized to define the load- is observed.
ing level for the stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests.
The datum stress prior to the cyclic loading was set
equal to one-half of the peak or maximum deviatoric
stress determined by the static test. The amplitude of
the cyclic loading was set equal to 20 % of the datum
stress. Tests only at confining stress of 103 kPa are
reported herein which is within the range relevant to
pavement construction. The frequency was set equal
to1 Hz for all tests. Two cyclic phases of 50 cycles
and 1000 cycles were applied.

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


3.1 Effect of tyre chips content on static strength
First, pure sand samples were tested under static tri- Figure 3. Stress-strain behavior from dry sand rubber chips mix-
axial loading and the shear strength parameters were tures at different percentages of rubber chips for confining pres-
sure of 103 kPa
compared to previous tests carried out on this material
which confirmed the suitability and accuracy of the
testing procedure.
Typical results at a confining stress of 103 kPa are
given in form of stress vs. strain and volume change
vs. strain curves in Figures 3 to 6. These results show
that for all chips contents the shear strength increases
with increasing chips content in the mixtures. It can
be seen from Figures 3 and 4 that pure sand and the
mixture containing 10 and 20 % rubber exhibit a
clearly defined peak in the stress-strain curve,
whereas samples with 30 % and 100 % rubber chips
did not exhibit any peak. The same trend was ob-
served in the results at confining stress of 203 kPa
that are not presented here. At a lower confining
stress of 53 kPa a peak behaviour was observed at all Figure 4. Stress-strain behavior from moist sand rubber chips
mixtures. Furthermore, for all specimen under all mixtures (w = 5%) at different percentages of rubber chips for
confining pressure of 103 kPa
165
17th ARC Conference 2019

3.2 Stiffness from static triaxial tests


The effect of adding rubber chips on the overall stiff-
ness of the composite material is significant and re-
sults in a reduction at all stress levels investigated,
both for the dry and the moist condition. Stiffness is
expressed herein in terms of the triaxial secant mod-
ulus at a deviatoric stress level equal to 50% of its
maximum value and is denoted by E50. Values are
summarized in Table 3. Similar findings are reported
by other authors (Rao & Dutta 2006).

Table 3. Secant modulus E50 for different sand rubber chips mix-
tures at three different confining stresses
E50 [MPa]
w [%] χ [%]
Figure 5. Volume change behaviour from dry sand rubber chips 53 kPa 103 kPa 203 kPa
mixtures at different percentages of rubber chips for confining 0 35.8 44.9 62.7
pressure of 103 kPa 10 12.1 15.6 23.1
0 20 6.9 8.6 13.4
30 3.9 5.3 7.2
100 0.5 0.76 1.2
0 42.8 50 71.2
10 12.5 18.5 24.8
5
20 6 8.3 12.1
30 3.7 5 7.4
3.3 Cyclic triaxial tests
Dynamic cyclic triaxial tests were performed on var-
ious dry and moist sand rubber chips mixtures. A sin-
gle amplitude of 20 % of the datum stress level (50 %
of peak or maximum static deviator stress) was em-
ployed. These tests were performed under confining
stress equal to 103 kPa. Examples of stress vs. stain
behaviour from dry sand rubber chips composites is
shown in Figure 8. The curve shows a multi-stage test
Figure 6. Volume change behaviour from moist sand rubber
chips mixtures (w = 5%) at different percentages of rubber chips including i) stress controlled monotonic loading, fol-
for confining pressure of 103 kPa lowed by ii) stress controlled cyclic loading of con-
stant amplitude, followed by iii) post-cyclic strain
Shear strength parameters in terms of friction angle controlled monotonic loading. It can be seen that the
and cohesion at peak strength obtained assuming a strain level from which the cyclic starts differs from
Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion are summarized in one specimen to another. This is mainly dependent on
Table 2. For dry conditions, the friction angle de- the variation of rubber chips content.
creases and cohesion increases when rubber chips are
added. At wet condition change in friction angle is
marginal whereas cohesion increases. The same trend
was obtained by Kowalska & Chmielewski (2017)
based on direct shear tests.

Table 2. Angle of friction and cohesion at peak for different sand


rubber chips mixtures
w [%] χ [%] φ [o] c [kPa]
0 37.5 9.5
10 36.5 21.1
0 20 35.9 26.3
30 33.8 36.8
100 13.2 20.3
0 35.4 16.8
10 36.2 20.0
5
20 36.5 22.4 Figure 7. Stress-strain curves for multi-step static and cyclic tri-
30 35.0 32.1 axial test for dry sand rubber mixtures

166
G. Banzibaganye, A. Becker & C. Vrettos

It can be noted that due to cyclically induced plastic


deformation and densification of the material, the
post cyclic maximum deviatoric stress is significantly
higher than the value obtained from the standard tri-
axial test reported above. The cyclic triaxial data from
sand rubber chips mixtures with chips contents of 0%
and 20% are presented in Figure 8 in form of stress
strain vs. cyclic deformation (hysteresis loop) for the
first 20 cycles. It can be seen that the cycle loops are
clearly formed.
The evolution of the axial displacement with cycle
number is presented in Figure 9 for the first 50 cycles.
The mean value at each cycle is also plotted in that
figure. In general, permanent axial deformation in-
creases with increasing of rubber chips content. This Figure 9. Cyclic shear strain test data with its approximation
is obvious because rubber chips particles are flexibly from all the tested dry sand rubber chips mixtures
elastic and once included in sand, the composite ma-
terial tends to behave elastically and exhibits higher Table 4. Values of the coefficient a in Equation (1) at stress level
deformation. These shows the capacity of the material of 103 kPa for 1 ≤ N ≤ 50
a [%]
to absorb the energy induced by cyclic loading. The χ [%] w = 0% w = 5%
increased cyclic deformation for the increased rubber 0 2.5 3.5
chips content can also be caused by the increased tem- 10 9.8 8.5
perature as a result of the chip particles floating dur- 20 14.8 17.3
ing cyclic loading. Equation (1) is adopted to approx- 30 26.9 33.8
imate the plastic deformation in dependence on the 100 8.7 8.7
cycles number N:

e1 = a × ln( N ) + e1,0 , N ³ 1 (1) 4 CONCLUSIONS

where ɛ1 = accumulated axial strain; ɛ1,0 = strain due Static and dynamic cyclic triaxial tests were per-
to monotonic loading prior to the start of cyclic load- formed on dry and moist sand rubber chips mixtures.
ing; and a = coefficient. Values of a obtained by curve Potential segregation of the mixture during the mate-
fitting of the mean value curve are given in Table 4. rial mixing was observed for the content beyond 20 %
but was prevented using a suitable technique. Triaxial
data on dry specimen showed an overall increase in
shear strength for rubber chips contents with angle of
friction decreasing and cohesion increasing. For wet
material, changes in angle of friction were marginal
and strength increase was due to increase in cohesion.
Stiffness on the other hand decreased as rubber chips
content increases. 20 % chip content was identified as
an optimum to reinforce uniform medium sand. From
cyclic test results, a significant increase of cyclic per-
manent deformation was observed when content of
rubber chips increased. An equation is provided for
preliminary assessment of permanent deformation.

5 REFERENCES

Anastasiadis, A., Senetakis, K. & Pitilakis, K. 2011. Small-strain


shear modulus and damping ratio of sand-rubber and gravel-
rubber mixtures. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
30(2): 363-382.
ASTM D5311 - 92/2004. Standard Test Method for Load Con-
trolled Cyclic Triaxial Strength of Soil.
ASTM D7181 - 11 Standard Test Method for Consolidated
Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils.
Bałachowski, L. & Gotteland, P. 2007. Characteristics of tyre
chips-sand mixtures from triaxial tests. Archives of Hydro-
Figure 8. Stress-strain loops from dry sand rubber chips mixture Engineering and Environmental Mechanics. 54(1): 3–14.

167
17th ARC Conference 2019

Balunaini, U. Mohan, V.K.D. Prezzi, M. & Salgado, R. 2014.


Shear strength of tyre chip-sand and tyre shred-sand mix-
tures. Geotechnical Engineering. 167(6): 585-595.
Becker, A. & Vrettos, C. 2011. Bodenmechanische Unter-
suchungen an Mischungen von rolligen und bindigen Böden
mit Gummi aus Recyclingprozessen. Bauingenieur. 87: 548-
556.
Edil, T.B. & Bosscher, P.J. 1994. Engineering properties of tire
chips and soil mixtures. Geotechnical Testing Journal.
17(4): 453-464.
Foose, G.J. Benson, C.H. & Bosscher, P.J. 1996. Sand rein-
forced with shredded waste tires. Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering, ASCE. 122(9): 760–767.
Ghazavi, M. 2004. Shear strength characteristics of sand-mixed
with granular rubber. Geotechnical and Geological Engi-
neering 22: 401–416.
Humphrey, D.N. & Sandford, T.C. 1994. Tyre chips as light-
weight subgrade fill and retaining wall backfill. Symposium
on Recovery and Effective Reuse of Discarded Materials and
By-Products for Construction of Highway Facilities, Den-
ver.
Kowalska, M. & Chmielewski, M. 2017. Mechanical parame-
ters of rubber-sand mixtures for numerical analysis of a
road embankment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Sci-
ence and Engineering 245: 052003.
Mashiri, M.S. Neaz Sheikh, M. Vinod, J.S. & H.H. 2013. Dy-
namic properties of sand-tyre chips mixtures. Proceedings
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2013 Confer-
ence. Hobart: Tasmania.
Rao, G.V. & Dutta, R.K. 2006. Compressibility and strength be-
haviour of sand-tyre chip mixtures. Geotechnical and Geo-
logical Engineering (2006). 24: 711-724.
Wu, W.Y. Benda, C.C. & Cauley, R.F. 1997. Triaxial determi-
nation of shear strength of tire chips. Journal of Geotech-
nical and Geonvironmental Engineering, ASCE. 123(5):
479-482.
Zornberg, J.G. Cabral, A.R. & Viratjandr, C. 2004. Behaviour
of tire shred-sand mixtures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal.
41: 227-241.

168

You might also like