You are on page 1of 6

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7356520

Ultrastructure of adhesive device in fly in


families Calliphoridae, Muscidae and
Sarcophagidae, and their implication as...

Article in Parasitology Research · May 2006


DOI: 10.1007/s00436-005-0100-0 · Source: PubMed

CITATIONS READS

26 122

5 authors, including:

Nophawan Bunchu Tarinee Chaiwong


Naresuan University Ubon Ratchathani University
45 PUBLICATIONS 670 CITATIONS 41 PUBLICATIONS 604 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Nophawan Bunchu on 03 February 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Parasitol Res (2006) 98: 477–481
DOI 10.1007/s00436-005-0100-0

ORIGINA L PA PER

K. L. Sukontason . N. Bunchu . R. Methanitikorn .


T. Chaiwong . B. Kuntalue . K. Sukontason

Ultrastructure of adhesive device in fly in families calliphoridae,


muscidae and sarcophagidae, and their implication as mechanical
carriers of pathogens
Received: 20 November 2005 / Accepted: 28 November 2005 / Published online: 14 January 2006
# Springer-Verlag 2006

Abstract The ultrastructure of adhesive device or the Sarcophagidae (flesh flies) have been incriminated as a
pulvilli, pad-like structure between the tarsal claws of the public health concern in many parts of the world. Due to
legs, is presented in the blowfly (Calliphoridae), housefly their life cycle of synanthropic behavior, which is closely
and relatives (Muscidae), and flesh fly (Sarcophagidae) associated with the human environment, along with their
through scanning electron microscopy. The blowfly feeding habit, adult flies in these groups could be
species were Chrysomya chani, Chrysomya nigripes, mechanical carriers of numerous pathogenic microorgan-
Chrysomya pinguis, and Chrysomya villeneuvi; while isms from filth to human food, thereby causing diseases
those of the housefly and relatives were Musca domestica to humans (e.g., Greenberg 1971; Levine and Levine
and Hydrotaea chalcogaster, respectively. Fresh fly 1991; Sukontason et al. 2000; Sulaiman et al. 2000).
species included Boettcherisca peregrina and Liosarco- These pathogens (bacteria, virus, protozoa cyst, helminth
phaga dux. Numerous tenent setae were observed on the ova, or larva) have been mechanically carried by flies via
ventral side of the pulvilli. Two features of the tip of the the external integument, particularly organs such as the
tenent setae were found as a spatula-like (in C. chani, C. mouth parts, wings, legs, or adhesive device that come
pinguis, C. nigripes, M. domestica, H. chalcogaster, B. into contact with filth (Greenberg 1973; Tan et al. 1997).
peregrina, and L. dux) and spoon-like tip (in C. Study using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
villeneuvi). Transmission electron microscopy of the revealed that a large number of bacteria, Escherichia
tenent setae in M. domestica revealed the electron-lucent coli 0157:H7, adhered to the surface of housefly mouth
centrally located, suggesting an adhesive substance. These parts and proliferated in the minute spaces of the
results provided anatomical information that allow us to labellum, thereby suggesting a none simple mechanical
not only understand the successful attachment of flies to carrier (Kobayashi et al. 1999). The adhesive device of
smooth surfaces but also clarify their role as a mechanical the terminal structure between the tarsal claws of flies has
carrier of microorganisms. also been demonstrated through SEM as a mechanical
transporter of microorganisms (Greenberg 1973). In this
publication, we present the ultrastructure of the adhesive
Introduction device in eight fly species, commonly found in down-
town Chiang Mai, north Thailand, to reveal the func-
Several species of flies in the families Calliphoridae tional morphology of this organ as a mechanical carrier of
(blowflies), Muscidae (housefly and its relative), and microorganisms.

K. L. Sukontason (*) . N. Bunchu . R. Methanitikorn . Materials and methods


T. Chaiwong . K. Sukontason
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Three fly species used in this study were from laboratory
Chiang Mai University, colonies maintained at the Department of Parasitology,
Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
e-mail: klikitvo@mail.med.cmu.ac.th Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Tel.: +66-53-945342 They belonged to the family Calliphoridae (Chrysomya
Fax: +66-53-217144 nigripes), Muscidae (Musca domestica), and Sarcophagi-
dae (Liosarcophaga dux). The other five species were
B. Kuntalue
Electron Microscopy Research and Service Center (EMRSC),
obtained from a fly collection in Chiang Mai Province,
Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, northern Thailand. They belonged to the family Call-
Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand iphoridae (Chrysomya chani, Chrysomya pinguis, and
478

Fig. 1 SEM of the adhesive device of flies. Top view of the Fig. 4 SEM of the adhesive device of flies. Ventral view of the
tarsomere of the blowfly, C. chani, showing the tarsal claw (CL) and tarsomere of fresh fly B. peregrina showing the densely packed
pulvilli (PU) setae of the pulvilli (PU) and empodium (EP)

Fig. 2 SEM of the adhesive device of flies. Ventro-oblique view of Fig. 5 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly pulvilli.
the tarsomere of the housefly M. domestica showing the tarsal claw Spatula-like tip of the tenent setae of C. chani
and pulvilli. Arrow indicates small attached material

Fig. 3 SEM of the adhesive device of flies. Top view of the


tarsomere of the fresh fly B. peregrina showing the tarsal claw (CL) Fig. 6 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly pulvilli.
and pulvilli (PU) Spatula-like tip of the tenent setae of C. pinguis
479

Fig. 7 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly pulvilli. Fig. 10 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly
Spatula-like tip of the tenent setae of C. nigripes pulvilli. Spatula-like tip of tenent setae of H. chalcogaster

Fig. 8 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly pulvilli. Fig. 11 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly
Spoon-like tip of the tenent setae of C. villeneuvi pulvilli. Spatula-like tip of tenent setae of B. peregrina

Fig. 9 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly pulvilli. Fig. 12 SEM of the tenent setae on the ventral surface of fly
Tenent setae of M. domestica showing spatula-like and pointed-like tip pulvilli. Spatula-like tip of tenent setae of L. dux
480

smooth pad (Fig. 3), while the ventral surface illustrated


heavily packed tenent setae (Fig. 4).
In the examination using higher magnification of the
pulvilli, the terminal setae of C. chani (Fig. 5), C. pinguis
(Fig. 6), and C. nigripes (Fig. 7) were as morphologically bent
outward as a spatula-like tip; however, those of C. villeneuvi
were as bent inwardly as a spoon-like tip (Fig. 8). The terminal
setae of M. domestica, H. chalcogaster, B. peregrina, and L.
dux were similar to spatula-like tips (Figs. 9, 10, 11, and 12,
respectively). However, some pointed tips were observed in
M. domestica (Fig. 9).
An ultrathin cross section through the tenent setae of M.
domestica revealed an electron-dense thick wall, in contrast
with the central electron-lucent (Figs. 13 and 14).
Fig. 13 Ultrathin cross section through the tenent setae of the hind
legs of M. domestica. Serial position of the tenent setae
Discussion

Chrysomya villeneuvi), Muscidae (Hydrotaea chalcoga- The ultrastructure of the adhesive device has been investi-
ster), and Sarcophagidae (Boettcherisca peregrina). gated using SEM in several insect groups, such as Coleoptera
Adult flies of each species were killed by placing them in a (Betz 1996, 2003; Betz and Mumm 2001), Hymenoptera
plastic bag put in a freezer that is set at 4°C for approximately (Federle et al. 2001; Federle and Endlein 2004), Strepsiptera
30 min. Flies killed individually were prepared for SEM (Pohl and Beutel 2004), Diptera (McAlpine 1991; Gorb
processing, as described by Sukontason et al. (2005). Only 1998; Niederegger et al. 2002; Niederegger and Gorb 2003;
M. domestica was selected as a subject model for inspection Gaume et al. 2004), and Heteroptera (Gorb and Gorb 2004).
of the ultrathin section using transmission electron micros- In insects, the adhesive device is not only used principally in
copy (TEM); the procedure of Sukontason et al. (2005) was locomotion and attachment on a smooth surface but also in
followed. catching and as a defense against predators (Betz and Mumm
2001; Betz and Kölsch 2004; Gorb 2004). In the blowfly
Calliphora vicina, the contact behavior role of the tenent
Results setae in attachment has been revealed using a high-speed
video recording (Niederegger et al. 2002; Niederegger and
Basically, each fly leg was composed of a coxa, trochanter, Gorb 2003).
femur, tibia, and five tarsal segments. Dorsally viewed, the In this study, the SEM investigation showed two remark-
pretarsus of the blowfly C. chani consisted of a pair of claws able features of the tip of the tenent setae: the spatula-like tip
with sharp apices and a pair of pulvilli underneath each claw, (as seen in C. chani, C. pinguis, C. nigripes, M. domestica, H.
by which, the empodium and unguitractor plate were not chalcogaster, B. peregrina, and L. dux) and spoon-like tip (as
clearly seen (Fig. 1). For the housefly M. domestica, seen in C. villeneuvi). The spatula-like tip in this study was
numerous tenent setae were seen on the ventral side of the similar to type I setae in the syrphid fly Episyrphus balteatus
pulvilli and claws (Fig. 2). In the sarcophagid B. peregrina, (Syrphidae) (Gorb 1998), kelp fly Amma blancheae (Coelo-
the dorsal view of the pulvilli represented a remarkably large, pidae) (McAlpine 1991), or blowfly Calliphora vimitoria
(Gaume et al. 2004). However, either the bearing spatula-like
or spoon-like tip of the tenent setae enabled flies to increase
the number of contact points for attachment to a surface (Gorb
and Gorb 2004).
The electron-lucent at the central region of the tenent setae
of M. domestica, as seen in TEM, was consistent with E.
balteatus (Gorb 1998). It has been suggested that the
electron-lucent areas may be due to lipid-containing sub-
stances, most of which are dissolved during the TEM
procedure (Gorb 1998). Investigation in Stenus (Coleoptera:
Staphylinidae) showed that the beetle appears to release
tarsal secretion through the tenent setae, within which lipid
and proteinaceous fraction are contained (Betz 2003). In C.
vicina, the tenent setae were reported as filled with secretion
(Gorb 1998). Likewise, an adhesive fluid was secreted by the
Fig. 14 Ultrathin cross section through the tenent setae of the hind fly pad of C. vomitoria (Gaume et al. 2004). Investigation
legs of M. domestica. Higher magnification of tenent seta showing on another blowfly species Calliphora erythrocephala
an electron-dense thick wall, with the central electron-lucent showed that the location of the secretion released opened at
481

the end of the tenent setae (Gorb 1998). Regarding this, the Federle W, Endlein T (2004) Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic
electron-lucent area in the tenent setae of M. domestica control of adhesive surface contact in ants. Arthropod Struct
Dev 33:67–75
would imply that the substance secreted through their tip. Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, Hölldobler B (2001)
Such substances appeared to be important not only for the Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants
successful attachment to smooth surfaces (Gorb 2004), but, and bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:6215–6220
in view of the mechanical vector, also as a glue for Gaume L, Perret P, Gorb E, Gorb S, Labat JJ, Rowe N (2004) How
do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-
attaching microorganisms (see Fig. 2, arrow). based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants.
No remarkable differences in the microtopography of the Arthropod Struct Dev 33:103–111
adhesive device were observed between sexes of the fly Gorb SN (1998) The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent
species examined. These similarities would, therefore, be setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion. Proc
R Soc Lond B 265:747–752
involved by similar functions and/or roles displayed by Gorb SN (2004) Walking on the ceiling: structures, functional
each adult sex. Investigations in northern Thailand showed principles, and ecological implications. Arthropod Struct Dev
that there was no difference between either sex of adult M. 33:1–2
domestica in the role played as a mechanical carrier of 42 Gorb SN, Gorb EV (2004) Ontogenesis of the attachment ability in
bacterial species; for example, coagulase-negative staphy- the bug Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera, Insecta). J Exp Biol
207:2917–2924
lococci, E. coli, Viridans streptococci, nonfermentative Greenberg B (1971) Flies and disease. Vol. 1. Ecology, classification
gram-negative bacilli, Klebsiella pneunoniae, Morganella and biotic associations. Princeton University Press, NJ
morganii, Enterobacter cloacae, Providencia stuartii, Pro- Kobayashi M, Sasaki T, Saito N, Tamura K, Suzuki K, Watanabe H,
teus mirabilis, Aeromonas sobria, Aeromonas hydrophila, Agui N (1999) Houseflies: not simple mechanical vectors of
enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7. Am J Trop Med
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholerae non-01, and Hyg 61:625–629
Staphylococcus aureus (Sukontason et al., unpublished data). Levine OS, Levine MM (1991) Houseflies (Musca domestica) as
In conclusion, this investigation revealed the morpholog- mechanical vectors of shigellosis. Ref Infect Dis 13:688–696
ical features of adhesive devices in flies in the families McAlpine DK (1991) Review of the Australian kelp flies (Diptera:
Coeloptidae). Syst Entomol 16:29–84
Calliphoridae, Muscidae, and Sarcophagidae, which are Niederegger S, Gorb S (2003) Tarsal movements in flies during leg
commonly found in Thailand. These results provide ana- attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate. J Insect
tomical information that allows us to clarify the role of these Physiol 49:611–620
flies as a mechanical carrier of many microorganisms. Niederegger S, Gorb S, Jiao Y (2002) Contact behaviour of tenent
setae in attachment pads of the blowfly Calliphora vicina
(Diptera, Calliphoridae). J Comp Physiol A 187:961–970
Acknowledgement This work received support from the Faculty of Pohl H, Beutel RG (2004) Fine structure of adhesive devices of
Medicine Endowment Fund for Medical Research. Strepsiptera (Insecta). Arthropod Struct Dev 33:31–43
Sukontason K, Bunchoo M, Khantawa B, Sukontason K, Piangjai S,
Choochote W (2000) Musca domestica as a mechanical carrier
of bacteria in Chiang Mai, North Thailand. J Vector Ecol
References 25:114–117
Sukontason K, Sukontason KL, Piangjai S, Choochote W,
Betz O (1996) Function and evolution of the adhesion-capture Vogtsberger RC (2005) Ultrastructure of the ommatrichia in
apparatus of Stenus species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Megaselia scalaris (Loew) (Diptera: Phoridae). Micron
Zoomorphology 116:15–34 36:191–194
Betz O (2003) Structure of the tarsi in some Stenus species Sulaiman S, Othman MZ, Aziz AH (2000) Isolations of enteric
(Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): external morphology, ultrastruc- pathogens from synanthropic flies trapped in downtown Kuala
ture, and tarsal secretion. J Morphol 255:24–43 Lumpur. J Vector Ecol 25:90–93
Betz O, Mumm R (2001) The predatory legs of Philonthus Tan SW, Yap KL, Lee HI (1997) Mechanical transport of rotavirus
marginatus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): functional morphology by the legs and wings of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).
and tarsal ultrastructure. Arthropod Struct Dev 30:77–97 J Med Entomol 34:527–531
Betz O, Kölsch G (2004) The role of adhesion in prey capture and
predator defence in arthropods. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:3–30

View publication stats

You might also like