Cincinnati Oakland

Production Cost 1.2 1.65

Freight Cost
Destination
Origin Santa Ana El Paso Pendleton Houston Kansas City Los Angeles
Cincinnati 10 0.84 0.83 0.45 0.36 10
Oakland 0.22 0.74 0.49 10 10 0.22
Demand 22418 6800 80290 100447 24570 64761

Freight Cost + Production cost

Destination
Origin Santa Ana El Paso Pendleton Houston Kansas City Los Angeles
Cincinnati 11.2 2.04 2.03 1.65 1.56 11.2
Oakland 1.87 2.39 2.14 11.65 11.65 1.87
Demand 22418 6800 80290 100447 24570 64761

Model Per gallon cost 1.705167959

Min cost 1318984.93

Freight Cost + Production cost

Destination

Origin Santa Ana El Paso Pendleton Houston Kansas City Los Angeles
Cincinnati 0 6800 39636 100447 24570 0
Oakland 22418 0 40654 0 0 64761
LHS of Demand Const 22418 6800 80290 100447 24570 64761
= = = = = =
RHS of Demand 22418 6800 80290 100447 24570 64761

Ans.2) Breakeven pIt is 1.705 If you inc by one gallon then loss hoga and if
Ans.3) 15% Mark up Inc cost by 15% 1.960943153

Ans. 4) Change freight cost

Inc by 5% and Inc by 10%
 Total cost= Freight cost + Shipping cost

ht Cost
tination
Glendale Jacksonville Little Rock Bridgeport Sacramento Supply
10 0.34 0.34 0.34 10 500000
0.22 10 10 10 0.15 500000
33689 68486 148586 111475 112000

Production cost
tination
Glendale Jacksonville Little Rock Bridgeport Sacramento Supply
11.2 1.54 1.54 1.54 11.2 500000
1.87 11.65 11.65 11.65 1.8 500000
33689 68486 148586 111475 112000

Production cost
tination

RHS of
LHS of supply Supply
Glendale Jacksonville Little Rock Bridgeport Sacramento constraint Constraint
0 68486 148586 111475 0 500000 ≤ 500000
33689 0 0 0 112000 273522 ≤ 500000
33689 68486 148586 111475 112000
= = = = =
33689 68486 148586 111475 112000 773522

lon then loss hoga and if you dec it by one gallon , then also loss hoga
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [Solution Plus case 5 march 2019.xlsx]Page 305-6
Report Created: 3/5/2019 10:21:25 AM
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.078 Seconds.
Iterations: 18 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Objective Cell (Min)

Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$C$21 Min cost El Paso 0 1318984.93

Variable Cells
Cell Name
$B$27 Cincinnati Santa Ana
$C$27 Cincinnati El Paso
$D$27 Cincinnati Pendleton
$E$27 Cincinnati Houston
$F$27 Cincinnati Kansas City
$G$27 Cincinnati Los Angeles
$H$27 Cincinnati Glendale
$I$27 Cincinnati Jacksonville
$J$27 Cincinnati Little Rock
$K$27 Cincinnati Bridgeport
$L$27 Cincinnati Sacramento
$B$28 Oakland Santa Ana
$C$28 Oakland El Paso
$D$28 Oakland Pendleton
$E$28 Oakland Houston
$F$28 Oakland Kansas City
$G$28 Oakland Los Angeles
$H$28 Oakland Glendale
$I$28 Oakland Jacksonville
$J$28 Oakland Little Rock
$K$28 Oakland Bridgeport
$L$28 Oakland Sacramento
Original Value Final Value Integer
0 0 Contin
0 6800 Contin
0 39636 Contin
0 100447 Contin
0 24570 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 68486 Contin
0 148586 Contin
0 111475 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 22418 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 40654 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 64761 Contin
0 33689 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 112000 Contin

Constraints
 Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$B$29 LHS of Demand Const Santa Ana 22418 $B$29=$B$31 Binding 0
$C$29 LHS of Demand Const El Paso 6800 $C$29=$C$31 Binding 0
$D$29 LHS of Demand Const Pendleton 80290 $D$29=$D$31 Binding 0
$E$29 LHS of Demand Const Houston 100447 $E$29=$E$31 Binding 0
$F$29 LHS of Demand Const Kansas City 24570 $F$29=$F$31 Binding 0
$G$29 LHS of Demand Const Los Angeles 64761 $G$29=$G$31 Binding 0
$H$29 LHS of Demand Const Glendale 33689 $H$29=$H$31 Binding 0
$I$29 LHS of Demand Const Jacksonville 68486 $I$29=$I$31 Binding 0
$J$29 LHS of Demand Const Little Rock 148586 $J$29=$J$31 Binding 0
$K$29 LHS of Demand Const Bridgeport 111475 $K$29=$K$31 Binding 0
$L$29 LHS of Demand Const Sacramento 112000 $L$29=$L$31 Binding 0
$M$27 Cincinnati LHS of supply constraint 500000 $M$27<=$O$27 Binding 0
$M$28 Oakland LHS of supply constraint 273522 $M$28<=$O$28 Not Binding 226478
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Solution Plus case 5 march 2019.xlsx]Page 305-6
Report Created: 3/5/2019 10:21:25 AM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$B$27 Cincinnati Santa Ana 0 9.44 11.2 1E+030 9.44
$C$27 Cincinnati El Paso 6800 0 2.04 0.24 1E+030
$D$27 Cincinnati Pendleton 39636 0 2.03 0.11 0.24
$E$27 Cincinnati Houston 100447 0 1.65 9.89 1E+030
$F$27 Cincinnati Kansas City 24570 0 1.56 9.98 1E+030
$G$27 Cincinnati Los Angeles 0 9.44 11.2 1E+030 9.44
$H$27 Cincinnati Glendale 0 9.44 11.2 1E+030 9.44
$I$27 Cincinnati Jacksonville 68486 0 1.54 10 1E+030
$J$27 Cincinnati Little Rock 148586 0 1.54 10 1E+030
$K$27 Cincinnati Bridgeport 111475 0 1.54 10 1E+030
$L$27 Cincinnati Sacramento 0 9.51 11.2 1E+030 9.51
$B$28 Oakland Santa Ana 22418 0 1.87 9.44 1E+030
$C$28 Oakland El Paso 0 0.24 2.39 1E+030 0.24
$D$28 Oakland Pendleton 40654 0 2.14 0.24 0.11
$E$28 Oakland Houston 0 9.89 11.65 1E+030 9.89
$F$28 Oakland Kansas City 0 9.98 11.65 1E+030 9.98
$G$28 Oakland Los Angeles 64761 0 1.87 9.44 1E+030
$H$28 Oakland Glendale 33689 0 1.87 9.44 1E+030
$I$28 Oakland Jacksonville 0 10 11.65 1E+030 10
$J$28 Oakland Little Rock 0 10 11.65 1E+030 10
$K$28 Oakland Bridgeport 0 10 11.65 1E+030 10
$L$28 Oakland Sacramento 112000 0 1.8 9.51 1E+030

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$B$29 LHS of Demand Const Santa Ana 22418 1.87 22418 226478 22418
$C$29 LHS of Demand Const El Paso 6800 2.15 6800 39636 6800
$D$29 LHS of Demand Const Pendleton 80290 2.14 80290 226478 40654
$E$29 LHS of Demand Const Houston 100447 1.76 100447 39636 40654
$F$29 LHS of Demand Const Kansas City 24570 1.67 24570 39636 24570
$G$29 LHS of Demand Const Los Angeles 64761 1.87 64761 226478 64761
$H$29 LHS of Demand Const Glendale 33689 1.87 33689 226478 33689
$I$29 LHS of Demand Const Jacksonville 68486 1.65 68486 39636 40654
$J$29 LHS of Demand Const Little Rock 148586 1.65 148586 39636 40654
$K$29 LHS of Demand Const Bridgeport 111475 1.65 111475 39636 40654
$L$29 LHS of Demand Const Sacramento 112000 1.8 112000 226478 112000
$M$27 Cincinnati LHS of supply constraint 500000 -0.11 500000 40654 39636
$M$28 Oakland LHS of supply constraint 273522 0 500000 1E+030 226478
Microsoft Excel 14.0 Limits Report
Worksheet: [Solution Plus case 5 march 2019.xlsx]Page 305-6
Report Created: 3/5/2019 10:21:25 AM

Objective
Cell Name Value
$C$21 Min cost El Paso 1318984.93

Variable Lower Objective Upper Objective

Cell Name Value Limit Result Limit Result
$B$27 Cincinnati Santa Ana 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$C$27 Cincinnati El Paso 6800 6800 1318984.93 6800 1318984.93
$D$27 Cincinnati Pendleton 39636 39636 1318984.93 39636 1318984.93
$E$27 Cincinnati Houston 100447 100447 1318984.93 100447 1318984.93
$F$27 Cincinnati Kansas City 24570 24570 1318984.93 24570 1318984.93
$G$27 Cincinnati Los Angeles 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$H$27 Cincinnati Glendale 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$I$27 Cincinnati Jacksonville 68486 68486 1318984.93 68486 1318984.93
$J$27 Cincinnati Little Rock 148586 148586 1318984.93 148586 1318984.93
$K$27 Cincinnati Bridgeport 111475 111475 1318984.93 111475 1318984.93
$L$27 Cincinnati Sacramento 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$B$28 Oakland Santa Ana 22418 22418 1318984.93 22418 1318984.93
$C$28 Oakland El Paso 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$D$28 Oakland Pendleton 40654 40654 1318984.93 40654 1318984.93
$E$28 Oakland Houston 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$F$28 Oakland Kansas City 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$G$28 Oakland Los Angeles 64761 64761 1318984.93 64761 1318984.93
$H$28 Oakland Glendale 33689 33689 1318984.93 33689 1318984.93
$I$28 Oakland Jacksonville 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$J$28 Oakland Little Rock 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$K$28 Oakland Bridgeport 0 0 1318984.93 0 1318984.93
$L$28 Oakland Sacramento 112000 112000 1318984.93 112000 1318984.93