You are on page 1of 104

2.

008x

Machining
MIT 2.008x

Prof. John Hart


2.008x
2.008x

Machine  shop  in  the  DC  printing  office  (1909)


National  Photo  Company  Collection  v ia  wikimedia.  This  
work  is  in  the  public  domain.

A  present-­day  CNC  machine  shop


“KIM_6446.”  Kim  Becker  (CC  BY  2.0)  v ia  Flickr

CNC  Tools
“Drill  bit  s et”  v ia  Pixabay.
This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.
2.008x

What  is  the  highest  


volume  CNC  machined  
part  in  history?
Manufacturing   the  Macbook ‘unibody’
(+  iPhone  etc) 2.008x

Excerpt  from:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxbiIpXZfG8


about  J ony Ive (Apple  VP  of  Design):  http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/23/shape-­things-­come  
12”  Macbook (released   2015)
2.008x

Terraced  CNC  housing  to  hold  30%  more  battery  v olume;;  s ingle  PCB
2.03  pounds,  0.51”  thick  (max),  9hrs  using  wifi at  75%  brightness
http://www.apple.com/macbook/design/
What  is  machining?
2.008x

§ …  “a  general  term  describing  a  group  of  


processes  that  consist  of  the  removal  of  
material  and  modification   of  the  surfaces
of  a  workpiece  after  it  has  been  produced  
by  various  methods.”  (Kalpakjian and  Schmid)

§ Traditional  machining:  a  rotating   cutter


containing  several  'teeth'  that  removes  
material  from  a  local  region  of  the  part.  

§ Other  machining  processes  that  use  


different  removal  mechanisms  and/or  
energy  sources  include  electron  discharge  
machining   (EDM),  laser  machining,  and  
water  jet  cutting.

Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Machined   parts:  from  small  to  large
2.008x
iPhone  5  and  6  
housings

Watch  m echanism
https://pixabay.com/en/watch-­
time-­gears-­clock-­time-­clock-­
932693/

Boeing  777  panel  


outboard

Brass  fittings
Image  from  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.
Machining   is  good  at  flat  and  curved  surfaces,  
threads;;  tolerances   ~0.001” 2.008x

Brass  fittings
Image  from  Pixabay.  This  work  is  
in  the  public  domain.

0.5  m m

Diagram  from  Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology.


2.008x

2 mm
Agenda:
Machining 2.008x

§ Tool-­material  interaction
§ Cutting  mechanics
§ Geometry  and  motion
§ Forces
§ Energy  and  power

§ Demonstration  experiments!
§ Cutting  forces
§ Tools,  finish,  and  wear

§ Milling  (+iPhone  housing)


§ Design  for  machining
§ Conclusion
2.008x

Machining:

2.  Basics  of  
tool-­material  
interaction
A  lathe
2.008x

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


2.008x
CNC  turning  a  chess  rook  (2X  speed)
2.008x

Cutoff  
(with  saw)

Boring  
(internal  turning)

Turning Contour  turning Facing

Video  excerpt  from:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcGHtI9Lql4


Diagrams  adopted  from  Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology
Basic  cutting  (turning)  nomenclature
2.008x

à The  cutting  tool  is  set  to  a  


certain  depth  of  cut  and  travels  
to  the  left  with  a  certain  
velocity  as  the  workpiece  
rotates  (spindle  speed)

§ Feed:  axial  distance  tool  moves  per  


spindle  revolution
§ Depth  of  cut:  amount  of  material  
removed  perpendicular  to  workpiece
§ Spindle   speed:  rotation  speed  of  
workpiece  [RPM]

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Example:   cutting  speed  and  MRR
2.008x

A  304  stainless  steel  rod  is  being  turned  on  a  lathe.  


§ The  rod  is  initially  2.0  cm  diameter,  and  becomes  1.9  cm  in  a  single  cut.
§ The  spindle  rotates  at  N=300  rpm,  and  the  tool  is  traveling  at  an  axial  speed  of  20  
cm/min.
§ The  specific  cutting  energy  is  4.0  W-­s/mm3.

à What  is  the  initial  cutting  speed?  (tangential  velocity)

à What  is  the  initial  material  removal  rate  (MRR)?


Example:   cutting  speed  and  MRR
2.008x

à What  is  the  initial  cutting  speed?  (tangential  


velocity)

Vc = πDo N = 0.31 m/s = 18.8 m/min


Example:   cutting  speed  and  MRR
2.008x

à What  is  the  initial  material  removal  rate  (MRR)?

MRR = πD1 Nfd = Vc fd

Va
f = = 0.067 cm/rev
N
Do − D f
d= = 0.05 cm
2
Example:   cutting  speed  and  MRR
2.008x

à What  is  the  initial  material  removal  rate  (MRR)?

MRR = πD1 Nfd = Vc fd

Va
f = = 0.067 cm/rev
N
Do − D f
d= = 0.05 cm
2

MRR = Vc fd = 1-­-­-­-­
0.3 cm 3 /min
correct:
6.3  cm3/min
Material   removal   =  controlled  failure
2.008x

Material   is  removed   (and  a  chip  is  produced)   at  the  


head  of  the  tool  by  plastically   deforming  and  
continuously  shearing   the  material
Excerpt  from:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRuSYQ5Npek
What  do  the  tool  and  material  experience  
during  cutting? 2.008x

§ Force
§ Motion  (sliding,  vibration)
§ Heating

à These  lead  to  deformation  


of  the  workpiece  and  wear  
of  the  tool

à All  of  these  are  coupled  


and  influence  part  quality!
How  we’ll  understand  cutting  mechanics
2.008x

Step  I:
Motion  &
Deformation

Step  II:
Forces

Step  III:
Energy  &
Power
2.008x

Machining:

3.  Tool  motion  and  


material   deformation
We  assume  a  2D  (orthogonal)   z
cutting  path 2.008x

z
x

y
x
Oblique  (3D)
Realistic,  yet  difficult  to  analyze
y

Orthogonal  (2D)
Provides  insight  for  understanding
2D  model:  angles  and  assumptions
2.008x

Three  important   angles:


§ Rake  angle  α
Chip
§ Shear  angle  φ
-­ +
§ Relief  angle  ε

α
Tool
φ Assumptions:
ε § The  tool  is  perfectly  sharp
Workpiece § The  tool  moves  at  a  
constant  V and  t0
§ A  continuous  chip  is  
Shear  plane produced
What  type  of  deformation  do  you  see?
2.008x
α

φ ε

Excerpt  from:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRuSYQ5Npek


Shear  model  of  
orthogonal  cutting 2.008x

tc

Chip

tc

Tool
t0

Workpiece

In  reality  the  ‘pages’  are  very  thin  and  


related  to  the  microstructure  of  the  
material  being  cut:  ~0.001-­0.01  mm  
(10-­3-­10-­4   in)  
Analysis   of  shear  
strain 2.008x

Δx bc + cd
γ= =
A ac
γ = cot (φ ) + tan (φ − α )
Analysis   of  shear  strain
2.008x

γ = cot (φ ) + tan (φ − α ) Chip

-­ +

Shear  plane α
Tool
What  do  we  learn?
φ
§ φ ↓  =  γ ↑  or  α ↓  =  γ ↑ ε
§ γ ∼2-­4  (very  large!) Workpiece

à Think  of  the  material  


‘turning  the  corner’
(Tesla  video)
Mapping  shear  strains  during  cutting
2.008x

Here,  digital  image  c orrelation  (DIC)  is  used  to  map  the  s train  field
NIST  high  s peed  v ideos  of  tool/chip/material  interaction:  http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/sbm/hsds-­machining-­videos.cfm
2.008x

Machining:

4.  Cutting  forces
Why  do  we  study  
cutting  forces? 2.008x

§ Forces  are  related  to  the  


material  and  cut  geometry
§ Forces  cause  the  tool  and  
workpiece  to  deform
§ Forces  (and  speed)  
determine  the  power  
required  for  cutting

à The  coupling  of  motion  


and  force  at  the  cutting  
interface  influences  quality,  
tool  life,  and  productivity!
Cutting  force  (FC)
2.008x

Chip

-­ +
α
FC
φ

Workpiece
Demo  #1:  Measuring   cutting  force
2.008x
Measuring   cutting  force
2.008x
Cutting  force  data  from  
Chip
video 2.008x

-­ +
α
Tool
φ
ε
Workpiece

Cut Feedrate Spindle Rake angle Depth of cut Diameter Force


[in/rev] [RPM] [deg] [in] [in] [lb]
1 0.0042 140 60 0.03 2 0.43
2 0.0147 140 60 0.03 2 0.90
3 0.0147 140 0 0.03 2 1.83
4 0.0147 330 0 0.03 2 2.03
5 0.0147 330 0 0.06 2 3.87
6 0.0147 330 0 0.06 1 3.38
!
Cutting  force  data  for  aluminum  (AA2014)
2.008x

à Here  too,  cutting  force  depends  strongly  on  feed  (f)  but  not  on  speed  (Vc)

Gokkaya,  “The  Effects  of  Machining  Parameters  on  Cutting  Forces,Surface Roughness,  Built-­Up  Edge  (BUE)  and  Built-­Up  Layer
(BUL)  During  Machining  AA2014  (T4)  Alloy”,  J ournal  of  Mechanical  Engineering  56(2010)9,  584-­593
Merchant’s   relationship:   relating  the  angles  
(reference  slides  to  be  posted) 2.008x

π β α [radians]
φ= − +
4 2 2 β =  friction  angle  (µ =  tan  β)
is  derived  assuming  that  the  shear  angle  (φ)  self-­adjusts  to  
minimize  the  required  cutting  energy

à if  rake  angle  ↓  or  friction  angle  ↑:  shear  angle  ↓

à consequences  of  smaller  shear  angle: Chip


§ chip  thickness  ↑ -­
α+
§ energy  dissipation  via  shear  ↑
Tool
§ heat  generation  ↑
§ temperature  ↑ φ ε
Workpiece
Validating   Merchant’s   equation
2.008x

π β α
φ= − +
4 2 2

φ ε

Key  assumptions:
§ Slow,  orthogonal  cutting
§ Constant  material  properties  
with  temperature
Chart  adapted  from:  Metal  Cutting  Theory  and  Practice,   § Simple  sliding  friction
Stephenson  and  Agapiou
§ No  strain  hardening
2.008x

Machining:

5.  Field  trip  to  IMTS


2.008x
Regular  CNC  machines
2.008x

Haas  DT1  drill-­tap  c enter


https://www.haascnc.com/mt_spec1.asp?id=DT-­1&webID=DRILL_TAP_VMC#gsc.tab=0
Giant  machines   (25  ton  table  capacity)
2.008x
Lots  of  tools
2.008x
Lots  of  tools
2.008x
2.008x
And  tool  mascots!
2.008x
And  chip  management  systems
2.008x
And  chip  management  systems
2.008x
2.008x

Machining:

6.  Tools,  finish,  and  


wear
Cutting  tools
2.008x
Monolithic  tool  (e.g.,  HSS  or  Carbide)

Tooling  with  inserts

Diagrams  from  Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Demo  #2:  Tools,  finish,  and  wear
2.008x
Demo  #2:  Data
2.008x

Tool Speed Depth  of  cut Feed   MRR


Material [RPM] [in] [in/rev] [in3/min]

90 0.05 0.007 0.40

HSS 140 0.05 0.007 0.62

330 0.05 0.007 1.45

330 0.05 0.014 2.90

Carbide 385 0.05 0.014 3.29

585 0.05 0.014 5.15


Tool  hardness,   temperature   rise
2.008x
speed  V and  feed  f;;  a  
a b and  b  are  constants  
Tmean ∝V f that  depend  on  the  tool  
and  part

max

Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


on
Tool  wear
2.008x

Crater
Crater  wear wear
Flank  wear
Flank
wear
Crater Wear W
Thermal
on the Rake t
Cracking
Face

Wear on Deposition
the Flank causing a
Face “Built Up
Edge”
Depth  of  cut

Images  from  Figure  23.2  Fundamentals  of  Modern  Manufacturing (4th  Edition)  by  Groover.  (c)  Wiley  (2010).
Wear  schematics  from:  http://www.sandvik.coromant.com/en-­us/knowledge/milling/troubleshooting/tool_wear
Chips  from  demo:  carbide   tool,  385  RPM
à Examine  both  sides 2.008x

Crater
wear
Flank
wear
Chip  types  (selected)
2.008x
Continuous chip  (narrow  primary  shear  zone)
§ Ductile  materials  @  high  speed
§ Entanglement  bad  (use  chip  breakers)

Continuous  chip  with  built  up  edge (BUE)


§ Bad  for  surface  finish  and  tool  wear

Discontinuous chip  (good)


§ Brittle  materials;;  very  low  or  very  high  cutting  
speeds

Discontinuous
Continuous  with  BUE
Continuous  chip
Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology.
What  determines   surface  roughness   of  
machined  parts? 2.008x
Surface  
roughness 2.008x

Figure  7.44  from  "Product  Design  for  Manufacture  and  Assembly  (2nd  Edition)"  by  
Marinescu,  Boothroyd.  ©  Marcel  Dekker  Publishing  (2002)
2.008x

Taken  using  Zygo profilometer


Improved  tool  materials  à higher  cutting  speed
2.008x

Rate =  200x  faster  in  


100  years
à ~5%  increase  per  
year,  (1.05)100
à Machine  
requirements?

Layers:  2-­20  μm thick


TiN: low  friction
TiCN: wear  resistance
Al2O3: high  thermal  
stability
Carbide: hardness  and  
fracture  toughness Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology.
Figure  21-­8  from  DeGarmo's Materials  &  Processes  in  Manufacturing (10th  Edition)  by  Black  and  Kohser,  ©  Wiley  (2008).
2.008x

Machining:

7.  Cutting  energy  and  


power
2.008x

Step  I:
Motion  &
Deformation

Step  II:
Forces

Step  III:
Energy  &
Power
A  simple estimate   of  cutting  force
2.008x

b  =  depth  of  cut  (d  in  turning)


FC ~b t0 S t0 =  feed  (f in  turning)
Chip
S  =  strength
-­ +

α
FC
Material UTS*  (MPa) φ
Wax 0.86
Workpiece
Aluminum 110
Aluminum  6061-­T6 310
Steel (high  strength  alloy)   760
ASTM  A-­514
Titanium  alloys 900
*UTS  =  Ultimate  Tensile  Strength
Shear  strength  ~0.5*UTS
What  other  forces  are  present?
2.008x

§ Thrust:  Ft
Ff
§ Cutting:  Fc
Fs N § Friction:  Ff (µ =  Ff/N)
§ Tool  normal:  N
Fn § Shear: Fs
R Ft
§ Chip  Normal: Fn

Fc
Estimating  the  cutting  power
2.008x
Power  input  =  Power  out  +  Power  dissipated

Power  input:
§ Machine:  Pc =  Fc *  V

Plastically   Fc
Power  dissipation: Deformed Chip
§ Shear:  Ps =  Fs *  Vs
§ Friction:  Pf =  Ff *  Vc -­ +
α

Not  deformed Vc
NOTE
φ
Vc =  velocity  of  chip
V =  cutting  velocity  
Fc
(denoted  VC earlier) Fs
Vs V
Contributions  to  cutting  energy Plastically  
Deformed Chip
Fc

à specific   energy   =  power/MRR -­ +


α
2.008x
Not  deformed Vc
φ
Fc
Fs
Vs V

Shear +              Friction +              Others                =              TOTAL

*Kalpakjian
neglects Units  =  
Power/(volume/time)
[W*s/mm3]
Let’s  estimate   the  cutting  power  and  force
2.008x
§ A  SS  rod  is  initially  2.0  cm  diameter,  and  
becomes  1.9  cm  in  a  single  cut  (full  rotation).
§ The  spindle  rotates  at  N=400  rpm,  and  the  tool  
is  traveling  at  an  axial  speed  of  20  cm/min.
§ The  specific  cutting  energy  is  4.0  W-­s/mm3.

à How  much  power  is  required?


MRR = Vfd = π D1 Nfd

à
p
d
Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology C
Let’s  estimate   the  cutting  power  and  force
2.008x
§ A  SS  rod  is  initially  2.0  cm  diameter,  and  
becomes  1.9  cm  in  a  single  cut  (full  rotation).
§ The  spindle  rotates  at  N=400  rpm,  and  the  tool  
is  traveling  at  an  axial  speed  of  20  cm/min.
§ The  specific  cutting  energy  is  4.0  W-­s/mm3.

à How  much  power  is  required?

Pspindle = ut MRR MRR = Vfd = π D1 Nfd


Pspindle ut MRR
Pinput = =
η drive η drive

P  =  0.6  kW
with  efficiency  =  0.7  
à
p
d
Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology C
Let’s  estimate   the  cutting  power  and  force
2.008x
§ A  SS  rod  is  initially  2.0  cm  diameter,  and  
becomes  1.9  cm  in  a  single  cut  (full  rotation).
§ The  spindle  rotates  at  N=400  rpm,  and  the  tool  
is  traveling  at  an  axial  speed  of  20  cm/min.
§ The  specific  cutting  energy  is  4.0  W-­s/mm3.

à What  is  the  approximate  cutting  force?


MRR = Vfd = π D1 Nfd
Pspindle = FcV = ut MRR
ut MRR utVfd
Fc = = = ut fd
V V
F =  1  kN

à
p
d
Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology C
Material-­dependent   cutting  energies
2.008x

à Also  see  ‘machinability  rating’


Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology
What  did  we  learn  so  far?  (summary)
2.008x

§ Cutting  removes  material  from  a  workpiece by  (severe)  plastic  


deformation.
§ Using  a  2D  approximation  (applied  to  turning)  we  can  relate  the  
geometry  and  motion  of  the  tool  to  the  cutting  force  and  power  
required.
§ Tool-­material  interaction  is  dominated  by  shear  and  friction,  
causing  deformation  and  heating.
§ Commercial  machine  tools  easily  exert  many  kN of  force  at  
many  kW  of  power.
§ Recommended  cutting  parameters  are  stated  based  on  
material  and  tool  limits.

à Now  let’s  talk  about  milling.


2.008x

Machining:

8.  Milling
How  are  milling  and  turning  different?
2.008x

Excerpt  from  Ingersoll  


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUBQN1JfY80  

Feed  per  tooth  (f)


v =  velocity  of  tool  or  workpiece
N =  rotational  speed
n =  number  of  teeth  (‘flutes’)

Diagrams  from  Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


3-­axis  milling  machine
2.008x
Climb milling  versus   6061-­T6  Aluminum   with  ¼”  endmill
Spindle  Speed:  4000rpm
Conventional milling Feed:  20.0ipm 2.008x
Depth  of  cut:  .400”
Width  of  cut:  .070”

Diagrams  from  Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology


Common  milling  operations
2.008x

Diagram  from  Kalpalkian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing  Engineering  and  Technology.


2.008x

Fly$cutter$ Face$mill
(single$point$for$making$
smooth$surfaces)

End$mill
iPhone  6  teardown
2.008x

Logic board

Front-facing
camera

Housing

Battery
Type  of  joint Number
Camera
Bolted 44
Adhesive 5
Screen
(flipped) ClipiPhone 6 chassis assembly
8
Faceplate Threaded inserts 46
Counted  from  teardown  s equence

Modified  f rom:  https://d3nevzfk7ii3be.cloudfront.net/igi/DSCkX6EfcARJYOHa.hug


iPhone  6  housing:  What  do  we  notice?
2.008x

‘Straight’  
tool  path T-­slot  
endmill

Press-­fit  
threaded  
insert

‘Curved’  
tool  path

Plastic  insert
2.008x
Feature  sizes
2.008x

0.5  mm

0.5  mm

6  mm

2  mm
Tool  paths
2.008x

Zig-­zag  tool  path

Contour-­parallel  tool  path

https://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki /CNC _po


cket_milling
How  the  toolpath for  each  area  is  designed
2.008x
Evaluate  the  shape  of  material  to  be  removed
Contours  of  drilled   holes  and  features  such  
as  bosses
Boundary  contours  pf  the  pocket

Generate  the  pocket  cutting  paths


Contour-­parallel  tool  path Direction-­parallel  tool  path

Begin  with  offset  elements   Select  reference  line  and  mill  along  
of  the  contour  to  generate   parallel   lines
cutting  paths
Zig  milling:   Feed  along  spindle  
Step  inwards  or  outwards   direction
for  subsequent  passes
Zig-­zag:  Both  directions  (includes  
significantly  fewer  tool  retractions)

Add  finishing  passes  


where  needed Finishing  pass  around  features

Contour  parallel   path

Diagrams  from  M.  Held,  O n  the  Computational  G eometry  of  Pocket  Machining;;  Lecture  Notes  in  Computer  Science;;  Springer  Berlin  Heidelberg:  Berlin,  
Heidelberg,  1991;;  Vol.  500.
Optimization  for  
cost  or  time? 2.008x

Cost  of  machining  =


§ Machine  use  ($/time)
§ Tool  cost
Taylor’s  equation
V*(Tool_life)n =  Constant
§ Tool  change  cost  ($/time)
§ Nonproductive  cost  ($  for  
load/unload  operations  
etc)

Time  (1/rate)  of  machining  =  


§ Machining  time
§ Tool  change  time
§ Nonproductive  time  
(load/unload  etc)

Kalpakjian and  Schmid,  Manufacturing Engineering  and  Technology


iPhone  housing:  4  à 5  à 6
2.008x
§ Materials?
§ Advantages  /  disadvantages  of  each  design?
§ Other  notable  differences?
4/5/6  back
2.008x
5-­axis  machining
2.008x

3-­axis 5-­axis

Photo  from  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqePrbeAQoM


Diagrams  fromhttp://www.awea.com/awea_en/milling/5-­axes/fmv/overview.htm
5-­axis  machining
2.008x

Video  excerpt  from  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mudofisRCjA


2.008x

Machining:

9.  Design  guidelines  
for  Machining  
2.008x

Design  for  
Manufacturing   (DFM):  

The  process  of  designing  


parts/products   to  enable  
easier*  and  more  robust**  
manufacturing.

*fewer  steps,  lower  cost

**more  reliable,  better  quality


Design  for  Machining
Don’t Do 2.008x
D  =  0.627” D  =  0.625”

Don’t Difficult  to  


fixture

Use  s tandard  dimensions


Avoid  long,  narrow  holes
Do
Don’t Do
Easier  to  
hold
Design  parts  that  are  easy  to  
fixture
Provide  access  for  tools Don’t Do

Avoid  long,  thin  sections  that   Impossible


Impossible
Use  ¼  -­ ½”  
cause  v ibration Radius  s maller   radius  
than  ¼”

Design  for  reasonable  internal  


pockets  radii

From  Otto  and  Wood,  Product  Design:  Techniques  in  Reverse  Engineering  and  New  Product  Development
DFM:  what’s  wrong  with  this  part?
2.008x

§ Sharp  internal  corners  are  


impossible!
§ Avoid  thin  sections  à
(deformation,  poor  surface  
finish).

also
§ Minimize  the  number  of  tool  changes,  while  considering  overall  
machining  time  (e.g.,  rough  removal  versus  fine  finishing).
§ Know  the  limits  of  tooling  available  (e.g.  minimum  size,  maximum  depth)!
§ Consider  fixturing (how  you  will  hold  the  part,  and  reference  it  if  re-­
fixtured)
2.008x

Machining:

10.  Conclusion
How  is  machining  
advancing   now? 2.008x

§ Higher  speed  machining,  largely  


driven  by  tool  materials/coatings  
à lower  cost  and  higher  
throughput!

§ Growing  demand  for  machining  


of  advanced  materials,  e.g.,  
titanium,  composites,  etc.

§ Networked  machines  enabling  


remote  process  monitoring  and  
optimization  à toolpath,   cutting  
speed,  tool  life,  surface  quality,  
etc.
High-­speed   machining:   chip  carries  the  heat  away
2.008x

Total  heat  generated


100%
%  to  
workpiece

%  to  

Heat  generated
tool

50% %  to  
chip

0
Excerpt  from:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Lh600hVyt8   Low High
Cutting  speed
Figure  adopted  from  20.31,  Degarmo,  Materials  and  Processes  in  Manufacturing
Conclusion:  performance   of  machining
2.008x

Machining

Rate Low-­Medium

Quality Good!

Cost Wide  range,  depends  on  design,  material,  


production  volume

Flexibility High  (within  machine  


constraints)
References
2.008x
1  Introduction

Photo  of  CNC  Mill  by  Roland  Josch on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  Machine  Shop  in  DC  Printing  Office  by  National   Photo  Company  from  U.S.  Library  of  
Congress.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Photo  of  CNC  Machine  Shop  by  Kim  Becker  v ia  Flickr  (CC  BY)  2.0

Photo  of  Drill  Bit  Set  by  Michael  Schwarzenberger on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Video  of  MacBook  Pro  Manufacturing  ©  Apple  Inc.

Image  of  MacBook  Pro  Exploded  View  ©  2016  Apple  Inc.

Machining  Processes:  Figure  1.5e  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (6th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing   (2010).

Photo  of  Mechanical  Watch  Mechanism  by  User:  tookapic on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  
domain.

Photo  of  Brass  Fittings  by  Ingbert Merz on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.

Machined  Part:  Figure  IV.3  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing   (2014).
References
2.008x
2  Basics  of  Tool-­Material-­Interaction

Lathe  Picture:  Figure  23.2   from  "Manufacturing   Engineering  &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Video  of  Rook  Machining   ©  2016  Glacern Machine  Tools

Lathe  Cutting  Operations:  Figure  23.1  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering  &  Technology  (6th  Edition)"  
by   Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2009).

Turning  Schematic:  Figure  21.2   from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Videos  of  Iscar Chip  Formation  ©  Rick  Steinard.

3  Tool  Motion  and  Material  Interaction

Video  of  Iscar Chip  Formation   ©  Rick  Steinard.

Video  of  Titanium   machining  example,  by  NIST  of  the  U.S.  Dept.  of  Commerce  2009.

Photo  of  CNC  Mill  by  Roland  Josch on  Pixabay.  This  work  is  in  the  public  domain.
References
2.008x
4  Cutting  Forces

Graphs  by  Gokkaya,  “The  Effects  of  Machining  Parameters  on  Cutting  Forces,  Surface  Roughness,  Built-­Up  
Edge  (BUE)  and  Built-­Up  Layer  (BUL)  During  Machining  AA2014  (T4)  Alloy”,  Journal  of  Mechanical  
Engineering   56(2010)9,  584-­593

Shear  Angle  Chart  adapted  from:  Metal   Cutting  Theory  and  Practice,  Stephenson  and  Agapiou

6  Tools  and  Wear

Lathe  Cutting  Tool:   Figure  21.10  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Tooling   with  Insert:  Figure  22.3  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering  &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Temperature   Distribution:  Figure  21.12  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing   (2014).

Hardness  Chart:  Figure  22.1  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).
References
2.008x
Crater  Wear:  Figure  23.2  from  "Fundamentals   of  Modern  Manufacturing   (4th  Edition)"  by  Groover.  ©  John  
Wiley  &  Sons  Inc.  (2010)

Wear  schematics  images  ©  2000  Sandvik AB

Chip  Types:  Figures  21.5  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering  &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Machining  Time:  Figure  22.6  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Coating  Cross-­Section:  Figure  22.8  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing   (2014).

Insert:  Figure  21-­8  from  "DeGarmo's Materials  &  Processes  in  Manufacturing  (10th  Edition)"  by  Black  and  
Kohser,  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons,  Inc.  (2008).

7  Cutting  Energy  and  Power

Turning  Schematic:  Figure  21.2  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Cutting  Energies:  Table  21.2  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).
References
2.008x
8  Milling

Video  of  Face  Milling   Slow-­Motion  ©  Ingersoll  Cutting  Tool  Company

Parts  Produced  by  Milling:   Figure  24.1  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing   (2014).

Milling   Operation  Parameters:  Figure  24.3  b)  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  
by  Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Conventional  vs.  Climbing:   Figure  24.3  a)  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  
Kalpakjian,  Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing   (2014).

Milling   Operations:  Figure  24.2  from  "Manufacturing   Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"   by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Image  of  iPhone  6  ©  2000-­2016  GSMArena.com

Image  of  iPhone  6  Exploded  View  ©  2016  iFixit

Image  of  T-­Slot  End  Mill  Cutter  ©  2003  Bewise Inc.  All  Rights  Reserved

Image  of  Tool  Paths  by  Kangkan iitd on  Wikimedia.   (CC  BY-­SA)  3.0

Pocket  Machining:   Figure  1.3  from  "On  the  Conceptual  Geometry  of  Pocket  Machining"   by  Held  ©  Springer-­
Verlag (1991).
References
2.008x
Toolpaths:  Figure  1.4  from  "On  the  Conceptual  Geometry  of  Pocket  Machining"   by  Held  ©  Springer-­Verlag
(1991).

Cost  Optimization:   Figure  25.17  from  "Manufacturing  Engineering   &  Technology  (7th  Edition)"  by  Kalpakjian,  
Schmid.  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2014).

Diagrams  of  Advantages  of  5-­Axis  Milling   Machines  ©  AWEA  Mechatronic  Co.  LTD.  2016.  All  Rights  
Reserved.

Image   of  5-­Axis  Vertical  Machining  Center  ©  Okuma  America  Corporation.

Video  of  Mazak  Variaxis i700  ©  John  Hart  Pty  Ltd.

9  Design  for  Manufacturing

DFM  Practice  Diagram:  Figure  14.10  from  "Product  Design:  Techniques  in  Reverse  Engineering  and  New  
Product  Development"  by  Otto  and  Wood,  ©  Upper  Saddle  River;;  Pearson  Publishing  (2001)

10  Conclusion

Image  of  Datron M8Cube  ©  2016  DATRON  Dynamics,  Inc.

Heat  vs.  Speed  Diagram:  Figure  20-­31  from  "DeGarmo's Materials  &  Processes  in  Manufacturing  (10th  
Edition)"  by  Black  and  Kohser,  ©  John  Wiley  &  Sons,  Inc.  (2008).

You might also like