Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contract is nothing but the recognition of rights and obligation' of parties to the contract.
Consideration and its role in contract
Position of Minors in contract
Relevance of Indian Contract Act in the present day scenerio
Sources of Law of Contract
Carlil v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.(1893)1 QB 256
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemist(Southern)Ltd.(1952)2AllER Rep.456
Balfour v. Balfour(1918-19)AllER 860(CA)
Lalman Shukla V. Gauri Dutt(1913) 11All LJ 489
BhagwandasGoverdhandas Kedia v. M/S Girdharilal Parshottamdas % Co., AIR 1966 SC 543
M/S J K Enterprises v. State of M.P., AIR 1997 MP 68
M/S Progressive Constructions Ltd. V. Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Ltd., AIR 1996 Del 92.
Harvela Investments Ltd v. Royal Trust Co. of Canada Ltd., (1985)3 W.L.R. 276
Esso Petroleum Ltd. V. Commissioner of Custom and Excises, (1976)1 All ER. 117
Gibson v. Manchester City Council, (1979)1 All E.R. 972
Powel v. Lee, Kings Bench Division(1908)99L.T.284
Holwell Securities Ltd. V. Hughes, (1974)1 All ER. 161
Entores Ltd v. Miles Far East Corporation, (1955)3 W.L.R. 48
Butler Machine Tool Co. Ltd. V. Ex-Cell-O Corporation (England) Ltd, (1979)1 AllER 965
Rose and Frank Co. v. Crompton Bros., House of Lords(1925)A.C.445
Kedar Nath Bhattacharjee v. Gorie Mohomad (1886)7 I.D. 64(Cal)
Doraswami Iyer v. Arunachala Ayyar (1935)43LW259(Mad)
Abdul Aziz v. Masum Ali, AIR 1914 All. 22
Nawab Khwaja Muhamad Khan v. Nawab Husaini Begam, (1910) LR 37 I.A. 152
Chappel & Co. Ltd. V. Nestle Co. Ltd(1959)3 W.L.R. 168
Glass brook Bros Ltd. V. Glamorgan City Council, House of Lords,(1925)A.C. 270
North Ocean Shipping Co. v. Hyundai Construction Co.,(1978)3All ER. 1170
Central London Property Trust Ltd. V. High Trees House Ltd., (1956)1 All ER. 256
Mohiri Bibi v. Dharmodas Ghosh (1903) 30 I.A. 114
Khan Gul v. Lakha Singh, AIR 1928 Lah.609
Ajudhia Prasad v. Chandan Lal, AIR 1937 All 610
R. Lingraj v. Parvathi, AIR 1975 Mad. 285
Rajinder Kaur v. Mangal Singh(1987)91 PLR 444
Raghunath Prasad v. Sarju Prasad (1923) 51. I.A. 101
Subhas Chandra Das Mushib v. Ganga Prasad Das Mushib, AIR 1967 SC 878
Lakshmi Amma v. T. Narayana Bhatta, 1970(3) SCC 159
Tersem Singh v. Sukh Vinder Singh (1998)3 SCC 471
Mithu Lal Nayak v. LIC of India, AIR 1962 SC 814
Gherulal Parekh v. Mahadeo Das Maiya AIR 1959 SC 781
POINTS TO REMEMBER:
## In case of Cases [Judicial decisions] as project topics, students are expected to cover the foll
(a). Analysis of the fact of the case;
(b). Finding out the issues of the cases;
(c). Find out the relevant sections of the Indian contract Act in the said case and explain;
(d). Find out the Ratio of the case;
(e). Critical Analysis of the decision of the case and their own views about the decision;
(f). Make a list of other judgments which are referred in the case and also analyse these cases.
he following: