You are on page 1of 30

COLUMNISTS


 

 

 

 

GET REAL

Lawfare under
Duterte
By: Solita Collas-Monsod - @inquirerdotnet
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:06 AM February 22, 2020

The first time I came across the word “lawfare” was when I
read Justice Antonio Carpio’s book “The South China Sea
Dispute: Philippine Sovereign Rights and Jurisdiction in the
West Philippine Sea.” He used it to describe what the
Philippines was doing to protect itself in the dispute with China.
Engaging in lawfare, rather than warfare. The Philippines
brought suit against China in the Permanent Court of
Arbitration in The Hague and we won an outstanding victory.

That was lawfare in the positive sense—a nation’s use of


legalized international institutions to achieve strategic ends,
against a more powerful enemy. Using the rule of law to level
the playing field.
ADVERTISEMENT

But there is an ugly side to lawfare: that of using the law


(weaponizing it) against democratic dissent. This was what was
discussed at an international law forum held yesterday at the
De La Salle University.

Lawfare has been defined as “the strategy of using—or


misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to
achieve an operational objective.”

Lawfare—using the law, as practiced by the Philippines against


China.

But President Duterte, his critics claim, has been misusing the
law to achieve his objectives which are personal in nature.
Where has he misused the law?

Let us start with Sen. Leila de Lima. Why start with her?
Because, Reader, De Lima has been deprived of her liberty for
1,094 days. For what? The real reason is that she had crossed
President Duterte (or so he thought).

Even the Supreme Court seemed confused with what she was
charged with—some justices thought she was charged with
illegal drug trading, others thought that it was conspiracy to
trade in illegal drugs—but they still went along.

If you are following her case, you will have noted that the
prosecution’s case is falling apart: One prosecution witness
(Gen. Benjamin Magalong, former chief of the Criminal
Investigation and Detection Group) totally belied another
prosecution witness (former Bureau of Corrections chief Rafael
Ragos), saying that the latter was the one “extorting and
receiving payola from high-profile inmates.” Ragos was
formerly coaccused with De Lima, became a prosecution
witness and was reinstalled in the National Bureau of
Investigation as a reward, in spite of the formal protest of the
NBI.

More recently, another prosecution witness, from the Anti-


Money Laundering Council said that De Lima was not involved
in the bank accounts that former justice secretary Vitaliano
Aguirre II claimed was hers. And it came out in court that Peter
Co—a drug lord in jail who was supposed to have had millions
of pesos delivered to De Lima for her senatorial campaign—
actually paid the P10 million to the jail warden in 2013 to
restore him to his life of relative luxury (De Lima ran for the
Senate in 2016).

See how flimsy the case against De Lima is?


ADVERTISEMENT

There are other cases: Maria Ressa, former chief justice Maria
Lourdes Sereno, Sister Patricia Fox. They are all women, and
they all, at one time or another, crossed President Duterte (or so
he thought). Ressa had several warrants of arrest served against
her, not to mention the 11 cases brought against her. Sereno lost
her position due to a totally misapplied quo warranto case. Fox
was forced to leave the Philippines.
The most recent cases are the sedition charges against 36
personalities (including the Vice President and four bishops) in
connection with the “Bikoy” videos accusing the President’s
family of being involved in drugs. Bikoy’s charges were never
investigated, but the 36 were. The charges have been reduced to
“conspiracy to commit sedition” and only 11 of the original 36
have been charged, including former senator Antonio Trillanes
IV. This is the second attempt to bring Trillanes down, the first
being the resurrection of long dead charges against him.
Trillanes crossed the President, too (or so he thought).

And lastly, the move to disenfranchise ABS-CBN by the Solicitor


General with his trusty quo warranto weapon. The franchises of
GMA-7, TV-5 and the Iglesia ni Cristo TV companies were
renewed without a murmur. Why is ABS-CBN’s being withheld?
Correct, Reader. It crossed the President (or so he thought).

Lawfare. The President misuses the law against his perceived


enemies or critics. Clearly a grave abuse of power. Why do we
allow it?

—————-

solita_monsod@yahoo.com

Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/127533/lawfare-under-duterte#ixzz6EfYor6fg
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

Xxxxxxxxxx
Turning the law
into a weapon
By: John Nery - @jnery_newsstand
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 04:07 AM February 18, 2020

The best definition of “rule of law” I know is a living concept.


Since 2018, I have heard the magisterial Bill Neukom, founder
of the World Justice Project (WJP), define rule of law many
times, and while the fundamental insight remains the same,
each time I hear him I find that he has teased a new nuance, or
stressed an unsung element.

WJP defines rule of law as a durable system — consisting of


laws, institutions, and community commitment — that gives life
to four universal principles: accountability, just laws, open
government, and impartial dispute resolution. The last time I
heard Bill talk on the rule of law was last November; that time,
he emphasized the “cultural” cast of the commitment that the
community must offer, put in practice. He meant, if I
understood him correctly, that a community’s norms help
shape that particular community’s responsiveness to the four
principles, and help determine whether rule of law in that
community would endure (or not). Bill quoted the great South
African jurist Arthur Chaskalson: “Unless it’s cultural, it’s not
rule of law.”
ADVERTISEMENT

(Disclosure: It is my privilege to serve on the WJP board.)


In the Philippines, the rule of law, precisely as a system, has
been under systematic attack from the Duterte administration
since Rodrigo Duterte was elected president — but many of us
did not know it then. I do not mean to say that the killing of
thousands of “drug personalities,” as the Orwellian language of
the Philippine bureaucracy described those suspected of either
trading in or merely consuming illegal drugs, failed to move the
general public. The same surveys that show President Duterte
enjoying record high ratings or solid support for his signature
campaign, the misleadingly labeled “war on drugs,” also show
that overwhelming majorities of voting-age Filipinos want
suspects to be arrested, not killed; fear they or someone they
know will become the next victim of extrajudicial killings;
disbelieve the police when the police say they killed a suspected
drug personality because he fought back.

This undercurrent of anxiety, if not outright fear, has been


obscured by the main narrative of a popular president
prosecuting a popular “war.”

What I mean by “many of us not knowing then,” however, is


that we did not realize early enough that the assault on the rule
of law was an attack on the entire system. It was not just the
humanitarian catastrophe that was, and is, the EJK killing spree.
It was also the corruption of the police force.

The rule of law is turned into a weapon against a country’s


citizens when the chief of the Philippine National Police,
himself a lawyer, orders the arrest of anyone caught vaping in
public, merely because President Duterte said so. Asked last
November for the legal basis for the arrest, PNP Chief Archie
Gamboa admitted that there was none. The arrests, and there
were many, were simply “Just to implement the directive of the
President. Under the police powers of the state you can do that,”
he told Rambo Talabong of Rappler. The result was a true
spectacle: Many arrested, then immediately released because
there was no legal basis to make the arrest in the first place.

But it wasn’t just the corruption of the police; it was also the
capture of the judiciary, starting with the Supreme Court. The
incumbent chief justice was the ponente of the cursed,
incoherent decision to allow the burial of the remains of the
late dictator Ferdinand Marcos in the National Heroes’
Cemetery in 2016; on hindsight, we can understand that
decision as an audition piece, for the high honor of chief
justiceship. But the Duterte Court disgraced itself in many other
ways: the illogical decisions to allow martial law in all of
Mindanao, even though the government’s chief lawyer could
not definitively state what additional legal effects martial rule
would allow; the ouster of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno,
an impeachable official, not through impeachment but through
an absurd quo warranto proceeding; and so on, ad nauseam.

But it wasn’t just the courts; it was also the reshaping of the
culture that permeates the administration of justice in the
Philippines. When the President of the Philippines pronounces
on national television that (to give only one of many
unfortunate examples) the police can kill anyone and he will
protect them no matter what, the nation’s capacity to create and
maintain a durable system of accountability and justice
becomes corroded, then brittle, and then, finally, ready to
collapse.
From a nation of martyrs, we are turning into a country of
killers.

***
ADVERTISEMENT

De La Salle University is hosting an international conference on


lawfare, or the weaponization of the rule of law, on Friday, Feb.
21.

[On Twitter: @jnery_newsstand, email: jnery@inquirer.com.ph]

Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/127455/turning-the-law-into-a-
weapon#ixzz6EfZP7Mco
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

COLUMNISTS

KRIS-CROSSING MINDANAO

The unusual
power of Jose
Calida
By: Antonio Montalvan II - @inquirerdotnet
Philippine Daily Inquirer / 04:06 AM February 17, 2020
Back then in Davao City’s legal orbits that included among
others “Fiscal Rody,” he was known as “Attorney Joe.” When
Rodrigo Duterte ran for president in 2016, Jose Calida was
tapped as one of Mr. Duterte’s campaign managers (but for
Alyansang Duterte-Bongbong). “If Duterte’s slogan is ‘build,
build, build,’ mine is ‘win, win, win,’” he once said.So how is he
winning as solicitor general, the “law firm” of the Republic? If
the Commission on Audit’s (COA) constant flagging of his excess
allowances since 2016 is any indication, Jose Calida must be one
who wears many hats for his boss.

For the record, COA had also flagged previous solicitor generals
Francis Jardeleza (2012) and Florin Hilbay (2016), but none
were as serial as Calida’s. A note to readers: a “red flag” in audit
parlance is a warning suggesting a potential problem or threat
in the use of public funds.
ADVERTISEMENT

For instance in 2016, COA said Calida received an excess of


P1.123 million in allowances. Then, in its May 31, 2017 report,
COA said Calida received P1.8 million in salaries and P8.37
million in allowances. COA Circular No. 85-25-E prohibits
allowances exceeding 50 percent of salary. COA maintained that
Calida earned P7.46 million in excess and was ordered to return
the amount. There is no public record that he heeded COA’s
warning.

But another COA public database is more telling. The Report on


Salaries and Allowances (Rosa) for 2017 listed Calida as the
fourth highest paid official in government. Topping that list was
Nestor Espenilla (then Bangko Sentral governor) at P14.9
million, followed by Diwa Guinigundo (Bangko Sentral deputy
governor) at P13.5 million, then by Cecilia

Borromeo (Development Bank of the Philippines president) at


P12.46 million. Calida was fourth at P10.917 million. But heads
of government finance institutions normally sit on the board of
many of the state’s regulatory funding agencies, thus the higher
emoluments.

–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

Calida’s salary soared even higher in the 2018 Rosa. Compare


his salary with those next in line at the Office of the Solicitor
General: Calida, Jose Callangan, solicitor general,
P12,469,650.68; Angeles, Henry Sumaway, assistant solicitor
general, P4,697,524.42; Ramos, Renan Espinoza, assistant
solicitor general, P4,355,676.61.

Since COA had made public its Rosa database in 2009, the
solicitor general had never made it to the Top 20 highest paid
government officials. Calida is the first; he is a winner, after all.

The splendor of government databases is their accessibility to


the public’s fingertips at any one time. One such is the
Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System
(PhilGeps), a website that posts all procurement movements of
all agencies of government. The portal lists all procuring
entities; what goods, services and supplies are procured; which
suppliers (i.e., manufacturers, distributors, contractors, and
consultants) are registered and qualified for bidding. The goal is
greater transparency.
Calida owns Vigilant Investigative and Security Agency. In 2017,
the House of Representatives awarded two contracts worth

P96 million to Vigilant. PhilGeps showed two additional


contracts given to Vigilant by the Philippine Amusement and
Gaming Corp. worth P14.3 million. Since Calida took office,
Vigilant’s government contracts have increased to 14, worth a
total of P261.39 million. Government contracts were “won”
starting August 2016, a month after he took office. Calida said he
has resigned as president, yet records show he still owns 60
percent of the shares, with the remainder evenly spread among
his family.

For a man tasked to run after Mr. Duterte’s pet peeves, Calida is
a dogged lieutenant. Consider the names in this record: Leni
Robredo, Maria Lourdes Sereno, Antonio Trillanes IV, Leila de
Lima, Rappler, and now ABS-CBN. It was also Calida who
recommended the acquittal of pork barrel scam queen Janet
Napoles in a serious illegal detention case. Yet we wonder how
he cannot outpace the 1,069,856 cases of backlog his office has
amassed.
ADVERTISEMENT

He says he is the “tribune of the people.” But the last word that
styles him comes from the journalist, British Chevening scholar,
and Nieman journalism fellow of Harvard, Glenda Gloria: “The
man is certainly earning his keep.”

[On Twitter: @AntonioJMontal2. E-


mail: antonmonta@gmail.com]
Read more: https://opinion.inquirer.net/127429/the-unusual-power-of-jose-
calida#ixzz6EfZlZjSu
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
HomeOpinionLaw professor lauds Duterte for fighting against selfish interests of the oligarchs:
He stood for us against powerful sectors

Law professor lauds Duterte for fighting


against selfish interests of the oligarchs:
He stood for us against powerful sectors
Trend Insider PHFebruary 21, 2020

Law professor Jocelle Sigue | President Rodrigo Dutertre


Where previous administrations were criticized for being subservient to powerful
companies and oligarchs, a law professor commended President Rodrigo Duterte for
standing up for Filipinos against these omnipotent figures in the social hierarchy.
University of St. La Salle law professor Jocelle Sigue wrote in a Facebook post the list
of prominent sectors that Duterte challenged head on in line with his promise to serve
the genuine interest and welfare of the Filipino masses.

“The President stood there today saying more powerful and hardhitting words than
expletives. More than anything else - HE STOOD THERE FOR US AGAINST
POWERFUL SECTORS which Business INVOLVE MILLIONS and BILLIONS - Making
himself VULNERABLE and a MOVING TARGET for PEOPLE who ONLY CARE
ABOUT THEIR OWN INTERESTS,” Sigue said.

From the moment Duterte pressed for the end of contractual employment, he made a
stand for the people against illegal labor contractors.

 President Rodrigo Dutertre | Photo from WIKI

Duterte also made a stand against big time drug groups in China and major telco
companies in the Philippines.

From rice cartels, abusive mining companies, unfair hospital schemes, and major multi-
national companies, Duterte made a resounding resolve to support the welfare of the
poor, the small to medium enterprises, and the marginalized.

The President vowed to sign and implement the Bangsamoro Organic Law in response
to the pressing need of Muslim brothers and sisters to gain true and lasting peace, and
in this way Duterte stood for Mindanao.

The fact that he forwarded free college tuition in state universities and public schools is
a concrete result of his goal to provide free, accessible quality education for all sectors
of society.

Sigue underscored how Duterte also attacked fixers and corrupt officials in the
government.

All this resolve, Sigue concludes, will surely make Duterte gain powerful enemies who
will attempt to topple down his administration.

And so, Sigue asks, who else to defend the President against selfish interests of the
oligarchs?

Her full post on Facebook reads:


President Rodrigo Dutertre | Photo from Straits Times

The President stood there today saying


more powerful and hardhitting words than
expletives. More than anything else - HE
STOOD THERE FOR US AGAINST
POWERFUL SECTORS which Business
INVOLVE MILLIONS and BILLIONS -
Making himself VULNERABLE and a
MOVING TARGET for PEOPLE who ONLY
CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN INTERESTS -
He stood there for US against ILLEGAL LABOR
CONTRACTORS by saying ENDO must stop
He stood there for US against the biggest TRIADS of
CHINA (he actually named one) and others who no longer
deal with drugs by the MILLION but by the BILLIONS (and
has a very organized network of delivery system via “tingi”
which he findunbelievable to have reach the provinces
(Oh yeah, MrPresident, heard about these drugs being
inserted in siopao or movie theaters as bagsakans and
public officials as distributors?)

He stood up for us against the TELCO Doupoly whose


assets are huge, it will be hard to stand against them
especially when you have politicians approving the third
TELCO process but needing campaign funds.

He stood up against rice cartels, hoarders


and protectors which is tantamount to as he
calls “economic sabotage”. I can just
imagine the huge capital of these
syndicates.
President Rodrigo Dutertre | Photo from BusinessWorld

He stood up against the all powerful mining


industry, companies exploiting our aquatic
and mineral resources and watershed
protected areas and told them to clean up
their mess

He stood up against IMPERIAL MANILA for the sake of


Mindanao and cities who have not been benefited by the
1987 Consitution which over centralized the sharing of
power and taxes in the national government
He stood there for the ones he call as his Muslim Brothers
and uphold the Bangsamoro Law, citing there are many
criticsmsagainst it but he wants to take the Road to Peace
rather than the Road to War, learning he said from the
Marawi experience.

He stood up against big multi-national companies who do


not wish to see the MSMEs or small businesses have
equal chances to compete with them by giving more
incentives to MSMEs

He stood for the middle class who can only earn a few
thousands every month and say they can keep more
savings because they will be exempt from income tax but
for those whose luxury extend to so many vices - taxes
will be up

He stood up for ordinary coconut farmers and the


agriculture industry, for families needing subsidy,
improvement of tertiatryeducation, despite the rigid
educational system that has become a business
President Rodrigo Dutertre | Photo from NAR

He stood there for us against unscrupulous


medical centers and hospitals who suck the
blood out of even poor people by
immediately ordering the passage of the
universal healthcare law
He stood there for us against fixers, corrupt and
incompetent agencies who continously milk ordinary
citizens and businesses as a result of inefficient and slow
transactions systems by warning them about the
implementation of the Ease of Doing Business Law
He stood for everyone who had continuously propagated a
unitary system of government and never gave fedralism a
chance so that cities can forge their own future.

By openly endorsing the ConCom Constitution Draft, he


also openly declared war again politicians who favor
dynasty and political clans who do not wish to see each
region vote for two senators each. These clans are
powerful. They can crush the president anytime.

I am sharing this because I am sure the PRESIDENT will


have “millions” of ENEMIES starting tonight and BILLIONS
worth of possibilities to really end up failing as he said in
his conclusion. His mouth is really going to cause him
more trouble this time.

He just tripled his number of enemies today. And I am


sure these sectors can afford to pay experts to further put
him in bad light. I learned early in life (well in a movie) that
the most dangerous men in the world are not politicians,
but businessmen. Especially businessmen with political
interests.

We can all hate this old guy all we want for his lack of
refinement, his biases, his inconsistencies, his craziness,
his senility - but today, he stood up for us.

Who is going to shield him from these high powered


“bullets” of business interests?
Source: Jocelle Sigue

Daughter of former Associate Justice to


Duterte: "A President that comes but once
in our lifetime"
Trend Insider PHOctober 20, 2019

President Rodrigo Duterte (Photo from Time)

"The mainstream media can no longer fool us."

For Presidential Communication Operations Office (PCOO) Undersecretary


Lorraine Badoy, surveys speak volume about the public trust in President
Rodrigo Duterte’s term which dispels the illusion of discontent and dismay
being spread by mainstream media.

“I think what it says about us now is that we are waking up to the excesses
and shameless rot inside mainstream media that relentlessly portrays the
President as brutal--murderous even-- dictatorial, uncaring,” Badoy wrote in
a Facebook post.
The Communication Undersecretary pointed out that while traditional media
focuses on negative news about the President, the people have shown 88%
approval and 87% trust as seen in the recent Pulse Survey.

The President shines through with his genuine service to the Filipino people,
and Badoy opines that the public finally trusts itself enough to make this
assessment instead of relying on the manufactured information flashed on
screen.

Badoy acknowledged the minor inconveniences caused by the big changes


coming into the nation, but she remains excited and hopeful for the future
that after all the Build, Build, Build projects and taxes come to fruition, it will
be a “beautiful country”.

She noted how the recent Pulse Survey showed that of those who approve of
and trust the President, 91% of them are millennials, followed by those ages
65 and up.

“It’s like the millennials—who are constantly online—took a look at the


constant bickering of their moms and dads online and said, “Meh.” Then
made up their own minds,” Badoy comments.

While critics have been busy parading “No to Martial Law” in supposed
representation of a collective sentiment in Mindanao, the surveys have
dispelled this illusion once more because the Pulse Survey further showed
that 99% of Mindanao approve of and trust the President.

Badoy retorted the Martial Law critics by saying that Mindanao, the very
place where this law is enforced, trusts the President enough and knows he
is not a “power-hungry dictator” that the mainstream media and dissenters
make him out to be.

If there’s anything that the surveys show the Filipinos that mainstream
media does not, it’s that the country is “solid and united”, as Badoy
describes it.

In her full post on Facebook, she said:

That 88%

President Rodrigo Duterte (Photo from Rappler)

Pulse Survey results came out days ago


and I still can’t get over it. I’ve been mulling
these numbers, wondering what stories
they tell about us as a people and where
we are in our consciousness right now.
Because I’ve often despaired about how little it took to
make us think one way or another.

And how we weren’t even aware in the slightest of the


existence of Puppet Masters who pulled our strings this
way and that so that we thought whatever it is they wanted
us to think (that the Aquinos were saints for instance or
that any politician who made avowals to virtue—someone
who knelt down and closed his eyes and beat his breast
with rosary in hand THEN had his photo taken and
plastered all over the papers—MUST be virtuous. AND
must be worthy of our trust.)

Where the only thing we needed to vote someone into


office was NAME recall. That was how far our brain cells
and consciousness took us.

Almost like cockroaches.

Our realities were totally defined by how Others defined it


for us.

So if ABS CBN said CJ Corona was a corrupt plunderer,


that was EXACTLY what we thought.

And if it showed the Ateneans, Noynoy Aquino, Mar


Roxas, looking and sounding so respectable and dignified,
spiffy in their Dockers and impeccable in their language
and dignified looking in their Barong Tagalog and black
pants and shiny leather shoes—why, that was what we
thought exactly of them.
That they were respectable, dignified, impeccable. Men of
Honor.

Not the incompetent indifferent Men of Horror they turned


out to be.

So I’ve been turning these numbers of PRRD over and


over in my mind—88% approval, 87% TRUST.

2 years into office.

I haven’t done my research yet but I’d venture to guess


that no other president—here and anywhere—enjoyed
numbers like these.

And that indeed Rodrigo Roa Duterte must be the envy of


leaders in the known democratic world right now.

Sure, there is the SWS Survey that had a huge


discrepancy from Pulse’s 88/87. And still those were good
numbers. Nothing to get worried about. Something to clap
about even.

But 88/87 is what interests me right now.

I think what it says about us now is that we are waking up


to the excesses and shameless rot inside mainstream
media that relentlessly portrays the President as brutal--
murderous even-- dictatorial, uncaring.
(And have made us, finally, ask the right questions: who
owns media? Who owns us? )

This is not how we have experienced our President. Not


how we see him. We feel his sincerity. We see his
exemplary effectiveness as Chief Executive.

And for once, we are trusting ourselves—our own minds,


our own instincts-- in how we measure this man.

A whole lot of us are feeling excited and hopeful for the


future. (96% according to a survey done at the start of
year.)

DESPITE the inconveniences: traffic caused by Build


Build Build projects all over the country. Despite some of
us paying higher taxes (my husband, for instance, pays
sky high taxes and still I have not seen him happier).

I put one and one together and I think that like a couple
remodeling their home, we take the inconveniences and
the added costs and are excited for the beautiful country
we are rebuilding.
President Rodrigo Duterte (Photo from Manila Bulletin)

And we can’t wait to see it and usher our


children into this beautiful home of our
dreams.
That 88% also tells me that it isn’t true that we are divided.
We are, in fact, solid and united.

I love that when desegrated into age, the President gets


his highest trust and approval ratings from the millennials--
91%!-- (and too, from the 65 and up bracket).

It’s like the millennials—who are constantly online—took a


look at the constant bickering of their moms and dads
online and said, “Meh.” Then made up their own minds.
I see it with my own children: how this generation likes
making up their own minds.

And that 99% of Mindanao? I had to laugh. More so at


those who keep opening their traps about “NO TO
MARTIAL LAW”—and from those who don’t live there,

Here’s the truth staring you in your arrogant, know-it-all


faces: the People of Mindanao LOVE it that there’s Martial
Law there right now. You know why?

They trust this President. And it is a trust founded on


having walked many many miles with this man. He is not
the power-hungry dictator you make him out to be.

But someone who has earned the trust of this war-torn,


grief-stricken region and who speaks for them when he
talks about finding the peace that’s eluded them all these
years.

So really, if you don’t live in Mindanao, shut your traps.

“Nothing about us without us.”, remember? That’s BASIC.


Let’s stick to the basics. Don’t be that walang modo
interfering with realities you know NOTHING about and
that are not your own.

And you know all this noise that continually paints a grim
picture of the President and our country?
Turns out it is MANUFACTURED noise. 
FAKE. Like fake news. 
With malicious intent.

But the Filipino people have said no to it and have instead


linked arms with each other and around this President.

Because let me tell you something you might not know:


this President’s strongest defense is YOU.

Specifically, YOUR trust and approval.

He defends, protects and fights for you. And you protect


him from those who’d like to take away from us a
President we have given our resounding Trust and
Approval to.

A President that comes but once in our lifetime.

The Filipino see him clearly. They see his heart, his mind,
his soul.

And they give him their deafening TRUST and


APPROVAL.

Mabuhay ang Mamamayang Pilipinong Mulat na <3

Mabuhay ang Pangulong Duterte <3

Mabuhay ang Bayang di na pasisiil sa mga nagkalat na


walang modo jan. LOL
****

Dear avid readers, what do you think of this article? Please share your thoughts
in the comment section below.

Source: Lorraine Marie T. Badoy | Facebook

You might also like