Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tax Remedies Summary PDF
Tax Remedies Summary PDF
Sec. 218, NIRC: No court shall have the authority to grant injunction to restrain the collection of any national internal revenue tax, fee or charge
imposed by this Code.
EXCEPTION: a decision of the CIR appealed to the CTA does not suspend payment, levy or distraint of taxpayer’s property; but if the CTA finds that
collection may jeopardize the interest of the taxpayer or the government, then CTA may suspend or restrain the collection of tax and require the
taxpayer to either deposit the amount claimed or to file a surety bond for more than double the amount with the court
Q: During pendency of the appeal in the CTA, the BIR files a civil action for collection of tax in the RTC, what is the remedy of the
taxpayer?
A: The taxpayer may file a motion to dismiss in the RTC on the ground that the collection of tax has no basis where the assessment thereof is still
under dispute with CTA.
1. Tax Lien
- from the moment the tax is due, not from the service of the warrant of distraint
- not valid against a mortgage purchaser or judgment creditor until NOTICE has been filed by CIR with the RD of the province or city where property
is located (the tax lien shall be annotated on the title)
2. Compromise
- allowed when:
Compromise v. ABATEMENT:
NOTA BENE: A compromise penalty is in lieu of a criminal prosecution. If the taxpayer fails to abide by the compromise arrangement, the
government has two options:
ADDENDUM: But if the taxpayer does not agree to the compromise, a collection action by the government for the compromise penalty does not lie.
This is because, by its nature, a compromise is entered into by mutual agreement between parties and the proposed compromise penalty is neither
tax nor an administrative penalty for tax delinquency.
KINDS OF DISTRAINT:
1. Actual – when delinquency of the payment sets in; there is actual seizure and distraint
2. Constructive – no actual delinquency ; the owner is prohibited from disposing of his property; preventive remedy to forestall a possible
dissipation of the taxpayer’s assets when delinquency takes place
PROCEDURE:
EQUITY OF REDEMPTION: payment of all proper charges any time prior to sale
NOTA BENE: A person in possession or having control of property under actual distraint (or levy) may be penalized if upon demand he fails or
refuses to surrender the goods, EXCEPT in case of judicial attachment or execution.
1. service of warrant of levy after the expiration of time required to pay the delinquent tax
2. duly authenticated certificate showing the name of the taxpayer and the amounts of the tax and penalty due from him (operate with the
force of a legal execution)
3. written notice of levy to the Register of Deeds and the delinquent taxpayer, his agent or manager (if TP is absent), occupant of the property
(if no agent/manager); in case government first effected distraint and it is not enough to cover the tax, then CIR shall, within 30d after
execution of the distraint, proceed with levy
4. advertisement of the sale within 20d after levy for a period of at least 30d at the main entrance of the municipal building and other public,
conspicuous places and publication once a week for 3wks in a newspaper of general circulation
5. public sale of the property under levy at main entrance of the municipal building or on the premises to be sold
6. return of sale within 5d after sale
7. issue certificate of sale; taxpayer is entitled to any residue
8. in case of no bidder, the property shall be declared forfeited to the government
4. Civil Action
WHEN:
1. when a tax is assessed and the assessment becomes final and unappealable (because TP failed to file administrative protest with BIR
within 30d from receipt of assessment)
2. when an administrative protest is denied or is not acted upon within 180d from submission of documents and TP fails to appeal to the CTA
WHERE: regular courts, with approval of CIR except if express delegation to Regional Director; motion to dismiss the complaint should also be filed
in the regular courts
HOW: the complaint must be brought in the name of the Government and conducted by a legal officer of the BIR
5. Criminal Action
WHEN: before lapse of 5 years (prescription period)
WHERE: DOJ
HOW: complaint approved by CIR brought in the name of the Government and conducted by a legal officer of the BIR
GROUND: prima facie showing of failure to file a required tax return or a willful attempt to evade taxes; no need for assessment
Forfeiture
Suspension of Business Operations
Enforcement of Administrative Sanctions
BEFORE PAYMENT
1. administrative protest
2. request for reconsideration
3. request for reinvestigation
4. judicial protest
AFTER PAYMENT
WHERE: BIR
HOW: written protest, stating facts, applicable law, rules and regulations or jurisprudence o which his protest is based; if only portions of FAN are
disputed, must pay the deficiency tax on undisputed portion
PROCEDURE:
1. finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in computation of tax as appearing on face of return
2. a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld and the amount actually remitted
3. taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or credit of excess creditable withholding tax for at taxable period was determined to have carried
over and automatically applied the same amount claimed against the estimated tax liabilities for the taxable quarter/s for the succeeding
taxable year/s
4. excise tax due on excisable articles have not been paid
5. article locally purchased or imported by an exempt person
2. Request for Reconsideration – a plea for re-evaluation of an assessment on the basis of EXISTING RECORDS without need of additional
evidence (question of law or fact or both)
3. Request for Reinvestigation – a plea for reinvestigation of an assessment on the basis of NEWLY-DISCOVERED EVIDENCE that a taxpayer
intends to present in the reinvestigation (question of law or fact or both)
- in either case, the request must be accompanied by a WAIVER of the statute of limitations in favor of the government
4. Judicial Protest
PROCEDURE
1. within 30 days from denial of protest by CIR or from lapse of 180-day period, appeal to CTA division
2. if CTA division denies, motion for reconsideration within 15 days from receipt
3. within 15 days from denial of motion, appeal to CTA en banc
4. appeal to SC within 15 days by petition for review (Rule 45)
5. Refund/Credit
- based on the legal principle of quasi-contract or solutio indebiti
- in the nature of an exemption, which cannot be allowed unless granted in the most explicit and categorical language
- strictly construed against the claimant (proof of claim must be established)
- partial payment of a tax cannot be the basis for a tax refund
- interest on taxes refunded may not be paid by the Government to the taxpayer, UNLESS: (a) the CIR acted with patent arbitrariness (inexcusable
or obstinate disregard for legal provision); and (b) in the case of income taxes withheld on the wages of employees, which must be refunded within 3
mos from April 15
1. there was an actual collection and receipt by the Government of the tax sought to be recovered (factual proof)
2. legal basis for the granting of refund or credit, including verification of compliance with the statutory requirements relative to the filing of
claims within the reglementary 2-yr period
3. in case of corporations, must signify whether to avail of tax refund or tax credit in the corporate income tax return
Q: Are income tax returns actionable documents which must be specifically denied by the Government, otherwise it would constitute an
admission to the allegation that payment has in fact already been made and therefore the taxpayer no longer has to submit proof of claim
of refund?
A: Income tax returns are not actionable documents because the action is not based on the income tax returns but on the entitlement of the taxpayer
to tax refund. Therefore, his claim for refund must be supported by proof.
NOTA BENE: If proof of claim for refund is established, the BIR should refund without any unreasonable delay
1. written claim for refund or tax credit must be filed by the taxpayer with the CIR
2. the claim must be a categorical demand for reimbursement
3. both administrative and judicial claims for refund/credit must be filed within 2 years from date of payment regardless of any supervening
cause (in case of corporations, the 2-year period is counted from the date final adjusted return was filed at end of taxable year)
Q: Suppose A filed his claim for tax refund with the BIR within the 2-yr reglementary period but it is only after two years have lapsed
before BIR rendered a decision and it is one of denial. A now files an appeal of the BIR’s decision with the CTA within the 30-day period to
appeal. Will A’s action prosper?
A: No, A’s action will not prosper. Although A filed his claim for refund with the BIR within the 2-yr prescriptive period, he failed to file the same within
the same period with the CTA. The rule is that the taxpayer need wait for the action of CIR on his claim for refund before he can take his claim to the
CTA. The 2-yr period must be complied with in both the BIR and CTA, regardless of any supervening cause.
PRINCIPLE OF EQUITABLE RECOUPMENT – allows a taxpayer whose claim for a refund has been barred due to prescription (lapse of more than
2yrs counted from date of payment) to recover said tax by setting off the prescribed refund against a tax that may be due and collectible from him;
NOT ALLOWED in the Philippines because it puts a premium on the taxpayer’s neglect to enforce or assert his rights under the law